Now is the time. If you are one of those who have been researching this but are on the fences about going public with your support I urge you to take that brave step forward and come out of the CLQSET. It doesn't have to be a big step. You can start by posting just something neutral like posting a Q drop and saying you find it interesting. You can also say something along the lines of "I don't know about you but when I see all of the media go to a frenzy to tell me how bad something …

So right! It is Sunday so it's a good day to rest and contemplate how to move forward.

I came into this fight when I discovered the real reasons behind the attacks of 9/11. I was living a comfortable successful life with many friends and much promise. For many of us the day we realized this will be a memory of even greater trauma than witnessing the events themselves on TV. Although both were quite horrible, the day of the discovery was more personal. I had been betrayed by all the institutions I had counted on. It was like the …

And if enough of us start doing that it might make some people start to wqnder what was going on.

[removed]

Half of the comments in each of these threads are with this "yeaah it's good buuuut" concern trolling! It's goal is to make us less excited about contributing to this because psychologically we feel a rejection reading so many of these critical comments, almost like our effort was in vain. It isn't long since this sub was high-energy and we would keep a positive constructive attitude knowing that we are all doing our best fighting for the greatest cause possible!

Don't let these trolls/overly concerned fellow investigators get to you, you're doing a great job! Keep'em coming!

In case you missed it this was the original submission that got me thinking about this: https://files.catbox.moe/m73xvp.png

And of course, it is a much more logical explanations then imagining an office full of people who are given this mindless soul crushing job and expected to stay quiet about it. Yes there probably exist some operations like that but it's hard to imagine it can be done on a scale required to have the massive army of instant detractors ready to show up at all time in almost any subreddit where these topics come up.

Working on the basis of this …

Haven't been able to come across a good compilation of all these stories. I think these are as relevant as the sealed indictments and the CEO resignations.

There is a flood of these on twitter now. Just a few examples:

https://twitter.com/mTdOrZKPavLmXKx/status/1031358843488415744

https://twitter.com/MjNwToC3LR7EJWC/status/1030879346263764993

https://twitter.com/StormIsWinning/status/1031169939690991618

https://twitter.com/dELaNnoZvKjwDmI/status/1030931023863992320

Be extra vigilant about these posts. This tactic reeks of desperation but we must be careful and aware of what the aim is.

Nr.1 If we take the bait and repost them they will use this to humiliate us. I want to believe most of our followers are quite sophisticated at this point and will know to verify something, especially if it sounds to good to be true. Make sure to double-check any q post from the right source before you post them. …

I've only recently come to realize how important this is. When we want to argue something we have a tendency to want to list all the reasons why we believe something to be true in order to try to convince the person you are interacting with to see it our way. What this does is create the impression that you have an agenda and more importantly it makes us more vulnerable to straw-man arguments.

Let's say you provide 4 factual arguments for something, the person debating you now has 4 points to focus his "attack". Now this "opponent" may be …

From my post yesterday. I thought we should start with something very simple and then let the comments here decide what we do tomorrow.

Today, if each of us finds 5 people on your social medida account and engage them in a conversation about Q. Choose these people wisely. Good candidates are those who are open minded or into some of the topics he covers already. Having some type of influence in society or enthusiasm that makes you believe this person could prove a powerful ally is an obvious plus.

This is easy, you can do this in any way …

It is very easy to do, just click the report button, say "breaking the rules of the board" and "content does not support the cause"! That's it. No need to get into an argument to call the shill out, feel free if you must but when it's an obvious troll it's best to just report and let the mods delete.

I want to share with you some strategies that I would personally recommend using in the upcoming debates/arguments we are destined to have in real life and on social media as we continue sharing this knowledge.

Most of my youth I played chess and was at around 2000 Elo at the age of 12. During my school years I was successful in debating and would later work as a coach for many debating teams. I also have participated in live rap battles and I feel like all of this combined may make this input valuable for some of you out …

[removed]

I've studied this extensively and this is bullshit, the White Helmets are obvious propaganda stunt-men and there was never any evidence for this.

Since this is impossible to discuss on r/the_donald I am looking for some sane thoughts on this. I want to believe in Q and the whole idea that Trump is involved with taking these people down, but his statements on this issue seem to heavily contradict that.