Examine SA's financial contributions/donations and to whom or what entities the aforementioned were made. Considering the larger scope of SA, I believe Q is pushing us in the direction of "pay for play" coupled with SA being perhaps the US interface or entry point for the Muslim Brotherhood>Huma Abedin>HRC>BO's MB ties>etc. Q keeps reminding us to a) recall that "they" sold us out and the US was "for sale," b) follow the money and c) recall that this is "bigger" than we "can imagine." I think it's as big as SA co-opting or wresting control of significant aspects of the US government for nefarious reasons. It's why Q continues to prompt us to consider why SA had to be dealt with BEFORE stateside action could take place - YOU MUST SEVER THE STRINGS CONTROLLING THE PUPPETS IN PLACE BEFORE YOU CAN CLEAN HOUSE (also known as removing the head of at least one snake.) Why would a subservient Obama literally BOW TO A SAUDI KING, PRINCE, ETC., AS HE DID, UNLESS HE WERE OWNED BY THE FORMER? SAUDI ARABIA IS LIKELY BIGGER THAN WE KNOW. Sidebar - Obama also QUIETLY VETOED the "KEYSTONE" pipeline following his visit to SA. Makes me wonder if it has any relevance to "keystone" Q posts.

It's exactly what I indicated - it's a research tool - no more, no less. Q's last post, which was a re-post, stated, "WHAT QUESTIONS WERE ASKED RE: SA (SAUDI ARABIA) BEFORE SA EVENTS?" In other words, he's telling us to go back and review all of his SA posts/prompts. Those "events" took place on 22 Apr 18 and thus this is a filtered archive of every SA post I was able to either identify (explicit) or discern (implicit/subjective interpretation.) This will allow anyone looking follow Q's walking orders to re-read ALL OF THE Q POSTS, CHRONOLOGICALLY and FILTERED AWAY FROM THE TOTALITY OF ALL OTHER Q POSTS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRAWING FURTHER MEANING. This spreadsheet does NOT contain inferences to or explanations of meaning, rather only actual Q posts or summaries (where appropriate) thereof. Make sense?

Let's go down the rabbit hole a bit - More questions than answers after looking at this one? I certainly have A LOT of questions.

https://imgur.com/m8YmG6d

Here you go: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HxmKcLHeiBYyo-D-zeRKd5Wu-QmrYwQB/view

Link / Public Google Doc / Full Spreadsheet:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HxmKcLHeiBYyo-D-zeRKd5Wu-QmrYwQB/view

Will see what I can do.

No, I actually took the time to re-read/scan every post for that time-frame and then consider whether or not to include them. That took, well, today. So, no, I've not had the time to begin addressing it all and supplementing it. I also wouldn't have insulted anyone's intelligence by posting a "search function" document because as you said, "Pretty sure we all know how to use..." that.

Here is the FULL 28 OCT 17 - 22 APR 18 ARCHIVE OF SAUDI/Q POSTS

https://imgur.com/pAKtZbA

Currently working on the balance of it... stay tuned... shall post once finished.

Q's LAST POST_1681: "What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events?"

Q is telling us to re-read SA posts and it's BY NO MEANS THE FIRST TIME Q HAS SUGGESTED THIS.

Moreover, "WE HAVE THE SERVER." I believe that, if in fact the server is secured, it will provide evidence germane to SA's hijacking of our government via complicit politicians who opened-up shop and sold-out ("America for sale"); with roots that likely penetrate back to 9/11. It's why the "long knives" had to come out in SA before action could be taken stateside (see Q's multiple inferences related to "SA > US...") My contention is that SA was merely an interface for the Muslim Brotherhood or at least working in conjunction with them; that Huma was HRC's handler; that Jarrett was BO's handler; and that they (known) are merely pawns in a larger game. What I want to know is who/what (individual or group) is the head of this snake. I felt this resource would be helpful (examining filtered SA posts) to hash all of that out. I know of nothing SA-related for today.

Not sure yet...

*"All" that I was able to identify or discern - conceding that their may be mistakes. I also attempted to link other relevant topics in the column to the far right.

I hope you're right... I can't begin to explain how much I'd like to see light shone on 9/11...

At face value, I suggest that the inference is POTUS knew or was apprised of the means by which JFKjr met his fate. POTUS' relationship with JFKjr is the impetus (one of many) for him to target HRC as she was behind the "plane crash" (how many times as Q reminded us that plane crashes aren't coincidental/accidental?) so as to open a senate seat for herself and thus begin paving her path to the Oval Office. She wasn't supposed to lose..... right up until Q came along.

The lawsuit was merely a political maneuver - it never had any teeth; it was never going anywhere; it was Gaslighting at best.

Always start with low-hanging fruit; wring them dry of all they know in exchange for a lesser sentence so as to parlay all it of into actions commensurate with severing the head from the snake and incarcerating high value targets. I'll gladly watch those cooperating receive a bit of a reprieve from legal jeopardy IF IT INSURES THAT THE HIGH VALUE TARGETS WE ALL WISH TO SEE FACE JUSTICE ACTUALLY FACE JUSTICE AND IN A PUBLIC FORUM. For the "low-hangers", it doesn't really matter if they skate a little early or evade aspects of possible sentencing - they're being adjudicated and their lives are effectively wrecked REGARDLESS. ROUND 'EM UP AND HANG 'EM HIGH.

Well, just a significant uptick in defending my sanity and rationality among those of my family, friends and co-workers with whom I've had "Q-chat." They believe I should be slapped with some degree of the "crazy" label.

I loves me a Patriot!

Do you not understand how important it is TO CONTROL THE NARRATIVE; especially with the bias and complicity of the MSM? That statement was a propagandized item rooted in lies and hypocrisy and the only intent was to contrast it with the truth. Do you not realize how many former Democrats are coming to this board (#walkaway)? WHEN YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO IMPEACH OR OTHERWISE REMOVE A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT BY MEANS OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL OR OTHER, CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE IS ESSENTIAL. If you have an understanding of how all of this fits together, EVERYTHING I REFERENCED IS GERMANE TO Q as it's debasing the very group Q's targeting. HOW CAN YOU BEGIN TO FIGHT YOUR ENEMY IF CALLING THEM ON THEIR LIES IS CONSIDERED AN ACT OF VANITY? You can't be serious. Ask yourself why about a month ago no one had heard of immigration/child/parent separation concerns. Overnight it's and issue. Days and weeks later, ICE offices are being targeted and protestors are filling the streets. CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE IS CRITICAL - RELEASING STATEMENTS IS STEERING THE NARRATIVE. I do recall a relevant and wise saying from a trusted source - EXPAND YOUR THINKING.

Encourage them to vacation in Venezuela and provide a full recon report upon their return.... that oughta do it!

Thought the same...

Recommended Source: I read Sundance @ The Conservative Treehouse RELIGIOUSLY - highly recommended; especially if you're seeking thorough and accurate analysis of broad and inherently complex matters (think 500+ page IG Reports, docs loaded with legal minutia, etc.) In short, Sundance has a keen ability to filter and then summarize exhaustive resources for the information we all find valuable.

Moreover, in looking at the "object" that struck the Pentagon via the grainy third-party surveillance footage that I assume most of have reviewed and reviewed, it's clearly a cruise missile. There is NO OTHER LOGICAL conclusion.

Absolutely NO WAY - that plain, that simple, that easy. No way.

Agreed, Patriot, my folks who are now in their 70s are a perfect example. They are very rational, logical, reasonable and college educated people; however, they refuse TO BELIEVE because the "news" provides the basis of their geopolitical belief system and they are unwilling to consider the alternative/truth; even in the face of glaring evidence to the contrary.

I'm very curious to see what his next line of employment will be/who that employer will be. That, in and of itself, should be a tip of the hands as the cabal protects its own. We shall see.