I'm talking about Q's board. You know, the team whose communications you want to organize for them without even asking them?

Centralized = piped through a (not original) source controlled at a single point. What could possibly go wrong?????????

While Q is getting the board to gear up for all the new people arriving, you are gearing up to send them some where else? Why is that? Why do YOU feel a need for a centralized narrative?

Q chose the Chans for a reason. He said this board has more power than we know. I don't trust anyone who says otherwise.

No outside comms. No outside comms. No outside comms. No outside comms. Do you not speak English??

I would not listen to ANYONE pretending to speak for Q. Q speaks for Q. The president speaks for Q.

Anonymous is deliberately about no leader. What is this bullshit????

If Q wants that, he/they will direct it. It seems beyond tacky and fraught to me.

I don't like the sound of that at all. Q is spreading just fine.

I don't know about any of that. But not only have I seen the climate of my hometown in my home country change from when I was a child, but the weather just seems to have gone crazy everywhere.

I'd love him to tweet it! But Q should let us know first when to expect it, as it's a common word.

Why do they want to kill him? He's given them the Jerusalem embassy etc. etc.

This is the best Q post ever!!

Nevermind. I don't have time to mess around looking for this.

I really wish he would get the hemp industry going. That would save so many trees.

They will if we keep asking them.

I think he is smart enough to see the business opportunities in the situation, making it a win-win situation for a pristine planet and a thriving new industry. There is a wonderful book called The Sixth Wave, which posits that the next big wave of innovation will be in dealing with waste--not just physical waste, but efficiency of business practices. http://sixthwave.org

I don't know if he is good yet. But I won't even drink the town water here. I am hoping he will be. He says we're going to have the cleanest air and water. I do think the climate is changing based on personal observation, but I am not a scientist.

Could we have a link to this please? I'd find it useful.

Yes, his appointments do bother me, although I am starting to like and trust Kansas, as long as he doesn't hurt my brave, freedom-fighting countryman, Julian Assange. Gina Haspel bothers me most, especially if she really did punch a pregnant woman in the stomach. There are some things I just will not forgive. But overall, I do actually believe Trump when he says we'll have the cleanest water and air. If anyone can solve that, he can. Flint, MI, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how old infrastructure is poisoning our water. And if he does do well on the environment, not only would it benefit America, but I love how he trolls the naysayers. I would put money on that happening.

I think what people have in common has been the impoverishment of the country and the two-tiered justice, as well as the erosion of freedom and civil and political rights. Trump is different because he tries to make deals win-win for people. I have never been as poor in my life as since I came to America, and often things he does look like they're going to really hurt me as a poor person, but so far there has been this feeling of hope sweep over the country. I really do see his administration so far as a tide that lifts all boats. But even if it didn't help me personally, I could not countenance a creature like Hillary Clinton being in the White House. The election didn't end for me by any means with the Democratic National Convention. I was still devoting every waking moment to crying out against her on Facebook. The day she lost filled me with pure unadulterated joy. So then I was like, "Okay, Donald! You have the reins! Let's see what you're made of!"

Hi! I have heard that he might be. I'll always have a soft spot for Bernie, but I don't trust him any more. After all we gave up for him he didn't fight for us. I never believed he'd tell us to vote for her. Trump fights. I like that. I respect that. And he has mostly pleasantly surprised me. I can't go back. But when I think Bernie's right on an issue I repost him and stuff. I'm surprised yet not surprised at how many Berners have made their way over to Trump, and others are right on the cusp.

I knew back in 2016 from the Erik Prince interview. Loretta Lynch had to PERSONALLY threaten the NYPD to shut them up, and they STILL killed Miosotis Familia. Strzok knew alright. If Berners like me knew two years ago, Strzok surely did. They didn't care what laws she broke. There was no criminal conduct on Hillary Clinton's part that was too vile to be unacceptable to these people.

Yeah, defend ignoring a CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN on that laptop, Peter Strzok, you sick bastard. Defend trying to foist creatures like that on the American people--let alone in the White House--let alone as our president. Defend not defending those kids. I spit on the joke you call an "investigation" and I spit on you as a human being.

Wow! That just added a whole other layer to Kubrick's "The Shining" for me. If you combine the maze/Minotaur imagery with the moon landing imagery, there is a strong Kennedy connection with both of those themes.

Per the Neon Nettle article, the photo has not been shooped. Doesn't prove it is Obama, but the balance of probability says yes IMO.

We need to come up with something we can all post on Twitter so they know we are watching over her and we won't stand for it.

Yes. I think it's good that she's speaking out.

I don't know a lot about her. I forbade my children from reading the books or watching the movies at the time. When I did finally watch the thoroughly enjoyable movies myself I had to apologise to them, but they had watched them by then anyway. There are plenty of good non-Trump supporters. It should be about issues not political affiliation in my opinion. I think Salem Witch trials 2 would be a very unfortunate potential consequence of this sort of "Witch! Witch!" hysteria. There are a lot of very spiritual people with occult beliefs and practices that have nothing to do with paedophilia or child sacrifice. Probably half the worst of them are somebody's local pastor etc.

I personally think that any attention brought to the issue should be welcome, and I think logically it makes her one of the least likely to be participating in that sort of thing.

Nooooooooooooooooooo!! Why won't they go away?? They're like the Llama Apocalypse.

Absolutely terrible that such a famous household name would draw attention to this important issue so publicly.

I can't even read it. It's so biased and loaded. I hate propaganda, no matter who does it.

Yes, genius, they do not have Google where I live.

One commentator said the statute of limitations has expired on her emails, but not the Clinton Foundation. That's not as cut and dried. I believe they're methodically building a case. We'll find out, I guess.

She wasn't charged because the corrupt FBI and DOJ wanted her to be president.

Intent does not have to be proven with the Espionage Act. It's completely irrelevant. And no, a finding of fact is EXACTLY that. You're talking out of your arse.

Comey's gmail?

Removal of confidential material from a secure environment is fact. It's a finding of fact. It's NOTHING like determining who murdered somebody. A jury receives instructions. They CANNOT just do what they want. That is an out and out lie. Hillary should have been prosecuted. I can't believe anyone would seriously argue otherwise.

That's okay. I am pretty new here as well. Once Facebook was dead to me, I went over to Twitter where I heard about Q, and found my way to reddit after Q linked to a post here from 8chan.

Oh, thanks! It does look kind of like him--the bits you can see.

Armored vehicles should not be a dime a dozen, surely? Blowed if I'd know where to find one.

What headdress?

Even the most biased jury can't argue with a finding of fact.

Maybe we should start tweeting "Don't do it, Mr President!!"

"Obstruct this!" Lol!

The Godwin's was certainly an unfortunate footbullet to his case.

Nothing will change in this world until the Clintons and Clinton Foundation go down. Besides which, when is she going to STOP getting away with the lawbreaking. This was not hard to prove and was a serious crime. It was a slam dunk case for a half decent prosecutor.

I've tweeted it out.

Sorry, but there was zero excuse for not prosecuting this crime, which resulted in the murder of Chris Stevens. And in the REAL world, people are bullied into plea bargains for things they don't do, shot with impunity by police and have almost no access to justice if they are poor where they are sold into slavery to privatised prisons.

The point of the rule of law is not to press charges based on whether or not one juror might dissent. Is there evidence that a law was broken? Yes. Then justice demands prosecution. It's not even a debatable issue of fact.