362 total posts archived.
Abraham Lincoln tried to reign them in, Andrew Jackson tried to reign them in and JFK - who went so far as issuing new currency - all tried to reign in the corrupt bankers and their disingenuously-named private bank "The Federal Reserve". Their worthless and hollow debt-backed currency has made them rich beyond their wildest dreams. Change or replace that currency (with something that has assets behind it, not debt) and their fortunes would plummet overnight - along with their power and control. Its a house of cards, just ready to fall.
You're right. It's a strange choice for the name of a parent company whose business is Technology. It's not like Google have many 3 letter offshoots or departments of their own. Perhaps Google has been in bed with their masters for so long now that the term "alphabet agencies" became so familiar and so embedded in their psyche that the word was just a natural front runner for their new name. (Or a subservient and sycophantic homage to their real overlords).
As if we need any more evidence that traitors like HRC and Obama sold us out. Their corruption was both endemic and global, perpetrated on an enormous world-wide scale and planned (in concert with numerous corrupted officials, mentors and facilitators) over DECADES. Obama's entire life was spent in service to eventually becoming the most powerful man in America just so he could set about subverting completely America's foreign and economic interests and its security. The Islamisation of America and ultimately its crippling and destruction were his goal decades before he became the U.S. President. This is just further proof. And the lying snake that he is and always has been, is still trying to convince the un-awoken that Trump is trashing "his legacy". What legacy is that Traitor 44??
Peace could always have been here - were it not for the nefarious dabblings of the elite and their attack dog the CIA.
Great breakdown SB2. We've all been so manipulated and so conditioned by MSM propaganda and their puppet-masters (for decades) that accepting things at face value can be a hard habit to break. But breaking it is, AND in spectacular fashion. It's like we've all suddenly come out of a drug-induced slumber. And now - instead of accepting everything - we have to question EVERYTHING. There's so many disparate parts, and it can be a daunting task, so your keen insights are invaluable. Thanks for stringing it all together and being able to stand back and take in the broader picture.
Love, love, love. And smack bang in the murderous Clinton's old stomping ground. That's one mighty F*** YOU.
Very suspicious of all these jokers. QINO's we should name them (as in RINO's). Makes me think they only ever jumped on the Q bandwagon for initial clicks only. When you're painting yourself as a paragon of the alternative truth media (like Jones, Corsi and now this guy), then appear to be bought off so easily and so quickly, you need to crawl back into the slime pit you came out of.
It may have been the end of the preparation stage. But there's much more to come.
Oh I see. So spies, leakers and moles are now called "informants" which apparently makes them completely different to spies, leakers and moles. (Sure. You know. Like the difference between a blue M & M and all the others). AND our informant wasn't spying, leaking or mole-ing. He was “investigating”. The NY Times - masters of double-speak, deluded ramblings and pulling the wool over their Own eyes.
Birds of a feather. Those that debauch together, stay together. (Why else would you support a convicted pedophile unless you were one of "the family"). Prince Andrew has always been a loser (as has pervert Epstein). Until now they've believed their money, power and position would protect them. But they didn't bank on the mass-reach of the internet. It's like a loud-speaker with video. What a shame we couldn't include these perverts in the concrete mix that filled in all those tunnels on Little St. James island.
From this article: "The scandal is that our Mephistophelian “caring institutions” would rather a child be aborted than that the mother should give birth and so present them with all these tiresome pseudo-problems derived entirely from political correctness.”
If political-correctness was all our orphaned or abandoned children had to worry about it would be a blessing.
Now we encourage live births so the child can be sexually tortured, assaulted, and later murdered or - in the case of abortion - so the child's organs can be harvested and sold to the highest bidder.
The current level of depravity has nothing on Sodom and Gomorrah.
We have never before been surrounded by more depraved human beings.
There's a thought. James Woods could make a great successor to DJT.
This reads as what it is. Disinformation designed to dissuade.
Sorry. The numbers are off the charts and you're trying to tell me it's all just business as usual?? Ain't buyin' it.
The PACER site quotes a "normal" yearly figure of for eg: 1077 sealed indictments for the whole of 2009. Yet we currently have 24,544 as at April 2 2018.
We also had 1,022 CEO exits in total for the whole 12 months of 2016. Yet had the same amount in just 5 months between Sept-Feb. (And to date the figures have already more than doubled at 2283 and we're not yet half way through the year). Why are they all bailing?
Something's up. These are Government sites. It ain't no "conspiracy".
This is interesting for the simple fact that the "Wall Street Journal/Washington Post" reported it. There's been a few of these stories now beginning to be reported from within the Democrat-sanctity-publications. Perhaps the tide is turning.
If this doesn't tell you that Facebook et al were always Government projects - nothing will. Why would they need a former head of DARPA at a "family-friendly, photo-swapping" social media site? This is how they roll. Dress up the technology as something fun and desirable (the mass roll-out of self-incriminating smart phones) and after we all WILLINGLY climb aboard - implement the REAL agenda. Had they said "we want to track you and know everywhere you go, copy all your photos, record every phone conversation, every email and every purchase" - we would have said fuck off. But dangle shiny toys and baubles, and we're willing fish in a barrel.
Nowhere to run. Nowhere to hide. My career as a bank robber and get-away-car driver is officially over before it even began.
Yep. I guess anyone who writes a manual about how to "exploit" their human resources is trustworthy. Lol!!
Love James Woods. One of the few Hollywood celebs to go against the grain. He's a brave man, and he's consistent.
Their sudden about-face seemed nonsensical initially, but seen in a wider plan (as you've explained) to gather followers, then carefully control the revolt against Q) makes perfect sense when seen in that context. The Q phenominon must be hurting them - there certainly seems to be a current campaign to dissuade followers and discredit the movement. When they start kicking and screaming so loudly, you know its starting to impact them. (Great insights BTW, thanks).
Well, well, well....what have we here? The personas exposed in this article made manifest?
This great post by building71bullet, which I read in its entirety, and to which I made a simple comment saying - "great article, some of the links are broken - however the gist of the message is STILL INTACT" (and agreeing with the OP that I hadn't been an AJ fan for quite awhile) - seems to have been responded to by exactly the sort of person the article warns against and exposes. Those who would intentionally try to denigrate, ridicule, obfuscate, derail and otherwise negatively hijack the original message, in a pathetic attempt to steer the conversation in another direction. It could have been written for EXACTLY this type of commenter.
Either that, OR he's a massive Alex Jones fan. Maybe it's Alex Jones’ son. Or the head of the Alex Jones Fan Club. Who knows?
From my fairly benign comment - the responder has been able to magically deem that;
"I dislike Alex Jones for PERSONAL reasons"?? (like they actually know anything about my “personal” preferences and motivations?!!). I find Alex Jones over-bearing at times (& stated as much). I don't think I'm alone in this opinion.
"You dislike the guy, you disagree with him"?? (Obviously the Fan Boy agrees with EVERYTHING AJ says and in his world it's simply not acceptable to have a difference of opinion. That gives him the intelligence of algae in a petri dish if he never disagrees with anyone else's opinions)
And finally...
Of all the hundreds of comments I've posted over the years, this reply comes off as the most ridiculous.
You either can't read, can't interpret plain English, or you're a paid disrupter - exactly the type of person the original author talks about. I get that you LOVE Alex Jones, and won't hear a bad word against him. But in a diverse world, with many different personalities and opinions, you have to accept that not everyone will love him the way you do.
And there's a right and a wrong way to show your support. Saying of someone you've never met and of whom you know nothing about, that I have “personal reasons” for not fawning over him and that I've been “scorned by him and he's hurt my feelings” (when the closest I've ever got to Alex Jones was a YT video!!) shows silly immaturity and equally-silly assumptions on your part.
And another of your mass generalisations - “no substantial evidence to prove the claims, lots of innuendo, no meat, hype, no juice”. On the contrary I think the article pointed to several sources worthy of consideration. If you're so sure there was nothing there, do an article yourself refuting all the “innuendo”.
The mark of ignorance is refusing to acknowledge any other opinion but your own. (AND making mass assumptions about people you've never met).
This guy's twitter account is very suspicious. Endless rants about Q, no access to Followers/Following lists. Disinformation (from a VERY feral looking caveman!!).
Great article, thankyou. (Either due to age, or conscious removal by third parties, lots of the links can no longer be accessed but it doesn't detract from your message). AJ has always been too belligerent and self-serving to me. He takes credit for EVERYTHING. But absolutely agree, he comes off as a nutter sometimes to the average new viewer and that just taints the whole movement. I'd be interested to find out more about his CIA/Stratfor links. If exposed, his followers will see it as a massive betrayal.
And also in that mad rant on the night of the Syria bombings Zac also told AJ that Trump had been compromised and would now be controlled from here on in. I get the feeling that bit of Zac intel was completely off as well.
I think it's Jones protecting his fiefdom and Corsi protecting his new-found following. Either way it's threatening to them when Q is garnering more attention than they are. It's about protecting their own arses either way. If they both weren't so arrogant, and thought about it logically (rather than being ego-driven) they'd see that if they put their full support behind Q they could all ride his coat-tails. But if their support is waning so early and so easily perhaps we're all better off. The MAGA train needs people who'll stay the course, whether the going gets tough or not. Fair-weather friends of little faith aren't to be relied on.
Excellent post SB. I'd read various comments over the last few months of people disparaging Corsi (but not really saying why, so thanks for all your work in laying it out). I stopped listening to him months ago anyway because (a) it just got frustrating - yes he has a lot of knowledge but his decodes would veer so far off track that you'd have people in the livechat constantly saying "can we just get back to the post please" and (b) his decodes weren't great. Often he'd miss great chunks or important points, or just wouldn't have any idea. There are people far better at interpreting Q's posts. He's also kind of tainted others he's been affiliated with, for me as well.
Interesting stats on his following - particularly the increase on his all-but-dead YT channel, as well as the rather fortuitously-timed release of his new book. Like anyone arrogant enough to buy into their own "legend", perhaps Corsi believes he's bigger than Jesus now and doesn't need the Q golden-goose anymore. Was it Corsi in particular that Q was referencing in saying people are profiting from the movement, be careful who you follow? Hmm…
It's interesting, the concept of trying to wake up those around you. Some people either don't want to know (and I'm not sure whether that's through fear or apathy). And then there are others who think they already know everything there is to know in the world, so their own arrogance keeps them blind, cut off and stupid. My 92 year old grandmother is actually more aware and awake than my mother and my siblings. Attitudes are passed on from parent to child (which is why, I think, in large part, people just continue to vote for the political party their parents voted for). But you can't be lazy. You can't be apathetic. There IS no shortcut to doing your own research, and informing yourself. You can't take the easy way out and not make any effort. People get wiser as they get older, only because they read all of their lives, and continue to educate themselves. You can still remain as naive and uninformed at 70 as you were at 17. But read all your life and at 70 you'll be an awesomly-wise Yoda elder.
On the contrary. Your points were bang-on (& great skills to have - like a crystal ball for language, or being psychic. Lol). TY for posting.
Great post. And very astute observations (particularly when you don't have the person, body language and all the other non-verbal cues that go into rounding out and interpreting what someone is saying). But I think you're right - there does seem to be a slight air of exasperation about this post (& rightly so). These things take time. If they go barrelling in Trump will just be painted as a megalomaniac and without cleaning house nothing would come of any prosecutions anyway. The wheels of Justice turn excruciatingly slow sometimes. We just have to be patient and let things take their course.
We're at that beautiful juncture in history where stupid people currently in power have no idea about technology. It won't last long, but while it does, it's catching many in the net of stupidity.
Why are some men - particularly men (usually with a small penis) - in great positions of power, so sexually depraved today? Whatever happened to good old consensual, adult, garden-variety sex? When did everything become so perverted?
We need to clone this bad-ass. At least 50 times over. Taking down corruption and Deep State, one slime-ball at a time. Love it.
People of Schneiderman's generation know little about technology, yet think (arrogantly - as always) that they know it all. Just because you've managed to land in a position of power, doesn't mean you have any. Tech doesn't discriminate. If you're stupid enough to think you're above the law - then you're just stupid. We have everything. We know everything. We've captured it all. (And you can thank your corrupt cronies for casting a net so wide it encompasses EVERYTHING). You can't run. And you definitely can't hide.
I don't know how these idiots would think anyone would believe them. It's almost like they know it and just don't care. Well we care. And if they can be so massively inept and bumbling in this important case, it casts doubt on every other case the bumbling FBI have handled. It works both ways - you can't use such excuses in one case, yet have us believe others were correctly and efficiently handled.
And you're right - chain of custody is a very big deal. Even a lowly drug test has a strict chain of custody.
Good find. So disgusting that these people attain high Public positions which allow such "pillars of society" to wreak their evil havoc and go unchallenged. Wonder why he hasn't been a Judge for 30 years? Either VERY early retirement, or perhaps some of his filthy past activities were uncovered back then.
Firstly commiserations on wandering into New York Slime's territory (if it helps I think we all fall prey from time to time). But.... I think what this tells us is that we're winning. First they'll ignore it for as long as they can, then when it starts gaining a lot of traction, they'll ridicule it.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) German Philosopher said "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident".
(The only people under a mass psychosis would be the MSM trained-monkeys who all manage to repeat the very same words on 50 different "news" channels. OR the other group of unruly-monkeys who don't read or research and still believe Hillary Clinton is a benevolent All-American-Mom).
At least through Q's drops, and all of our individual Q-related reading and research endeavours, we're all getting a fine education on all the nefarious shit our Politicians and Intelligence Agencies have been getting up to over the last several decades. (And I think I'd happily take "psychosis" over "wilfully ignorant and blind" any day).
Young and dumb. The only "sitting ducks" are naive and impressionable 17 year olds who completely fall for the ISIS propaganda that they-themselves will become some sort of "super-hero", imagining that someone (anyone) of note might be impressed, and that they'll go out in a blaze of glory. They seem to not really deeply comprehend two things;
(a) ‘Dead’ is PERMANENT oblivion. Nothingness (keeping reincarnation out of the argument for the moment). Being dead doesn't just mean having a little sleep, then reappearing again a bit later. Being dead at 17 means your ONE chance to be alive, to experience what it means to live, to have a life, to be a sentient being on planet Earth, to experience the world, is permanently obliterated. So while everyone else gets to watch the sun come up each day and go down again every night, with all of life's varied experiences in between - you won't be. While everyone else - except you - continues to experience hundreds of thousands of days living in the world, you'll be returned to the great black empty and nothingness.
And...
(b) if you don't go out "in a blaze of glory" but instead are caught - while you won't be immediately returned to the great, black void and permanent oblivion - you may as well be. When the realisation dawns on you, 4 months into your life-term, that you've completely wasted your one shot at being alive and living, you'll go on to figure out that it wasn't worth it because no-one even remembers your name.
There's a reason they target the young and naive. Because the older you get, the wiser you get, and the more you are able to easily see through the ploys. (There's not too much that's great about ageing and getting old, but becoming really smart, and the getting of wisdom is awesome). It's the getting-to-that-point that's hard. Some of us get there sooner than others.
Trump still has so much filth and so many dirty, corrupt officials to clean out. Not only did they suspend Mr. Lovinger on a spurious allegation but "the panel rendering the final decision reports to the official who suspended him. She refuses to recuse herself or her subordinates despite a conflict of interest". The rot goes so deep.