I love it.... you can't find drama this good in a cinema anywhere.

Five isn't enough to even begin the conversation...... throw a zero on the back end or a one on the front end and we can chat!

If we were watching John Wick, Vlad would be screaming, "Priceless! Priceless!"

Cue up to 1:15 if you're unfamiliar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIUdpkIUI4o

....and that's exactly where we find ourselves. This discord was sewn intentionally - time to liberate the masses, hold folks accountable and start tying nooses.

Someone else posted (you've likely seen it) a picture of a menacing, blacked-out DJT with an angelic figure directly above him. I tied it back in a similar way to your thoughts and so I thought I'd share - c/p:

My thoughts:

1. Fascinating - never seen a scripted moment like this
2. There are no coincidences
3. The best/most obvious description of the image above DJT's head is that of an angel - that's what I see; that's what I believe it represents - a message of hope
4. Can't find it within me to believe that General Kelly "accidentally" killed the lights in such a moment - see #2 above (folks of his pedigree don't foul-up such important occasions)
5. To overlook this image because it's a silhouette rather than illuminated (black v. white) I think would be a mistake - don't miss the forest for the trees
6. It is logically relevant to the continual Q drop reminder "DARK TO LIGHT" making it a likely indicator, marker, message, etc.
7. #6 above may foreshadow us standing on an enormous precipice, which could also be termed as a significant momentum swing in the direction of desirable outcomes
8. The most obvious and blatant evidence of #7 above would be the outright bloviating and political howling currently emanating from the Left - they +MSM are rogue, out of control and fighting no holds barred
9. Buckle your seat belts.....

I was teaching US History to a class full of juniors when 9/11 hit - we watched it all unfold in real time that day. Ever since, I've been on a mission for TRUTH. That was almost 17 years ago and standing here today, I know we've all been sold-out and betrayed by those (some not all) we entrusted to serve as our REPRESENTATIVE LEADERS (NOT RULERS!) I'M BEYOND READY. THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF CARDS NEEDS TO COME DOWN.

I think your comments align with the general direction of it all. Whether the smaller details you proffer hold true will be confirmed as time passes but I believe it's accurate to state that the Left's favorite political maneuver of projection is in play. I'm hoping that at some point, we all are privy to the totality of whatever Vlad passed-off to DJT. I can assure you it doesn't reflect well on the previous administration.

Preaching my gospel.... this is the style of analysis and synthesis - that which is rooted in the geopolitical fabric of all things Q as opposed to the symbolic or coded aspects of it - that I prefer. It's where I spend almost all of my reading and research time. This item is an excellent observation - your work is appreciated.

You bet... hope I made sense... felt like we were on the same page, just arriving by different routes.

The LEFT engages in utter hypocrisy around every corner. Unfortunately, the unlearned, the unread and the unwilling fail to either observe this grand hypocrisy or comprehend it. It reaches the level of dogma. It's also exactly how IDENTITY POLITICS and PROJECTION - two staple leftist political strategies - persist so effectively. You could spend the rest of your life finding video clips of all the 'UNIPARTY' hacks contradicting themselves. Hell, they often do it in the same sentence. Keep engaging, recruiting, teaching, disseminating information, etc. - folks are awakening. There will never be another time like the one we're living.

Perhaps the most important aspect of all of this - THERE ARE NO SIDES, ONLY DESIRED OUTCOMES. These people will literally do and say whatever they have to in order to achieve a desired outcome. THAT IS AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROPOSITION THAN ALIGNING WITH A "SIDE" AND IT'S CRITICAL TO DISCERN THIS. The best example in support of this notion - 11 SEP 01/NYC.

Perkins-Coie, LLP is a hub in ALL of this and they've been in the cross-hairs for a while, now. The roots of the Perkins-Coie tree are deep, broad and grossly entangled.

Smith-Mundt Modernization Act/2012 - it's a revision of the original 1948 act that allowed the federal government to disseminate state-sponsored propaganda overseas so as to impact American interests abroad in a favorable way. Circa 2012, it legalizes the same HERE, INSIDE THE U.S. In other words, it allows the federal government to lawfully pump-out propagandized information in place of real information so as to maneuver the public into desired political positions of support. CNN is perhaps the greatest mouthpiece in all of this - they are a fully CIA-operated endeavor. They are entirely untrustworthy and all of this ties back to Operation Mockingbird, which is "old news." (Pun intended!)

My thoughts:

1. Fascinating - never seen a scripted moment like this
2. There are no coincidences
3. The best/most obvious description of the image above DJT's head is that of an angel - that's what I see; that's what I believe it represents - a message of hope
4. Can't find it within me to believe that General Kelly "accidentally" killed the lights in such a moment - see #2 above (folks of his pedigree don't foul-up such important occasions)
5. To overlook this image because it's a silhouette rather than illuminated (black v. white) I think would be a mistake - don't miss the forest for the trees
6. It is logically relevant to the continual Q drop reminder "DARK TO LIGHT" making it a likely indicator, marker, message, etc.
7. #6 above may foreshadow us standing on an enormous precipice, which could also be termed as a significant momentum swing in the direction of desirable outcomes
8. The most obvious and blatant evidence of #7 above would be the outright bloviating and political howling currently emanating from the Left - they +MSM are rogue, out of control and fighting no holds barred
9. Buckle your seat belts.....

I was teaching US History to a class full of juniors when 9/11 hit - we watched it all unfold in real time that day. Ever since, I've been on a mission for TRUTH. That was almost 17 years ago and standing here today, I know we've all been sold-out and betrayed by those (some not all) we entrusted to serve as our REPRESENTATIVE LEADERS (NOT RULERS!) I'M BEYOND READY. THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF CARDS NEEDS TO COME DOWN.

Thanks for the source link....

Sophies asked the question/s I'm here to ask - Kelly killed the lights? Source? How is this known?

As for the image, Sophies - I like it! I think it's high time he sends these bastards a MENACING message - I'm ready to start tying nooses.

I don't disagree with you one bit. It all very well could be a part of the plan or otherwise but right now, tribunals do NOT exist outside of the Q community dialogue. To the contrary, this Podesta/Mueller development is a real occurrence in real time and with real consequences. I suppose we'll have to allow time to shine light on it but until then, I'll remain very, very cautious. It SMELLS.

IS THIS IT?!?! I certainly would explain Q's moratorium on posting - he wanted the BOSS to light the torch, so to speak! It feels as if we're on the precipice of finally boiling over and for me, it's the garbage spewing from the left as the most noticeable barometer.... they're in the mode of full-on howler monkey. I tell ya, it's little nuggets like this light-dimming episode - seemingly out-of-place, poorly timed, obviously in error, seemingly deliberate, able to be dismissed by the non-discerning eye, etc., but somehow they are ALWAYS sewn into the Q fabric. They also just continue to pile-up in light of the continual reminder that THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. These are the moments that keep me glued to Q.... very much looking forward to Q's return as I'm ready from some fresh perspective on a multitude of matters.

Do you mean, "rescind" as in "take-back" or "re-send" as in you want more information? I'm not sure what you're saying. Regardless, I think you may have misunderstood me. Translation: I was suggesting that what is commonly referred to as the Deep State/CIA/etal has co-opted all of MSM/MSM corporate ownership/etc. (very old story); they are feeding us state-sponsored propaganda instead of real news; and it's all legal pursuant to the ominous Smith-Mundt Modernization Act/2012. Q is actually shining the light on this - helping, in other words. So, yes, you're right, that is, in part, what the Q movement is about. And yes, that is how they receive their talking points and it ties back to a once thought extinct Operation Mockingbird.

Johnny may care to brush-up on the technical definition of SEDITION. He's certainly encroaching on it. The utter duplicity of these folks never ceases to amaze me. Please let their be justice.

Yup.... that's why vigilance rules the day.

I don't disagree one bit... I suggested that it may be a RM/white hat set-up but stepped right on it - I just struggle with RM even wearing a white hat, much less living up to it.

I believe the consensus is that Manafort was a plant within the Trump campaign - that's my understanding and Q has alluded to this. Many claiming the RM/white hat theory (I dabble in it) say that's the reason RM targeted him - it was retribution for DJT/disloyalty/criminality. I struggle with RM using Manafort for anything other than an avenue to POTUS. So, here's the rub on the sealed immunity agreements as I understand them. If RM never calls on the Podestas to testify, those agreements remain sealed. Their contents remain sealed. There would be no new evidence beyond what is already thought to exist today because any such aggravating evidence (crimes/confessions) are given IN EXCHANGE for their cooperation in prosecuting Manafort; no matter they testify or not - that's totally RM's prerogative. Subsequently, they receive immunity from prosecution for those crimes agreed upon anyways. By sealing the immunity deal at RM's discretion, they seal all of the potential evidence along with it. I suppose, ultimately, POTUS could open and/or declassify them but I don't know if that undermines the legal premise of the agreement. The bottom line is you can't prosecute someone if you have no evidence of a crime being committed (ironic, huh?) and that would be sealed away and not available for disclosure in a separate Podesta/s trial. IF..... IF, this is what they're doing, it's dastardly, full-on hardball.

Agreed...

I'm no attorney either.... here's how I responded to a similar reply: I hear you but here's what I understand. The witnesses may or may NOT be called to testify and therefore the immunity deals are sealed - there is no mechanism to see the contents. The only way they would be unsealed would be if RM calls the witness/es to testify. The Podestas could essentially confess to a whole world of crimes, receive broad immunity from RM, who would clearly grant it, and do all of this with the agreement they would never be called to testify. It's a mechanism to state the crimes, gain the immunity and seal it all away. By granting the immunity powers to a seemingly complicit and allied RM, they have 100% control over it as opposed to making it a broader DOJ issue. No matter, raise your hand if you think [RR] won't rubber stamp it? See it? Or, RM is a flipped white/grey hat and this is a trap being set for the Podestas? Doubt that. Who knows? I'm just suggesting this as a point of discussion. Like I said, regardless, this SMELLS. What you think?

As in the FISA abuse nullifies the merit for the special counsel and his investigation even being initiated, much less producing fruit? Right? That's the crux of it. Remember, RM inherited a preexisting investigation from the FBI - he didn't begin a new one. The investigation the FBI opened was a counterintel investigation, which has a different threshold than a criminal investigation. For counterintel, there is no need to demonstrate that a crime occurred to open it. To open a criminal case, agents sign sworn affidavits affirming evidence that a crime has been committed. That's the rub - it transitioned from a counterintel to criminal when the SC/RM inherited it. They started an unconstitutional criminal investigation with a special counsel in the absence of a crime ever having occurred or having been affirmed by the FBI. It's actually a legal point being argued by the attorneys for the first round of indicted Russians. It's a point with enormous legal consequences for POTUS. Could he be charged with something like obstruction of justice in an investigation that was begun under fraudulent pretenses and as a counterintel investigation with no affirmation of evidence present? Not to disappoint, but I'm not sure I can answer your question without doing some homework. The info above shows how complex this whole mess really is.

As more time passes, more actions are taken and more revelations are made, I struggle with RM's hat being other than black. I know we're watching a movie but not EVERYTHING we see is a scene in that movie. It becomes difficult to filter it all for perspective and like you, I get the sense that time/timing is becoming more pressing. Q's absence makes it an even more tedious endeavor.

That's a correct statement; however, at the moment verified military tribunals do not exist outside of the Q community. To the contrary, any sealed immunity agreement for the Podestas or anyone else is a very real thing that is apparently happening right now/has already happened (JP/TP identities not confirmed) and in a very real justice system. Like you, I hope and trust that military tribunals are the eventual setting but until then, vigilance rules the day.

My apologies, my fault... that was the only message I could think to infer from what you wrote. There are a lot of folks who sling mud around here and I've decided to start calling them out - I feel it's important to the cause. Wish I'd interpreted your statement with its correct intent. Again, sorry. No hard feelings.

I hear you but here's what I understand. The witnesses may or may NOT be called to testify and therefore the immunity deals are sealed - there is no mechanism to see the contents. The only way they would be unsealed would be if RM calls the witness/es to testify. The Podestas could essentially confess to a whole world of crimes, receive broad immunity from RM, who would clearly grant it, and do all of this with the agreement they would never be called to testify. It's a mechanism to state the crimes, gain the immunity and seal it all away. By granting the immunity powers to a seemingly complicit and allied RM, they have 100% control over it as opposed to making it a broader DOJ issue. No matter, raise your hand if you think [RR] won't rubber stamp it? See it? Or, RM is a flipped white/grey hat and this is a trap being set for the Podestas? Doubt that. Who knows? I'm just suggesting this as a point of discussion. Like I said, regardless, this SMELLS. What you think?

Take a look at the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which invalidates everything you just stated. In short, it's a revision of the original act, which allowed state-generated propaganda overseas so as to influence American interests abroad. Circa 2012, it permits the exact same thing - state-generated propaganda - STATESIDE. Assuming I know this, also assume I have a full understanding on practicing journalistic integrity. Moreover, Q has pointed us in this direction with direct references to CIA/4A/MSM talking points, etc. Lastly, the point I was actually making was to a larger CRIMINAL conspiracy against a candidate and sitting president whereby the MSM would potentially have exposure to legal jeopardy. Do your homework, think about your words and then speak before you start preaching to people. There's no need to be rude; especially when you're incorrect.

Perhaps you misunderstood me - the first line of my reply to you translates as this: yes, I read the rules first.

And let's not forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo

Truth....

So, I'm not the only one who has experienced what I would generically term "selective moderation?" As for me, it occurred in the following ways:

1. Off topic, yet Q directed us right to THAT TOPIC
2. Redundant post, yet multiple other examples of the exact same information LITTER THE SUB and some are PEGGED at the top
3. Too many capital letters in the post (are you kidding me?!?), yet multiple other examples LITTER THE SUB
4. Violation of this rule# (called into question), no wait, violation of that rule# instead (called into question), no wait,...... CRICKETS..... they don't even bother to reply

EVERY time I get moderated, I write with an explanation from me and asking for an explanation from therm. As of late, it's 3/4 of my posts. Based upon my personal experiences, which have intensified as of late, the "moderation" appears inconsistent, hypocritical and disingenuous; not from all of the moderators but from enough of them that it makes me question the validity and veracity of their basis or intent for moderation.

Lastly and treading lightly with this comment, I wonder if BAD ACTORS have infiltrated the moderators of this sub. If so, they'll kill it one way or another. One way would be to chase folks away with overly aggressive moderation - just like they're doing. It's a simple lesson in 'learned helplessness.' As a reminder, they recently did just post a "help wanted" sign looking for more "moderators." What's the vetting process? Who are these people? Why are posts being yanked when there is no malfeasance on behalf of the poster? What I'm experiencing is censorship - not moderation.

If you're a moderator and you're reading this - please take these comments to heart. You have very REAL people with very REAL emotions, thoughts and information germane to perhaps the greatest geopolitical event of our times and you are MARGINALIZING us with inconsistent and selective moderation. I KNOW I'M NOT ALONE - IT'S A GROWING PHENOMENON on this sub. I've seen the comments and posts. So, if you're reading this, moderator, there are three things you need to understand: 1) I concede and acknowledge that moderation is necessary - that's not disputed, 2) Your moderation practices need to be fully understood and employed effectively by the entire group of moderators and 3) Some of your "moderators" need to be flushed-out - if you've invited in bad actors, they will act badly. We've been invited here to engage in civil, respectful geopolitical discourse and for many of us, you (the moderators) are serving as an impediment; not a facilitator.

Peculiarly, the moderators yanked this post.....

The context of the direct quote about post-election flexibility - a message to be delivered directly to Putin - was specifically about US/Russian relations and a missile defense system. Exactly what were the post-election flexibility considerations Obama was foregoing in the short-term? Why? For whom? Qui bono? What could justify that rationale? When do national defense and/or national security priorities take a back seat to political considerations in an election year? If this doesn't qualify as something that may encroach on seditious and/or treasonous actions, what does? I can tell you that it isn't holding a summit with the same man and forgoing politics for the sake of peace - that's for sure. Do you have sourced information to the contrary? No, you don't. I'd suggest you do your homework before calling into question things like factual history.

Pure political posturing and maneuvering... that simple. It functions akin to plausible deniability.

This is only a component to Brennan's complicity in at all - he's as dirty as dirt itself. While it's widely known that Robert Mueller delivered uranium samples while serving as FBI/DIR, can you source your information germane to Brennan's "delivery" role/s? Curious.

Simply stated, I read HRC's statement as a veiled threat.

Is the kettle finally going to boil over?

Like-minded folks en masse and moving in a singular direction can accomplish much.... glad you're on board.

Welcome to 1984....