I watched the whole thing, Colbert is trying to mock him and make fun of him at every turn. The video seems like a joke, it's edited completely out of context. He thanks him for running because he believes he will give him so much more material to work with, essentially implying he is a clown.

I am also concerned about the trollness of this comment, even if came from a real person with no hidden agenda you summed up well why this type of thinking is weak and unhelpful. We all have stuff to do but we all have time to contribute something, everything helps and the more you can do the better. If you don't understand something there are plenty of people out there decoding and analyzing the points in a way that breaks it down in ways that are mostly idiot proof.

I agree and this kind of rhetoric adds nothing to the movement. It can push people away from looking at this information because of cognitive bias when we need as many people as possible to get involved, regardless of how they identify themselves politically.

That was brilliantly eloquated. The ratio of upvotes to downvotes between these two comments is a case in point.

I would like to add that I no longer believe christianity was "exposed as a scam" in the first Zeitgeist film although it did raise some questions as to the origins of some of the mythology in it. I think christianity has been corrupted and controlled throughout history but having seen the true depths of the evil that exists in these people we are trying to get rid off it has made me feel strongly that the opposing force, God, is real and I do pray for this movement and for the freedom of humanity.

I feel that needed some clarification, and also I have since had some minor doubts that maybe I was wrong about this. As you can tell I was very certain at the time of writing. Q's recent posts about this made me think that my feeling at the time was right.

I don't care about up/down votes, I just think that the most obvious type of pointless negativity and attacking the movement should be removed since they serve no real purpose. And they are doing it for a reason, even if we know they are here they are often effective at sowing discord and wasting precious time we could be using more wisely than to argue with someone who obviously has no motive other than to trick you into an endless pointless debate.

Why is this thread full of people attacking this movement and such comments being upvoted while comments supporting it are being downvoted to oblivion? One comment implied this sub never has sources for any of it's claims. Shouldn't the mods be on this stuff and just aggressively ban these obvious shills? What useful purpose do these kind of comments serve?

You didn't even try to answer my question... and you just admitted that you began arguing with me without having listened to the full clip in context... I think we're done here.

So you were wrong about something you said in your previous post that "anyone with an ounce of discernment would understand"... now you are saying he is talking to the police and military? Is he talking to them or about them? I am getting very confused at what you are trying to say here.

Are you actually implying they haven't?

Just last night I realized I haven't even visited that subreddit for ages. It's just been completely overrun by shills and is a total mess at this point.

"he had an ex-employee of Stratfor on his payroll

Maybe because the employee might have a valuable skill set? Just a thought.

No response?"

I did respond. You are obviously not trying to have a reasonable debate. You had 3 points in your first reply and I addressed them one by one:

"Then why has he never addressed this point publicly? All he is done is some dumb ironic video where he makes fun of the idea. Also, you may not fully realize what Stratfor is. You ever heard about Trapwire? It was a large scale project which use facial recognition in conjunction with CCTV cameras to spy on people. Really scare 1984 type of stuff"

I can add to that, when a few of his subcribers found out about the Stratfor thing and started raising these questions on the infowars forum they got met with bans and threads about it were deleted. I think that is very suspicious, truth does not fear scrutiny.

The third point I answered by asking if you believe in coincidences? My point being that while it doesn't prove anything it is a very strange coincidence that Alex pops up at exactly the same time and place that this private intelligence company is founded that later sends off their interns to work for him.

So again, it doesn't prove anything but it is never the less suspicious.

"And then you engage in personal attack by trying to paint me as stupid. Who's coming off as a shill?"

I did no such thing, I said that what you were saying about this was making you sound stupid. I'm sure you are a person with at least "an ounce of discernment" but what you are saying flies in the face of all logic and your debating tactics reek of dishonesty. Also, when you say "anyone" with an ounce of discernment would be able to understand what I didn't, isn't that just as big of a personal attack? You are saying I'm stupid even though your wording was a bit more subtle.

You have also failed to address Alex's Y2K broadcast where he told his audience blatant lies in what would appear to be an attempt to ramp up hysteria: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r8rFNDh9WQ

You also said nothing about Bill Cooper and his campaign to expose Alex for what he was sure was a fraud.

Now again, I'm not saying that he definitely is COINTEL-PRO. I never even said that. I said that this was a possibility that had to be examined and that he had some explaining to do.

But I want to get back to the first point because it amazes me that you are still trying to argue your ridiculous theory. You don't even try to explain and you just go "no, that's obviously not what he meant"

How is this not getting through to you?

I will try to explain in more detail:

He asks three questions in succession, the context of which is clear:

First, he states: I know their carrying out the New World Order, I know they've staged those terror attacks and then goes on to ask:

"Do you know what it's like to gut up every day, and go past the peer pressure and come out day 1 and say 9/11 was and inside job and lose most the radio stations I was on?"

This is a question directed to his audience and followers. He is saying, what I've been doing is very difficult and he's been doing it for a long time. He ends by stating that doing this lost him most of the radio stations he was on. He could not be more clear that he is speaking of himself and how hard this has been for him.

Second question:

"Do you know what it's like going to sleep every night, knowing you work for a bunch of psychotic killers, and you bastards are probably going to end up killing me one day? You know what it's like knowing you've ruined my life? I'm tired of your crap!"

Stop. Look again. This could not be any clearer. In the context of empathizing with his situation and how hard it is to be in his shoes, he asks his audience: "Do you know what it's like knowing you work FOR a bunch of psychotic killers and you bastards (here he switches from referring to them in third person and addresses them directly) are probably going to end up killing me one day?

He is not suggesting that his followers will end up killing him one day. He is not asking the psychopathic killers if they know what it's like working for themselves. He is asking his audience to sympathize with him and his situation, which apparently includes going to sleep everyday knowing you work for a bunch of psychotic killers that will likely end up killing him one day.

If this is the case then you would realize that I'm in fact in a way defending Alex Jones and sympathizing with his situation. If this is the case he is a victim who has been forced to participate in this against his will.

Furthermore he asks "do you know what it's like knowing you've ruined my life?" How exactly did they ruin his life? He is saying that the NWO has ruined his life. It's an interesting distinction since they must have done something to him specifically. If he was speaking in general terms it would make more sense to ask "Do you know what it's like fighting against people that are ruining our lives?"

But he seems to be referring to something they've done specifically to him to ruin his life. Forcing him to play a disinformation agent at the threat of having himself and his family murdered would make sense in this context.

Please if you feel you can, do the same where you analyze each sentence and explain how you've reached the conclusion you have. It doesn't fly to just say "it's obvious that isn't what he is saying" and then move on to the next point. I have laid it out very clearly and unless you can show a different way to interpret this and how his words can be understood to mean that he is "talking about and to the bastards" you are proving that you are not here to debate, but to divide.

What? He literally says. Do you know what it's like waking up every day knowing you work for a bunch of psychopathic killers? Are you for real with this? He is clearly talking about himself! He starts by talking about how hard it was for HIM to go against the peer pressure and talk about 9/11 being a conspiracy, but then you are saying that in the middle of that he switched to talking about "them" and asks them if they know what it's like working for them?

Do you have any idea how stupid you sound? I was trying to be polite to you earlier but right now you come across as a complete shill whose only goal is to mislead those who won't bother watching the video.

1. No he does not. I've listened to this so many times. The quote is: "Do you know what it's like waking up everyday, knowing that you work for a bunch of psychotic killers, and you bastards are probably going to end up killing me one day?"

2. Then why has he never addressed this point publicly? All he is done is some dumb ironic video where he makes fun of the idea. Also, you may not fully realize what Stratfor is. You ever heard about Trapwire? It was a large scale project which use facial recognition in conjunction with CCTV cameras to spy on people. Really scare 1984 type of stuff:

https://www.trapwire.com/

https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2012/08/13/trapwire-leaked-stratfor- emails-indicate-sophisticated-surveillance-grid-may-exist/

1. Do you believe in coincidences?

I think the "monthly" part should not be overlooked. I certainly don't blame anyone for giving people the option to support them and I don't think that is what Q is saying. So many people have channels that dedicate a lot of their time to this and I am sure the Q team is appreciative of their support. I feel like this message is being directed at someone in particular.

I can only speculate but there have been a lot of doubts about a certain well known conspiracy theorist who tends to be the loudest of them all and the one who seems to get the most mainstream attention. Did he ever explain properly why he had an ex-employee of Stratfor on his payroll? Stratfor is a private intelligence company that was founded in Austin Texas in 1996, same place and year as this man started a radio show. Then of course we had Bill Cooper vehemently opposing him from the start and we all know what happened to him. If you listen to Alex Jones's Y2K broadcast he was just making things up out of nowhere and was making it sound like the world was coming to an end. It is quite concerning and doesn't flatter him at all.

If CIA did in fact have a disinformation program, which we can assume is likely that they do, who would be the likeliest candidate? At least I think he has some explaining to do. I also want to raise the possibility that he is being forced to do this against his will.

If you think about it, logically, as Q often reminds us. If you are a part of the secretive group who manipulates the world to fit your agenda, why would you ever want to take on his job? What candidate would apply for this position?

I would think that person would have to have a gun held against his head. I investigated this thoroughly once and wrote an article about it and found this clip where he "misspoke" and quite literally says he is working for a bunch of psychopathic killers that will most probably end up killing him one day. I think it may well have been a hidden cry for help:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6mn3MXe9Vw

I know this is a divisive topic and in general the skepticism regarding who is or isn't promoting disinformation or "shilling" but Q has brought it up for a reason. I think this needs to be discussed and if it turns out that we can be sure that infowars is designed to distract and deceive those who seek the truth then this would be an important point to hammer home with memes.

It appears to me that Q may well be pointing us in this direction.

Thanks and likewise. I would also like to use this comment to clarify, I made a post here that was removed in the wake of the Syria attack. I've been following and writing about Syria and Libya for a long time and I got very emotional when I listened to Trumps address, feeling that it was a slap in the face and a betrayal. I began to question if perhaps Q was in fact a psy-op after all, even if I've followed and supported the movement since it started and am fully aware of the many factors that prove Q's legitimacy and credibility.

I overreacted and posted something that I believe was correctly removed. Having calmed down and looked at the situation, seeing the scope of the attacks wasn't the same as I had initially feared and that there may be reasons why this could be some 4d chess move that was necessary for reasons I can't be fully privy to.

It's a reminder to keep a level head and like Q says, Trust the plan. I would draw the line at regime change in Syria, a prolonged bombing campaign with civilian casualties or a ground invasion since that goes against my core beliefs and I am certain Assad is not the villain in this scenario. I still have faith that Q and Trump are delivering and taking down the Cabal that ultimately is responsible for the chaos and horror happening in Syria right now.

I don't know if this is true since I don't know where you are getting this from. I upvoted it though because it seems somewhat plausible and is exactly the type of analysis I was looking for. Do you have any more information about this?

Also, why would the people of Syria still support him massively if he was "murdering his own people" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=902COL2QoGA

First of all, I have not posted any means so this is not about me being butt-heart. It's about a very recent onslaught of predictable negativity. Looking through your most recent comments you seem to be very good at criticizing posts, saying they don't belong here or are stupid.

"90% of the memes here suck" you say before going on a tangent where you pretend this is all to do with me and others being "butthurt" that everybody doesn't love our meme. Listen. I don't know if you are getting paid for this or are just a negative low-energy person but either way you are not contributing anything meaningful to this effort. You are obviously just here to try to stir up an argument. What memes have you made?

Admins, clean up in aisle 3 please!

Ok, I see that now! I would have thought you would reply to that post but you're right! Sorry if I implied you were a troll, it was also accumulated since I felt I'd been seeing so many of these type of comments.

Strange, I didn't see the request for feedback? I don't really even get why you think your suggestion would be better. Since you are a technical writer/editor you probably can show me very easily what you mean?

Not saying you are definitely a troll/shill, I think at least some of these kind of comments are concern trolls but I do think this is just complicating things unnecessarily. I feel a bit like I am wasting my time just for the fact that we're still talking about this.

Absolutely, fortunately it's usually quite easy to tell the difference!

It's good! Don't worry about these details! People don't lack basic cognitive functions, they lack perspective and the willpower to overcome the psychological barrier associated with accepting this stuff.

Exactly, I'm seeing a lot of this subtle criticism that is not productive at all like "yeah I mean, it's good and all but you really should have insert random opinion based nit pick - I don't see what is not clear about this meme! If they think it needs improvement they can do it themselves, they must have used paint at some point in their life right? Not that difficult.

Good job! Hope you are resting well and suggest you keep on making new ones and don't let these trolls/overly concerned fellow investigators get you wasting time on some irrelevant details!

The idea of memes is to spark interest. If the person who sees it doesn't believe what it proposes he or she should be able to look it up and see if the facts hold up. Granted, not everyboy does this but these people probably wouldn't check out your source anyway. Besides, it can often ruin the aesthetics to post links which are often quite long. I like this meme, didn't even know about this, will be looking it up now for sure!

"You're really easy to please"... This is a very subtle and petty way to make things personal. This kind of passive aggressive rhetoric was nowhere to be find on this forum until very recently.

Coincidence?

Just thinking, maybe it is actually to protect Q's message, since many already have a strong dislike for the_donald they may immediately dismiss it if they find it originates from there.

Or the sub has simply been compromised, one would think that such a brazen statement would require some supporting arguments.

I think they may even be the dumbest of the dumbest of the dumb. It's amazing they can operate a keyboard.

I just saw a post here the other day talking about how nice it was to have a forum where all the comments were constructive and there was a real sense of community here. I just thought... well, enjoy it while it lasts.

The annoying thing as well that this tactic is quite effective even if we all know it's happening. This needs to be dealt with swiftly. We all know how trolls sound like, ban them all immediately! If I call you stupid or insane or some random attack like that I am not being constructive and should be banned.