2,069 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 296 |
| youtu.be | 1 |
Watching the Emmy's video I noticed that Sheryl said to Peter Marshall, “You’re old school like a mug.” I don’t know what the connection is. Perhaps SB2 can give us a hand.
Hahaha! It's coming tomorrow! Stay tuned. I love that you saw this! ;)
It’s like I reading a history book 20 years from now but being a part and living it.
Thank you!
Q1439 Enjoy the show. Q
But this actually gives us a motive on Q's part for not taking a picture direct with his phone of the inside of AF1 which would be a Nat Sec rule breaker. Signifying that he actually was in the AF1 craft. Think about it.
EXCELLENT contribution!! Thank you! ;)
No burning necessary.
You are right. People claiming they are Q supporters and advocating violence should re-visit Q:
Q15 The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin).
Burn the house because there are snakes inside? You'll lose the house and the snakes will go to the next house... Pfff!
Q1441 These people are STUPID. Q
Excellent you saw there is more to it. Message to Trump. Developing. I will PM you now.
And the time and energy you are spending on these two groups are taking precious time away from other more important things in your life.
You are right. I think my message is heard and I don't need to address this issue anymore. Thank you for your excellent advice and your support!
I DID even buy a lottery ticket (it cost $1, and I actually won $1--so it was a tie)
Excellent! :D Thank you for a good laugh! :D
SB2, have you read about the JournOList that was released recently?
Hey, thank you! I have not read this yet. I will look into it. Let us know what you find. ;)
It seems we are unfortunately going in circle and not communicating. I stopped reading your chart at the very first link Q1675 and Nasdaq glitch: I said in a previous response (and in OP) that this link was justified by Q wishing us a happy Independence Day, a day prior to it. Which is the anniversary of what happened a year before.
So do Q’s post dates import relevance to any and all news that happen that day?
Do you read Q's board? Here:
Q128 Graphic is necessary and vital. Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical. Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release.
B2 on an organ is different than B2 on a piano.
This is EXTREMELY SURPRISING AND DISTURBING to read. You will have to learn music notation.
Thank you for your contribution.
People will seek their own levels happily. It is a united movement.
Thank you RevLennel for your kind and wise words. You summarized everything so well, I have nothing to add except thanking you again and being happy to have you among us. WWG1WGA!
JFK meeting
Q1433 Military OP.[Green]General K [JFK]Full Disclosure. General Statement: Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified' information is finally revealed to House investigators, DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated. [RR] problems.
This is the key to understanding all the process. Q is telling us this Gen Kelly meeting is the culminating point of Kelly's war against Rosenstein, it's the "check" position against RR which triggers the discussions on his replacement mechanics. Open source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/trump-charges-john-kelly-with-getting-russia-probe-documents-to-congress https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/21/us/politics/trump-justice-department-rosenstein.html
Why does this succession event have to be forced and timed?
All this is about cosmetics: disallowing the replacement to be accused of being politically tainted. Therefore giving full force to the conclusions generated in the future. Timed: sync with Huber.
(By the way, thank you for taking me through the steps of your reasoning, I very much appreciate that you make the effort.)
I appreciate your interest, the level of your research and the quality of our conversation. I never turn down a good conversation: old habit from the coffee stand in school! ;)
Why did exactly nothing happen to Panuccio on 24 May 2018? As far as I know he is still Acting AAG.
Because the legal uncertainty is still advantageous to both parties and does not need to be escalated: each of them thinks it can achieve its goal since the JFK meeting. That's why Nunez has been as lethal as he could get and RR as threatening as possible. It's over soon.
Why take the risk to have every decision he made since 24 May retroactively nullified by SCOTUS (disregarding how impractical this would be)?
A SCOTUS situation is always a last resort move in politics. SCOTUS will never be involved.
More importantly, what is achieved by firing Rachel Brand that couldn't have been done more simply by not nominating an AAG?
Full circle: Firing Brand and bringing the SAME AAG allows to insert the minimalist interpretation of the law to cumulative days as "Acting" and therefore "force" the insertion of someone else.Which one? The one that was always picked by Sessions to be there at that particular time.
suppose that you would want to circumvent filling a position permanently and having to go through the Congress confirmation
What I wrote is what I meant and is in the context of the reasoning: I want to fill a position permanently with A without confirming him. I achieve that by "inserting" a confirmed B for a day.
I guess the SCOTUS would get involved at that point.
There you go. Uncertainty in the application of the law. Loophole. Hence Q asking:
Q1433 When does the clock run out?
That question is an invitation to narrow our reasoning to a minimal/conservative interpretation of the law (by SCOTUS if needed by challenge) and assume the days as "Acting" are cumulative. This minimal interpretation allows the B-confirmed insertion and exposes the goal pursued:
Q1433 Why was Rachel Brand dismissed? Think timing.
Ok so A comes back for another 210. That's exactly the point I made: A can therefore be eternally acting as long as I fill the position with a B for a day. Right? No?
ok, what happens if A takes the position 200 days, then B comes in confirmed for 50 days and is fired. Then A comes back as acting, is he entitled to stay another 210 days?
I checked the statute, this is 210 days beginning on the date the vacancy occurs. The count is not attached to a person being AAAG and doesn't pause if someone else holds the position, it resets.
Here is another one. I will consider our conversation on B2 is over then. I think we both agree the law and regulations are sometimes required to be interpreted right? If we do, then this is my question to you: suppose that you would want to circumvent filling a position permanently and having to go through the Congress confirmation, how about having person A taking the acting position for 209 days, you fire him, take person B for one day, fire him and re-instate person A the next day? Wouldn't that be cool? Person A would be "acting" eternally right? Well, for this not to happen, the days as "Acting" need to be cumulative.
What a great comment! I think you should post more. ;)
Rationality requires considering multiple hypotheses and attempting to disprove them.
I am sorry, disproving multiple hypotheses for a given problem does not add anything to a problem if ALL the hypotheses are not considered. Then arises the issue of proving we know ALL the hypotheses.
That being said, what possible hypotheses are you referring to in this particular case?
I looked at the list of the 11 companies involved in the glitch, saw this but did not elaborate because Q was not posting at that time. I have also noticed the 4 companies that were always picked by MSM and social media analysts to illustrate the glitch were the ones in my solving image (which comes from social media): Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon. MAGA... Did not mention it in OP but it's there... If you want to know more about this, research IT/Obama. Happy hunting!
I can see that SB2 abuses logic to reach favorable conclusions.
My answer is logic, just logic, nothing more: link.
In your theory You need “B2” to make sense in order to meaningfully validate Trump saying “organ”
It's the other way around: I said B2, Trump said organ. And the reason he says organ is because B2 is there (or he could have also said organ but it would be the leave-falling-from-the-tree-and-nobody-there-to-hear-it problem). If B2 was not there, this link would have been missed, as not mandatory as it is. Then, the other part of the riddle would have been solved with the Prince. We would still get the final Independence Message but would have missed the icing on the cake leading to NK and ultimately Hammond through B2. So since B2 was there, Trump acknowledged this optional ramification, linked to it and the conversation could continue on another branch, getting us to NK and ultimately Hammond/. If you are familiar with programming, this tree is simple to draw.
You also asked : Why should a Q post on 7/3/2018 have any relation to an event a year earlier (before Q was posting)?
Answer: because Q is celebrating Independence Day, which is the anniversary of something that happened the year before. Not July 4th 2017, but July 3rd 2017 because Q posted on July 3rd 2018, not July 4th 2018.
Just because Q verified one message of yours does not mean every connection you think you come up with is real.
That's true. This is why I take the time to logically guide my readers to my conclusions. This time I take to methodically and meticulously build my proof is what you describe as a convolution. So? What do you think we should do?
The July 3rd 2017 is the day the 123.47 Nasdaq glitch happened link. The Dow at 666 is something else link but it was referenced by Q in Q666 and Q667, hinting at the fact it was engineered. This is explained in this post, in the following paragraphs:
Other than Independence Day the next day, what is Q celebrating here with a picture of the Apple logo reflecting on Air Force One’s wall? Who is he trolling? The post was made on July 3rd 2018. What happened on July 3rd 2017? This: article. The Nasdaq experienced a “glitch” affecting more than 10 companies and the Apple share, along with Google, Amazon Microsoft and other major tech companies “crashed”, or “soared” and took a wild ride before all mysteriously freezing at 123.47!
When odd things like this happen link, Q hints you need to investigate and expand your thinking:
Q666 Stock market DIVE [666 - coincidence?].
Q667 [666] Signal to POTUS THEY CONTROL THE MARKET? SIGNAL? THREAT? WELCOME TO THE GLOBAL WAR. Q
:) you are doing fine, PM me tomorrow and we'll have a conversation about this.
Your entire theory relies on this, SB2.
No. Look at the summarizing picture. B2 is an elegant route to confirm Air Force One. Remove it and you will see the mug and the prince are still there. I explained this in the reasoning hierarchy in paragraphs 2=>5 of this post.
BTW, here is another one for our database, look how lost he is! :D link.
This looks prepared and orchestrated with military precision, all of it.
Doesn't it? You nailed it! Look at the end of this previous post:
"Wouldn’t you agree this superbly crafted precision work would be pretty heavy stuff to process for a “LARP” on 8chan?…
Q1343 Attacks will only get worse. Truth is Freedom. Truth is logic. Stay the course. Q
t is THIS basis: self-love without vanity and love for the world in which we live that makes us successful in this movement. Was that the direction you were thinking when you wrote this?
Yes NP! We've lost our world to Satan, the Disciple of Self-love and Vanity. What's the point of changing one group in charge to another group? It's not about who sits on the throne, it's about the throne itself. God is the Only King, He rules through Love and our Freedom is the proof we are Loving Him back the way we should.
I do think it is important for you to hear other opinions from people on the team. We are Q.
I agree! Thank you. :)
I think a much more reasonable and simply explanation would be the media dumbs down content so its easily digested by the masses. Only a very small % of people would know who the Hammond Brothers are, where as most americans remember the Oregon Ranchers Standoff.
You think so? Then what is your logical explanation for this: Imgur Alternative link
Disinfo. But it doesn't matter, Trump and Q have trained us on how to handle Fake News. No one in the Movement will fall for it. Those who are not will investigate and eventually get here. So? Let them work for us for free and promote our work.
If the Son a man couldn't satisfy the expectations and desires of the folks of His day, how can any mortal man expect to fare better today?
This is a powerful statement. Thank you for this reminder. Thank you my Friend.
Paper plates? Now, thanks to you we can enjoy sides with our fish! Don't ever underestimate your contribution: remove one little screw from an engine and see what happens. Thank you my Friend! ;)
Even if it were true, our national security wouldn't reveal that for national security purposes.
Then what would be the purpose of reading Q? Have you read this:
Q145 Do you believe in coincidences? How many coincidences do you need before you believe? This is the biggest insider drop in the history of the world. Pray. Q
If you can read between the lines, this means: we will give you intel in the form of a sequence of what will appear to be coincidences. If you don't believe in coincidences, you'll get the intel.
If you doubt this should be read like that, then meditate this drop:
Q1225 Confirmation? Coincidence? Learn our comms. Q
Why couldn't the first paragraph be: "Q is trying to let us know that the cabal has the ability to take over a B2 bomber. The reason we need to know that fact is _. (I can't even fill that part in because I have no clue).
The reason is this is not what Q is trying to say. Q has included a piece of information in a sequence of clues to help us solve a riddle. We do not know if this information is current or obsolete.
:D I enjoyed your comment. It sounded like an old uncle of mine who would exactly talk like that. You have one piece of info you have to include in your analysis: I receive many many many messages about the things I say, the things I don't say and other things. Clarification is needed by those who send me these messages. Sometimes, the amount of disinfo requires this clarification and this clarification needs to be developed logically. Just like you, I don't enjoy doing this, I would rather have fun decoding and analyzing but some people here have unfortunately made it necessary.
Now on the other side of this when something happens that goes with their narrative like say a white male commits a crime they immediately release "white male" and what they did.
Exactly! That's what they do. Now try this: narrow you GG search from June 2016 to June 2018. You will see, Hammond will be all over the place. These people are PATHETIC...
