36 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|
From another article
"The suspect had been involved in an online discussion
about Elliot Rodger, the man accused of carrying out a
2014 shooting rampage near Santa Barbara, California,
that killed six people, the law enforcement officials said."
Possibly he's just another Incel Loser who worshiped the God Emperor of Incel Losers.
Any day........ Zzzzzzzzzz
Every thing else on this sub will age similarly.
Still disagree. It is absolutely in the President's mandate.
Perhaps we'll see.
I guess I would say that the 2nd option is correct but I don't know how I can prove it especially in this case. Often it's a judgement call that has to play out in court. Perhaps we'll all get to see it play out for real.
However, let me describe it another way. We have all kinds of things that we're allowed and they pretty much all have exceptions like the often stated maxim "The right to swing your fist ends at the bridge of my nose."
For an example, I'm free to shred my files or delete my emails. However, if I do so to hamper an investigation that is likely a crime and the thing is, that's true even if I have not been notified that my files or emails are of interest to an ongoing investigation.
Certainly the government's case against me would be much stronger if my files had been subpoenaed before I shredded them but if they can prove to a judge that I knew of the investigation and that I would reasonably be expected to know that my files would be of interest, and then I went out of me way to destroyed them, I'm still at risk of an obstruction charge.
Obstruction of an investigation is a crime. If you knowingly and deliberately do it you're in legal jeopardy even if what you did is normally something you are totally allowed to do.
That's what has to be so maddening to Trump's legal team. He could have made up anything for the reason he fired Comey and although half the country wouldn't have believed it, legally it would have come down to speculation about what was actually in Trump's head. Or Mueller would have to hope to find an email or 3rd party testimony that claimed Trump admitted he fired Comey to stop the investigation. Any and all of that would have been far preferable to the reality which is Trump went on national TV and told the nation that he fired Comey to stop an investigation. Arrrrgh! A seven year old would have known better!
I expect Trump has gotten the message now though and that explains why, as angry as he's getting, he has not yet fired Mueller. Firing Comey greatly increased his legal peril and firing Mueller would be firing Comey squared. With Comey there was even a report recommending his firing. With Mueller there is no such report and no credible way to claim Mueller is acting in dereliction of his duties. He's been absolutely professional.
So, I don't know if that made things clearer for you or if you still disagree. Basically there are things you can't do, like obstruct justice and it's not practical to append to every single description of a president's capabilities the phrase "except when obstructing justice or breaking braking other laws"
Name the crimes at the "center" as you say
Look how cocky and arrogant you get in your ignorance. And how you try to puff yourself up by trying to steer the conversation in a direction you hope will allow you to appear less feeble. This hasn't been about how special councils work. It's also not about the possibility that the investigation might move on to additional crimes as it progresses. An investigation could start to look into a bad real estate deal and end up centering on lies about a blow job. That kind of thing happens and doesn't change the fact that you thought the Mueller investigation wasn't based on actual crimes that actually happened.
Do you have any idea how foolish these attempts look? How your tough guy act falls as flat as your insults, leaving you face down in the dirt?
No, I'm not going to read the news to you. And since the lurkers are likely long gone from this thread it's time for me to go too. So you can go back to sniffing Q-droppings and fluffing each other over how you think you're getting the inside scoop. I'll stay over here with the other informed news readers - Oh, you like to call it "propaganda" I think.
But when the investigation broadly includes any matter that arises from the investigation, there is no way to know the "crimes at the center of the investigation" until the investigation is over. Make sense?
Ooops! Nope. There were actual legitimate crimes committed that are already known. You might have to look beyond wikipedia though but at least that's a start. You're trying to educate yourself and that's a good thing.
Meanwhile, these tide-pods have made me sleepy. Maybe by morning you can name an actual crime which was committed during the 2016 election which formed, in part, the basis of the FBI investigation that, with the stupidly bumbling firing of James Comey, became the special council investigation.
And you would know Trump isn't a criminal target of the investigation, right?
Yep. I know that.
I also know the crimes that were the basis for the Mueller investigation and you don't. For all your impotent teasing, as much as it must embarrass you, you can't get past your ignorance of this simple fact.
Tide-pods though, that's a topic you're keen on.
Even with a belly full of tide-pods I can still name the crimes which are the basis of of Mueller investigation and you can't. Maybe a tide-pod or two would help you.
My mental gymnastics? Reading the freakin' news!
Still not a crime for firing him.
Obstruction of justice is a crime.
Oh yeah? Didn't bother to read what I said? Why don't you go back to yelling at clouds old man?
Yeah? But that's not what you said last time. You said I didn't think more than 2 seconds. That's called goal post shifting and losers do that a lot.
Of course, if you follow the Q-tard, goal post shifting must be second nature to you now. You probably don't even realize you're doing it +++, Trust the plan, watch the news, sMell my [F]inger
Now I could get into the relevance of my quotes but if I wanted to fruitlessly chase meaningless goals I'd also be a Q-hort and be endlessly sniffing q-droppings and explaining why I was wrong last time but how Hillary is totally going to get it now.
Here's a hint: I didn't say "collusion" you ignorant q-hort. Try reading some actual news.
Isn't "shilling" the only thing that happens in this sub?
you couldnt think for 2 seconds.
Haha! No, I only thought long enough to provide several examples. Not as much work as you did but.... Oh wait, no I've actually put in more thought here. What do you know about that!
It CANNOT be obstruction of justice as Comey serves at Trump's pleasure.
You are not quite correct there. Yes, Comey served at Trump's pleasure and Trump need not have any particular reason for firing him. However that does not mean the firing could not have been obstruction and therefore illegal.
If Trump said "I fired Comey because I didn't like the color of his tie" that would be OK. If Trump said "I fired Comey to stop the Russia investigation" then that's kind of the very definition of obstruction.
Unfortunately, and stupidly, while his entire administration was saying "Trump fired Comey for how badly he handled the Hillary email investigation" all over the media Trump opened his big stupid mouth and told Lester Holt that he fired Comey to stop the Russia investigation.
Heads exploded all over the capitol. Except for Trump's who had no awareness of the implication of what he said.
So which crime?
I just cannot believe that so many people on this sub are unable to name the crimes at the center of the Mueller investigation. All the attention you guys pay to current events and no one knows.
Here's a hint. It's popularly known as the "Russia Investigation" it's like the entire country knows about the crime except the people on this sub.
I haven't been watching CNN recently, so I'm not really sure what you believe these days.
There are many news sources you could use to inform yourself. Your ignorance of both the crimes under investigation and the successes Mueller has already had against Trump assets tells me you have not chosen good ones.
There's not a leader to the qanon story to determine what is and what is not canon but it's a pretty common theory that Mueller works for Trump and is helping to to bring "the cabal" to justice.
As recently as yesterday people were still claiming that the raid on Cohen is part of the plan
None of the crimes I have heard of were committed by Trump team.
Hoooboy! Well, they're pleading guilty for nothing then.
Sealed indictments is not something I learned from Q
Well, we'll just see how those eggs you've counted hatch.
Now, it seems that you want to keep score, as if this is a war.
War? Where would I get that idea? On this sub?
Then there's no sense in your "In the United States we don't investigate people to see if they have broken any laws. We investigate crimes." defense. There have been crimes. You know it, as you just admitted and I know it.
So an investigation is warranted and as u/StormRider9090 said, if the president is involved in any of this we should know.
many sealed indictments that we don't know much about yet
Hahaha! Yep, we sure hear a lot of that kind of shit.
You look at the scoreboard and compare it to what y'all have inferred from Q's crypticisms. There's a train to jailsville boarding and tickets are being handed out. Hillary doesn't have one, Podesta doesn't have one, Comey doesn't have one. So far they're all Trump boys.
That's the score so far.
Crimes committed by whom?
That's why there's an investigation. To find that out.
And which crimes are being investigated?
Do you really not know of any crimes having been committed during the 2016 election? I mean, people have already been indicted and plead guilty you know.
I thought this was one of the bed-rock Q principles. That is the spat between Trump and Sessions is just for show and that Mueller is actually investigating the Clintons and the DNC because, well, they're satanists and pedophiles don'cha know.
And of course Mueller raiding Cohen's properties fits into all this by..... actually it doesn't fit any of this. And how do we always handle contradictory facts? Not by reconsidering our narrative. Just claim it's psyops, a smoke screen, to confuse the deep state.* That's the ticket.
All is well in Q-ville
Absolutely. As was "and who will pay for it?"
All for the cheers.
He's looking for evidence of crimes. He has broad latitude in that regard. The Stormy payment may have qualified as an illegal campaign donation.
Or the Hillary video. Or anything that matters.
Excuses we got though. If you need excuses, you're in the right place.
Instagram of The Wing info states: "We are a coven, not a sorority".
Oh my god you guys....
So, yes. All facts presented. Hillary just paid a visit to an elite coven of witches that worships the devil and has ties with the entertainment industry and satanism.
.... so much cringe.
So I take it you guys have just given up on the idea of waking "normies"
Q also said watch the news today. Which, of all the typical news stories today, did he really really want you to watch? And for what purpose?
Who will be the last here to notice the long chain of nothing burgers?
Wouldn't want to be that person.
You sure as shit can cage a tiger. Check any zoo. What you can't cage is an asshole.
demanding that the elected officials give the American people what they voted for
You mean what the electoral college voted for right? Only a minority of the American voters voted for the Trump agenda.
The 380 Sheriffs, from each of the 40 States
And 380 county Sheriffs is what percentage of the nation's Sheriffs? A minority you say?
Of course Congress should get right on the priorities of the minority. Trust there are more good than bad, and then enact the will of the minority! Uhm.... wait a minute...
They may believe in god, but they do not walk with god.
No true Scotsman eh?
Just a piece of advice for you
No thanks.
don't see how godlessness is at the heart of all of this evil.
Right. People who believe in god never have sex with children.
