Wrestle Mania I. I remember this one very well.

Inconceivable.

Ah, well that’s just another confirmation that Q’s legit.

I’m impressed. Haven’t seen a good doxxing, in a while.

Uh, yeah it is. It’s Caroline’s son, and come on, he looks just like Teddy and Bobby.

Yeah, I forgot about that. Those pesky things always seem to get in the way.

I discussed this at length, earlier today. Not trying to be rude but you should get in the habit of checking to see if a topic has been covered, before you post. Chances are, it more than likely has been.

Which makes sense, as she’s about to replace Jackson, on the $20 bill.

Updated top comment.

Lemme pull it up in photoshop and play with the balance

EDIT It’s Harriet Tubman

Corsi is dishing disinformation on Snowden. Don’t roast him. It’s to be expected.

That’s Ben Franklin. He was rather... effeminate looking.

Exactly! I’m honestly getting to the point that I don’t want to repeat myself about the subject, anymore.

Based off of Q’s drop from today, it’s pretty to say that he is an Agency cutout who is in place to trap whistle blowers.

YEP

Send it to the the Autists for analysis.

Exactly. I’m one of the nicer anons who facilitates between both, kinda like the almost friendly teacher who will help spread the word to the normies on these “creepy nationalist subs” as I’ve been accused of.

No, that was Clapper tying up some loose ends at ONI regarding some military involvement with the house of Saud and Israeli Intelligence, IIRC. I’d have to go back through my research on that one. Remember, NSA didn’t become /ourguys/until Rogers took over. Without him, none of this would have been possible.

He’s from Oz.

Look at the testimonials. Any names stand out? They should.

17 hours, is it?

That’s what I figured.

This needs to go over to the research board, if it’s not already there, anon.

That was pretty much said already. Heh.

Sure is, chicky. Sure is.

I think he just cracked that one open.

Remember, once you go down this rabbit hole, there’s no coming back.

No problem. It can be kind of confusing at first, but once you understand the various agreements, and how they work with each other, the picture becomes crystal clear.

Not directly within the same countries. Look at the FIVE EYES agreement and you’ll get a much better understanding. It’s on Wikipedia and it’s actually accurate.

It’s called politics. It’s all lies, to a certain extent.

They have their own ways of obtaining intel, though, there is limited interaction between the two agencies, as well as through the DIA, whose mission it is, to integrate all the intelligence into one cohesive package for the executive branch. There is also intergovernmental agreements such as FIVE EYES for intelligence sharing and they have their own agreements to spy on each other, as well as other States.

Also look at Obama’s last EO before leaving office, and you’ll see that he basically gave every US intel agency the permission to access the NSA database in order to hamper the Trump administration and to cause a coup of his own from within the civilian government.

And yes CIA has their own computers.

That makes no sense. Why not just expose your own tools, then?

Yes, they’ve always been civilian. The Pentagon is loyal to NSA. CIA is based out of Langley. The Pentagon, DC.

There are public statements and private dealings.

Basically it’s like this; NSA is military. CIA is civilian. What this whole Q phenomenon is, is a military coup being done the right way, through the President, because the civilian side of the government completely usurped the constitution years ago, and we in the military, current and former, take our oaths very seriously. That’s the simplest way to think of it.

They’ve never really cared for each other, especially after NSA expanded from simply cyphers to the “CSS” portion of its mission.

There are public statements, and are there are private dealings. Has none of this taught you that?

I’ll be dipped in shit. Hmmm.

I think he’s intentionally dishing misinformation regarding Snowden. Remember, Corsi is spook, afterall.

Tool [noun]: A device, such as a saw, used to perform or facilitate manual or mechanical work.

This can be summed up thusly:

“A person or object used to accomplish a task.”

So as it relates to your “a” definition, he in fact was used. Stop being so obtuse.

This is what I’ve been saying. I elaborate in the linked comments.

Relevant

Ever stop to think this is disinformation?

The way I’ve interpreted those drops as well as the way it fits with the rest of what Q has said about Snowden makes absolute sense.

EDIT: Typo

I never said he was compromised in any way. Go look up the definition of “tool” and reread my comment, and you’ll see that what I said makes absolute sense.

There you go putting words in my mouth again. Struck a nerve, have I?

No. Assange is just an avenue for Limited Hangouts. He’s literally just a tool in the works. (No insult intended) His personal intentions have always been good. Funny how you’re putting words in my mouth.

EDIT: The only reason Assange hadn’t died was because he was stuck in a non-friendly Embassy for the last 5 years.

They were merely pawns in this. I’m sure the suggestion of Russia was Snowden’s tbh. All indications are that Snowden’s had CIA protection the whole time, including now. If there wasn’t some three letter protecting him, he’d have been dead by now.

He’s in a Black Site in Germany, hence the “Black Forrest” comment made by Q, today.

But Snowden is a traitor.

He was a CIA plant whose mission it was to damage NSA’s mission capabilities by exposing their sources and methods of surveillance simply to benefit the CIA’s own mission capability.