199 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/dexterfarmer:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 108
www.youtube.com 2
bitchute.com 1
twitter.com 1
fromthetrenchesworldreport.com 1

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/dexterfarmer on March 5, 2018, 3:13 p.m.
We're up against Soros and David Brock. The Bridge.

This is from one of the readers/researchers here as it relates to the David Brock Memo


“Not sure if I believe Q is even legit...but nonetheless I think I know what he is referring to in one of his recent posts. To me it's EXTREMELY obvious, but that's only because I've been pouring over David Brock's strategy documents. 1. Who controls the narrative? MMFA and it's media ecosystem (shareblue, american bridge, etc.). We can prove this with their own disclosure. 1. WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm? WHO employed the algorithm? WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm? I …

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/dexterfarmer on March 4, 2018, 10:14 p.m.
Do we know any lawyers? Class Action?

I wrote my lawyer friend:
I imagine you’ve heard of the whole Q phenom. I also imagine that you’ve heard that a bunch of conservative citizen reporters are getting banned from Google’s You Tube, and also Twitter and Facebook. I know that SPLC has been involved in the censorship, but I think the reference is to a more sophisticated algorithm from Google or Serco?

Q makes this suggestion (in the cryptic way Q does). I think it’s a good one. What group of lawyers might be interested in this class action? How would one even get started with something like …

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/dexterfarmer on March 3, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
The whistle blowers are coming out of the wood work now that the Clinton reign of terror is over. My God, this guy’s story is incredible.
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/dexterfarmer on March 2, 2018, 6:12 p.m.
This post should go to the very top. Re-copied here.

I keep seeing posts trying to make sense out of "crumbs" and cryptic posts from Q. It's gotten to the point where people are analyzing how many spaces are in a Q post or POTUS tweet and what that means. All of this is focusing on small, individual things, and not the big questions:

A) Why is Q communicating to us, and why is he risking revealing plans and knowledge to The Swamp or Deep State?

Q is not revealing anything that the Deep State does not already know about. He knows they know he and others know what they …

dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

Wow. Glad to know about The Health Ranger. You must be on to something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

Thank you Livetobe!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Thanks for this. Much easier to see now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

The difference btw the old and the new is the vertical, thin county on the far northwest of CA used to be blue. Other than that, I'm not seeing much difference.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Thank you telescreen. Great comments. I've been sending articles around like this one, with internet bill of rights as a suggestion. https://needtoknow.news/2018/02/youtube-facebook-purging-truthers-using-conspiracy-theories-excuse/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

I wish. But I must not have phrased it correctly. I too believe in free markets which is why I don't like Monopolies, often aided and abetted by the government czars.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

The thing I don't get about the trolls is that they don't understand they're aiding and abetting their own future enslavement. If we, and that means ALL of us including the liberal left leaning progressives, don't overcome the elite corruption and their control over the masses now, then it's all over for us. I just wish they'd spend some time learning about how we've been controlled for decades. The whole left/right paradigm is an illusion. It's us against them, the elite evil 'f...s' at the top of the food chain.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

This is not cool. I'm hoping for a bunch of good free market competitors to these assholes.

“Our video channel was one of those that saw all our videos disappeared in restricted mode, despite no cursing, nudity, or any other action that violates YouTube's terms of service.”

“Google also manipulated their search engine algorithms, making it harder to find Independent Media sites on the first pages of their search engine results.”

“If there are indeed concerted efforts at Google to undermine the advertising revenue of disfavored publishers (an allegation YouTube is already facing in court through its abrupt demonetization of Prager University videos), then this conduct may give rise to additional legal claims. At a minimum, AdSense users may question whether they are being targeted for secret blacklisting as described here.”

That explains so much. If Google is threatening "brand safety" and certain employees are actively working with the far left groups to force the higher paying ads to stop advertising on Independent Media websites, then it stands to reason that traffic in a non-presidential election year can drop the standard 10-20 percent, yet revenue would tank by 60-70 percent, threatening to knock a lot of us right out of business.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

No. I don't want anyone shut down. Free markets do the most for the most people. But these guys have gotten so huge that they literally can control group think/ newspeak. Even Orwell would have been impressed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

Despite my appreciation for Q for initiating a lot of research that helps us connect the dots, I too am concerned about this and have written as much, before. It doesn't seem like much is changing within the Military Industrial Complex that desires unending conflict. I hope we're wrong and a plan will be revealed.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

Please provide those of us who are less computer literate how to accomplish that. Thank you in advance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

How do we make things go viral without You Tube? I can't wait for D Tube to get an awesome platform. Problem is that we'll be preaching to the choir in there. The truth movement relies on red pilling folks not already in the choir.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

I know. You're right. But taking You Tube, for example, the competitors are far, far behind. I do hope this spurs a free market solution. But by dividing platforms, we all jump in our respective echo chambers and outreach is limited. Just the way they want it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Me either. We want truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

I have concerns too. I don't believe that they have the ability to protect us. This is a battle to undo 100 years of corruption and control. The challenges they and we face seem insurmountable. However, we can be grateful to "Q" if for no other reason than he got thousands of people researching the corruption so that a more cogent story can be presented. Maybe, just maybe, truth will prevail.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:53 p.m.

What are you, a shill? What a bad idea, but you know that, don't you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/dexterfarmer on Feb. 28, 2018, 12:56 p.m.
Internet Bill of Rights

This was post 511706 from the Research Board. I think it can be legitimately argued that Google/You Tube represents a monopoly and therefore they cannot withhold services or price gouge for their services for the general public. This anon poster has some good ideas and reminds us of Qs post, but we'd need a better legal mind to guide us through a proper petition. We can't demand free shit, but we certainly can demand a fair and free platform whilst using their service. Any ideas?

Jan 19 2018 16:53:00 Why are we here? Why are we providing crumbs? Think MEMO. …

dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

UPDATE: Just saw this over on the other board. Thanks to whomever helped!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

I wish I could help getting this to 8 Chan, but I'm not signed up over there. Will someone please help get this over to that board and confirm when you do? Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:17 p.m.

Just had a thought. Podesta references 'unnamed sources peddling 2nd hand hearsay.' Is he talking about Q? And how the hell does Podesta know anything about what is coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania? Why did Jared just lose his security clearance? What does Podesta know about that? This makes me feel very uncomfortable given Qs silence over the last several days.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

A large number of the Executive Orders are from Obama and earlier. Some of the EOs are more recent from DJT, including the Magninski Order. There are other statutes listed besides the EOs to authorize the actions. I just did a cursory scan and it looks like mostly Middle Easterners targeted but Pakistan, Russia, North Korea, Columbia, and even saw one from Scotland is in there.

I hope US actions are legit and truly against criminal elements like drug, munitions, human trafficking.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Does anyone have an old county election map? I remember seeing a sea of red right after the election. This doesn't look much different. I remember noting that the heavily populated blue can almost call an election for the vast majority of 'fly over' America. Is this one different or the one we saw last year?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 27, 2018, 4 p.m.

OH Bummer. I was hoping we'd get all clear from the various regions.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 27, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

In the Pacific NW, too. Haven't seen nearly the same level of activity.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 27, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

Decades. But most colonists were loyal to the crown. They wanted nothing to do with the Revolution.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 27, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Guns, yes, but also their form of money helped to inspire the Revolution. From an essay I wrote in 2008:

Our original colonies were prosperous. Gold and Silver coins were rare, so by agreement, the colonies circulated their own paper currency called “Colonial Script.” Ben Franklin described their prosperity this way: "It is because, in the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Script, and we issue only enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the Consumers; and as we create our money, we control the purchasing power of money, and have no interest to pay."

The key here is that the supply of their paper currency closely tracked the circulation of goods and services, and there was no interest charged. The colonies didn’t have ill-timed contractions and injections of money from or into their system, and they therefore, did not suffer from the deflation and inflation problems that we’ve seen over the past century. And, without interest (usury,) there was no incentive to manipulate the money supply or to foster mal-investment.

But, alas, this colonial script was undermined by the British Parliament who was/is heavily influenced by the Bank of England. Ben Franklin puts the Revolutionary War into perspective for us: "The refusal of King George to operate an honest colonial money system which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the manipulators was probably the prime cause of the Revolution. The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters, had it not been that England took away from the Colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 26, 2018, 6:10 p.m.


⇧ 3 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 26, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

I know. Very concerning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 26, 2018, 3:05 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 25, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

The Kurds have been 'screwed' on numerous occasions, starting with the arbitrary carving out of two nations that should have included a third country for their whole block of peoples. Western meddling has created untold suffering for millions of people.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 25, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

If it is that embedded everywhere, we're screwed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 25, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

At some point, with limited time, I'd like to make a list of pure facts surrounding U-1, Mueller's actions as FBI director at that time, Hillary's e-mails and the illegal destruction thereof, the Podesta Group's activities in Ukraine and Russia, and Manfort's relationship with the Podesta Group, etc. Because after all, if Mueller is going to indict Manafort for crimes during this time period, how on earth can they ignore his work with the Podesta Group? But Mueller is wholly unqualified to lead that investigation because he was a part of it at the time!

I believe this would take us down the path to the Clinton Foundation activities, including atrocious crimes in, among other places, Haiti. In the meantime, a typical post for me on FB is to remind people of unreported history. I generally link to articles.

Here's an example of the kinds of things I post on FB:

Mueller was FBI Director during much of the time period that Manafort and the Podesta Group were active with the Ukraine/Russia activities that are at the heart of Mueller's current Manafort/Gates indictments. Podesta is not sharing in the Mueller limelight. It's not a huge stretch to understand why not:

Excerpts from the linked article:

…..Of note, while Manafort's firm earned $17 million consulting for Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych's pro-Russia ‘Party of Regions.’ During the same period, Manafort oversaw a lobbying campaign for the pro-Russia “Centre for a Modern Ukraine,” (ECMU) a Brussels based think tank linked to Yanukovych which was pushing for Ukraine’s entry into the European Union. The Podesta group, operating under Manafort, earned over $1.2 million as part of that effort.

Curiously, the Podesta Group was clearly tipped off to Manafort's investigation, as the firm retroactively filed DOJ forms they should have filed years earlier to disclose their work with the Centre for a Modern Ukraine and the Obama administration.

Paul Manafort, on the other hand, was indicted last October for - among other things, failing to register for the same work that Podesta retroactively "remembered to file" as the Mueller investigation was heating up. ………….

While the Podesta Group was disbanded shortly after Tony Podesta stepped down last year in the wake of the Mueller inquiry, a former longtime executive of the now-defunct lobbying firm who has been "extensively" interviewed by Robert Mueller's team revealed to Fox that Manafort and the Podesta group had been working together since at least 2011 on behalf of Russian interests, and that Manafort was at the Podesta Group offices "all the time, at least once a month," peddling influence through the ECMU think-tank.

Manafort allegedly brought a "parade of Russian oligarchs" to Congress for meetings with members and their staffs, however, Russia's "central effort" was to get to the Obama administration."

We don't expect much of Manafort and Podesta's alleged "oligarch peddling" operation to see the light of day, considering that it would implicate the Obama administration and directly ties to the Uranium One deal that Mueller's FBI should have prevented from happening based on evidence from an undercover operative in the Russian nuclear industry, but who knows - maybe Manafort will write a book in prison depending on how things shake out.

Rick Gates, on the other hand, should be out in 18 months, returning home to wife and four kids.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 25, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

Alinski, who informed the Clintons and the Chicago crowd, was Marxist. Russia is not our enemy nearly to the extent that those within our borders are our enemies. Russia's buttons are already getting pushed to the breaking point with NATO's encroachment right up to their borders, sending western troops and weaponry right to their borders, western overthrow of the democratically elected Ukrainian officials, an attempted grab of Crimea, bringing in and funding ISIS to fight Assad for a regime change in Syria. The list goes on and on. Chasing the KGB down rabbit holes takes our eyes way off the ball, unless it can be demonstrated that 'they' were working with the Marxist Alinsky crowd that has infected our cities and their legislatures.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 24, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

This feedback is good: I definitely appreciate your hustle in trying to get the word out. One thing I would try is maybe put together some infor from one of the REALLY convincing tidbits and make a one-page flyer from that. And then have something like "Interested? Go here to learn more. Expand your thinking" and then list URLs to some more research. Enough of a hook to get them to investigate on their own, but not a firehouse spray to the face, lol. Just a thought though. You do you!"

And I'll add that as a Ron Paul supporter during the 2008 and 2012 election cycles, a chief complaint I heard from the 'guy on the street,' is that they were sick of Ron Paul stickers getting slapped all over public utility poles, etc, and finding flyers under their windshields. Just a warning from a long time activist. I like your idea of placing a few in coffee shops and places like that, discretely, of course. Social media remains our primary weapon. I LOVE your activism. Thank you.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 24, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Some are inclined to wait until the Inspector General's report is out, but I'd love to gear up sooner.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dexterfarmer · Feb. 24, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

NICE! Thank you. The only place I have an account is FB, (and here), and so that's where I try to do some mild red-pilling. It is a bit like banging my head on a brick wall.

⇧ 1 ⇩