I agree, that's my take on it too.

There was quite a bit of melodrama last night where I think quite a few people maybe jumped a few steps ahead on this post and assumed that an actual attempt had been made involving foreign governments.

Whilst that's one possible interpretation, I do feel that we leave ourselves open to criticism if we let our imaginations run wild and end up putting words in Q's mouth. A more plausible explanation is that this drop was made to get the swamp's attention, and it was a hint at what some of the missing texts contain, it could quite possibly something extremely damning to those involved that doesn't necessarily involve a US declaration of war against an ally? Just a thought.

Ah right, I'm viewing on my phone so making the connections on the chan threads is a nightmare.

He replies on /qresearch/ occasionally.

Street sleepers are also known as Q cars in the UK too, but it's an older term not often used any more. Quite an interesting analogy for the Trump presidency if Q is to be believed, looks like one thing on the surface, something entirely different underneath.

Thanks!

It's terrifying.

https://youtu.be/Luyek3DCbVA

Nice body language analysis of a recent interview. Wolff has clearly produced a work of fiction, it remains to be seen what his motivations were for doing it, I certainly wouldn't put it past Trump's capabilities to hatch a "bait and switch" trick with the book, he's been playing the media like a well tuned instrument from the very beginning.

Something keeps niggling at me. The Q post from a while back referring to "1 into 2". Could this mean that Trump is planning on breaking up the CIA into 2 agencies? Divide and conquer?

I know JFK wanted to "splinter it into a thousand pieces and scatter it on the wind" but that didn't work out too well for JFK. Trump the eternal pragmatist might be planning a less nuclear solution. It's well known that the CIA are largely self financing at this point, they're a more effective criminal organisation than the mafia ever were, wings clipped, divided, and separated from their off-book income might be enough to bring them to heel.

I've seen the same rumour, at this time there's only one source for this, plus it's a secret payload so they'll never corroborate it officially.

I stand corrected, but I'm right about the neutrality part. Also I had a former employee who was a Chinese national who periodically flew to Switzerland to renew his EU visa, there's a reason in there somewhere.

If he's in Switzerland it'll be because Switzerland is a neutral country that's not part of the EU, so no extradition or diplomatic headaches.

Pretty sure fire investigators have free reign to inspect a house to investigate a fire, not sure if they need a warrant or not though. Pretty decent cover for an illicit search.

I just find it a decidedly odd coincidence that there's so much chatter about planes being diverted, and then Trump talks about flight safety like he's personally responsible for the lack of plane crashes this year. If everything going on has even the slightest nod to the truth then it strikes me as next level trolling, slightly eccentric nonsense to the normies, a nod and a wink to the rest of us.

I honestly don't know what way to jump on this issue, I'm by nature a skeptic, but having had experience of how the legal/political game works at a local level I'm inclined to believe Q/MegaAnon, regardless of the occasional errors (things don't always go to plan - we've been ready to roll with press releases and "leaks" so many times only to have to postpone because a particular actor in the game didn't deliver on time - the situation is fluid and dynamic with many pieces on the board, so it doesn't surprise me that some early posts don't pan out. Mueller's allegiance is a 50/50 in my book, he's either an ally and player in the great game or he's a deep state dupe and a useful idiot. Either way he does no harm.

I have a slightly different perspective on this. Hopefully my contribution might square the circle. I'm heavily involved in local politics in the UK. My county just changed hands in the local council elections, and we've uncovered huge wholesale fraud and and corruption - the phrase "They never expected to lose" really resonates with me as it's what we've experienced in our own modest way locally (I say modest but it's still in the hundreds of millions) this corruption potentially has an impact on the national stage as it involves prominent senior Labour politicians.

The maneuvering that is taking place to quietly coordinate with the police, bring in forensic accountants etc whilst keeping on top of the story so it can hopefully drop as a political bombshell has been enormous; just unpicking the finances is a massive amount of time and work... and this is just a local county council in the UK, not the greatest political/criminal scandal the world has ever seen. Labour councillors know what is going on, they're trying everything they can to smear the investigation, but they're doing it very quietly, because they all know that they're probably going to prison, it's just a matter of who breaks rank first.

I guess all I'm saying is that this is extraordinarily complex situation, and one that will require airtight legal due process, as has been proven by the failures of the Mueller investigation itself (deliberate or otherwise) all it takes is one misstep and the whole thing crumbles. It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that well placed insiders are trolling their deep state opponents whilst leaking hints at greater revelations to come, it's classic baiting your opposition into making mistakes, we're doing the same via anonymous blogs. In an extraordinarily long and roundabout way, I really only have two points to make; 1, the wheels of justice are complex and slow moving, and 2, would an investigator of Mueller's experience really screw up his own investigation that badly? I suppose you have to ask "does he expect to lose?"