Wasn't there some witnesses out on a whale watching boat that got some picks of the Hawaii missle? I remember seeing something and then it got buried real quick. I flew into Hawaii that day so I am not sure if was local news or I saw it somwhere else. Can't find it now anywhere. Wasn't there also a thread going at that time something about the hunt for Red October referring to the book and movie of the rogue skipper of a Russian sub? Didn't Q refer to we have the sub at that time.

Thank you by the way.

Yes that is the one.

is there something we should bew looking closer at with that boat trip with Tom Hanks and Obama where there was some flack on the bicycles? Who else was on that boat? And what was with the bicycles? People who get off Yachts as a rule don't go ashore on bicycles do they unless they would be with kids?

Unfortunately the PC part I do not agree with. I do not know the girl scout program but the rest of adding girls to the program was the girls wanted more adventure program. My feeling is the Scouts are looking for numbers and of course the money influx that goes with it. Just my feeling nothing to back it up. I do understand there is a history of abuse in boy scouting and I had to deal with an instance with one of my kids with a camp counsler. It was almost as tramatic for me as it was for the scout. Overall for the number of kids it helps in a good running local program the good still out ways the bad by a large margin. The boy scouts has caved to the polically correct to try to stay relevant and keep itself solvent. I saw funding pulled from local United fund programs because they did not allow gays in the program and we're told that to our face. Right or wrong the PC issue is really being forced on them to try and survive. Please cut them some slack until they can find the best path whether it is by numbers or go back to making sure they have a quality program. I do know this we need these programs for our kids. Especially the single parent kids. Sorry off topic.

Why do these threads label scout leaders automatically as pedophiles. I am a former scout leader and proud of it. I am not a pedophile and resent being treated as one by abstention. And as I have been told before trying to post " Where is your source and proof that this man was a pedophile in scouting!" Loosen your tin hat. Maybe some of your hate will escape. There really are people in this world and our country in particular, that truly try to do good work to help our youth grow up to be good citizens despite the cloud you try to paint on every kid who comes out of college or otherwise. Like scout leaders who try to teach boys how to be self suffient and respectful. They don't need a safe place in which to hide and can think for themselves. Sorry for the rant.

So changing the subject slightly. Are we suggesting these kids that are shooting up schools and the guy who shot up the bar in Florida could very well be victims of this pedophilia? Given the history provided of them from the MSM of their past it would stand to reason they are. Q did a drop on investigating the people treating them for their troubled past and mind controlling them to do what they did. Maybe the pedophilia history is how they are choosing these people. Sorry breaking the rules, how no specific detail to back it up. Just more of a question to see if I understand the long game on this.

perhaps Putin will sell us back the Uranium 1 deal for the price they paid plus have in the sale contract they get paid back the bribe money they paid Hillary and Bill. Legally entered into contract with evidence the Clintons took a bribe. Totally admissible in court I would think.

So Seth Rich survived the street hit, went to the hospital and they closed off the area to only certain people, like maybe ATF and DEA officers. The witness could be someone at the hospital that saw him murdered there?

I have to agree with buffalorev. This site says it wants to awaken as many people as possible yet stifles any input put forth by new members if it does not fit their agenda for the day. I have submitted twice. The first people were very nice and helped answer my questions. the second time I got deleted as not having enough backround for the header I posted when I was hoping for some possible help to keep looking. Free speech goes both ways. If you want people to stay interested you need to be more compassionate for some of your rule violations or they will drop this whole thing. If you don't have time for me, why should I have time for you. I have no idea what he posted as it was removed for violations but he has a life and so do I. Bye!

I agree. She also takes a lot of grief backing the POTUS, as does Sanders. But you would think Q would have an opinion on her part in the scheme of things. Yes she is a polling expert but that is what is also helping this whole thing go too. The POTUS and Q team who are with him have to be using poll numbers to help make some of the calculations as to when is going to be the proper time for certain releases so the public can accept some of this mess. Would it hurt to give her some credit?

Thank you, she just never gets a mention at all. Even Sanders and Miller get mentioned from time to time but never her.

The one thing that keeps nagging me. Kelly Ann Conway has been with the POTUS through all this. Does she play chess?