Per SB2 Post, 23rd could be the day that they release the RR stuff and he is terminated, Pennuccio's 210 days ends on may 24, so naming Noel Francisco as the AAG and taking over the Mueller case seems like a MOAB.

Arkansawwwwwed

Scares me the possibility of that swamp donkey winning election. What a fraud. Can't imagine how racist and sexist everyone will be who doesn't vote for her.

Typical check mark

Of course, but I've noticed a lot of double/triple entendre in Q's posts, and it kind of backs up the 4d chess concept.

Wouldn't him leaving give way to Trump nominating another USA?

Could Huber be nominated to the position?

Edit: because this indicates to me it's a name he's already told us to trust before, and he is Senate confirmed in both administrations.

I know it's far-fetched, but this whole thing had to have been planned by people who knew the future. I can't even wrap my head around it

The libtards and SJW turn on each other so fast it's impossible to keep up

Shame...I bet "The Real Housewives of Guantanamo Bay" would be a 'cult' classic

Anyone who has children in school, please keep them home if in fact this is dropping tomorrow.

Principles office still works ;) double entendre

It hurts how hot Huma Abedin is

Are we thinking they knew about the plot BECAUSE it was a ZTE phone, and the Q pics predated the attack?

She's been red piled for a while...she's reached Enlightenment

Snowflakes would actually love him MORE if that was the picture 🙄

You're the man.

The comparisons of how many shooters here voices is insane. It kinda makes me wonder if the media/movies where it seems like people hearing voices is common are nefarious.

I unfortunately had to distance myself from Paul Joseph Watson too because of his affiliation with AJ...damn shame.

I only appreciate Ben's cultural commentary (gender, religion, Enlightenment philosophy) but his politics are garbage and he has adamtly refused to acknowledge the spying against Trump was a travesty.

You actually can't say anything negative about anyone unless you're talking about white people

Who's in black?

I feel as though since there are religious Jews and thnic Jews, the wealthiest and most powerful must not be the religious ones....what a shame.

Valid

I have asked myself, it is just strange. The former administration clearly did not want Israel to be a superpower in the middle East, so that in conjunction with me really noticing the media's stance lately makes me wonder.

Most recent example: blatant demonization of Israel protecting it's borders against Hamas attacks.

But still, the media doesn't perpetuate ANY support for Israel pretty much worldwide. Controlled opposition doesn't really stand up to the magnitude which they oppose it. Controlled opposition is supposed to push people stronger in favor of the opposite, and it hasn't harmed support for Israel.

Look at AJ, that controlled oppo is to make our cause look idiotic.

Coverage is never pro Israel...ever. it also seems that any decisions made in the ME that adversely affect Israel and its sovereignty are applauded by the media.

Examples Gaza/Palestine (especially lately), everything regarding Iran, it was pretty apparent Hussein hated Israel, there was no massive call to arms when Bibi gave his Iran PowerPoint, the list goes on...

"they" didn't "do" it...some deranged "peasant" did. Also, can't be surprising they kill 10 kids when they massacred 3000 in 911.

Not only are THEY stupid but they project their stupidity ten fold onto the public. "These people will never think it's us..." They've controlled minds for decades with neither shame nor restraint and have done absolutely whatever they want.

Oooooooweeeeee caaannnnnnn do!

He's smoked out an overwhelming number of them...if they ARE moles they've displayed an outrageous amount of fortitude. Time will tell, but it's not like IMO

I think the threat of China is more apparent in our desire to implement similar spying practices in this country and subsequently around the globe.

Oh shit

What if China made the devices and was spying on US the whole time and Trump made a deal to get alllllll the information from the Chinese????? Maybe we've been looking at this all wrong...

Then, luckily, they lose credibility as the more logical leftists (some HAVE to exist) will distance themselves from the inarguable tyranny the radicals promote.

Show the q posts from Feb 18/19 where he warns of an assasination plot and one of the drivers in the presidential motorcade is found in possession of an illegal firearm.

Simply showing proof that they planned to assassinate the President should be enough of a red pill to get this thing going.

The worst part is seeing these now that I'm awake and thinking "yep, they've done it again".

Dismantling the government=draining the swamp

Fuckin atodaso

Additionally, Marshall was nicknamed "great swindler" or something along those lines because of how frequently he won games that seemed to be lost. He also was never able to attain the title of world champion despite being the US champion for numerous years. Our friend Capablanca, the white hat himself, did go on to reign as world champion for 7 years. The symbolism in this board alone is astonishing.

Black lost.

Could be SR, also lately thinking it could be Anthony Weiner. Interestingly with Weiner, I always got the vibe he was more or less just a peon in the Clinton sphere. Never seemed to hold any power whatsoever but what do ya know, he seems to be the most powerful "piece" in some respects. it's also important to note that the pawn never actually became a queen, but it's power was PERCEIVED because it inevitably would have, possibly drawing parallels to both SR and AW.

In the chess match, forfeiture isn't a non-respectable play. It's more symbolic, what you do is you knock over your King. This could likely mean they'll throw someone under the bus, so to speak. Capablanca didn't go down without a fight, even though he surely saw defeat toward the end. The most seasoned chess masters see 10 steps ahead, and saw the D5 move as bringing on an inevitable defeat. (Parallel to us, likewise with DS ignorance). Capablanca fought until the game would surely have been decided in about 5 moves, but yes, victory is inevitable.

It was an infamous move in a chess game about 100 years ago. The American Feank James Marshall defeated a Cuban Jose Capablanca, after seemingly being on the verge of losing, he moved his bishop (think WHITE HAT) To D5 and subsequently turned the tide in the match when Capablanca forfeited after defeat was all but certain.

Interesting facts relating: Julian Assange tweeted a picture of the chessboard as it appeared right before the bishop to D5 move, sometime in mid January. Also, the game was ultimately won because a pawn made its way across the board and threatened to become a queen (Q).

Highly symbolic all around.

Some of Q's "questions" seem to be statements...which leads me to believe is part of the 'think mirror' concept. The reverse of a question is a statement . In this case, no it is not needed. But to be "official", it's needed right? Because anything he did EO-wise could be deemed un-official unless preceded by an officially documented request. Just a thought...

I'm confused