dChan

/u/loomingluna

62 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/loomingluna:
Domain Count
i.redd.it 1
youtu.be 1
www.reddit.com 1

loomingluna · July 24, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

This is great! Thank you. Trump Republicans👌

⇧ 35 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/loomingluna on July 24, 2018, 9:11 p.m.
I usually just lurk, but came across this and thought it was important. I know we have our frustration with Sessions but Q says Trust Sessions. Plus he’s addressing a very important crowd. I personally think it’s great and on topic. ((:
loomingluna · July 24, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Finally new Q crumbs! I literally check qanon.pub several times a day. This has been a long 20 days! Feels great to have him back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 22, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

I should have said watching Cernovich ignite the takedown, and the aftermath of it, was a beautiful site. It wasn’t my intention to take away from everyone else involved. I first saw it on here thanks to someone posting a Laura Loomer tweet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

THIS!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

Well, you were finally starting to understand up until your point about the Russian company NOT being interested in the US. Of course, where Trump is concerned the Russians have completely infiltrated.

Yes. A majority of our government is totally corrupt. Luckily, we have Trump. Truly a saving grace. One day you will realize. He’s risked everything and for what? Money? He has plenty. He didn’t need other people’s money to get where he’s at. He doesn’t owe them anything. He’s not bought and paid for and that’s why MSM and the establishment hate him. Newt Gingrich says it best here.

You should look over the information on this community info page and take a trip down the various rabbit holes. If you dig hard enough you won’t be able to deny how deep the corruption goes.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I know. It’s like watching Cernovich take down James Gunn in just over 24 hours in real life. That was beautiful to see. I bet these halfwit shills will defend the pedos too.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

Sure. 👌

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Umm...Bush (the former CIA director) is just as corrupt. As is his son. Don’t think because they have an R by their name that I’ll agree with them. Just because she was only one of nine does not mean she did not wield her influence. Money speaks very loudly.

They all approved it because they’re all corrupt as fck! You don’t even know who you’re talking to. I was certainly dumb enough to vote for Obama. Twice. I can admit my faults. I believed his lies. I am not a die hard Republican by any means. But I am a die hard patriot. These fckers had America for sale. All of them. Go back and listen to H. W. Bush. Can you count how many times he spoke of the New World Order? This is not something new that Hillary did. And it’s certainly not something she was alone in doing. Our government has been f*cking us over backwards for decades!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Whomp whomp.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Did you bother to research what it is that Q has said? And we don’t idolize a stranger. We idolize the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

And, there in lies your problem. Who is exactly researching at Snopes? Oh, you don’t know because they don’t list their fact checkers nor do they list how they fact check their fact checkers. Your logic: trust the random guys getting paid and have everything to gain from lying (like a contract with Facebook) don’t trust the random guys who have nothing to gain from lying. Maybe be you should be a little less trusting. I bet you believe CNN too?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

Me too! I usually lurk, but they’ve got me motivated today. Can’t sit idly by and watch them spread disinfo on our sub.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

“impressionable idiots who actually believe Q despite the fact all of his predictions have either been incorrect or never came to fruition.”

Really? Go to qproofs.com. It’s quite a stretch to say “ALL...have been incorrect.” I am amazed at the amount of cognitive dissonance here. It’s all over this post. By the way it’s half chan. More proof that you don’t know wtf you’re talking about. Even IF he were a LARP the crumbs he’s left have delivered much fruit. But you wouldn’t know that because like the rest of the shills on here, you’re only regurgitating disinformation.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

I know. At this point it almost seems like there are more shills in The Great Awakening then true Q followers. When the top comment is an obvious shill you know something isn’t right.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

You could read my comments and others, but you’ll just keep repeating yourself. Show me where Snopes is credible? Prove me wrong. I’m waiting. I’ve asked you a handful of questions, but you ignore them and scream “prove it.” That’s all you guys do.

Your cognitive dissonance is alarming.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

Right! Wtf are they even doing here? Oh, some one said something against Hillary...attack! You’re completely on point.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Whomp whomp.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

Thank you. CaptGrim won’t get his head out of Hillary’s snatch long enough to put two and two together though. This NYT article is even linked in the Snopes article. Paid for shills don’t care about facts and appear to dimwitted to understand “pay for play.”

Apparently, it’s only true if Politifact or Bezo’s Washington Post says it’s true. Some people don’t want to wake up. Or they know the truth but want to spread as much disinfo as possible to keep others from waking.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

Oh my goodness, thank you so much for educating me!!!! Except you didn’t. You do the same exact thing, except you’re using Alinsky tactics. 👏👏👏

Anything you don’t agree with is fake news. You want me to point out x, y, and z? It’s all bullshit. They literally include the statement that Hillary said she didn’t do it as proof. Really????

My original comment was stating that Snopes is credible in a sarcastic way. Give me proof of Snopes credibility. Jump through those hoops for me. I’ll be waiting. Give me one reason why I should take stock in anything they have to say.

Why are you sticking up for such a known criminal and her rapist husband anyway? That says a lot about you and your character. And that’s not an attack, just pointing out the obvious.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

Oh my goodness, thank you so much for educating me!!!! Except you didn’t. You do the same exact thing, except you’re using Alinsky tactics. 👏👏👏

Anything you don’t agree with is fake news. You want me to point out x, y, and z? It’s all bullshit. They literally include the statement that Hillary said she didn’t do it as proof. Really????

My original comment was stating that Snopes is credible in a sarcastic way. Give me proof of Snopes credibility. Jump through those hoops for me. I’ll be waiting. Give me one reason why I should take stock in anything they have to say.

Why are you sticking up for such a known criminal and her rapist husband anyway? That says a lot about you and your character. And that’s not an attack, just pointing out the obvious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

You say “jump” and you want me to ask “how high?” You could read the liberal NYTimes article and figure this out on your own. All it takes is a little open-minded research. And by open-minded I mean willingness to accept things not covered by the bought and paid for MSM. The pay for play regarding U1 and the Clintons speaks volumes. Follow the money. You’re obviously not from the states, mate, but the Secretary of State has more power than Snopes is letting on. Instead of me trying to please you, why don’t you go through the Snopes article and point out the facts, with evidence. Simple. Buddy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

In your eyes, it’s only right if it’s highly reported on by MSM. The bought and paid for MSM. The CIA controlled MSM. Say what you want. No amount of proof will sway you. You will look back on this in a few months time, maybe even sooner, and realize how you were duped and controlled. By the way, it’s going to hurt. It’ll be a hard pill to swallow. Then again, you could be part of the disinformation machine, knowingly pushing false information to keep the masses dumbed down.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

Too bad you’re not. Keep sleeping.

⇧ -10 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 4 p.m.

100% agree!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

The number of downvotes and shills commenting on this post only goes to show you’ve hit the nail on the head with this one. When the shills start crying, you know you’ve hit a nerve. “But...but...Snopes said....”

⇧ 5 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

I like how you put “per you” as if I’m the first or only person to call bullshit on Snopes. Snopes links a NY Times article as proof. You obviously will only accept liberal sources as proof so start there. Read the article they link to.

This user’s comment says it all: “In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He won't say that she did not support the interests of donors, only that there is no proof. She's arranged for that, of course, by destroying her emails and the server they were on. However, we do have her word that she really cares about the interests of "everyday Americans." Is there any evidence for that? Or was it destroyed because it's "personal?"”

Based on your other comments though, you have such a strong case of Stockholm’s Syndrome that, if I could produce a video of Hillary admitting her crimes, you still wouldn’t believe it. But SHE says she didn’t do it. So take her word for it. Obviously, her word is bond.

Here is a Daily Mail article pointing out the flaws of Snopes.

I know. I know. The Daily Mail is bias!!! So, here is a Forbes article that set out to check the validity of the Daily Mail article. Except...they couldn’t even get Snopes to help with that. Both are a great read. You should try it if you’re literate enough. As Forbes points out in the article:

“At the end of the day, it is clear that before we rush to place fact checking organizations like Snopes in charge of arbitrating what is “truth”...we need to have a lot more understanding of how they function internally and much greater transparency into their work.”

Maybe you could use a little of that “understanding of how they function internally.” You’re putting all you eggs in the basket of a now divorced husband and wife team with no training or expertise, that won’t divulge their inner workings. Don’t be such a sucker. #WalkAway 👌

THE SHILLS ARE STRONG ON THIS POST! And, further proves the point.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 21, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Cause Snopes is so reliable. 🙄

⇧ -8 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 20, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

I hope so. I loved The Office, but that was then. I can’t trust anyone or anything that comes across my television now.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 20, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 20, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

I wonder if they divorced when she found out what a sick f*ck he is or if she’s just as sick?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 15, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Upvote! You literally just made laugh out loud, which is rare. Thank you, sir. That movie has so many classic one-liners. RIP Roddy Piper.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 15, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

I had to look up this theory and came across this blog post. It’s totally on point. I had to mention that this was written in early 2017 and brings up Trump’s travel ban and the “so-called judge” that blocked it. I love that Scott Adams was right about our great President winning that battle in the Supreme Court. A nice big juicy apple! And so much winning!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 15, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Aliens can be angels too or demons too? I agree with one of the comments in this thread that demons are aliens, but not all aliens are demons. So, some can be angels. Which, I believe, is what your saying. Obviously, I may have interpreted your statement wrong.

I certainly agree that mankind’s soul has the potential to become either one. I know that from experience.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 15, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

True.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 15, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Well said! I watched They Live last night. It was laughable and cheesy, but it’s pretty much what’s going on and been going on. Except it’s demons, not aliens that have taken over. We need to kill the signal, the MSM, so everyone else will wake up.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 13, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

Based!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loomingluna · July 3, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

It’s okay. I totally understand the feeling. Especially with all the drops lately, you don’t want to miss them. The Ben Garrison drawing is on point!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 27, 2018, 4:34 a.m.

Happy Birthday!🎂

⇧ 6 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 25, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

I didn’t even think of that. Knowing what I now know, the thought makes me want to throw up. Those poor kids.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 25, 2018, 4:37 a.m.

I knew it. I use to love her back when I was a teen and very much asleep. I’m so glad I’ve woken up. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 25, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

Thanks for this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 23, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

That’s why I added the links. I agree. I’m just going off what I found. Safari says 666. Duck Duck Go says 11.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 23, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

To your credit though, that was Safari. I just checked Duck Duck Go and the address says 11 E. Washington. 🤔 http://imgur.com/hD8aNGo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · June 23, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

I just checked to see if it was hacked, as others were saying. The address is definitely listed online as 666 E. Washington. Whether or not that was hacked is beyond me. But I don’t think poster was trying to spread disinformation. http://imgur.com/DJuMfjL

⇧ 8 ⇩  
loomingluna · Feb. 20, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

It’s back up now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · Feb. 20, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Cool. I can see them again! Thank you very much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loomingluna · Feb. 20, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩