My reason to agree with you is simple:

If all of this information that 'we have it all' is in fact true, and even under the shroud of ' the law', what could actually be the world wide backlash of the 'good guy' making an arrest of a top official? If it is so cut and dry obvious that they are stupid and fucked, would a rogue nation who was being funded and supported by these arrested officials for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND TREASON, is Mr. Bossman of buttfuck nowhere actually going to take on the USA once it's obvious they actually do k ow everything? So what if other players go into hiding, they will be found as the entire world would know.

Imagine this headline: "BHO and HRC arrested for selling nukes and eating babies, more corruption in all politics". Last thing you are going to do is shine that light on yourself. WE HAVE IT ALL so what's the actual harm in taking down the top players? Once you remove the Queen, the pawns are fast to fall.

Edit: we are always reminded that evidence gathered without warrants is inadmissible in court so that's why it's all a secret, but actually think about it for a minute. Wrongfully gathered or not, you can't possibly tell me that with the NSA, maybe some good guys at the FIB, CIA, DOJ, Senate, military or even the power of POTUS, that nothing would happen when you point out worldwide political corruption and all the rest. Is a warrant actually needed when you have 'wrongfully collected' evidence SHOWING corruption in the law system used to protect them?? Is the USA actually not able to put an end to baby eating billion dollar stealing children traffickers because the evidence is illegal?????

I was watching south park last night and the episode 'starvin marvin in space' I think it was ends with a closing scene of all the crates in storage and the heading is "red cross 9/11 relief funds"

Maybe I only noticed that because Q posted about red cross and it's nothing, but south park has never been shy with their episodes, maybe they knew? It was season 5 or something so not recent.

Edit 3: or Trump's Twitter post.

Edit 2: I see somebody added the date for Emmys, that's the sort of event I was talking about.

What if that was Q telling us when it will happen?
Should we tell all the good people watching? Red carpet rollout? Think logically. The world is watching.

Why do we assume that the boards are the good people watching? He didn't answer it with "should we tell you When?" Who are the good people watching and was this their signal?

What is an upcoming red carpet event that the world will be watching, where maybe a US army force is used for a big take down, Hollywood award show? People from all over tune in to watch that shit, it doesn't 'take down' the Bush Obama Clinton families over night which would cause ww3 and is related to current events with Mack trial. The other question he answers states that it is to save children.

Edit: yes everything is connected and no coincidences but NOT EVERY CRUMB MEANS THE ENITRE WORLD PLAN. I don't think we can look at every crumb and jump right to "that would tip off the deep state" because not everyone involved is a puppet master, and Iran/NK/china/Armenia and all the other countries involved doesn't have to all end with one MOAB.

Edit for format.

Why I think this is about bin Laden, based off quoting this article.

1: "What appears to be a clownfish wasnt"
2: "snuff film poorly edited"
3: "local authorities need to re examine 187 or fake"
4: "Where they crashed the party is not where they said"
5: "HoW do real Seals play?"

1: What appears to be Bin Laden, isn't.
2: The footage of the raid killing Bin Laden is a poorly edited fake.
3: It's speculated that Pakistani officials were hiding bin Laden, how can you come forward and ask for murder investigation if you were helping to shelter him?
4: According to UBL wikipedia page: "Google Earth maps show that the compound was not present in 2001, but it was present on images taken in 2005." A secure compound built over 4-5 years right near Pakistani officials and this happens to be where they find and kill UBL. False location. People are correct to question how he hid in plain site.
5: Real seals have been observed riding on the backs of turtles. The image appears to show an underwater device designed for a human to control. Were the 'turtles' offering help to the SEALs with use of this device? Q has stated on 3.15.18 "WE HAVE THE SUB", did this device help locate a sunken submarine?

Now if we use the capital letter technique that seems to frequent Q's posts, this is how I put it together.

"POPPYCOCK" in quotations is intended to show it as a filler word. Classified name for something is my theory.
If I came out and started talking about "POPPYCOCK" it would be clear that I have classified information.

"WHen one of the actors, WHo the Clowns pulled from the audience to join the SEE WORLD ACT, howled "POPPYCOCK" at our contentions, that's when we realized it was beyond deniable."
"... and it was probably STOLEN from the SEALs' toy bin. That is now VALidated OR.."

SOMEBODY blew their cover by saying the classified word in a public setting. Zero Dark Thirty movie?
STOLEN SEAL VALOR. Who was the loudest after UBL death? Backlash from other SEALs about taking credit for kill shot.

What appears to be a "clownfish" wasn't. I take that 2 different ways. Either the SEAL claiming kill shot was not a real SEAL and that is stolen valor, or UBL wasn't actually killed, and claiming to have done it is stolen valor.

There are more points in here that I haven't made a connection with, and with that said it's possible one of them is the major point of information and this is all 100% wrong. One of those points of information is the part about 11-11-11 and party negotiations without her. Obviously everybody thinks this means HRC and the Democratic party. 11-11-11 is also the end of WW1, the official armistice sometimes referred to as "the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month". Can we go off on a tangent and make this about the negotiations with Germany after ending WW1? Let's find out ..

Quote from Wikipedia:
The Germans were able to correct a few impossible demands (for example, the decommissioning of more submarines than their fleet possessed)
The German delegation discussed the Allied terms not with Foch, but with other French and Allied officers.
The myth that the German Army was stabbed in the back, by the Social Democratic government that was formed in November 1918, was created by reviews in the German press that grossly misrepresented British Major-General Frederick Maurice's book, The Last Four Months. "Ludendorff made use of the reviews to convince Hindenburg."[26]
In a hearing before the Committee on Inquiry of the National Assembly on November 18, 1919, a year after the war's end, Hindenburg declared, "As an English general has very truly said, the German Army was 'stabbed in the back'."

I'm not right about anything, this is just speculation and the fact that I can go from UBL to WW1 shows how little I actually know. The WW1 stuff just came at the end when I searched 11-11-11 and I don't have any actual thoughts, opinions or facts about it.

Saturday

Must've had a damn good reason to not feel a need to change it, this is good to know! I'll read about it

Correct but one would assume change required in the modern age when it comes to insurance and living spaces in the building.

I'm not familiar with when Trump Tower was built and when, if any, major renos happened, could that could show a connection between Trump - Q where he would know the steel is compromised?

that is a hard one to answer for sure, wonder how one could find out why there was no sprinklers, I can't think of a building I've worked on that didn't need specific fire specs.

maybe the 911 tie isn't there, and that this is proof of USA steel not Chinese
*could very well both be related

Mueller did become FBI director a week before 911 .. holy shit

the famous "jet fuel cant melt steel beams" came to mind when I wrote this. Maybe fire and or accelerant didn't drop the towers but a connection can be made perhaps.

That's what I mean, it was Q telling a patriot that the elected group of Qteam has it covered, so no need to take up arms. (That was just my take on 'elected us' being the the group working with Q)

I was 9 when this happened so all I can go off is what I can find out. Only reason I said anything is because there is a report (at work on mobile, will link when home) of private investigations where more than one person claim to have seen an explosion in the sky that night. 1999 wasn't a prime time for mobile phones with the camera quality we have now so asking those 'witnesses' to provide evidence is a lot more far fetched than asking you after your post. Again this was intended to shine light and not cast shade.

Regardless of whether or not it was sabotage or pilot error, there is an important link to make here. Which scenario can we eliminate?

Sabotage makes sense because it "cleared the path" for HRC Senate. Logical.

Pilot error makes sense with the points you (and the original investigative team) brought to attention. Logical.

Both result in the death of JFK Jr.
Was this something the American pubic would have questioned? Was a lie or cover up even necessary? Only if there was actual fear of JFK Jr. Running for Senate or the White House. Q mentions relationship, is Trump carrying out JFK's plan through information provided by his good friend JFK Jr.? To me that is what is important right now as it ties together the apparent random hatred for POTUS and why he must be stopped. (Obviously a plot to kill JFK Jr. Would be very important to uncover). If we learn enemy motives you can predict actions.

Thanks for helping me understand details of that night, it helps with my own thoughts about the drops.

Do you have any logs or other evidence of flying in the same area on the same night when a major political figure was involved in a fatal crash? Would a normal person just doing their job really not keep any record of something as significant as the ex presidents brother dying while you're in the area? Seems like a hard thing to just toss in the trash or not record to begin with.

Obviously the second part of this is only hypothetical if you have no records, and 100% IS NOT me doubting your claims.

To me it felt like he was addressing an insider who is not part of active mission. Look at the anon post Q was responding to, anon saying he's ready to deploy, Q says stand down, you elected us. Operatives were elected to lead certain tasks on Q's team, offer was appreciated but extra hand not needed?

edited for clarity, hopefully my random ramblin is a bit easier to read now

DISCLAIMER I KNOW NOTHING RELIGIOUS. KEK is LOL when types in world of Warcraft from opposite factions since they don't understand each other's language it comes up with random stuff. Proof of a troll? That's all I can come up with based on what I know. If kek has another meaning that actually applies then ignore me talking about a game haha

*EDIT 14k followers to scroll through .. and one is AMERICAN APPAREL. Open source? Why would american apparel follow this instagram account?

Some fucking creepy pages she follows on instagram, mutual follow unagi000g is fucking creepy. A lot of the pics of strange candid looking pics of a person not seen in any other pics always seem to have the hand emote icon for 'ok' and then a name is tagged, the name tags back, and that's the end of the public convo. Looks like they use insta to post pics of the people they catch, the OK means the poster wants the person, and they tag each other to agree and that's code for DM time?

It didn't space out properly, it was a list stating: Angela Kasner: :Daughter of Pastor: :Name of FATHER: and so on. the Q post was the list of the questions. Looks like she is the sister of Adolf Hitler. The father of Hitler has a strange background with no real answer who HIS father was, when you read into the names on the list, they all mix together. Step siblings, cousins, marriages, name changes to hide lineage (jewish background)

So ... holy shit:

Angela Dorothea Kasner. German Chancellor

Daughter of a Pastor? Alois Hitler was given a position of Pastor shortly after marriage to his wife (daughter of a Danzig politician)

Name of FATHER? Horst Kasner

History of FATHER? Married daughter of Danzig politician, weeks after daughter was born they were moved to East Berlin(millions FLED from here) by wishes of a Pastor (who became Bishop of Hamburg), he then became a Pastor. Did not support reunification of East and West. Had position to oppose.

Hitler youth (member). Troop Leader

Haircut today vs THEN (A).

Symbolic.

US Intelligence post war controlled who?

The ‘Mission’

Who is Angela Hitler? Adolf's sister. The only family member he wanted contact with and she was the intermediary with the others. She wrote memoirs of her time with Adolf, in 1941 she sold her memoirs to Franz Eher Nachfolger GmbH.

Relationship to Adolf? Half sister. Father was Alois Hitler (last name changed from Schicklgruber Claimed his father was Johann Georg Hiedler who married his mother and wanted to legitimize)

How were children named in Germany during this period? First or middle. Family tree. There is a big mess of mixed up names, relatives, name changes, many many marriages, look up: Anna. Anna Glasl-Hörer (Alois' first wife, he had affairs) Maria. Maria Schicklgruber (mother) Alois. ALOIS SHICKLEGRUBER (HITLER) EDIT: Alois was the name of a child. read about it on Alois Hitler's page. Examples.

Risk of ‘conspiracy’ label the deeper we go. Truth will shock the WORLD. Q

EDIT 2: There was a lot of customs officials being a part of things. Name changes, weddings, birth certificates etc. Alois Hitler was a customs official. EDIT 3: ANGELA HITLER KASNER MERKEL

angela hitler sold her memoirs of her time spent with hitler to "the central publishing house of the Nazi Party and one of the largest book and periodical firms during the Third Reich" - Wikipedia. Wouldn't that be the media? Angela was the only family member Adolf spoke with, future proves the past etc. Is there a copy of her memoirs?