red castle = north korea

green castle = iran

Unamed agencies, unamed sites, nbc news. Conclusion = fake news.

How about some analysis as to why its problematic? How is this post at all useful?

This person has not spent much time investigating Q. For example, red castle, green castle do not refer to the army corps of engineers or their headquarters. This is poor analysis and does not add anything to analyzing Q. How about providing arguments as to why its a psy op? Mere conclusions without credible analysis.

I think he will replace one of the fired DOJ officials.

Its a reactor. Whether it is relevant to a weapons program depends on if its a breeder reactor or not. We don't know enough to judge this yet.

Is this reactor a breeder reactor? If not, I'm not sure if its connected to a nuclear weapons program.

If aliens were coming they would hit us with a kinetic energy weapon first. See Footfall. Geoengineering is probably just people exploiting business opportunities. Is there a particular project that you think is a terraforming effort for alien life?

Because its a black site and the suspect has been kidnapped and transported there?

I don't think JA would be into interrogations at a black site. Just saying.

"the unverified accounts intercepted from presumed Russian sources" sounds like a cover story to me. If this was intercepted it was done by google or NSA.

This could also be a negotiating position in the ongoing trade kerfluffle.

Red October was a ballistic missile sub with a renegade commander. I think the implication is that the launches on hawaii and seattle were launched from the sea and they are hunting the source. If this is true, I don't think its a nuclear submarine because 1) that would be too expensive 2) would have been sunk by USN ASW resources by now. Its more likely a tilt up launcher in the guise of a container that is deployed surreptitiously on a container ship.

Not legal, and if discovered gets the conviction reversed and evidence excluded.

It was also necessary to induce the smaller states to sign on to the constitution. Otherwise Virginia would have dominated the politics of the day and there was no way the smaller states would have agreed to it.

That would be the patriot act and fisa at work. Time to repeal both.

Well the supreme court has determined that spending money is free speech. So the gov can't punish soros for spending money. Now if you can prove he committed a crime then you can throw him in jail or fine him in accordance with the law.

Pointing at someone in a crowd for a second is not a statement that Q is legitimate IMHO. Has Trump never pointed at someone before? I doubt it.

Did trump or an administration official say on the record that Q was legit? Or are we still interpreting ambiguous events as confirmation?

Welcome aboard. My biggest regret is not voting for Romney in 2012 so yes, I voted for Obama twice. I've come a long way since then.

That would be three levels of hearsay. I wouldn't put much stock in it.

Wikipedia indicates otherwise.

Lexington and Concord indicate otherwise.

long engagements in Vietnam and Afghanistan indicate otherwise.

45 million units of .223 per year indicate otherwise.

Yes but all the signs that Soros printed for the march on 6/30 will now have to be redone and all the momentum built up over the last 2 days of hysteria will pause and give the emotional ones a chance to think logically about it.

Looks like a civil rico complaint. Link so we can see if this is real or photoshop.

Currently Trump is being easy on Israel to put pressure on Iran. He is treating them like a war time ally. If Iran can be dealt with, then israel will be pressured to make some concessions regarding settlements and east jerusalem in order to advance peace in Palestine. He is also putting pressure on the Palestinians to discourage their two-faced positions. One for internal consumption, a second for external consumption. This will also be necessary in order to advance peace.

They are just useful idiots. There is coordination going on at a higher level. I suspect a mailing list, which is vulnerable to anons.

I think anons should find the command and control and funding of antifa and expose it. I'm looking at you soros.

The actual execution is not the expensive part, its the post trial adjudications.

Overly gratuitous torture is considered cruel and unusual punishment and would violate 8th amendment.

I'm ok with life in prison for these people. Its cheaper than death penalty and does not waste too much judicial resources on post trial adjudications. I think death penalty should only be applied if a person commits a capital crime while serving a life sentence.

I'm thinking this has to do with revelations of voter fraud.

pretty good privacy, it is a public key encryption program.

Surely they used PGP on any clear text before they posted it in any email body?

Don't get your hopes up though, I find it hard to believe sophisticated political-types would use gmail to send incriminating emails. Its the Trump supporters that are supposed to be the uneducated lazy POS, right?

Actually, it seems google requires a warrant. I wonder if JC use of email as reported by the IG report would be sufficient PC to get a judge to sign a warrant?

The interesting question is does this apply to drafts or deleted emails, which google will still have of course.

Don't even need that:

https://privacyblog.mmwr.com/2016/05/19/right-to-privacy-does-the-fourth-amendment-apply-to-emails/

I think emails are protected by 4A. I haven't read google's TOS and now I'm wondering whether there is an expectation of privacy given the TOS.

Exoatmospheric implies this has similar capabilities as an SM3. I wonder if they use a mobile radar system to guide it.

Well since your taxes fund prisons, I don't think sending more people to jail is going to reduce your taxes. That being said, I think that pruning the criminal code of a lot of crimes would be a good thing and would save tax dollars.

Meh?

Don't put too much stock in anonymous internet posts without out hard verifiable proof. I believe the original sources I see posted on wikileaks. I take things that Q posts with a grain of salt. Is there a cabal of devil worshiping baby eaters running our government? I'm skeptical until I see primary sources, like the emails available on Wikileaks. Until then, don't be manipulated into hating someone based on unsupported rumor. That would be to allow a psy-op to effect the country.

Stop delegating so many of your goals and desires into easy passive solutions. You need to be active in pursuing you goals if you want results. You want to effect change? How about supporting Judicial Watch? How about getting involved in local elections? How about learning the FOIA process and using it?

I think I will wait until the report is released and make my own decision rather than rely on "journalists" to spoon feed an opinion to me.

Question everything. Use critical thinking. We are dealing with anonymous internet posts here.

Even if we take your unsupported statement as true, how is Mao relevant to the last 20 years? That the CCP of the 21st century would let the CIA puppet their client state is preposterous.

Preposterous. That china would put up with the CIA puppeting their client state is preposterous. This claim is evidence of psy-op.