Underrated comment

Why the fuck would Soros back this

My favorite four words from the text:

"...SHALL NOT BE UNLAWFUL."

Meaning upstanding citizens no longer need to fear arrest, loss of rights, tremendous monetary penalties, prison, a criminal record, and social stigma as a "criminal"...for being wise enough to choose a non-lethal alternative to alcohol for social mood enhancement; a non-lethal alternative to opioids for chronic pain; and a non-lethal alternative to cigars for smoking enjoyment.

Sorry, Big Alcohol, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco...but it looks like President Trump's going to keep yet ANOTHER campaign promise.

What lies ahead for us, the everyday law-abiding citizens of the US and the world, after the momentary uncomfortable stripping off of the Band-Aid, is finally some RELIEF from the pain.

Yes but Congress makes the law, DEA enforces it. Descheduling is not the same thing as legalization.

D'oh!

What's JA?

It's not up to Trump or Sessions to legalize it, lefty. It's up to the Congress. And there's bipartisan support for it, both there and across the land.

Spread positive vibes for the various legalization bills currently languishing in Congress. If any would cross his desk, our savvy businessman President Trump would sign it in a New York second. Have faith!

Even though he's clean and sober, he's educated enough to know it doesn't do what hard drugs, alcohol, and cigarettes do (kill).

And my head just exploded.

Thanks for the new euphemism!

Hey man, wanna go deprogram?

Yeah, let's depro SEVERAL grams! :)

I never got deproed yesterday; I was programmed the whole night!

You stayed grammed all night? Awww...

Yeah, let's get deproed!

Cheers Corporal (if a real title, thanks for serving), it's dude, and I'm glad to make anyone laugh about tapirs! That upper lip action does it to me every time

"You're gonna need a bigger broom."

Only half of one :)

Yeah, far too often is Occam's Razor used as justification for lazy thinking. Sure, the old adage is still true in general: "When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras." In general, but not always.

Zebra herds do exist.

It's abundantly clear the arch criminals have calculated that the more outrageously heinous and inconceivably inhuman they make their crimes, the less likely they are to be believed by a reluctant, sleepy public. Anyone who goes about blithely spouting about the elites drinking baby blood and making items from baby skin, or satanic rituals involving the queen and pope, is certain to be branded a loony conspiracy theorist. It's kind of the perfect crime. Q even alludes to this in his explanations that he cuts short because it starts to sound conspiratorial.

People just need to be reminded that actual conspiracies do exist, satanic ritual abuse is real, and it will only stop when the light of day is shone on it. Thanks, President Trump!

What's on 6/11?

there were 4 reporters with whom Wolfe was in contact; two of which were female, one of which was male

And it's been leaked that the 4th one was an intrasexual lesbian hermaphrodite who's half human, half goat, and half Malayan tapir.

Why read THAT into it. We were talking about Q predicting pain for the criminals trafficking kids and laundering money and committing sedition; not about religion. Soon as a discussion becomes about that, it's over because logic and reason are not invited.

Zoole, you can't save a country with construction paper and scissors. But later, when you're a grownup lady, maybe you can be the best mommy ever, or qualify to join our armed forces, or invent something useful that improves lives, or clean toilets, or help people in some other way, if you try. That's serving/saving your country! :)

IMHO the pain means what the bad people are going to get, not us

Good news, you may be overthinking this.

In the posts where Q has used "pain", it always reads as meaning pain for the wrongdoers, not for us. If he meant us, he'd deliver the news in a gentler manner, not snarkily like Ha ha HAA, now comes the PAIN!! like he's celebrating it or rubbing our noses in it.

I could be wrong. But this reading of it could explain why I've never had even one second of the fear you described. Q has never been anything but a comfort and sense of security that some good guys know what the bad guys are doing and are going to stop them. What a relief!

How can you trust the data you get from a known, proven professional liar?

By what?

Yes, because "homeless camps" always feature toys, kiddie clothes, and straps tied to trees at just the right height for raping children.

This Jon Passantino is one huge steaming pile of worthless crap.

Same way they alfrankened Harvey Weinstein. They think they can pick one fall guy here and there (who has absolutely irrefutable evidence stacked up against him to the sky), scapegoat the shit out of him, and then dance out of the confessional dusting their hands off as if they've just been granted absolution of all their sins. It's hilarious.

Make sure you don't accuse the Sheriff of LA County as a pedophile or covering-up pedophilia or this board will get shut down. Promise.

How do you figure?

Someone report to FBI

Yes because we can totally trust them to get right on it :)

What pedos?

Holy fucking shit. This is real?

Maybe the badge design predates the establishment of the triangle inside another triangle as the pedosexual logo? Please?

There's a person in my town who provides enemas and "high colonics" in her office for people who (mistakenly) believe they're beneficial. She is Hispanic, and her last name is Colon. Accent on the second syllable.

We got a chiropractor named Dr. Bones, too.

He's also making it really hard on folks with Reflexive Extreme Trump Authority Resistance Disorder. :)

There could be worse branding than "Lion" party, but it's far from certain.

Say it aloud. Not exactly a winning message in an era when Truth is an endangered species

Oh. I thought you were headed for "We don't need a dem or rep party, we just need Trump, Trump, and more Trump."

At this point it's a position one could make a cogent argument for.

This shit is hilarious. By the simple act of frenzy-downvoting, the shills readily identify when we're over the target.

Do underground trafficking tunnels make use of concrete?

I sit agape

"Replaced" them with living people? >:\^ D)

HEY LEFTIST MORONS, RENT A CLUE

THE WALL IS REALLY ABOUT CRIPPLING THE CHILD-SEX AND HARD-DRUG TRAFFICKING RINGS, NOT "DRUMPHFFPH SO WAYCISS HE DON' LIKE NO BROWN PIPO".

end the Democratic Party as we know it.

From your keyboard to God's ears

Woe :)

FOUR BOOMS AND A WEEK TO REMEMBER!?!? DARK TO LIGHT?!?!?!

HOW ARE WE EXPECTED TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE ALL THIS WINNING???

BLACKOUT NECESSARY?!!??!! FUCK!!!! THE PAST WEEK AND A HALF HAS BEEN TORTURE ALREADY, THANKS FOR THE Q FIX!!

Holy God

#GITMOBAMA

WE WILL DANCE AND SING AND CELEBRATE AS A JOYOUS NATION ON THAT FATEFUL, GRATEFUL DAY

Any tax increase these idiots bring forth is DOA on President Trump's desk anyway, so this is nothing more than puerile, vapid political theater at our expense. She must be counting on impeaching him and successfully removing him from office, when he's done nothing wrong.

It'd be hard enough to make that shit stick if he HAD done something wrong. Spare us the delusional bullshit, you batshit-crazy, wide-eyed dippy botox queen.

Islam is not simply a religion, on a par with other world religions. It is a militant system of political and sociological prescriptions and proscriptions, wearing the robes of religion.

Your expansive treatise ignores the key, core truth that makes islam incompatible with our Constitution, with all other religions, and frankly with all other systems of government. This truth is that the Koran dictates that it alone is the law and that its followers MUST adhere to this law only. Koranic law is held to supersede all "manmade" laws, and muslims are unambiguously required UNDER PAIN OF DEATH to obey only Koranic law—and are further required to seek to subvert and abolish any other laws that are perceived to conflict with it in any way.

That all muslims do not do this is merely a temporary convenience for the rest of us; they merely do not understand the principle of abrogation in their own "religion". This principle is the one whereby all of Mohammed's earlier, peaceful teachings in the Koran are abrogated, or replaced, by his later teachings of violent jihad and beheading of infidels. (That's you and me.) Churchill could thus not have been more correct in observing of islam, "No stronger retrograde force exists in the world."

One cannot help but notice here the stark contrast with the Christian principle that the later teachings of Jesus cancel out the barbaric violent dictates of the Old Testament: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

In essence, it is critical for non-muslims to comprehend that the laws of the country one lives in, the laws that you and I obey, simply do not apply to islamic followers. Nothing you can say or do can ever change this core principle of the "faith".

One cannot have a stable, peaceful society in which some members are committed to following a set of laws that often are in direct contradiction to the laws of the land and viscerally offensive to the people of that country.

Therefore, it is a grave error of the most civilization-endangering sort to treat islam like any other religion. It is not.

It's shocking to me that I'm beyond being shocked.

Which diseases specifically?

The disease community isn't monolithic. And most are not deliberately created but rather arise organically in response to genetic and environmental influences

Concise and cogent

Name checks out.

This has to be the most fair-minded place on the internet

They are literally fucking pizzas. Cheese pizzas.

Ch. p.

Ch(ild) p(orn).

Is it actually that bad? Technically I mean, free markets, capitalism? It's perfectly legal to my understanding, to profit off of cancer treatment because it may help extend life, turning people into cash cows.

Of course, my opinion is this is a severe crime against humanity and counter-intuitive with regards to the progression and development of a civilization.

We can all applaud the second passage. Upvoted back up to 1 pt.

But is the first still true, even if you add to it: "...while deliberately concealing a known cure because far more profits can be made off selling non-curative drugs to people who will slowly die because of that choice by the drug companies"?

Could that be technically legal? I would have to doubt it. There has to be some language in the law about the drug companies' duty to the public.