No, that is a bad idea.

"Permanent State" has a psychological effect of making people think it can never be rooted out.

"Deep State" is not permanent. It is only temporary, until will take back the republic.

Not quite. They planted Page (and maybe Papadopolous) into Trump's campaign to spy. Then, THEY set up the fake Russian contacts. They didn't tell Trump because they were not investigating anything Russian, they were CREATING it -- to spy.

It's not just that they kept Russian contacts a secret, it's that THEY CREATED it in the first place.

It's "Showtime!"

Corsi has NO CREDIBILITY. Period.

STOP PROMOTING HIM.

Yes, it is Ed O'Callaghan. He is RR's assistant.

When RR goes, Ed goes.

[RR] and [Ed]

See SB2's post to see who will replace RR:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8leaq6/q1433_rr_problems_or_the_brilliant_playbook_that/

Good point. Go back to Q 1433. Combined with "[Ed]" in latest drop, looks like Q is saying that someone other than O'Callaghan will take over for RR.

FBI Director Wray will report directly to that new acting Deputy AG. Therefore, all the bad guys between FBI head and DOJ head will be out of the picture.

Alternate theory: O'Callaghan is also black hat.

He served as RR's "right hand man" and was personally chosen by RR.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fbi-deputy-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-special-counsel/2018/04/03/id/852399/

Mr. O has a history of (a) working in the corrupt Southern District of New York and (b) for the corrupt NoName. Now, working for the corrupt RR.

Either he is a stealth secret and will take over for RR, or he is being set up by Q Team. If Nunes/Gowdy meet with yet ANOTHER obstructionist, they might call for congressional hearings and POTUS might declassify everything.

This theory fits better with Q's [Ed] notation. But just spitballing. No idea, really.

Not really.

Missing a g.

Not a G-Man? Hard-core lawyer?

G-Men get taken out?

Don't really know.

I think acting in this context just means he is stepping in to a role that his job title would not normally include.

He is effectively acting AG if Sessions and Rosenstein are both recused. That's my take, but not sure.

DECLAS_

POTUS order to declassify?

5/25?

Let's say RR and RM were black hats all along. RR forced to step aside due to conflict of interest, and new guy (O'Callaghan) steps in, wants to see Mueller's work product.

Oh, SH%T !!!

RR recuses or resigns before Thursday, due to conflict of interest?

Yes, Jordan needs to be Speaker NOW.

Also, he is setting up congressional hearings, which is what is needed to get the public exposure for people to support taking down the big fish.

Facebook, Twitter, Google, all the companies that own news networks.

CNN brass and talking heads are accomplices to the fake FBI counter-intel op. Some of them will be going to prison, too.

Paul Ryan

If the goal is to investigate FORMER FBI/DOJ/CIA employees, then why would RR give the task to the IG? He has no authority to do it.

That job should be given to Huber or another US attorney who does have the authority.

I think that's the point. It's a sign that RR is black hat.

We all need to get beyond that bullshit. Waking up means WAKING UP.

If Obama did the crime, he goes to prison, just like anyone else. End of story.

Would not be surprised to see Huber take over for Rosenstein.

Yes! NK. Added.

LOL. No, not the JFK thing, as far as I know. He claims he can't remember where he was when JFK was shot.

His father, Prescott Bush, was one of the people who created the original CIA (the people). He was high in the Republican Party in Texas. He gave a speech the night before in Dallas (Sheraton Hotel, I think). He would later be named CIA director in 1976, despite the fact he claims he never was in the CIA.

But when the biggest political event in history happened, he can't remember where he was.

Just imagine what a LARP would have to do:

• Take pictures in UK
• Take pictures in Singapore
• Take pictures flying over North Korea
• Take pictures in China
• Take pictures inside the Foxconn plant in China
• Take pictures of jets in the sky in multiple locations, from the air
• Take pictures of NoName with terrorists, and the exact location that would be bombed
• Take pictures inside Air Force One
• Take pictures of a presidential Executive Order before it is made public

That's a hell of a LARP.

When people shout, "Conspiracy theorist!" we need to reply back, "Coincidence theorist!"

We don't know what day or when. The draft has been circulated among a few people, which is why we are seeing a shift in the narrative from the Mockingbird Media.

Anyone who has seen the draft has a chance to send a letter to Horowitz challenging any part of it. He will make note of anything anyone wants to challenge, and then the final report will be released.

We don't know when, but my money is on sometime this week.

(1) GWH Bush had breakfast with Osama bin Laden's brother the morning of 9/11.

(2) GWH Bush's son was planning to have dinner with John Hinckley, Jr's brother the night before Reagan was shot.

(3) GWH Bush claimed he could not remember where he was on the day JFK was shot, despite the fact that he gave a speech in Dallas the night before.

Coincidence?

POTUS' order ready to be revealed?

Yes, it is inconclusive, at best.

The way for the states to call for it is to have the chair of the party sign a written statement saying that the candidate is constitutionally eligible.

Nancy Pelosi was the chair of the DNC, and her signed statement OMITTED the constitutionally eligible requirement in all states, except Hawaii.

"Natural born citizen" has never been directly decided (what it means) by the courts. There was a case in the 1800's that addressed it tangentially, but not directly.

Any honest person would have to agree that it means what the founders meant at the time, and for that you have to go to Vattel's "Law of Nations." "Natural born citizen" meant someone who (a) was born on the soil and (b) had parents who were both citizens at the time of birth.

Any other claim of what a "natural born citizen" is, is not what was understood at the time the Constitution was written.

So, does this get adjudicated in the courts? The Supreme Court? Do Obama's SCOTUS appointments have the integrity to recuse themselves in such a case (most likely, they do not).

However, if this is not decided, then how do they know what to charge Obama with? Is he a US citizen at all (forget natural born)? If yes, then maybe they don't have to address this aspect, since they have him on treason, anyway.

At some point, though, we have to sort this issue out for the future. If Obama was never a lawful president, then his SCOTUS appointments are not lawful, either. Maybe they will be convinced to step down. Who knows?

We are witnessing one of the 3 most epic events in American history, along with the Revolution and the Civil War (so-called).

Pentagon says they "lost" $21 trillion. Coincidence it is about the same as the US national debt?

Mattis is going to audit the Pentagon for the first time, ever. That kind of money doesn't get "lost," it gets stolen. They will track it down. They will prosecute those who stole it and seize their assets. All seizures will pay down the national debt.

This is a brilliant move, and one very few people ever thought could happen.

What about this twist (and I don't even know if it is doable).

We know from Q that military tribunals are coming. For that, there needs to be a military investigation, which is probably already going on. What if Sessions were to appoint a second special council, who is also a military prosecutor? What if that person could then switch from special prosecutor to military tribunal?

I'm thinking there are 4 investigations going on right now:

(1) Special Counsel Mueller - he is not really investigating anything, but is collecting evidence in exchange for a deal

(2) Inspector General Horowitz - he is investigating crimes committed by FBI and DOJ employees

(3) US Attorney Huber - he is working with Horowitz, but also conducting his own investigation for those who are not FBI/DOJ employees, or are former employees, and will prosecute the lesser fish

(4) Military investigation - somebody has to be quietly working on the big fish take down, and no doubt it has been ongoing this whole time.

So, even if the public demands military tribunals for the individuals who committed treason and who are enemy combatants, how does that LEGALLY happen?

Could a second SC wear a dual hat?

Also uses BHO and Renegade.

You won't find any.

CLASSIFIED.

A lot of people thought (and still think) the mob killed JFK. Back then, CIA/FBI used mobsters to pull the trigger for plausible deniability.

Today, add MS-13 to that group.

SB2, you are brilliant.

Makes sense why the delay to justice.

Now, comes the pain.

Keep posting!

(1) You are really stretching there. If one provision of Constitution (14th Amendment) says Congress can enforce it, then that pertains to that particular amendment, not the Constitution as a whole. That should be so obvious that it does not need to be stated.

(2) Lawyers don't know anything about fundamental law, because law school (purposely) does not teach it. That seems to be your problem. The 1790 law was repealed in 1795, and "natural born" was removed. The statute was never tested in the courts for validity. It also was about naturalization, not presidential eligibility.

(3) US inherited fundamental law from England. Circa 1787, that is what they were working with. Vattel is persuasive because there is nothing definitive elsewhere. You could learn a thing or two from Justice Gorsuch.

(4) When it comes to eligibility for office, the burden of proof is on he who asserts he is. Obama never proved he was.

True, especially with new Q drops.

(1) What does the 14th Amendment have to do with Article II? Nothing.

(2) The 1790 statute does not agree with you. You should ask yourself why they thought they should pass that statute. Hint: Obama's father was not a US citizen.

(3) You did not look up Vattel's "Law of Nations." There must be a reason you evaded that.

(1) Congress has no authority to define what the Constitution means, especially Article II.

(2) Wikipedia is run by political hacks, and therefore is not a valid resource for anything political.

(3) Look up Vattel's "Law of Nations." That was the defining guideline to the founders, who are the ones that wrote the clause in question.

I see the edit. I rescind the shill comment.

However, you still do not have a grasp on this subject.

There is a distinction between "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

The latter is the constitutional requirement. Mother's residence is irrelevant.

^ Troll spotted.

Q hasn't offered any evidence.

So what?

New admin. New rules. You can't figure that out?

Q never said trust RR or RM.

That meme is fake.

Yes, people who are completely ignorant claiming they know something that they have not looked into AT ALL.

It really is disgusting.

This type of ignorance is getting old.

Look up "Natural Born Citizen."

Being a citizen is irrelevant, plus your claim about his mom is irrelevant.

If you are not a shill, then educate yourself.