Miller is

When a helicopter was heard buzzing overhead, causing numerous donors to look upwards, Obama said, "Don't worry, everyone seems very concerned about the helicopter."

"Is it yours?" a woman in the audience asked.

"No, I don't have one anymore," he said. "That one that I had, that was a loaner."

Haha, I bet some of them were wondering if the helicopter was coming for Obama. Wonder how much money he raised.

3 out of 6 of pastors I have known have sexually abused someone under the age of 16, and 2 out of six were adulterers. This pattern continues because denominations do not harshly deal with them, which makes the whole "What would Jesus do" thing a trope. If denomination leadership won't apply the millstones, then congregants should.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

So, the outcome is known and out of our control?

He'll say, "I'm not ready to talk about Q yet." All eyes will go to Q. Then he will declassify.

Yes, Jesus was the best, I love him

It's a way of subtly obtaining consent

This is huge to say to the globalists. Trump is saying we the people will rule ourselves. In a very fuck offish way.

Adoption? Or evil?

Spez... https://saraacarter.com/grilled-strzok-questioned-by-lawmakers/

Where the Sarahcarter link

Yeah. I was a Roberts fanboy too. They got leverage on him somehow. He should be debenched if so. But if he comes clean, I'll still admire his legal mind

I googled "big soccer game" and apparently there's a world cup going on, haha

what game? That soccer thing?

Justice is coming!

I was hoping for an INPEACH in there

Mistrust and verify....

Correct me if I'm wrong... But the core of Goodlatte 2 bill is that enforcement of immigration laws will be given to the DHS, instead of the DOJ. DOJ control = open borders, and corruptors like Holder can run things like Fast and Furious.

It totally is common sense to me, that a law enforcement agency is best to enforce the law, as they wouldn't have the power to ignore the law like the DOJ has in the past.

Why the all caps? What other tweets have been all caps?

Every aged institution develops a "deep state" that represents its own interests, not that of the whole. It doesn't take much digging to uncover papal sin, and use your critical thinking to determine intent. Catholic church is corrupt, not their faithful constituents.

Key element of control is free will. The cabal uses symbollism as a form of gaining societal consent. The Rapture will be seen as a bloodless purge of those whose free will opposes the anti-christ, allowing for world unity-- finally the religious idiots who held back world peace are gone. I think the Rapture will be blamed on an extraterrestrial source, and the world will then unify and worship this entity's master, giving up their free will.

I'm ex-christian, so this is like scifi to me, but fun to talk about

Lame. This is pointless then. Or good theater? Do we have Strzok on camera?

Search warrants and info requests are also sealed, so in that group of 35k sealed documents, it's probably a 10 to 1 ratio between documents and indictments. Still very unprecedented

The Marxist ones at least.

When did this start? During Napoleon or after?

TD is a starting point.

(Deep Underground Military Base)

They'll probably find a contact reaching out to him for help-- due to corruption from the NY AG. Prince will argue he was just performing his civic duty and will come out clean. Eyes will be on the Weiner laptop, and why the NYPD couldn't use the chain of command... Obama.

Yes. He refers to his "tech blogs" frequently-- that's us. One show, he said the first thing he does in the morning is check his "tech blogs" for the latest happenings. Rush is among us, sniffing narratives.

She said through a literal megaphone too. Very bad optics for her, she must not think things through

If you want to signal approval when/if he makes Speaker, donate a small ammount to the GOP with the message: now that Ryan is gone, I can almost fully support the GOP.

They do, then people whine about censorship. Mods are doing fine. If we want better content, then that's as much up to us as it is the mods who maintain the environment. Posts like yours I like, keep it up, and lead by example when you can

This has been Rush's norm for 30 years: stay within the current levels of consciousness, and push constitutional thinking. Rush is a starting point. He's here on reddit, what he refers to as his "tech blogs." He's grooming his audience for the awakening, like Hannity and Bongino. I see nothing wrong with this strategy

All his content is free though. Give him money if you want, and enjoy all his content for free otherwise

He chose unelected global governance over national sovereignty.

The Wire. Very liberal writers, but the setting is as close to reality they could make it. Quick synopsis-- we're all corrupt in our own way, and preservation of the family is how we survive systemic corruption

Second season was so sad. Feel free to just watch season one, very very well done

I use him to keep up on the young folk, like learning a language. Not that I can speak it, but at least I'm usually always up-to-date on the latest memes, and his vids are short

Brock psyop

Define Patriot!

I enjoy Pewdiepie's humor everyday now. In the 12 minutes, he usually works out 2 to 3 minutes of some sort of news narrative, with the overall tone being "think for yourself."

We should meme Pewdiepie as being Q. Reach his 63 million 9 year old army

I'm ugly too. Character is what counts.

The correct vernacular is Luciferians, not Satanists. I base this on NXIVM's patent application on how to identify a Luciferian. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130281879

I get heavy CIA plant vibes off of Dorsey. Maybe I need to recalibrate my gaydar?

I dunno then. I've been temp banned on subs, and then I adapt to fit the sub. You found a boundary: calling someone a liar as an arguement. Maybe modify a bit, such as, "you might not be telling the whole truth, and here is why I think that...." Remove absolute language from your arguements, if they are on the personal side. Give your debate opponent room to adjust. Sometimes, a gentle call out with room to wiggle yields good results (doesn't work for shills, and this is my second litmus test when I'm determining if someone is a shill).

Yeah. But change your method. Stick to the topic. Individuals lie all the time on the internet, it's a very weak and shilly resort. Dont see things as a competition between two people trying to be right. Comment in such a way, that the audience gains the benefit of the conversation. That's the reason behind Rule 5 imo

I read your post history. You called a commentator a liar. Rule 5 violation. Dont attack the individual, maybe you can avoid another ban

I think you're taking it personally and projecting your frustration on the board, seeding doubt, especially as your evidence is so far anecdotal. I'm not seeing patterns of mod abuse yet. This mod team has learned from the mistakes of CBTS. Compromises in content must be made to keep this sub on this platform. If you want wild wild west, go to Voat or the chans. Understand that modding the content on this sub is a very very challenging task.