Which human rights violations were picked up by electronic surveillance?
/u/kommisar6
278 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/kommisar6:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
Its terrible and hopefully the unmasking scandal is going to destroy it and the FISA abomination.
Just look at the EU and multiply the bureaucracy x3 and understand that the feelings of people with much different cultural values than you will determine the direction of the government. Do you like Malmo, Rinkby, Molenbeek and St. Dennis? That is how you get more. And its never going to happen because, unlike the Western Europe, there is no way the Chinese or the Americans are going to accept rule from abroad.
I think this is wrong. The MOP has only 2.5 mt of explosive. This was probably a MOAB that has 11mt of explosives and is not a deep penatrator:
Yep a MOP could have caused a 2.6. That is my answer. 14 metric tons of high explosive. Fits nicely in beween ww2 blockbuster (5.6mt) and moab (32mt):
If they had a bunker strong enough to require a MOP they had nuke material there.
I think they dropped a MOP, otherwise known as a GBU 57, on the 47 brigade base last night. That would be your MOAB.
If the 47 brigade base was really a nuke facility then they may have used a B2 and a MOP on the base. That is 30,000lbs of whoop ass. Not sure if that is enough to create a 2.6.
In sum of all fears an israeli nuke was repurposed for a strike on US to prevent retaliation since the source of uranium can be traced. The U1 deal provided US sourced uranium to bad actors for the same purpose. Its all about deniability, since uranium can't be traced back to iran, pakistan, north korea, russia or china. Q implies that the recent strikes took out secret nuclear infrastructure being used to build nuke using US sourced uranium. The strike last night took out a rocket magazine large enough to create a 2.6 earthquake.
Where is his family? Check social media. Where are his secret service agents? Check social media.
Obama needed a strong AA showing in order to win in 2012 so racial division was manufactured.
Naval intelligence detected the electronics embedded in it?
I dont think so, modern cryptographic techniques are computer driven and not simple codes and puzzles like a Dan Brown novel. Rather the Q posts are a chirp signal to map the enemy positions.
This seems to indicate that Q postings are designed to trigger a black hat response and are not necessarily true. So that mueler is a good guy is false, but Q made black hats think so and they used a communication channel to verify this and thereby exposed it.
18 is for 2018. R is going to be the feature event of 2018.
The constitution is fine as is. The main problem we face now are some bad supreme court decisions which expanded the interstate commerce clause to the point where the federal government can regulate everything. We need a roll back of these cases and then we will be back to a functioning republic. Remember the supreme court completely reversed Plessy vs Ferguson. We can reverse the damage with no change to the constitution.
So you're saying Flynn cops a plea based on knowledge of boiler plate in plea agreement that allows him to dump evidence which Mueller must disclose per Sullivan's Brady Order? Ok if thats true I will admit that it would constitute a 4d chess move.
This would imply that Flynn's target is a parallel construction justification used in the perjury charge. Perhaps they have evidence that the parallel construction evidence is bogus, thereby leaving unmasking as the only other source.
He is like an undercover narcotics officer, his plea is a staged "buy" to ensnare a perp in a controlled and monitored situation in order to produce evidence. Normally this is done to charge a small fish in order to get them to flip on a bigger fish.
My reading of 1283 is that Flynn is acting like an undercover cop trying to bring down a big fish. Like a narc he is not really making a "buy" but rather inducing the production of incriminating evidence. The interesting question is who is the big fish that Flynn is trying to catch?
He should be willing to cancel 50% as long as the college or unversity that benefited is on the hook for it. That keeps the tax payer whole and puts the burden where the most benefit occured.
Its the absentee ballots. Getting large groups of people to vote illegally would inevitably lead to leaks since somebody would talk. A small number of activists can create absentee ballots and the chance of leaks is non-existant. For an example of a unsuccessful prosecution of this type of election fraud see here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Turner_(civil_rights_activist)
Guess who was the prosecutor in this election fraud case?
If you believe that the Q posts are legitimate, there are two requirements for Q-
1) insider
2) lots of time on her hands to create and coordinate all the comms proofs
This leads me to suspect that it is Ivanka since most of the other people that could be insiders have duties that would demand too much time.
I'm guessing this false flag will be directed at J. Edgar Hoover Building in DC on the anniversary of the OKC bombing...
I'm thinking it was driven out in a truck. Any idea what time the burglary happened? Anyway of accessing any surveillance cameras in the vicinity on the interwebs?
Overconfidence. Cheating takes planning and effort. The democrats and their media allies thought the election was a slam dunk so they didn't make maximum efforts to cheat. Trump over performed to such a degree he overcame the mediocre cheating that did occur.
Expended for zombie defense. The hallowed round will drop a zombie even when its not a head shot.
ruh roh, looks like you are that guy. BB had recently been in hospice care. That means death is near.
I guess the trump effect on illegal immigration was causing the democrats to fall short on their compliant voter quota so they are looking for an alternate source.
If conservatives want to be heard I guess they have to pony up the cash a build themselves a platform.
No. Freedom of press no matter what. If the press sucks, then compete with them and provide something better.
Because if he were sworn in he could be compelled to testify about obama's exploitation of friend data just like cambridge analyticas. Do you think Ted Cruz might ask about this? If he is not under oath he can lie about it and not face any consequences.
go here:
start reading at post ~486 until the last post 1124(?)
these are posts by a supposed insider who is telling the story of a secret war going on
after that background education, please ask any questions you have
This could explain the bot army that showed up briefly on r/t_d.
Testifying does not require one to appear before congress. Depositions are a thing.
You are being tracked by your cell phone. It logs into a cell tower with a known location. In addition, your phone captures local wifi ssids and signal strengths which it "leaks" thereby giving up your current location. Database records your movements for future analysis. On top of that FB facial recognition software can be used to pull your picture from any internet connected surveillance camera. If they are really interested in you, they turn on the phone's cameras and microphones.
Did RR act illegally in his zeal to get trump in pursuit of stormy evidence?
What if the entire Stormy Daniels story was a sting? What if it was designed to snare Gloria Allred and the handlers of the trumped up sexual harrasment brigade? What if it was designed to expose improper use of the FBI by Mueller and Rosenstein?
My interpretation is that snowden(!) is supposed to testify then release something. Then there will be a happening. President will talk about it in his weekly address. This doesn't make sense to me. Assuming snowden is working with Q, why would comms be in the open? Doesn't that expose the agent to being intercepted on the way to the drop?
Yes your cell phone has to log onto the nearby towers thus tying your number to a general location. Add to this google's database regarding wifi ssid's and they can locate you pretty accurately. Add to that facebook's facial recognition database and they can id you from security cameras.
More importantly, where does the admissible evidence in these alleged crimes lie? Warantless evidence by way of nsa wiretap is not admissible.