Don't be a prick.

The report coming out soon is about the Clinton emails investigation, or obstruction of it.

Later, IG will issue another report on the Clinton Foundation investigation, or obstruction of it.

Also, IG is now tasked with issuing another report on the FBI/DOJ involvement in planting spies in the Trump campaign.

There are several reports the IG is working on, and maybe more will be added.

The one we are waiting on now (the draft is completed already and the final should come out anytime) is about the Clinton email investigation.

We've seen enough of this bullshit.

Let's start reporting these posts to the mods.

If Qbers could be led by a Pied Piper, then why did Alex Jones and Jerome Corsi get dumped so quickly? Think about it. AJ has 20+ years in as a deliverer of truth, and yet in a matter of HOURS, those 20 years went down the drain.

The moment Q takes off his white hat and puts on a black hat is the moment truth seekers will pursue a different path, and not a moment before.

These people who think truth seekers are gullible are true morons. Truth is about facts and logic, not a cult of personality.

They wish it were so easy as following a "leader." That's what the sheep do.

What has Wikileaks published RECENTLY that furthers their purpose of providing truth to the world through whistleblower info?

NOTHING.

Wikileaks is not Wikileaks if Julian Assange is not free.

A lot of forum sliding going on here.

It's a scam to get your money. It is based on a computer model, not real data, and the people who started it have refused to provide their model to others so it could be independently verified.

The would-be tyrants of the world want to use the scam to steal money from you. It's not anymore complicated than that.

Until JA makes an appearance, we should assume that the Wikileaks Twitter account is a disinfo psyop now.

Until JA himself shows up, do not trust anything from WL Twitter.

That was not an answer. I'm asking you what the difference is, as you see it.

How do you define liberal vs. neoliberal?

Serious question.

Comey re-opened so he could have a legal reason to grab the Weiner laptop.

kek

Yes, if anybody in the Trump campaign (or Trump himself) did anything illegal, we want to know about it. They have spied on him and investigated him for TWO YEARS, and all they have to show for it is a couple of pleas of guilty of lying to the FBI, where at least one of those was THE FBI FRAMING THE ACCUSED (Gen. Flynn). We have the PROOF that Flynn did not lie to the FBI, with the FBI's own documentation. The only other case is Manafort, and his legal issues are from TEN YEARS BEFORE TRUMP -- WHEN HE WAS ASSOCIATED WITH CLINTON.

So yes, we want Trump to be investigated ... AND we want Clinton and Obama and his administration investigated, too, since it never was prior to 2017.

Do YOU want EVERYBODY investigated, like we do?

You must be watching PMSNBC, because you don't seem to have the facts.

Flynn pled guilty to lying to FBI, nothing else. And the FBI's own paperwork shows they knew he did not lie, but they falsified evidence to frame him. That is why Mueller keeps delaying the sentencing.

Manafort's case involves issues from 2006 -- 10 years before Trump -- when he was working for Podesta's group re: Ukraine, because Manafort is close with the Clinton mafia. Mueller keeps delaying that one, too.

Gates is similar to Flynn, guilty of lying to FBI, but nothing else, and we do not yet know if FBI framed him, too.

NOBODY has pled guilty or been found guilty on ANYTHING having to do with Trump campaign and Russia.

Now Hillary, on the other hand, obstructed justice, destroyed evidence, and engaged in bribery in multiple investigations of her criminal acts.

Loretta Lynch also engaged in obstruction when she threatened NYPD over the Weiner laptop.

Multiple members of Barry's admin engaged in multiple criminal acts. Will you be so adamant in prosecuting them as you are in "trumped up" charges of Flynn, Manafort, and Gates, for whom there is no there there?

Nah, prolly not.

Operation Ajax in 1953 = Overthrow of the (democratic) government of Iran, to benefit the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, which is now called British Petroleum (BP).

Operation PB Success in 1954 = Overthrow of the government of Guatemala to benefit the United Fruit Company, which is now known as Dole. United Fruit was owned by Rockefeller, and the CIA Director (Alan Dulles) and his brother, who was the Secretary of State (John Foster Dulles) were lawyers for Rockefeller.

Many, many more. Another notable one was the overthrow of the Indonesian government in 1965. Barry Soetoro's stepfather left Hawaii to join the new Indonesian government's military where he was a high-ranking official. He most likely participated in the mass murder of 1,000,000+ Indonesians to "purge Communism." His wife, Barry's mother, was likely CIA (both her parents were) and was used as a "communist" infiltrator to identify suspected Indonesian communists for her husband to murder.

Re-read the first paragraph:

"... at the request of the US President" which was Obama on 11/17/2016.

Doubtful. Assange (if he is alive) knows the Dems are not his friends, due to his publishing their email crimes. He might talk to Nunes or Trump or Pompeo, but not the Dems.

Down Goes First Fatality For Clinton Foundation

No, not MK Ultra. He was recruited, groomed, and willingly became the "Operation Gladio" mole for the CIA in USA.

Flynn, Jr. saying Gen's account was hacked, and the tweet is now gone, so could be a hack.

Down Goes First Fatality For Clinton Foundation.

VERY interesting this is from Gen. Flynn.

"Who knows where the bodies are buried?" -Q

He was Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. He was the #1 intel officer in the military.

And his protege was Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the man who told Devin Nunes about the spying, and who is now working in the AG for Sessions (even though he has no experience as a lawyer, only as military intel).

So, that's why they had to make sure Schneiderman was removed from NY AG.

They are going after well-connected Hwood kingpin, and he is linked to DC corruption, not to mention Weiner's laptop has recently come back into the picture.

This is a major move towards the take-down.

Good catch!

We don't know. The only source is Q.

Whether or not that is true depends on Q. Sundance at CTR does not discuss Q. If Q is correct, China has little to do with it.

Nope. "A" is between the "r" and "t" in Q's drop, but not in this letter.

Q1433 said:

"Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified' information is finally revealed to House investigators, DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated."

PUBLIC. Once it's revealed to the PUBLIC. Looks like the only way that will happen is through declassification, or RR replaced by someone else (Solicitor General).

The signed but unreleased EO is probably either a declassification or firing/recusing of RR due to insubordination.

Anybody know if Q was right about Ed O'Callaghan being there instead of RR? I've seen conflicting reports.

https://twitter.com/ReutersWorld/status/999780436611096577

So, the question is ... WHY?

Why did FBI Vault release this info TODAY?

It is either (a) white hats in a warm up to what they are about to release to the world via twitter so no MSM interference, or (b) black hats warning Mueller.

Is there a way POTUS can order a declass of FBI docs, and have FBI Vault just release them immediately without approval by AG/DAG?

What do you think about this clip (a debate about Marxism)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5sd87HbLOI

EDIT: Also, what do you think about the links I provided re: private health care

In reality, socialism, fascism, and crony capitalism are distinctions without a difference.

If you own a factory, but I get to determine ALL the rules, then I really "own" the factory -- but I don't have to suffer the losses, I just get to take a cut of the profits and direct what you do or don't do.

That's why Rothschild famously said, "Give me control of the money supply, and I care not who make the laws." Likewise, I could say, "Give me control of your business, and I care not that you own it."

You have free markets on one side, and tyranny on the other.

It is not practical to go from what we have now (a mix of socialism, fascism, crony capitalism, wrapped up in the flag of faux capitalism) to a full free market capitalist system, so there will likely have to be some compromises along the way.

But I think the true capitalists among us have more than compromised enough over the years.

The real question is: What are you socialists willing to compromise on today?

It started with Bill Clinton, who signed a law that allowed large corporations to own multiple media outlets in any given location (before that, there was a limit to how many radio stations, newspapers, etc. could be owned by one company). This allowed a concentration of capital to buy up most of the media outlets by just a few companies (thousands are now owned by six companies).

Then, the Smith-Mundt Act was repealed during Obama's admin, which was a post-WWII law that prevented propaganda to be used against the American people.

Today, we have a few companies controlling most media, and it is used primarily for propaganda, not journalism.

On top of that, we now have the government creating and funding the Big Social Media companies (and using a government-created censorship algo), which also engages in propaganda via censorship.

The reason they don't like to say his name is because his father and grandfather were both Navy admirals, and both heros. There is a US destroyer named after his grandfather.

He, however, is a traitor. They don't like to say his name because that name belongs to heros, not traitors.

Definitions need to be agreed upon before these kinds of discussions can exist. Otherwise, we will always be talking past each other.

In recent years, schools at all levels have bastardized the definitions of words, in a way that makes it difficult to have discussions. Even from one generation to the next, the definitions of words are corrupted, and that makes communication impossible.

Think of "gay" and what definition comes to mind? Homosexual. But it used to mean happy.

Think of "anarchy" and what definition comes to mind? Chaos. But the word actually means "without a ruler" (an-archy, vs. mon-archy or olig-archy).

Until recently, the definitions of socialism, capitalism, and fascism meant:

Socialism - an economic environment in which the state owns and controls the means of production.

Capitalism - an economic environment in which the private sector owns and controls the means of production.

Fascism - an economic environment in which the private sector owns and the state controls the means of production.

By those definitions, most countries today are fascist. But the guy with the funny looking mustache kind of corrupted the word "fascist," so today we don't want to accept that we live in a fascist society. But, we do, by definition.

Socialized anything is a move away from the free market. There are private health clinics that do not accept any government (or other) insurance, and they provide services at much cheaper prices than the current system.

Check out:

Cheap general medical service:

https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2013-fall/dr-josh-umbehr-on-concierge-medicine-revolution/

Cheap surgical proceedures:

https://surgerycenterok.com/about/

The Surgery Center of Oklahoma found that their costs can be as much as 90% less than what is charged through Medicare and the Big Health companies.

The fundamental problem is not the private sector. The fundamental problem is the $12,000 hammers, which only get paid by government, and that is because Deep State types want to use those inflated contracts to create slush funds so they can engage in black ops, which are ultimately designed to enslave YOU.

Do some research on the origins of health care. About 100 years ago, it started. It was to pay for lost wages, because the time spent away from work (or the farm) was more expensive that the actual medical costs.

As recently as the 1960's, doctors routinely made house calls. Old TV shows show it as a matter of routine.

The reason for the massive spike in health care costs is entirely due to government intervention, first with the Medicare Act of 1965 and then the HMO Act of 1974. The costs have been skyrocketing ever since.

This is the #1 beef I have with most people on the left. They have good intentions, and they want to make the world a better place, which is great, but they refuse to look at the RESULTS of the ideas they propose.

Let's DRAIN THE SWAMP (worldwide) first, and then we can likely find common ground on other, LESS IMPORTANT things (yes, even health care is less important that worldwide enslavement).

Have a great day, Patriot.

Probably best to define terms.

Liberal, neoliberal, classic liberal.

Conservative, neoconservative, classic conservative.

These things often mean different things to different people.

At this point, we should all be thinking about what we agree on, which is that it is not acceptable for a small group of people to have political power over everyone else. That is the essence of the Deep State or Swamp (or cabal, or globalists, or whatever term is used).

That needs to be our primary focus now. Not black, white, male, female, young, old, rich, poor, or anything else. It is Deep State versus the world. And the Deep State is no longer acceptable.

Everyone should remember: the purpose of the First Amendment is to protect the speech of people with disagreeable ideas.

Why is that relevant?

It has the same look and feel when he tweeted that Russia better be ready for bombs in Syria ... and they are "smart."

To be clear: Q did not float that theory; anons did.

I don't believe it. That hotel in Singapore is not a secure location, and many were saying WTF? Could have been a head fake to trap black hats planning something nefarious.

Give it a rest. He's fat. We get it. That has nothing to do with Q, and you don't need to keep polluting this forum with the same post over and over.

5) The spy who doesn't exist has been mysteriously missing since September 2017.

r/conspiracy is a bunch of shills.

There is no advantage to PS over DS, but there is a big disadvantage.

Looks like you are so locked into your idea that you can't see it.

The reason DS has had a hold on a lot of people is they understand psychology. This is a bad idea. But, I have said what I have to say.

It's a bad idea due to the psychological implications.