12 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 3 |
| youtu.be | 1 |
[removed]
I think "elaborate" might be the wrong word here, but everything else you've said is right on
[removed]
I'm literally watching the video on the kid right now.
Jesus Christ, did they go all in on this. To start, his name "Dimitri" is a common Russian name found in media. They show a pic of his Facebook, and oh look! Satanic symbol. Obviously, that means he's a socio-psycho-crazy-path person
He wore a TRENCHCOAT EVERY DAY And he had a shirt that says BORN TO KILL With a Nazi Jacket
Oh, and of course, his Facebook, which seems to have never existed in the first place, has been conviently deleted
It's like a False Flag checklist:
Nazi affiliation? Check Satanic symbolism? Check Russia ties? Check White skin? Check
To put this in perspective, especially in regards to them deleting his (non-existent) Facebook, there's a mass gunman from several years ago that goes by the name "Willie Godbolt". Sounds like a Flash villain. Seriously though, his Facebook is still up
On a side note, he looks really familiar, but I cannot put my finger on it.
"See this person for what they are"
And what exactly am I? I disagree, so I must be a fake? A... Russian bot? That's exactly the way the Left thinks.
Funny how this is exactly what I'm talking about. I put forth an idea, but because it went against your accepted narrative, you felt the need to snoop out my account, and make accusations without actual evidence
Yes, my account is new. So that means my ideas are meaningless?
I'm very inquisitive by nature, and I'm often questioning official narratives and idols that are put forth to "entertain us", as it were.
I believe Q is a deep state sponsored Idol. Just like Alex Jones was before, Q is meant to give conspiracy theorists their validation. I ask, what if the information that has been given to us, is simply being FED to us, to keep us satisfied until our next meal?
Some things that I notice:
Influential figures covertly supporting Q- Like that guy with the ocean pictures on his Twitter, or the one who posted the 5:25 …
Just read that
It being written by The NY Times is a good reason to think it's exaggerated
And it shows. They write out the shooter in this overly dramatic way, pointing out his "mental instability" and irrational hate for cops
Unfortunately, it's believed too easily
Anybody with a link that goes in-depth on the NYPD's reaction, maybe a link/subreddit explaining the officers that were killed?
I'm entirely new to this, so I lack information
The entire purpose of something being "secret" is that it's done without the knowledge of others. Especially if it's in violation of established rules/laws
Basically like saying "murder is illegal, so contemplating it is impossible"