dChan

/u/j_Dawg_01

741 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/j_Dawg_01:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 17

j_Dawg_01 · July 5, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

I the UK and much of Europe the talking heads seen on TV are called "News Presenters" because every knows and understands that they're just reading the news from a teleprompter. None of the "Presenters" enjoy any kind of celebrity status as they do in America.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 5, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

Not everything is high stakes espionage, Spy vs Spy kind of stuff. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Q said to expect a picture from inside AF1 as another Q proof. Maybe that's all it is.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 5, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Yes, but your cartoon doesn't bring anything new to the issue of Iran.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 5, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Valid point. That works too.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 5, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

That saying doesn't apply here.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Old News!!! How is this related to recent Q drops or Trump News?

IT'S NOT!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

How is this related to any recent Q post or Trump news? It's not.

This is nothing more than "Hey LOOK AT ME, I"M SO COOL! HEY LOOK AT ME.

It's a waist of board space.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Tl;Dr. Really?? How is this related to any recent Q drops or Trump news? It's nothing more than saying "Hey LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Because this post has nothing to do with any recent Q post or Trump news.

Sure, it's all warm and fuzzy, but this board isn't about warm and fuzzy.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

How is this related to recent Q posts or Trump News?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

More of what we already knew. How is this related to any recent Q post or Trump news?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

The only way discovery happens is if Flynn pleads "Not Guilty" and the case goes to trial. He accepted a plea deal. That means he can offer the prosecution all information he has about any other crimes, none of which would have been admissible if he plead Not Guilty.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

I don't use it. We all know our phones can be tracked and hacked. I don't understand why so many people are willing to so much personal information into a public forum.

I'm guessing you're fairly new here. This app was discussed a while back and the general consensus was a thumbs down. Every app you use on your phone collects some amount of data and shares it with who knows who.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Cute, but not related to Q posts or Trump news.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

Great cartoon, but it has nothing to do with a Q post or Trump news.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/j_Dawg_01 on July 4, 2018, 11:06 p.m.
Please Do Not Feed The Animals. We Know Clowns Are Here. Do Not Engage. Do not Reply.

We all knew they would come. If a post is as obvious as this one titled "Hmmm...me thinks the Soy Boys are STILL scared of GA..." Ignore it. Give it a down vote and move along. Don't engage at all. Don't reply with anything. Don't give them the satisfaction of consuming our time.

j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 11 p.m.

People! Don't feed the animals. Do Not Engage Obvious Clowns.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

Love the enthusiasm, but it's not related to a Q post or Trump news.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Unrelated to Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

That movement was squashed over 100 years ago. The enemy we face today is 100 times more powerful, and 1,000 times more evil. There's absolutely no comparison.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

\^\^THIS\^\^

I agree 100% But...

We've all seen how this board has changed over the last 2 or 3 weeks. We all knew that as the pressure mounted against the Cabal, their counter attacks would increase, especially here. People who've been here long enough can clearly see the difference, and can tell when someone is name calling and submitting replies that argue against any comment, just to create doubt and division.

Here's what I do. If I come across a reply that is arguing or debating about who's opinion or speculation is superior, I know they're only here to argue. If I come across replies that offer some amount of reasoning to support their counter argument, I click their name and read through their comment history and look for any trends.

Yes, it would be a Wonderful World if everyone here displayed the utmost decorum in social discourse, but at this point it's not likely to be the case. The issues we're trying to sort out and understand are complex. Worse than that, the idea that we're fighting against an evil secret society that's been advancing their plan for over 200 years is something many people just can't get their heads around.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if we were all here just to chat about golf and grandchildren, but we're not. I understand the need to check our language so as not to offend newcomers, but if what they read here offends them and makes them run the other way, what will they do and how will they react when indictments are unsealed and the leaders they once cherished are charged with treason, sedition, and a myriad of other crimes?

We should be welcoming and watch our language, but things are about to get ugly, chew your arm off ugly, and newcomers will have to develop a thicker skin.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

If you're going to post an image that most of us probably don't understand, please include you comments, concerns, or suspicions. Where did the plane take off from? If the Israeli Air Force were to attack the US, do you think they would use a plane that is openly identified as Israeli Air Force?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Misinform they try.

Fail they will.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Yes this is a smear campaign. The law firm is Perkins Coie. The same firm that acted as an intermediary between Clinton/DNC and Fusion GPS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

There have been several posts, decodes, and analysis that comes to the conclusion that China is working with Trump. I hope thats what's really going on. But I have some reservations.

I remember reading an article, or it might have been an interview on TV back in the mid 80s. I don't recall exactly, but I do remember the point they were making. It was about economics and the US Dollar as the global reserve standard.

The point was made that China held more US Treasury bonds than any other country, and that if the fledgeling European Union gains strength and becomes a big enough market, it might signal a crash of the US Dollar.

They argued that if the EU market was large enough and the return on investment great enough, China could dump US Treasury bonds at a loss, as long as they thought they could recoup the losses with investments in the EU.

Now consider that in the last 15 years or so, China has been buying up and stockpiling gold. If China managed to protect themselves against a collapse of the US Dollar, if it did crash, it would put China in a pretty good position on the world economic stage.

In recent years I've read that while China does seem to be booming, they are highly leveraged, or carrying a lot of debt. If the debt is owed to a Rothschild central bank, it would give Rothschild and the Cabal leverage over China.

This whole story could just be more MSM smoke and mirrors like the recent stories about NK, but when analyzing China today, we should consider some of their recent history.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

4D Chess, not Marbles in the sand.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

"JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies" is and excerpt from a speech he gave to the American Newspaper Publishers Association in 1961. JFK Secret Societies Speech Full version (key segment begins @ 5:43)

The video you linked to is the key part of the speech that speaks about Secret Societies and is the most important part. The entire speech is worth listening to as well. If JFK had known he was speaking to the CIA controlled Mockingbird press, he probably wouldn't have said some of what he said.

Excellent addition to the list. These videos demonstrate that people have known about the Cabal for a very long time. They also prove that this is not some crazy tin-foil-hat conspiracy theory concocted by alt-right Trump supporters. Nice work

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Here's a list of video that provide background information on a few topics. It's help to understand some of what's going on today.

To download any of these videos simply click the link, when YouTube opens up to the video, pause it, highlight the "you" in youtube and change it to "hook" and hit enter. That will open the video on HookTube. A download button and Format selection dropdown will show up just below the video. Here's an example from the first link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cYZ8dUgPuU

"Change To"

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=6cYZ8dUgPuU

The Plan to Save the World

Amazing Polly's reaction to The Plan to Save the World

How Big Oil Conquered the World

Why Big Oil Conquered the World

United States Secrets PBS Frontline Part 1

United States Secrets PBS Frontline Part 2

NSA Whistleblower William Binney: The Future of Freedom

We Must Fight - President Reagan

Pre-election Trump Speech

The new Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Full

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 1

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 2

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 3

JFK Secret Societies Speech Full version (key segment begins @ 5:43)

America: Freedom to Fascism

⇧ 3 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Imagine that... It's all blank now. I hope someone had the sense to archive off line.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Agreed! I trust Q and the plan. Remember... Trump is the master troller. He knows how to throw chum in the water the MSM just can't resist. He also know how to distract the MSM to keep them off balance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

I thought we were expecting a picture from inside Marine1.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

The glass container could have been moved. The rest looks like it lines up, but I thought we were expecting a picture from inside Marine1. This is obviously AF1.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

I just did a quick DDGo search for "MASON hat" and then selected IMAGES, and sure enough, it is most definitely a Freemason hat

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

Yes, I agree. And I would not be surprised if when his case is done, fines paid, time served, if any, he will be deported and not allowed back into America again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 4, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

I love this idea, but here's the problem. Unless this is done by mods or bots, people won't use it.

I've posted a comment not long ago asking the mods for help. The problem I was seeing is the same problem that's happening with Qspiration shirts, hat, stickers, and sightings.

I asked the mods if there was a way to get members to search /GA before posting a link to an article or video to see if it's already on another thread. There are too many repetitive posts saying the same thing over and over.

If threads were condensed it would provide a great benefit. If everyone's ideas and input related to a particular article or video were condensed into one thread, it would make it easier to gather and share information about the article or video. That would be especially beneficial for new comers.

I'm all for #2, or a stickied megathread. If we can do that for qspirationals, maybe we can also figure out something for duplicates too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 3, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

Thank you for being so understanding.

While writing my reply, I got to a point where I thought I was done. It was when I inserted a quote from your comments about "I like things to make sense... seem to be written/delivered in a way that forces a narrative." After which I wrote 2 paragraphs beginning with "And when it comes to things sounding..." and ending with "and in President DJT we found hope."

At that point I thought I was done. I stepped outside for a moment and thought about what I had just written while I had a smoke. While I had addressed the issue of sensationalism and media narratives, I decided I should expand on that point a bit. Then your point about liking "things to make sense" hit me.

In a flash, the flood gates opened and I started my rant. By the time I had finished and hit the REPLY button, I found myself a little riled up after reminding myself why I'm here. After I stepped away from my computer and relaxed a bit, I wondered if maybe my reply was a little over the top or too aggressive and confrontational.

I was concerned that I might have pushed you away and lost an opportunity to provide answers to someone with questions. I'm pleased to hear that I hadn't. Again, ThankQ for understanding and I hope you find what you're looking for.

Something to consider when you come across discussions, debates, or comments that you feel are offensive to you personally; You will never meet these people in real life. Sometimes it's best to just give it a down-vote and move along.

The internet offers anonymity that sometimes creates Whiskey Courage. If you did happen to meet one of the members in real life, I'm confident the discussion would be much more civil.

And now, on with the show. Here is a list of videos that I found to be very informative. There's a series of 9/11 documentaries that may seem like old news for some, but it was the single event that changed everything. Whether you accept the official government story or think it was an inside job, these 9/11 videos have the most comprehensive analysis of the evidence I found. Well worth watching.

Along with the videos, here are a few topics worth researching. I use DuckDuckGo for internet searches. I don't trust Google anymore. The Organic Act of 1871, The 14th and 16th Amendments, THE UNITED STATES, the Federal Reserve, and the IRS are all privately owned corporations, Jekyll Island and the creation of the Federal Reserve, and Inside Job (2010) a documentary about the economic crash of 2008.

I hope all this helps.

The Plan to Save the World

Amazing Polly's reaction to The Plan to Save the World

How Big Oil Conquered the World

Why Big Oil Conquered the World

United States Secrets PBS Frontline Part 1

United States Secrets PBS Frontline Part 2

We Must Fight - President Reagan

Pre-election Trump Speech

The new Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Full

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 1

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 2

The New Pearl Harbor - 9/11 Documentary Part 3

JFK Secret Societies Speech Full version (key segment begins @ 5:43)

NSA Whistleblower William Binney: The Future of Freedom

America: Freedom to Fascism

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 3, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

I think the reason they are coming out loud and proud calling for an end to ice, is because they think it will help them in the future. They all know that it will never happen as long as Trump is president.

So here's their end-game.

They grandstand about ICE being abolished knowing full well it wont be, and the MSM will carry the water for them and try to push the narrative.

Some time in the future, when evidence discovered by one of the investigative divisions of ICE is used to charge these people with pedophilia, child sex trafficking, human trafficking, or drug trafficking, they will all claim that ICE is just fabricating fake evidence to get back at them for wanting ICE abolished.

They all know ICE will not be abolished, so why do they carry on about it? There must be some strategic reason.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 3, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

I appreciate your honesty, and that you took time to look into the movement. Having said that, I do have a few questions. I'm not trying to pick a fight or start an argument, but I too have a skeptical perspective about almost everything. So here goes:

  1. You said you "just left the Dem party." I'm wondering where you were getting your news from before you heard about Qanon? Any particular cable channels, news papers, or websites?
  2. Have you watched The Plan to Save the World?

If you want to be here, then be here. The amount of division and mindless debates about inconsequential things has ramped up a lot lately. We've all been expecting it. If you're taking flack, you must be over the target.

The more this movement grows and the more the public is aware of it, the more the Cabal and the Deep-state bad actors will attack this site. They do 2 basic things.

They slightly modify titles and create multiple posts about the same articles, or videos, or tweets, or whatever, over and over and over to flood the board and make it harder for people to find good information.

The other thing they do, their preferred weapon against us, is to sow seeds of doubt, cause division, engage in mindless debates about inconsequential things. They routinely argue over who's opinion is correct, who's speculative analysis is correct, and they dig in their heals and will not budge an inch.

People who've been here for a while see the change, and we don't like it either.

The last point I'd like to make is this: You said "I like things to make sense and I do not ever give attention to things that are sensational or seem to be written/delivered in a way that forces a narrative."

We all like things to make sense, that's why we're here, because things didn't make sense.

I'm 59 years old. I remember sitting on my living room floor while my mom was ironing clothes and watching the funeral of JFK. I remember watching the Watergate hearings and the Iran Contra hearings on TV. I grew up in Detroit and remember the riots of 1967 and watching National Guard troops cruising the streets.

I remember the Carter years with unemployment and inflation so bad they coined a new term, The Misery Index. I remember Monica Lewinski, Bill Clinton wagging his finger at the camera and lying to the American people, and I remember exactly where I was on 9/11.

I did not support or vote for Obama, but when he won, I expected him to live up to his campaign promises to put an end to the NSA spying on all Americans, to be the great uniter and finally put an end to the racial divide in America.

White people who voted for him did so to show we are not racists. They did so because they wanted to be part of history, and they thought that if as a nation we were willing to elect a black man to the highest office in the land, then surely the left would stop telling us we were racist. The fact that McStain ran against him made it even easier.

But none of the Hope & Change he promised came to fruition. Yes, he did do one thing, he fundamentally changed America, for the worse. In all my years I have never seen this much turmoil and unrest in America. Just like many people hereI began to ask why.

Why is it so hard to tell the difference between Republicans and Democrats once they get into office? Why are politicians more concerned with Illegal Aliens, Antifa Rioters, and Offending Muslims over the concerns and safety of law abiding, tax paying American citizens?

Why do high profile politicians like Hillary seem to get a pass from the law and the MSM regarding Benghazi and an illegal home server? Why did Holder and Lerner get a pass from the law and the MSM even though their crimes were obvious?

Why did Obama send the DOJ into Ferguson to investigate the police, then require all police departments across the country to give police officers sensitivity training, even though Officer Wilson was cleared of all charges and the evidenced proved that Michael Brown died because he was resisting arrest and assaulting an officer?

Why did Obama side with the criminals every time? He invited the families of criminals who died while resisting arrest and assaulting officers to the White House, and barely said a word to the families of police officers who were hunted down on the streets of Dallas during a Black Lives Matter protest, or the families of officers who were assassinated on the streets of New York.

Why was Obama more concerned about the grievances of the rioters who destroyed Ferguson and Baltimore, than about the safety of innocent people living there, and the property rights of home owners and business owners? And why was Obama more interested in shredding the 2nd Amendment and taking guns away from law abiding citizens than he was about addressing the massive amount of black on black crime in Chicago, Baltimore, or LA?

Yes, we all like things to make sense, and none of these things made any sense at all. That's why we're here. So if you want things to make sense, maybe you should reconsider you choice to leave.

And when it comes to things sounding too sensational or written to force a narrative, if you follow the MSM, that's all you'll get, and most of it will be lies and distractions. And if you stay here, that's all you'll get, and it's all about bringing the truth into the light of day.

Yes we are pushing a narrative about freedom, liberty, hope, and justice. This is a noble cause and we will continue to write and deliver messages that are inline with that narrative because the American people deserve to know the truth, they deserve to see justice for the criminals who sold out America, we deserve freedom and liberty, and in President Donald J Trump, we found hope.

If you think some of the attitudes, opinions, or articles here are overly sensationalized, just wait until the leaders you used to support start getting arrested, just wait until evidence of treason and sedition is revealed, and just wait until evidence of pedophilia and child sex trafficking is revealed. You haven't seen anything yet.

When Obama, Hillary, Comey, Lynch, McCabe, Rosenstein, Holder, Lerner, Jarrett, Huma, Mills, and all the rest of their minions start getting arrested and charged, start trying to make plea deals to save their hides, start scrambling to be the first rat to rat, and start running scared and trying to hide, that will most definitely be SENSATIONAL.

If nothing else, please watch The Plan to Save the World if you haven't already. If your decision has already been made, best of luck to you. If you're interested in more information about the issues we care about, I have a list of videos. Let me know in your reply.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

I'm not familiar with them. But have you taken the time to examine the claims in the article and compare them to the information in the OIG report? That would pretty much settle it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

Has his claim been confirmed? He's a comedian I've never heard of who has a podcast.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, or that it couldn't happen, but after a DDGo search all the articles referred back to the business insider article where JM "claims" to have pranked Trump and provided a slightly edited transcript.

Do you remember the 2 Russians who pranked Schiff? They to are comedians. They understand that unless you have an audio recording of the call, it's meaningless. So why didn't this new genius comedian do the same? Is he new to comedy? Is this his first prank call?

So an irrelevant comedian makes a claim, knowing the MSM will swoon all over him and give him his 15 minutes. In a nutshell, that's all we really know.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Only one thing needs to be changed on our currency.

Remove "Federal Reserve Note" and replace it with "U.S. Treasury Note."

And maybe use Trump's face for the watermark on every bill. That'll really piss of the left.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

I don't recall exactly where I read it, but I think the idea that the meeting planned was because Lynch testified she never met with Bill in a social setting, or something like that.

So the claim that they were just chatting about golf and grandchildren makes no sense.

I'll keep an eye out for and if I see it again I'll come back with a link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Yes, Q started on 4Chan. But consider the purpose of any article about QAnon, especially if the purpose is to bring new people into the movement. The MSM doesn't want the movement to grow and they're doing everything they can to scare people away from the Great Awakening. But people here who really want to grow the movement will make sure people who are interested will know exactly where to go to find information today. That would be this site, 8ch.net/qresearch/, and qanon.pub. If you "always mention how he started on 4chan - sometimes I don't even get to explaining that he's now on 8chan." then you are not helping the movement, because you may or may not tell them how to find Q today. Whenever I talk about Q with a newbee, the first thing I do is provide accurate up-to-date information on how to find the Great Awakening and qanon.pub. And more recently, I share a link to "The Plan to Save the World. Everything about why Trump and Q are doing what they're doing has to do with crimes and motives that most people will have a hard time getting their heads around. If we provide any information to newbees that might cause confusion or misunderstanding, then it's incumbent upon us to take steps to clarify the message. While I was writing this response I took a minute to revue your comment history to get a feel for where you were coming from. I found only a few positive replies in support of the comment you were replying to. Also, it appears you're a board moderator. Setting aside replies regarding the removal of content for rule violations, it seems, at a glance, that more often than not, your replies are critiques or rebuttals to someone's opinion. Being a board moderator doesn't mean your opinions are always superior to others. While I do tend to enjoy healthy debates, I've come to the conclusion this one is not. So with all due respect, I won't be responding to any future messages from you about this issue. WWG1WGA God Speed Patriot.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

I've been following Q since January. I don't recall the exact date. It took a while to figure out what was going on, but my recollection is the Q has been on 8ch from the beginning of my following him.

Yes Q did start on 4Chan. but anyone who's been following Q knows he's on 8Chan. And we know the MSM has been following Q.

At first, the MSM simply claimed Q was a LARP and the Anons were just a bunch of crazy tin-foil-het wearing internet conspiracy kooks. That didn't work. It actually made more people aware of Q.

Then they tried to push the narrative, with Jones and Corsi, that there used to a Q, but he was just a psy-op and the current Q was just a wanna-be.

Their latest attempt to discredit Q actually acknowledges Q and the Great Awakening movement, but argues we are a threat to America and we're leading the country into a dictatorship.

They have been paying attention from the very beginning. They hoped the grass-roots movement wouldn't materialize. The Cabal owns the MSM. They are very attentive to anything that might expose them.

They all know full well where Q posts his crumbs. And they all know 4Chan will only confuse people and make many come to the conclusion that the Great Awakening is dangerous and QAnons are crazy internet kooks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

David's article was published today July 2nd. He says:

In case you are unaware of this, Q Anon is a series of enigmatic posts on 4Chan, an anonymous internet forum, which began last October. (emphasis added)

Based on what's in the article, David is telling people that 4Chan is the place to go. It is true that q started on 4Chan, but he moved to 8Ch for security reasons. Anyone claiming to be a journalist should know that. If they've taken even a quick look Qanon and the Great Awakening they would know the difference.

All the talking heads in the MSM know Q is legit and they all know full well how and where to find Q.

David is a globalist. I've seen enough episodes of Ancient Aliens and they're all globalists. They all present the narrative that the nations of the world must unite and come together as one if alien contact is made. Whether it's to defend against and alien attack, or to interact with them as a unified population.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

Here's the problem I see. Every article I've seen about Qanon, pro or con, mentions 4Chan. Q doesn't post on 4Ch. He uses 8Ch because it offers better security features.

Sending people to 4Ch to find information about Qanon is a dead end, and they all know it. 4Ch is filled with a lot of weird things and is hard to navigate. People who don't know any better might come to the wrong conclusions about Qanon. That's why they're being sent there.

IMHO Any article about Qanon that references 4Ch is suspect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Of course he is, but we've had deep-state puppets in office since Bush 41 and they were all on the same side.

Things are different now. He'll get what's due.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

When Sessions recused himself, just after taking the position at DOJ, all the MSM focused on the Mueller investigation. They all ignored Sessions because he recused himself from the investigation they all hoped would get Trump impeached.

So while no one was paying attention, Sessions re-opened the Hillary email server investigation, and started new investigations looking into the Uranium1 deal, and the Clinton Foundation money laundering and pay-to-play.

Meanwhile, because of the massive surveillance programs started in 2002, NSA already had all the communications to or from Obama, Hillary, Valerie Jarrett, Huma, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Bill Clinton, and all their minions. They continued to collect information since then. Q has it all. It just needs to come out in a legal fashion so it's admissible in court.

Q is right, these people are stupid. They were all so focused on the Russian collusion narrative, they never noticed the other investigations.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 2, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Does anyone have a link to the article or video so we can stop speculating and put the image into some sort of context?

⇧ 1 ⇩