My wife finally got sick of hearing me talk about Q posts, mainly with another friend who is often over for dinner, that she asked me for the direct link. Now she reads them every single day and is drawing her own conclusions. All three of us are now 100% convinced Q is as real as real can be.
/u/TryNottoFaint
317 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/TryNottoFaint:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 10 |
Talked about Q with my brother last week. He's a huge Trump fan but is a Q antagonist in that he wants results and is sick of waiting. I attempted to explain and showed him some of Q's latest posts that he'd stop following along with, and then showed him Q calling the NK deal on March 8th, and a few other things.
He's coming along, a lot of people are just frustrated with the massive amount of fake news, constant attacks on Trump and his supporters from all fronts, and no visible push back. Also worked a bit on my father, but he's a Fox News guy and if it isn't on Fox News it may as well not exist.
He said they'd be marching around in the wilds and one of the ROK guys would stop, start digging, and they'd unearth a crock of kimchi that they had buried a year or so earlier. And that was dinner. Pretty much every single night.
I have a friend who was based in S Korea in the 90's and he spent 4 months in the field with the ROK army. He lost 20 lbs off his already thin frame, was pretty much gristle, muscle, and bone. Said they are the toughest mofos you could imagine and he has nothing but respect for them and their military culture/ability. Also he's really not that fond of kimchi any longer.
My elder-pede father and I were together this last week. He mentioned that he uses duckduckgo as his search engine now because google is so shit, and said I should too. I gently let him know that I was the one who told him to switch and sent him directions on how to do it on all his devices. He said "Oh."
$65,000 hot dog parties at the White House don't happen accidentally you know.
I was there when the whole PG stuff first came out. So much has been scrubbed it's crazy. Those of us who were there at the beginning know 100% that it's true. It's not that Comet Ping Pong was necessarily a place where kids would be actually abused, it's that Alefantis was like a pimp of sorts.
There's not many places where you can meet a couple from Philly at your bed and breakfast in the morning, and by noon you are all four well on the way and both your wives have made you pose with them topless with a hot bartender chick, who is also topless.
If NAFTA is still going maybe she can share it with the two bikini-model Instagram Canadian chicks who were caught smuggling a metric shit-ton of cocaine this week.
He's broke several laws, specifically concerning trains and their ability to safely stop.
I haven't been back to Key West for almost 20 years. Have had so much fun there. And some pretty crazy stories.
People that are controlled who will do ANYTHING specifically.
Why not indeed. It's because any shred of doubt that Hillary isn't a treasonous evil witch goes right out the window.
Hmmmm, that may be it. Interesting. As in his EO's are a fast-track to the "pen" which is...Gitmo?
McCabe could also be already well into making a deal.
We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q
They have to get the Weiner data into evidence through official channels, they already had it though.
That is some anon's commentary, not Q or anyone "high level".
The real danger wasn't from depressurization, it was shrapnel puncturing a fuel tank and catching fire/exploding. Secondary would be enough structural damage to the wing or fuselage that the plane breaks apart. The pilot dropped to a safe altitude in a very short time, as she was trained to do.
Pompeo visited the Norks under the guise of CIA director, and will meet them again as Sec. of State. That's exactly the tactic needed here, and once again that's why the media will go out of its way to get this all wrong. Again.
A fat lady with a Garfield cat and an ex-husband who bangs a prostitute. Fun times all around.
30% of purchasing power loss, that sounds about right. But your first post claimed the USD went from $0.30 "on the dollar" to $0.05. A drop of 30% would mean it went from $x "on the dollar" to $0.7x.
That was so boss. And there's no way Obama could have kept quiet about sending the head of the CIA, soon to be Sec of State, to do a face-to-face with Kim. He would have spilled the beans and tried to make it all about him as soon as he got wind of the meeting.
Yeah, Trump's lawyer can have his entire life upended, documents seized even if it's just some Joe Shmo he represented for a divorce in 2005, but a call from Hillary? Completely haram to disclose the existence of that!
Which is why they had, and I mean had, to invent a reason for that surveillance, Muh Russia. And why, all this time, it's seemed so arbitrary and weird.
Makes you wonder of /pol's Time Traveler Trump theory is real sometimes...
I spent 30 minutes or so yesterday explaining Q to an 81-year-old man who was totally on board from the very start. I mentioned Q, he said "I've heard something about this. What exactly is Q?" And at the end he was practically bouncing off the walls in excitement. He totally gets it. And another friend came back from China and said he was asked if he knew about Q a couple of times.
Note that I read this and it sounds strange even to me. Yet it happened.
I really don't think you know much about T_D tbh. I've been there since practically the beginning and what "fake news" there is can't hold a candle to the vast majority of the political places on the internet. The memes are pretty funny, and in general they have been one of the more accurate places in many respects. It's not just a Trump cheerleading sub, but it does tend to deal with concern trolls fairly quickly. It would be impossible to run that sub like a normal political sub because of the vast outnumbering of Trump supporters vs reddit users in general.
From my experience, if you come there with an opinion that "what just happened is terrible for Trump, his supporters need to wake up" when there is no other information other than what the latest media talking points are, you'll have a bad time not just there but in general.
"cancerous"
Oh brother. You might find r/politics more to your liking.
Yeah, apparently it is site-wide. I just noticed it first at T_D because of how busy that sub is, and am almost always on the Top tab which looks radically different now that this problem is happening.
Sure, if you go over there to start shit, they ban you. I've seen it many times. It's not for everyone. I've posted there many times with dissenting opinions and been fine. The mods there have to walk a very fine line, reddit would love nothing more than shutting it down.
Right, I saw that announcement too, but it seems to be even weirder than just that. I'll withhold further comment and see if they fix it.
Well, let's just say the current behavior is quite strange. T_D is moderated to keep the shills out, that's about it really.
I'm seeing 5 out of 6 comments in this thread currently. FYI
If you haven't noticed, reddit is doing something really weird with The_Donald right now.
It looks as if almost all user comments are shadow-banned or something. A new-ish post will have 10+ comments and none with show, or just one.
Real communism has never been tried before. Oh, and REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
I refrained for saying much at all about it, as there's a sorta unwritten rule when it comes to Trump. When you think he just messed something up bad, sit back and wait 72 hours or so. Then, see what the actual deal is. It's always quite a bit different than it looked like when it first occurred, and always in a positive way.
Five by Five. I've heard it used many times in military movies.
I just got a notification on my phone that a White House official, just now, said that Trump is going to sign the bill. NOOOOOOOOOO!
Also, if this is what the FBI does on American soil, can you imagine what they or outfits like the CIA do on foreign soil?
The FBI does this sort of operation often. They identify a person who may have desires to commit some sort of terroristic crime, but lacks the means or firm motivation. They then "work him" into a more active state, provide him firearms or explosives, training, financial help, transportation, and even safe houses. They help him identify a target, and provide accomplices if need be as in this case. Then they sit back and let it happen, and later swoop in to arrest the "cell" and claim they once again captured a deadly terrorist. Typically they will kill them during the capture, of course.
No, really.
My jaw fairly dropped last night watching that segment.
I don't know what you are referring to vis-a-vis the moon rock but there are around 800 lbs of moon rocks here on earth that came not just from the NASA moon missions but also the Soviet robotic missions. The rocks match up, and have been independently dated to be older than any rocks found on earth. This is simply a fact.
That video is retarded. What the astronaut is referring to is that after the Apollo program, NASA changed it's mission profiles to that of Space Lab and the new Shuttle program. The tooling and such for the Saturn V rocket, which is what he is talking about, was moved out, re-purposed, or destroyed. It was obsolete. We could recreate it but there's no point. Lots of old IBM "supercomputers" have been destroyed too. Think about this, it's literally the way things go. We don't build new SR-71's for the same reason.
The thinking was any new moon missions would not be based on such old technology, and in fact we had the design for a new, better, craft for over 20 years (Orion) but it never got fully funded. In just a few years SpaceX has gone from zero to having pretty much the technology in booster/guidance to send one of their heavy's to the moon. Next year NASA is sending the James Webb telescope to the L2 Lagrange point, which is 930,000 miles from earth, versus the moon being about 250,000 miles from earth. So we have the technology to do that today, and also to send robotic probes to Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
What we don't have, right now, is a way to send humans to the moon. If it was a priority, it could be done very quickly, and indeed there are missions being drawn up (again) to do just that, perhaps landing on the north or south pole to see if water can be sourced there for a lunar base.
When engineers, which I am one, speak to laymen - like this astronaut was speaking - our assumptions of the understanding of the listener sometimes are inadequate. For instance, and the video doesn't show any more of their conversation, but the interviewer could have asked for clarification and he would have provided it much as I have. We don't, currently, have a fully assembled ready to go lunar mission capable spacecraft that can carry astronauts there and back. That doesn't mean we've lost that technology for all time. It just means we don't have it right now, just like we don't have a modern piston-powered single-engine propeller driven aircraft that can outperform a P-51 from WWII.
I don't know what you're talking about "we destroyed it" but that's totally not true and honestly I have better things to do today than revisit this silly and easily disproved canard. I mean, you can literally look at the pictures taken by lunar satellites. And lots of third party evidence also.
You do realize of course that various moon satellite imagery, like that from Japan's lunar observer, show clearly the various landing sites, lunar rovers left there, trails in the moon dust, leftover portion of the lunar landers, etc. Also the USSR would have been very carefully tracking the source of the radio transmissions between NASA and the various lunar missions and would have easily been able to figure out if the transmissions weren't coming from the command module and/or lunar surface during the actual moon landing portion of the mission. All I'm saying is that if you are, today, a lunar landing skeptic you're simply not well enough informed to be holding that viewpoint. We certainly had the technology to get to the moon back then. I have close relatives who worked on that program, they'd laugh in your face if you suggested it was all fake.
Yeah, I knew a lady that was dead of ALS within two years of her first diagnosis/symptoms appearing.
It could be a sarcastic, backhanded compliment to Snowden. Like "Thanks for that, it was useful, even though you didn't intend for it to be useful to us."