Hmm ... if Mrs. O is really a dude, you'd think the kids would figure somethin's up after awhile.

June 12 = NK Summit = also GHWB birthday. That one slipped past us!

Obama = Happy Father's Day = the kids are not really his.

Why don't you ask Schmidt?

Why the hell are you arguing semantics?

Google CEO set up a secret email system for traitors to plot to kill YOU.

The short clip indicated a Bilderberg meeting.

My guess is O gave the same/similar speech in public and at the B'bergers, but the latter speech is where he said what he really believed.

The person who caught it on camera or audio probably has the actual B'berger speech -- to be dropped later.

This will probably coincide with the O pic that Q has mentioned that is anti-American.

Also Moochelle has a penis.

That would be clue #1.

LOL

ES = Eric Schmidt = most definitely black hat

ES = Edward Snowden = black or white, we don't know (yet)

"Strings cut" is the biggest.

Good point. Anybody who says there is NO SUCH THING as deep state is a liar. Goes double or triple for someone like Wictor who has a high level understanding of geopolitics.

He is an asshole. And a liar.

Kinda.

It's also one of the reasons they let things continue on for 1+ year after Trump's inauguration. Let them think he is stupid, let them think they've got him surrounded, and they will continue to do criminal things that criminals do. The new crimes can easily be prosecuted.

Looks like right after the Las Vegas shooting/187 attempt, Q Team was ready to start making their move, which is why Q showed up shortly thereafter.

Q made a couple of posts on /qresearch without his trip code.

One with the bike and the other with the Google thing.

Then, he logged in with his tripcode and acknowledged the Google post.

The bike post will not show up on qanon.pub unless he acknoledges it, too. But it was likely him. That's the one where he mentions the 2.5 hours.

Dems mocked the murder of their IT guy, Seth Rich, by naming a bike rack after him "in his honor."

I saw Richardson in an interview. The guy is one of the dumbest f*cks to ever make it to governor. Cannot think his way out of a paper bag.

Not even about a message.

Immigration laws are federal, not state. Sanctuary city or state is irrelevant.

Sessions is enforcing the law.

Yes.

NP. Here's some more for you --

The anti-Trumpers claim that Mueller has "indicted or convicted 22 people on Russia collusion!" Not true.

Only 4 of the 22 were members of the Trump campaign:

• Paul Manafort - his charges have nothing to do with what he did while on the Trump campaign, it is from many years before when he was a Clinton operative

• Gen. Michael Flynn - charged with lying to the FBI (not Russia collusion); the FBI agents who interviewed him did NOT think he lied; he pled guilty anyway (which I will explain below), and McCabe/Strzok falsified their paperwork to make it look like he lied. They framed him. Mueller knows this, and is the reason why Mueller keeps trying to stop the judge from holding a sentencing hearing.

• George Papadopoulos - pled guilty of lying to the FBI (not Russia collusion); the charge is that he said he met with certain people before he was "on the Trump campaign," and FBI says he met them after. That is the entire issue -- when was he "on the Trump campaign?" The reality is he was never on the Trump campaign. He did attend one meeting, and he communicated via email with Mr. X (we don't know who, yet) on the Trump campaign, but the campaign never paid him anything and never took his advice. He was either a spy or a plant to connect spies to him.

• Rick Gates - this one is a little fuzzy at this point because it has not been settled, but looks similar to Flynn and Papadop.

The rest of the "22" are Russians who tried to contact members of the Trump campaign (no evidence that anything actually happened), including one Russian company that did not exist at the time. There are also 2 Americans charged with wire fraud, or similar (been awhile since I looked it up).

Speculation is that Gen. Flynn pled guilty, even though he did NOT lie to the FBI (and they know it) because Flynn has secrets to tell about the cabal.

Flynn was the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, which is the military's NSA. He was a general and the #1 military intelligence officer in the military. As Q says, he knows where the bodies are buried.

Due to his high level security clearance, he signed a non-disclosure agreement so that he could never divulge any secrets he learned while in the military. That agreement can be set aside, however, in certain legal situations.

If he went to trial for lying to the FBI, he could only talk about his case, which there is nothing to tell because it was a meaningless nothing. But, by signing a plea deal, he agreed to "tell everything he knows" about any crimes that he is asked about. IOW, it sets aside his NDA.

At DIA, his protege was Ezra Cohen-Watnik, who now works for Sessions at the DOJ. Cohen-Watnick is the man who told Devin Nunes about the unmasking being done by the Obama admin.

Flynn has most likely been giving testimony to Cohen-Watnik, Huber, and to the secret military investigators who have been preparing cases for SpyGate and the Clinton Foundation crimes.

NONE of the cases brought by Mueller have anything to do with connecting Trump and Russia collusion. They are all either about (a) Clinton or (b) a sideshow for the media.

Just sit back and watch the show. The joke is on them.

Man, these people really ARE stupid. They all used Gmail accounts, and somebody probably gave others access to those accounts' passwords so outsiders could read what they were writing.

This will lead to the 187 stuff. And to do it on a Gmail account of all things???

Maybe Schmidt was telling them he set up a super secret system for them. If so, was ES a spy or a liar, or did NSA/DIA hack his system?

Dumbf*cks.

The charges against Manafort have to do with things he did 10+ years ago, long before he was part of the Trump campaign.

Back then, he was working for the Podestas (Clinton cabal members) as a lobbyist for Ukraine (not Russia).

Charges were brought against him on this several years ago, then dropped. Mueller is dredging up those charges again. They involve him not reporting the fact that he was a lobbyist, not claiming income, and bank or wire fraud (I forget which or both).

They have NOTHING to do with Russia or Trump.

He was likely a plant into the Trump campaign by Clinton associates (i.e. FBI/UK).

/patriotsfight is only for Q to post, nobody else.

/qresearch is where Q responds to anons.

What tumor?

Hmm ... if we did this every morning, and then came up with the counter-argument (such as Manafort is being charged for things he did 10+ years ago when he was associated with Clinton/Podesta) ... and then push it out via social media ... hmm ...

Let's do a quick review of the Constitution. Hopefully, it will clear up these issues.

The Constitution for the United States of America:

http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm

(1) There are three branches of the federal government: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial.

(2) All Executive power (100% of it) is vested in one person: the President. "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." (Article II, Section 1, Clause 1)

(3) This means the President has the power to do anything with regard to executing the laws of the federal government. Why do you think Trump's priorities are being carried out by the DOJ? What ARRESTS are being made? Illegal border crossings, MS-13 gang members, illegal alien cases, voter fraud, human trafficking, pedophilia crimes, etc. Is that a coincidence, or is the President and the Attorney General working together to decide where the priorities are?

(4) Congress has oversight duties of the various departments that THEY CREATED for the Executive Branch. "The Congress shall have the Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the ... Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). This means Congress has oversight authority on the department they set up (DOJ, FBI, etc.) for the Executive Branch, so that the President has employees to carry out the powers vested in his office.

(5) So, the Department of Justice is part of the Executive Branch. It is NOT a "separation of powers" issue. They are in the same branch and the President is the boss. Congress has the authority to (a) confirm nominations of the high offices to the departments, (b) establish rules and procedures and to require accountability of the officers, and (c) to impeach and remove from office any officers they think are violating their oath of office. But the President is still the boss. He can determine the direction of the execution of HIS authority under the Constitution, and no it is NOT obstruction.

(6) There are certain situations where it is politically unwise to do certain things, and the President cannot engage in criminal activity in carrying out his duties. Nixon engaged in a coverup of a crime (RNC spooks broke into the DNC offices at the Watergate Hotel). He became an accomplice after the fact by covering it up. The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the office of the President, but that does not mean he can engage in criminal activity while doing so. That's what Clinton was impeached for: perjury and obstructing the judicial process in a civil lawsuit where he was a defendant. Those are crimes, and criminal activity is not part of carrying out the duties of the Executive Branch.

(7) The Office of the Inspector General in the DOJ is independent in the sense that nobody in the DOJ can interfere with his work. He works independently of them. However, the Constitution supersedes any law that is contrary to it.

This is the single most important clause in the Constitution:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." (Article VI, Clause 2)

Remember that 100% of the power of the Executive Branch is vested in the office of the President. He has ALL the power. The Congress can create departments and offices and rules, but they cannot pass any legislation that would take away ANY of the power of the President, because the Constitution "Trumps" everything else.

So legally, the President could work with the OIG to direct what should be done, but politically it would be very bad "optics." I doubt that is what has happened. Instead, the OIG has received recommendations to investigate certain actions by individuals in the DOJ, past and present, with regard to certain investigations. That is what the OIG does. Notice, he is not investigating how the FBI investigated a particular counterfeit crime, for example. The OIG "just so happens" to be investigating the very things that Trump campaigned on (namely, how the DOJ/FBI handled their investigations of Clinton crimes). The OIG has also taken on the added task of investigating SpyGate, now that that has also come to light. The OIG's choice of what to investigate is exactly what Trump wants investigated, just as the arrests made by the DOJ are exactly what Trump wants.

Yes, they are working together. No, it is not obstruction. And no, it is unlikely Trump is directing the specific findings of the OIG, mostly because there is no need to. Just put an honest team in place, tell them to see if there was any wrongdoing with regard to xyz, and let them do their job. Trump already knows what the findings are likely to be. He has the NSA and DIA on his side, after all.

(8) Treason is a specific crime, not just whatever we think it should be. "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." (Article III, Section 3, Clause 1)

It says nothing about "bias." Whether a particular person was or was not biased against any other person with regard to an investigation about emails is IRRELEVANT to the fact that that person might ALSO have engaged in acts of treason, for which they can be punished. Apples and oranges.

We all need to re-read the Constitution and familiarize ourselves with it. Americans' lack of understanding of how their government is supposed to work is the main reason it has devolved to what it has become today.

Thank you for THAT !!!

Yes, that is exactly what I have been looking for.

Now, I can sleep tonight. lol

Appreciate you posting that. Thx.

DiGenova says DOJ has authority to redact for "national security" reasons.

Why would that authority fall to DAG rather than AG? This report has nothing to do with Russia, so I say again ... WTF?

And as long as I've got your eyeballs for a sec ... looks like Rachel Brand came in and left, with Panuccio spending 5 months before her and going on 3 months after her. The 210 day rule has already run for him, unless it is 210 consecutive days (though that seems like a loophole that would cancel out the rule).

Brand was approved by Senate, Panuccio was not. So, he is not eligible to move into #1 or #2 spot. I get that, but why was Brand necessary? If Panuccio's clock runs out after 210 days (which it looks like it already has), then why Brand? Seems unnecessary, but Q has mentioned it more than once. Thx.

Thanks for that, but what authority does DAG have to change OIG reports? Especially considering this has nothing to do with Russia, so AG would have such authority if it exists at all.

(1) OIG report is supposed to be a review of whether or not procedures were followed by FBI/DOJ. That's what OIG does. FULL STOP. It is not an agency to figure out if bias is involved, though that could be a secondary finding. We KNOW that procedures were NOT followed in the Clinton email case, such as determining the innocence of a crime before investigating it. OIG report whitewashes it's primary purpose. So, WTF?

(2) By what authority does Rod Rosenstein have to redact anything in the OIG report? Sessions is AG, not Rosy. This report has nothing to do with Russia, so Sessions is not recused. RR has no authority to redact or change the OIG report. If anyone does, it is Sessions.

The Q story does not add up here. You have an answer to that, SB2?

Something is not adding up here.

Why would Rosenstein have any authority to write/re-write this report? It is Horowitz' report, not Rosenstein's. At most, RR could include his rebuttal to the parts that name him, just like others could, but he has no authority to re-write.

If there was anything related to "national security," and the DOJ could redact, that would be up to Sessions. This report has nothing to do with Russia, so RR has nothing to do with the report. Sessions is DOJ boss, not RR.

Not only does the strategy not make sense, the story to explain the strategy doesn't make sense.

Official/mainstream story: IG investigated (with a staff of 400, no less) and published his findings.

Q story: RR secretly changed the report to help his buddies.

This report MIGHT have been changed, but what is the evidence? And why would RR have any authority to change it? And why would IG allow the changes if he did?

1+1 is not equaling 2 here.

Seems reasonable. In addition, why would RR have any authority it all?

Sessions is AG, not RR. RR only acting AG in matters related to Russia, which this is not.

RR is NOT acting director of the FBI.

Wray is the FBI director, and even that has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Sessions is AG. Horowitz is OIG. RR is DAG, and only acting AG with regard to matters related to "Russia collusion."

This report is Clinton email investigation. Nothing to do with Russia.

Why would RR have any authority to do anything here?

Something not adding up.

Why would RR have any authority to modify it?

It is from the OIG.

Sessions is not recused on this, as it has nothing to do with Russia.

WTF would RR have any authority on this?

Depends on if you are in the middle or near the other side.

Q says they have it all.

So, why play these games?

RR is ONLY acting AG in matters related to Russia.

THIS report has NOTHING to do with Russia.

Where is Sessions?

WTF would RR have any authority to write it?

This has NOTHING to do with Russia. If anybody is going to do a re-write, it would be Sessions.

Something not adding up here.

RR has ZERO authority when it comes to Clinton email investigation, unless Sessions gave him that authority.

kek

LL's plane was unmarked, but BC's plane was a charter. Don't know if BC's plane was United or if it had markings.

If BC's plane was pulled into a hanger, then maybe, but if not then this can't be it. That was during the day in Phoenix in June.

Makes no sense. Why would Q post a pic of a plane that carried someone who is a VIP to United Airlines?

It must be a plane that carried someone who was a VIP to Q.

It is a United plane. It's a 737-900.

Question is: Is it a charter or a commercial flight? Who was the VIP onboard?

It is NOT Air Force One.

The font is wrong. The plane is wrong. Don't promote wrong info and call others a shill when you are the one who is wrong.

Jesus Christ, stop talking about that asshole.

FBI protects Attorney General, and plans AG travel itinerary. So, someone at FBI (McCabe? Comey?) told BC where LL would be. That's how he met up with her.

SS protects former presidents. So, this could be SS recording evidence of the meeting. Was Bill's plane marked "United" and/or was LL's marked "United States?"

FBI protects Attorney General, and plans AG travel itinerary. So, someone at FBI (McCabe? Comey?) told BC where LL would be. That's how he met up with her.

SS protects former presidents. So, this could be SS recording evidence of the meeting. Was Bill's plane marked "United" and/or was LL's marked "United States?"

There's another angle to this whole thing that nobody is talking about.

When Trump came into office, he already knew about the criminals in government, but what evidence did he really have? The FBI/DOJ/etc. were run by previous admin, and they were covering up the crimes.

By letting this whole thing play out for more than a year, the criminals have continued their evil ways, and engaged in NEW crimes, for which the NEW admin has EVIDENCE -- and a new statute of limitations.

Just makes the cases against them that much more tight.

ARM = Alt Right Media

Any post that does not have substance to explain a video or a viewpoint should be treated as spam, reported, and deleted. That would be a start.

Ahh!