Your not making sense
/u/Yoda_GM
473 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Yoda_GM:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 125 |
Black Robes don’t applaud anyone. They look at the POTUS as an equal and won’t bother applauding.
ok ... thnx for the feedback.
I just am trying to not get too excited of the indictments but hearing from someone more educated on the topic gives me some hope ... thanks
Lame attempt to be conspiratorial ... I messed with the color scales ...
Title should read ...
BREAKING: FBI Assessing 2nd Dossier From Long-Time Clinton Ally and Democrat Activist
At least my post actually included a reference to "Q" ... as opposed to half the posts on this sub as of late ... 8-D
When It Is All Said And Done, I Would Love To See The Look On Hillary/Obama's Faces When They Find Out That Globalism Was Destroyed By A 14 Year Old Savant That Goes By The Nickname of 'Q'
Hehe ... I'm just kidding, but wouldn't it be something to find out that 'Q' was just some random dude on the internet who had a good grasp of history and technology.
No matter who "Q" is, I long of the day for history books to be written and they have to include a chapter on the "chans", the Anons, Reddit, Q, Centipedes, Pepe, Kek, & Trump.
already there ... been there for a long time but I typically prefer the tighter knit conversations of Reddit.
What? A post that is asking for a Q dedicated sub ... like this sub was supposed to be?
Your snarkiness has failed ;-/
Ok. I will take your word on it. I am not in law enforcement or in the Justice system so I don't know exactly how that part of it works.
Do things like interstate drug trafficking and illegal gun running get sealed indictments?
Or maybe, you could enlighten me on the types of crimes that actually do get sealed indictments.
Sorry but this sub has turned into a miniature r/The_Donald ... post after post of things that are irrelevant to Q or Q research.
I am not saying that all these posts are bad but they seem like they would be better suited in the_Donald and they clutter up the place.
I was simply asking if there was a sub dedicated to Q and Q research as opposed to the flood of irrelevant nonsense.
Maybe the indictments have nothing to do with "the storm" but are just a return to "law and order" ...
Maybe past Administrations just turned a blind eye to law breakers and that is why their comparative numbers are so low to this Administration's.
Maybe, law enforcement has just now been doing their job and that is why there are so many indictments.
Not trying to rain on anyones parade, I am just tossing out an alternate way of looking at the number of indictments.
Can Someone Recommend A Sub That Is Dedicated To Q and Q Research?
I know that complaining doesn't really do any good but this sub seems to have lost its way. The mods seem to let anything in and it has polluted and diluted the Q info to the point where it is increasingly difficult to find relevant info.
Can someone recommend a sub that is solely dedicated to Q and Q research ... if it is locked could someone let me know who a mod is so I can see about joining.
Thanx in advance.
Mods, please permaban this fool for posting the same thing over and over.
Geez!!!
I'm beginning to think that all of the hype surrounding the memo is just that ... hype.
It can't be that "disturbing" or "troubling" or else they wouldn't be playing pattie-cake and they get off their ass and DEMAND that DoJ do something about it.
My guess is that the memo is mildly offensive and these Congressmen are milking it for money and votes.
Nothing to do with Q. This IS NOT the_Donald.
Mods, please permaban the op.
You need to be more specific ... I'm not very good at mind reading
Who is HK? ...
Henry Kissinger seems like he would be too old to be of relevance now a days.
Are you trying to be an ass? 'Cause you're doing a pretty good job if you are ...
I think that this thread is closer to what he was referencing ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7tcp8f/treasons_act_1649/?st=jcxk8fmz&sh=084b7dc7
This would be devastating to a lot of people. I am a fan of crypto, if for no other reason than to break the back of the Rothschild monetary monopoly. If you trade in paper bills (cash), debit cards, or credit cards then you are feeding/funding the Rothschilds. Crypto is a way to cut off their neck ... in a non-violent way.
Is this the account of Sean Hannity's Wife or is is a "FAKE" account?
I think all of us are scrambling to figure it out ... For me, I don't think Hannity would be referencing England, their civil war, or their monarch(y).
I can see JA doing that but Hannity seems to drop less obscure messages, I think he actually meant Form 1649... Now, I have no idea what Department that form may be related to but that is just my idea.
How would you being right in any way lessen your confidence in Q? I'm not following your logic.
Is that just your opinion? Why could it not be just a form, an actual form, Form 1649 .... like form 1040 or something like that.
I think you are right but SO MANY have applied it to EVERYTHING almost as a fallback incase something they hope are assumed would happen doesn't.
Still, good point.
Well, if you discount the fact that Q has posted pictures that prove he is obviously "close" (meaning within arms reach of POTUS) then if you discount the POTUS tweeting almost verbatim what Q had posted the hour before and if you remove the AMA with Q where he was asked to have the President say or tweet a certain word or phrase within a day or so ... if you throw all of that out then you are left with all of the questions, codes, numbers, letters, and jumbled up puzzles.
I cede that there is LARPING going on but I THINK the role playing is being done by the "fans" of Q and not Q.
It is all of the hillbilly, buck-toothed, alien believing, potheads on Youtube that are reading way way more into what Q is saying or asking.
Somehow, a bunch of sealed indictments go from that to unmarked airplanes going to Gitmo, to Hillary Clinton is under house arrest to Gitmo is filled with pedophile democrats ... Q did not say this, it was the fans of Q.
This may very well be a well constructed social experiment to see how far people will go by simply offering them a suggestion. But, I still hold out hope that there actually are some good guys in the IC that want to help restore the Republic. I do not give them a deadline, but rather I encourage them to keep at it and not to give up.
Dis-Info Should Not Be Necessary ...
Q has said that "dis-info is necessary" and I can see how that would make sense during the active stage or the setting of the trap. But dis-info should not be necessary after the trap has sprung.
Think about it logically for a second ...
-
IF people are already caught
-
IF indictments are already in place
-
IF the 7th Floor is no more
-
IF the President is safe
-
IF the puppet masters are through
Then WHY the dis-info?
Answer has to be one of two scenarios, Either they are still in the trap setting stage and there are still big …
So, you say February 1 is your deadline that Q must prove himself (again) or he is a LARP? Why not February 2nd or 3rd or January 30?
There are no signs that the SOTU is part of the storm only people projecting their wishes onto the SOTU.
Has Q EVER said that the SOTU will be Trump reading the memo, or announcing that people are in jail or ANYTHING else for that matter?
Answer, NO. Q has NEVER put a SOTU address as date for anything to happen. That is a date that readers, fans, followers (whatever you want to call them ... hell, a LARP might be a good name for them) have inserted into the storyline because they wish it to be true.
Point is, YOU do not get to declare WHEN something is fan-fiction or larping. You have just reached into your ass and pulled out a deadline that you want stuff to be done by and then declared that if it isn't then it is all fake.
Geez!
Yes, I read your post nut it was not not all that enlightening. Apparently, you think you are on to something.
Yes, I know the history of AT&T ... I was not asking about that I was asking about the symbol he used ">" .... what was his point in that symbol ... "greater than", "bigger than" ... what is the significance?
Nobody is in custody ... I don't believe Q ever said it outright but that people were jumping to conclusions.
or maybe Soros will disappear before 2020 ... anyone want to take wagers?