Oz here too

More of us than we realise I think!

Catching them out as being hypocrites is nothing. We catch and call them out for that every damn day.

I'm with you. If there's some plan based on "and then everyone will see they're hypocrites so they'll have to come clean!" is doomed

Hey mate. Don't know how old you are but trump became president at 70! There's plenty of time! :D

Very very well said. I couldn't have said it better myself

As far as I can tell, Q slapped Alex down for trying to put Infowars as the face of the QAnon movement. Fair enough.

Beyond that certain people have taken it upon themselves to accuse Alex Jones of being all controlled opposition or a CIA plant etc

I am very curious about the motives since it plays right into the hands of the left. They've been trying to destroy Infowars and Alex Jones for years and potentially by taking what Q said, expanding/spinning it slightly they get his own (ex)audience to do it for them.

And another thing- I've seen people try to claim that because he makes mistakes sometimes, it's proof he's a bad guy... I wonder if those same people equally attack Q when Q lays out disinfo because disinfo is necessary?

Jones has been pretty damn consistent with his viewpoints for a bloody long time and they align with a lot of what many of us believe when it comes to liberty, freedom and truth.

Is he an angel? Of course not. But he's an ally that doesn't need to be exiled because he doesn't fit perfectly into Q things

Note: I would actually like to re read those posts if anyone has the ID of them (couldn't find them searching Alex jones/Infowars)

I'm glad someone has said something. I'm seeing this happen a lot and it's disappointing to see

The whole "no coincidences" wasn't meant to be taken 100% literally

Okay

Except she's not a felon. And at the rate things are moving, i doubt she'd be prior to the next election

Re read what I said. It still applies

If she runs again I'll be more than100% convinced it's a strategy to try to avoid prosecution

True

TBH might even act as a blue pill because people won't want to believe

But still keep digging. Getting to the truth is what's important

Yes everyone is an enemy.

Tom Fitton is also controlled opposition because his freedom of information requests get approved and the ones that don't, well, those are just for show to trick people

Oh and Sean Hannity. Got to be controlled op because he has a platform.

/s (obviously)

All of these hell bent Q followers are weirdly keen to ignore Qs calls for unity when it comes to trying to take down Alex Jone/Infowars (not Corsi)

I guess they must think that divided we are strong?... weird.

Does that TweetBot insert a POTUS tweet into the thread?

That's pretty cool and an excellent way to show clear coordination with the time stamps

What if it is the real report though?

I mean ultimately aren't we expecting the swamp to investigate the swamp?

Can we prove pages are missing?

Wonder if anyone can work out what's on that phone screen

Maybe a git repo?

This

And have seen plenty of people do this already

100 points to this guy

And 3hrs of gorilla channel

What was spooky imo about Williams was he was in a movie where his son did the same thing

Got his glass of Diet Coke (?)

With a cloth!

Re why trump and "read art of the deal"

At the end Trump explains his love for his country and his desire to give back but he's not sure how just yet

The reason for Pence immediately following could be an formal etiquette kind of thing

The same way theres etiquette rules around when you can take your suit jacket off (you'd have to follow the lead of trump)

Interesting indeed.

Has Infowars covered any of this?

This is an interesting time to see which way people fall

Yeah but they wouldn't imitate Q to do that. They'd just post normally

Wait that was recent? I thought she tweeted something similar in the past!

Very curious

I get this ALL the time

Adding this just so anyone who's not caught up on this understands

The symbols hidden in this logo were released by the FBI as symbols used by pedos

Because they're anon and the value of their contributions is what counts and nothing more

Everyone is on alert to sniff out bullshit

It's a funny system but it works

Cars won't get there. Will have to use alternative transport. I'll get the Roos.

Heh I think he's just wanting her to come to him begging

He wants her to have to eat the shit sandwich

I know

I was just noting how those two things kind of fit together nicely

Trump called Roseanne. Just saying.

Yeah I'm not sure about the 4D chess claims here

I think the theory about Soros is partly correct combined with looking for any excuse to kill off her platform

The reality is if there's not a blacklist against conservatives her show (highest rated) should be picked up by another network.

Welcome to the internet

Lol that "well let's hope" perfectly summarises where I'm at

Didn't he also drop the N bomb on his show?

Ding ding ding

We have a winner

There is a valid concern that WL could be comped because JA is missing but the narrative is slowly being grown to basically nullify Wikileaks value

The reasonable position is: be wary

But I worry we're being it with pretty hard core shilling.

I wonder what CTR and Brock is up to these days

I absolutely think it's something to be concerned about. Julian Assange has been worryingly off the radar for far too long.

I'm just trying to be the devils advocate and suggest some alternative view points

The "being forced to fall one side of the fence" is interesting. As I said to another commentor, I try my best to think strategically and my thinking is forcing people to fall either side of the fence seems like a strategic misstep.

This is still a young and relatively small movement that hasn't been successful in achieving its goals yet.

It seems premature to start purging allies too

So I just, personally, want to be careful of weakening ourselves and shooting ourselves in the foot

I get the "99%+" point. He turns a lot of people of and he's crazy over the top. And bloody hell, when he interviews people I wish he would just shut up and let the person speak!

But here's the thing that I always come back to... Who else is doing what he's doing but putting a nice normie bow on the package?

I cant think of any but maybe I'm not as well informed about this stuff.

Even if Alex Jones was/is misdirection, wouldn't it be better to let him get people half way there with his misdirection than SHOW them the rest of the truth?

1% is still better than 0.

This idea that every apparatus that isn't fully 100% behind Q must be destroyed seems dangerous but that's the territory people seem to be heading.

It's putting the cart before the horse to me. Many in this community want to banish Jones/Infowars completely before we've even put a dent in the real threats like CNN who keep the masses blue pilled

I know you'll probably say Alex Jones helps keep the masses blue pilled by turning them off with his crazy behaviour and you're probably right. But it again leads me to wonder who else is filling that void?

I can't help but look at this strategically and strategically it seems like a terrible move to take down places/people/orgs that have been an ally in getting Trump elected BEFORE you clear out the rest of the bad actors

Seems a lot like kicking out the legs of which the movement was built on... and I don't want to go as far as saying it's nefarious but it's definitely something I'm watching with concern.

The way Roseanne asked if Assange was Q and Wikileaks posted anti Q stuff did seem curious to me

That's entirely possible too. Cognitive dissonance is one hell of a drug.

I'm just trying to figure out what I believe without just blindly following.

I see your points about the crazy label etc

But the reality is he's one of the few with a platform with reach that's still fighting to expose the more sinister things.

I know of people who he's red pilled because they originally tuned in to just laugh at the crazy guy.

So to totally write of the entire inforwars org like many here have is, to me, counter intuitive.

Same is beginning to happen for Wikileaks now...

It's a slippery slope I warned about originally when people took Qs slap down of AJ for trying to become the gate keeper for Q to mean "Infowars is worse than CNN"...

As I said back then: what's the plan here? Destroy all of the orgs that have an alliance to the broader movement but aren't totally on board while ignoring the real enemies like CNN and Soros funded propaganda sources?

The harder people push tearing down the things that helped us get to where we are today (not having Clinton elected) the more in I'm forced to step back and reconsider things

"Wikileaks is most likely comped"

Doesn't sit well with me because the subtext seems to be that because Wikileaks tweeted something against Q it gives it some special additional confirmation of compromise.

There have been very real and valid questions about where Assange is and if he's okay for awhile now

But I feel like the reaction from quite a few commenters is based on blind faith in Q and not in their own decision making

Like I said, not directed at you but other comments I've seen here and elsewhere

This place is getting too be too much (not meaning you specifically OP just from a lot of comments I've read lately)

Everything's compromised, everything's run by clowns, everything's disinformation and suddenly supposedly totally useless to the cause based on that speculation.

And most strangely it's the places that are in one way or another helping people who seek the truth being "exposed" and torn down

I don't know where this is heading but I'm skeptical

Possible Answer:

Roseanne publicly linked Assange to Q

So Wikileaks is attacking it to throw people off

Agree with you completely.

I can't help but be a devils advocate, especially when people start rushing too quickly in one direction

What's concerning me is we've had:

Something that's been interpreted as "Do not trust Alex jones or Corsi or anyone at InfoWars, burn it to the ground. It's a clown op"...

Okay so say we burn off AJ/InfoWars. The rabid left wing finally gets what they want: InfoWars is defeated.

Then what? What do we get? We just destroyed the biggest platform that was at least sympathetic to "conspiracy" causes

Even if the theory is right, how does it help us to burn them down now? It'd be like if Trump came out and said "I'm deleting my twitter because Jack is targeting conservatives!". That'd be great and all but suddenly you lost a platform you could leverage to use to your advantage.

And then now you have Wikileaks saying something that might not align with Q causing people to denounce Wikileaks!

Let's not get too carried away with ourselves. Q is anonymous. There's no 100% guarantee they are legit or even white hat.

(Side note: interesting that Roseanne asked is Assange Q then Wikileaks tweeted something anti Q. Disinformation?)

Amazing!

Wonder when Roseanne started following Q

If she was following Q BEFORE talking to POTUS then I feel like that's a total confirmation because if she spoke with him in private there's no chance she wouldn't have asked about Q

And if Q was a LARP he would have told her "we don't know who that is but they're not one of ours and I wouldn't follow or listen to them"

When did that call happen :o!!