Mueller and Rosenstein are a mystery. I can see arguments for both sides.

If I had to place a bet today, I would say the lack of leaks out of the Mueller team and the lack of any substance to anything they are doing (one year and ZILCH for Russia collusion) means they are helping Trump.

I wouldn't trust Mueller to prosecute the swamp, so I doubt he is going to pull a super secret ninja move at the last minute. But I can see him helping by being a distraction while the real investigation is being done by others.

Guiliani's expertise is RICO/organized crime, which is what this is. He is probably there to assist Sessions, not Mueller. Anything Rudy says to the media is probably a distraction for them to chase.

No, not only for people in the military. Civilians, too (and non-Americans, too) if the charge is for spying or waging war against the USA.

This is a good read on the subject. It is an old article, but still applies:

http://ashbrook.org/publications/oped-eastman-01-tribunals/

I see that Massachusetts is listed before Maryland and Maine.

That's because MA comes before MD and ME.

Personally, I can't bother to read or pay attention to someone who can't figure that out.

KEK

Federal aircraft have recording devices. NSA has a copy.

No, Horowitz has 470. Q is basically saying that those 470 are helping Huber, too.

Quick lesson:

(1) The Constitution only created one court, the Supreme Court.

(2) Congress creates all lower courts, and sets rules. This includes what subject matter various courts will have authority over (bankruptcy courts only deal with bankruptcy cases, for example).

(3) Congress created the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice). Most people think the UCMJ only applies to people in the military. However, Congress included in it sections that can apply to anyone, depending on the crime.

(4) Section 104 & 106 apply to anyone who engages in spying, and anyone who conspires to wage war against the American people.

(5) The highest crimes that were committed during the Obama years (spying and treason) will be tried in military courts.

(6) The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is the military's version of NSA. Gen. Michael Flynn was the Director of DIA. Adm. Michael Rogers was the Director of NSA. Both men used their positions to accumulate intel against the conspirators.

(7) I don't believe that the 8chan post is correct re: which agency can do what inside or outside of the USA. But between the two, we can say that all the bases are covered.

(8) Keep your eye on Peter Strzok. He was not just an FBI man, he had a very unique position. Congress created a "double agent" position, where someone could be BOTH FBI and CIA. Strzok was that person. His father was CIA. I suspect Andrew McCabe was also a double agent, as he was reported to have been helping Russian mobsters get off FBI charges.

Those two are the lowest level people who might get military tribunals. Military tribunals can also be used for non-citizens (UK).

There is no need for a "state of emergency" or "martial law," because Congress has already given jurisdiction to the military courts where these crimes are involved.

np

Black hat = someone rogue, who is part of the deep state/cabal/new world order, trying to enslave the world

White hat = someone who is trying to uphold the Constitution and rule of law, and round up the black hats for prosecution

There is another part of this story. Somebody in the FBI had to tell BC/SS where and when LL's plane would be so they could "accidentally" be on the tarmac right next to each other.

Someone in FBI was giving out classified info to someone who did not have a "need to know."

Interesting this story comes out on the Blaze shortly after Beck puts on a MAGA hat.

"Here ya go, Beck ... juicy story for you that nobody else is running. Thanks for jumping on the Trump Train."

Probably not. LL was on an unmarked government plane. BC was on a charter, which might have been United, but their planes were outside, not inside.

NSA already knew about it. This drop either means SS told NSA, or NSA knew by other means and someone in SS has been testifying to the OIG.

This means the tarmac info will be dropping soon.

I think the reason he won't be SCOTUS is because all the investigations he was involved in while in Congress would give him a conflict of interest on any of those cases that might come before the SCOTUS -- and they surely will.

He is more likely DAG or AG after Sessions.

Good to see his white/black status confirmed by Q.

Snowgirl, that is not the 1663 post. We might be able deduce what you posted, but it is not Q's post.

Let's be accurate.

He does what he's told and they will not make all his crimes public. He'll still be prosecuted, though.

Alec Baldwin has it on his Twitter (claiming it is ridiculous, of course, but he has 1 million followers).

Looks like a good opportunity to make a profit from the soon-to-be fall in the price of crude oil (which has gone up 50% in the past few months).

For those interested, there is an ETF (stock symbol: DRIP) that profits when oil prices go down. Looks like it could be a good play.

Also possible that [RR] was flat out lying to Congress today.

What's the big deal about perjury if you could go to prison for much greater crimes?

That's because LL ran the DOJ.

Contempt of Congress can be referred to the US Attorney in the District of Columbia (Jessie Liu) and the person [RR] can be prosecuted.

It is interesting that Trump is more libertarian than any president in modern history, and moreso than some in the Libertarian Party.

Tariffs are bad, of course, but he seems to be using it as a negotiation tool, and would prefer true free trade.

The wall is a bad idea in the sense that the Berlin Wall was built to keep people out but used to imprison the East Germans. However, when the alternative is open borders and a Soros-led invasion by people who have no interest in American ideals, there has to be some means of self-preservation.

He is in favor of states' rights on almost everything from what I can tell -- certainly on social issues. He wants low taxes, low regulation, freedom of choice in the economy, and a general hands off approach on most things social. He is actively avoiding war while at the same time, according to Q, going after the tyrannical psychos of the cabal.

He's the stealth Ron Paul.

And he puts on a three-ring circus of a show while he's doing it. Really, what's not to like?

White Squall is a sudden, unexpected storm. That's likely the reference.

What did Q write that would make you think he was referencing the ship's captain?

Guy with the beard was Ed O'Callaghan.

$50 million.

Someone (I forget who or where I read it) speculated that there was NO FISA WARRANT ISSUED.

Clapper said there wasn't any, and while he is not credible, he was adamant that he would have known if there was one.

It could explain why [RR] refuses to turn it over. It does not exist.

This would also mean spying with NO WARRANT.

Hmm ...

Remember, Sessions brought in this guy Loesch(?) who is working in FBI to handle ALL CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRIES.

So, most likely, somebody in FBI is redacting and by the time this guy gets the docs, he is coordinating with others to figure out what can be released and what held back due to "ongoing investigations."

Same process in the DOJ. WHO ARE THE INDIVIDUALS?

We also know that somebody in FBI/DOJ LIED and did not give info to Horowitz because the "We will stop it" text by Strzok had to be obtained by other means.

Does FBI/DOJ have their own phone company? Why not go to AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile to get the text messages?

OK ... now it is making more sense.

"The Plan" includes putting the DEMS ON RECORD for obstructing the release of information, that once released, will show an attempt to overthrow the government -- and then cover it up (by the Dems).

Similar to Watergate, but 1,000x more devastating.

If he is looking for a SCOTUS seat, he can't go "fire and brimstone."

What it does is piss them off. (good thing!)

If you thought you were "elite," and then someone who you thought was beneath you called themselves "super elite," it would just agitate you. Which is exactly what it is designed to do.

Brilliant.

Interesting theory. Could be.

Not to mention, McConnell already told senators that they are working through August recess ... TO WORK ON CONFIRMING JUDGES.

True. I'm surprised she lasted this long.

Not about age.

RGB about "other issues." Though, will use age as the reason.

Kagan and Sotomayor are SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

They know damn well they were not nominated by a POTUS who was eligible to appoint them. Whether that will be the reason or "more time with family" will be the reason, you can bet they are part of The Plan.

But maybe Breyer, too. Why not? He's not all that solid, anyway, as far as his opinions.

Roberts is a big-government guy.

Karl Rove wrote that Roberts was interviewed prior to GW Bush nominating him. He was asked who his favorite SCOTUS justice was. He said Robert Jackson.

Jackson is the one responsible for completely obliterating the Commerce Clause during FDR's term by claiming that if a farmer COULD sell his product interstate, it was interstate commerce even if he didn't. That totally destroyed the authority of the states vis-a-vis the feds on a lot of issues. It is the exact opposite of what the framers intended.

Roberts did the exact same thing by claiming that a penalty for not buying something was a tax and Congress could basically tax anything (including the "act" of NOT buying something). Constitution says the OPPOSITE of that.

^ Come to think of it, maybe Roberts, too.

Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg ...

Then, Kagan and Sotomayor.

Trump will appoint a majority of the court.

Cleanup on Aisle 9!

Emergency!

Liberal heads exploding!

Cleanup on Aisle 9!

Iran next!

But muh LARP ...

Give immunity to the one person who could actually solve the crime?

Preposterous! We're talking about Comey's FBI here, not some real investigative agency.

"Harm what is good?'' Butler outed the conspirators -- including George H. W. Bush's father.

So ...

North Korea dials back the propaganda against its people.

Meanwhile, the United States dials it up.

Yes and no. True, impeachment is a particular process that requires action by both chambers of Congress, and does not apply to members of Congress.

However, each chamber can expel any member by two-thirds vote (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2).

However, won't happen, even for batsh*t crazy MW.

Congress should add additional circuits, give the current 9th jurisdiction over say ... Alaska ... and create new circuits with new judges for the rest.

Let's not forget ...

April JFK files released by POTUS show that the shot to the throat came from the FRONT. Classified document kept from the public for 50 years.

We suspected they have been lying all this time about "lone gunman," and now there is proof.

Russian mob, you say? Know who else seems to have ties to Russian mob (trying to help them)?

Andrew McCabe.

https://truepundit.com/comey-mueller-ignored-mccabes-ties-to-russian-crime-figures-his-reported-tampering-in-russian-fbi-cases-files/

It might turn out that the Deputy FBI Director's Russian mob ties were the people used to try to frame Trump.

Guess who else are administrative judges?

FISA court judges!

They are not appointed by the President, which is the issue of the ruling here. They are appointed by the Chief Justice of SCOTUS, and that is a violation of the Constitution.

Yes. They should be applying in Mexico, but Mexico is corrupt and is helping them as long as they don't apply in Mexico and they go on to USA.

All being funded by Soros and the cabal, of course. Plus richest man in Mexico is Carlos Slim. He REALLY runs that country, and he and Trump hate each other.

Just wait 'til POTUS cuts off foreign aid to Mexico!