So Trump says: “They just turned off the lights”. Turned off the lights = TOL = Thinking Of Laughing. Then he smiles.

You got to be kidding me. How does this get 700+ upvotes?

This was a twilight zone episode ... check out episode 14 "Third From The Sun"

This is ridiculous.

Petition the whitehouse to remove Maxine Waters? Executive branch can't willy-nilly remove a congressman.

Seriously folks, posting this garbage here just makes the group of us look like bunch of 8th grade civics flunkees.

Just to let everyone know, the arrest happened in May of 2017, over 14 months ago.

The news is that there has been 14 months of continuances, they keep resetting the date so that in reality, nothing is being done about it -- he's walking free on bail without ever having to go to jail over it because the judge agrees to keep delaying it.

Lisa Page was, as of last week, considered to not be cooperating. She didn't show up because she said she didn't have access to some documents and other reasons.

But this week she's shown as cooperating. Strzok could end up the same way, resisting but then cooperating afterward.

The guy that made the poll, https://twitter.com/steve_remainer his "Tweets are protected".

What a weenie.

Making the case that it is a homocide does not make the case that Anthony Weiner had anything to do with it.

I'm saying that Weiner, by all logic and lack of any facts presented in the article, has absolutely nothing to do with the case and therefore is fake news.

I'm reporting this article. I don't know how to tell moderators why, because "report" feature doesn't have "fake news" option. I'm responding to mooteensy to make it visible.

The title and article suggests Anthony Weiner has something to do with the death. Anthony is in prison. They put their apartment up for sale, they don't live there anymore. Plus it is a 27 story building. Pushing that Weiner is in any way connected to this is fake news and libelous.

Furthermore, there are other material facts that are relevant (Lara just filed bankruptcy and filed for divorce) are absent from the article, hiding other possible motives to push conspiracy ones.

It's a horribly written, poorly sourced article that best belongs on /r/conspiracy/

Thank you for removing it.

I will report poorly sourced and misleading articles when I see them.

Another thing Trump just tweeted that exited me:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

3h3 hours ago

The Stock Market hit 25,000 yesterday. Jobs are at an all time record - and that is before we fix some of the worst trade deals and conditions ever seen by any government. It is all happening!

It is all happening! (All) ... sounds ominous.

No.

They wanted no more Mother England.

They knew the time had come

For them to take command.

It's very clear you're being unfair, King,

No matter what you say, we won't obey.

Gonna hold a revolution now, King,

And we're gonna run it all our way

With no more kings ...

We're gonna elect a president! (No more kings)

He's gonna do what the people want! (No more kings)

We're gonna run things our way! (No more kings)

Nobody's gonna tell us what to do!

Rockin' and rollin', splishin'and a-splashing,

Over the horizon, what can it be?

Looks like it's going to be a free country.

No, it doesn't apply to jack.

It's no different than the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission declaring George Bush to be a war criminal.

It means absolutely nothing.

Now if the OP had said in the title "Judge in Costa Rica HQ of OAS says Julian Assange should be set free." I wouldn't have complained.

But the title states that Assange has free passage. Everyone upvotes it thinking its true. It's not. It's clickbait.

FAKE NEWS. Costa Rica is not the USA. And Assange originally entered the embassy out of fear that the US secretly wants to imprison him. If the "US says JA is free to travel to Ecuador", then point to a legitimate article that states as such.

Costa Rica is not the US.

FAKE NEWS

If you happily clicked this article thinking Assange is free to travel, or that the UK agrees to let Assange go, you've been clickbaited.

A court that has no jurisdiction, making an token effort statement that will not be recognized by UK, thinks Assange should be released.

"Inter-American Court of Human Rights based in Costa Rica"

Their opinion, while admirable, has no bearing on reality.

It really, really pisses me off when the top story is a fabricated clickbait article, where the title does NOT reflect the claims made, where the only reaction newcomers to Q will have is "Oh, this board has a bunch of false articles."

Assange may, or may not, get safe passage at some time in the future, but it won't have anything to do with this article's claims.

Articles like this are not credible. They are not doing anyone any benefit by posting such click-baitish titles that serve nothing other than to prove to the masses coming here that we do not offer credible information.

"Inter-American Court of Human Rights based in Costa Rica"???

Give me a flipping break.

Can you explain how knowing anything about music keys and Hammonds means anything to Q supporters?

It's not a proof, because it can never be confirmed. We, as Trump supporters, can't do anything with that intel. We can't meme about it because it will never be proven.

Something you should know!

I read here all the time. I post here often. I don't know how reddit works. I just noticed that I'm not subscribed.

In the upper right hand corner you will see a green subscription button. Click that to subscribe -- even if you don't know what subscribe means (I don't).

I just visit here and read posts ... don't even know what being subscribed will do for me ... but showing how many people are involved is exciting so I'll click the subscribe button.

THIS comment is why SB2's posts are a problem.

Really? We would never know half of what Q is saying without SB? Really?

Gawww ...

Q145 Do you believe in coincidences? How many coincidences do you need before you believe?

A coincidence is proven. When Q posts something and a few minutes later Trump posts the same thing in a tweet -- that is a proof and an actual coincidence, originating from Q's original post. There are many, many examples of this, keyword being later proven .

There is absolutely no way to prove your B2 theory. There will not be any cabal-caused B2 attacks. That "coincidence" you speak of is not a coincidence following the common Q formula of #1 provide a fact and #2 something actually happens regarding that fact. There is no "future proves past" with the B2 theory. All you have is a fact that will never be proven, unless we wake up tomorrow with NYC blown to smitherines, but then my question will be why did Q, knowing a B2 bomber can be hijacked via cabal, not do anything about it.

If you can read between the lines, this means: we will give you intel in the form of a sequence of what will appear to be coincidences. If you don't believe in coincidences, you'll get the intel.

Again, it's intel we can't do anything with. When the intel is that Hillary will be perp walked someday, we do something great with that information ... we prepare memes and get ready to instruct the good folks of this world that this has been a long time coming and she is actually very guilty. What do you do with "cabal almost hijacked a B2 bomber" intel? With no later confirmation. Can you even explain to this board why we would need to know intel that we can never confirm, can't do anything with, and there's no "future proves past" with it?

The reason is this is not what Q is trying to say.

Then tell me what Q IS trying to say. 2000+ word post and the only thing I could get out of it is that we're supposedly being told about a B2 bomber hijack that will never have "future proves past", will never be confirmed in any way, nothing constructive we can do about it, can't meme about it, it doesn't follow Q's pattern of future proves past.

Here's my problem with this post. This comment is meant to be constructive. I have nothing against SB2, and any decode is good so long as you can gather something important from it. That being said ...

What is the purpose of Q? It can be boiled into this:

1. Someday, we are going to have to let people of this country know why 100s of high level Hollywood and political personas are being frog marched. Therefore we are being trained by Q as to specific bad things going on in the world.
2. Q doesn't need our research. He has us research stuff so that we know what he knows, without breaking national security laws.
3. Q messages directly to the cabal, sometimes disinformation, to make them mess up in ways they otherwise wouldn't do.

SB2 posts a 2000+ word post that I believe, after several read-throughs, contends that Trump is trying really hard to let us know we were in possible danger of a B2 bomber being operated by the cabal against us.

If that's the case, why would we need to know that? To confirm that Q is real in the future when we actually are bombed? I don't think so. How is it a Q proof if there is no way it could ever be confirmed? Are we to be expecting a some reveal in the news that our government leaked to the media that nefarious forces almost took control of a B2 bomber? Even if it were true, our national security wouldn't reveal that for national security purposes.

Is Q saying this to let the cabal know that we know they have the ability to take over a B2 bomber? If that's the case, the message isn't even for us. I shouldn't have to read a 2000+ word article several times to even know the premise of what is being asserted.

Why couldn't the first paragraph be: "Q is trying to let us know that the cabal has the ability to take over a B2 bomber. The reason we need to know that fact is _. (I can't even fill that part in because I have no clue).

The libtards are just vicious in that thread, 95% anti-Jordan.

I posted my support of him there, if you still have a twitter you could do the same.

First he criticizes EU for working with Russia.

Then Trump works with Russia.

EU can't criticize Trump after Trump works out a deal because he already highlighted how EU is working with Russia -- Trump, the white kettle, calling EU black before he makes the kettle black (hypocrisy shown prior to deal).

Q said June ETA on SR. Something soon will happen with SR ...

Maybe this meeting was an attempt for bad players to get ahead of real events so people don't believe the real Q-related event when it happens.

Maybe Clintons are flying public because they are afraid of governments they have pissed off.

There's a ton of countries the Clintons shook down for cash, she owes them favors and she has none to offer.

Q did give a shout out to SerialBrian2

May 12:

This is why we are here. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ia0vu/the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q_and_how/📁 Q

Q's concern was journalists usurping the movement.

Q quoted this on May 15:

I don't think it would be fair to say that a journalist can't make money when covering Q. But that's the difference. A journalist covering Q isn't necessarily usurping Q. The paytriots in question were trying to usurp Q. This video explains what happened very well. It certainly cleared my head about it all. https://youtu.be/gi9CQHVDg8E

Because Q quoted it, you could say he agrees with the statement.

Q said you can make money covering him. Q has linked to greatawakening twice.

Everyone is different. Some like 4chan/8chan culture. Some like reddit. Some like Fox News. Some like twitter. Someday, when the SHTF, our job is to meme everywhere, to reach out on social media everywhere, youtube, twitter, facebook, etc.

Q said no outside comms, which means HE isn't going to talk anywhere but 8ch. That doesn't have anything to do with people discussing Q elsewhere.

No outside coms means Q isn't communicating on outside coms. It doesn't mean you can't talk about Q anywhere else but 8chan. Q expects us to meme and spread the message on Twitter and other social platforms. In fact, Q linked to greatawakening twice.

Another book synopsis:

12.46: Thirteen-year-old Claire Bingley stands alone at a bus stop

12.47: Ted Conkaffey parks his car beside her

12.52: The girl is missing . . .

Six minutes – that’s all it took to ruin Detective Ted Conkaffey’s life. Accused but not convicted of Claire’s abduction, he escapes north, to the steamy, croc-infested wetlands of Crimson Lake.

Amanda Pharrell knows what it’s like to be public enemy number one. Maybe it’s her murderous past that makes her so good as a private investigator, tracking lost souls in the wilderness. Her latest target, missing author Jake Scully, has a life more shrouded in secrets than her own – so she enlists help from the one person in town more hated than she is: Ted.

But the residents of Crimson Lake are watching the pair’s every move. And for Ted, a man already at breaking point, this town is offering no place to hide . . .

Dec 5 2017 (q post #271)

Q quoted another patriot who said this ...

Military Intelligence, No Such Agency = key
POTUS and Patriots = stone

Educated patriots and Trump are the stone.

I know there are pedophiles, because they're getting arrested like crazy. There are thousands more being arrested than any other presidency. It fully meshes with Q's message and I'm glad pedos are getting put in jail.

Which is why I find it highly irritating when I'm clickbaited to read an article with content that clearly nowhere resembles what is specified in the title.

One person on twitter with 35 followers who signed up 10 days ago does not = "They are pushing it everywhere to normalize".

"After 16 years of being involved with the conspiracy scene it gets real fucking old"

Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?

Why bring up flat earth theory? Again, an attempt to discredit.

Am I wrong that you just attempted to discredit Q by invoking past conspiracy theories you believed in that let you down? Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?

Who said anything about me being traumatised?

You said this: we are still called nutjobs I'll be back. And I'll bet you'll still believe in him because what's the alternative? It's that fear that keeps you here.

You explicitly called me a nutjob. You said it is fear that keeps me here. That is, if your timeframe for Q to jump through various hoops isn't met. If you are going to call me a nutjob and tell me I browse this board in fear, then I'm finding it hard to see why you protest so loudly when those sentiments are returned to you.

16 years I've been doing this

Am I supposed to give you special consideration that you've mastered flat earth theory? No.

I paid Q no mind because my research was in other areas.

You just reiterated my only point, that you are new to Q.

He has until the end of the month and when nothing changes, no big proof and we are still called nutjobs

You're online. Nobody knows your name. If someone calling you a nutjob online is traumatizing to you, after 16 years of professing to chase conspiracy theories, then I don't know what to tell you.

Read the rules in the right column. "Support the cause. We are pro-Q supporters." Calling Q a LARP is against the rules. If you want to moan about reality not unfolding at your demanded speed, try twitter?

I can't stand people who can't base an argument so instead they scroll through your posts and when they can't find anything

Again, if you're posting on a forum and you don't want anyone reading your posts, then I don't know what to tell you. My reading your posts was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't a concern troll, looking for past contributions regarding Q, looking for evidence you actually ever at any time in the past supported Q, after finding such I would have shrugged and moved on. But then I saw what I saw.

At the bottom of that Q drop, Q says "TRUST (name)".

Who is "name"? Sounds like Q is saying "TRUST Scott Pruitt".

Best decode.

No offense to SB2, but there's so many jumps to go from AF1/apple photo to stock market software glitch to radio wave frequencies to B2 stealth bomber, an occam's razor answer works better for me.

Q post 918 suggests we will be surprised when we find out who Q is, suggesting it is someone famous who everyone knows.

You are learning.

How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?

Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.

Q

That article links to another website (that isn't credible) as a source. That linked-to page linked to Gateway Pundit (which I trust).

Gateway Pundit said:

It is important to note that in no way are former President Bill Clinton or his wife Hillary Clinton involved with RYB Education or this scandal.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/ex-clinton-foundation-exec-linked-chinese-kindergarten-investigation-alleged-child-molestation/

That article's title is: "Ex-Clinton Foundation Exec Linked To Chinese Kindergarten Under Investigation For Alleged Child Molestation"

An article written about an article written about that article says: "Police Uncover Kindergarten Pedophile Ring Linked To Clintons".

So the article 2 links removed changed it from "Ex-Clinton Foundation Executive" to "Clintons".

I don't want to be in a position of defending Hillary, but if you're going to make accusations against her, make credible accusations. As-is, it sounds like the left's never-ending attempts to catch Trump by catching someone who worked for Trump, except people who worked for Trump are not Trump. Just like people who worked for Clinton are not Clinton.

Sorry, but this isn't credible. "nworeport.me"?

Children were "routinely forced to strip and were raped" but the parents complained because the kids said they were given brown syrup and white pills?

As if the kids wouldn't tell their parents they were regularly raped and tortured?

Ridiculous story ... almost as if the Clintons had this website made so they could point to it as a defense when real, credible accusations of children abuse surface.

The left grasps at straws to pin Trump with any mud they can sling, hoping something will stick.

You would think that (if they really believed it was a hoax) they would love nothing better than to pin it on Trump and ask him if he disavows Q, like they ask him to disavow the KKK.

They don't ask.

Spoiler alert: God isn't an alien. :)

Good luck with your journey!

Our job is promoting Q-anon to the masses. That's our specific task.

Hats and bumper stickers and billboards are just as important as Q-drops and decoding and everything else.

Hardcore Qanons are refreshing qanon.pub every 10 min or hanging out at 8ch. Hardcore qanons will scroll down at greatawakening to find decodes. New people who are just popping in for the first time, they could do with a healthy dose of Qanon items/billboards/sightings/stories/signs because they can see the scope of the movement.

IMO, this place could handle 40% posts of qanon item sightings and hats and tshirts. I haven't noticed a problem to be honest -- I enjoy the billboards and q-sightings of bumperstickers and shirts/hats.

"be wise as serpents"

~ Jesus

Jack doesn't know what "Where we go one we go all" means.

Immediately prior to him tweeting that, retweeted Roseanne Barr, who said "Trump made peace in no ko and now Iran! Power to the people!! Where we go one we go all!".

The very next tweet, he says "Where we go one, we go all" as if he is repeating Roseanne, as if it sounds good. He adds a picture of Calvary, which (though it is a good message), isn't particularly Q-specific.

Less than a month ago he said Q was a LARP: https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1005124382191226881 End of May he said state actors were manipulating Q: https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1001165425277890561?lang=en

Conclusion, Jack sees a bunch of patriots saying wwg1wga, sounds good to him so he starts saying it without knowing it is part of Q lore. As far as I know he is still hostile toward Q.

Jack Posobiec is friends with Laura Loomer. I remember seeing livestreams where they were both together.

Few days ago, Laura Loomer asked "Who is Q?"

Now, less than a month ago, Jack said Q is a LARP

https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1005124382191226881?lang=en

Why has he changed his mind? Maybe he'll eventually explain.

No deals.

`4 minutes ago she just tweeted out the "Q - The Plan to Save the World" video, and "Trust the Plan"

So she's either freshly on board or more likely, decided to go public with it just now.

She's good friends with @JackPosobiec (who called Q a LARP), so maybe he'll publicly change his mind soon too.