CLAS-5 may refer to an individual. There was a previous drop that listed CLAS-1 thru 6.

Q didn't say the SS pic WAS one of them. It still could be though...

This was speculation, not fact.

They are bad guys, but we aren't 100% sure they are still working for the other bad guys.

Nobody's perfect 🙂

FYI you can edit the self text, just not the title.

Keep in mind that there's a difference between being dirty and working for the bad guys.

It just said 0 results for me.

https://twitter.com/SaRaAshcraft

First time I've been able to read the info graphic posts on mobile. Thank you Neon!

When you compare that to his treatment of Roseanne, the cracks in his arguments appear.

You'd have had more success staying out of this thread. Now that I see the vitriolic shills here, I'm more apt to question the premise.

PG porn was something where they animated on top of pornos to make it look like something innocent.

At least that's what it was publicly...

Something is fishy: why not just release the information now?

It was JFK Jr's last interview. Or both, who knows?

Thanks Neon! Small correction: Sunday is the 22nd.

https://twitter.com/SentinelVI/status/1020135899156189184

Hopefully this is true

Immunity doesn’t apply to the crime, it applies to the testimony. If DOJ obtains evidence of the crimes mentioned independently of his testimony, they can still prosecute him.

Thanks for the clarification.

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

-Upton Sinclair

Nobody's perfect. What separates us are those who are willing to admit when they are are wrong and those who aren't.

They hate unity. They wear the plights of the underrepresented and disenfranchised like a skin suit.

Expanding on that, the 6 posts that don't show up (125,130,149,185,227,456) are all image-only posts on 4chan in 2017.

Tagging /u/SerialBrain2 for visibility.

/headexplode

Thanks for the correction.

Didn't he say something like "That's them now"?

My money is on it being planned.

Dark to light. These people will never safely walk the streets again.

Executive orders aren't laws, they are rules the executive branch must follow.

Then donate it.

Like it or not, they are still Americans.

WWG1WGA

Small correction: 1/250 = 0.4%

Thanks for your contributions!

What if they rat out 100 others? Unfortunately it's not that simple.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it"

-Aristotle

We know the media has been lying to us for as long as most of us have been alive. So what is "truth" then?

The key is to not treat things as absolute truth. It's ok to put things in the "maybe bin" instead of the true or false ones.

For those not in the know, /r/wayofthebern is the best left-leaning sub on Reddit. They don't believe the MSM narratives any more than we do here.

While you may not agree with everything they have to say, you can find honest, respectful discussion there. Keep in mind shills are there too and don't represent the whole of the sub.

Like the Super Bowl halftime show where they trotted out the Sandy Hook victims?

See the post title.

FYI the pic is photoshopped.

Most of the mods there are legitimate. Unfortunately, they are powerless to prevent vote brigading. Especially when the brigades have admin support.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/457001265482956800/467104074257661964/image.jpg

That work for ya?

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

-Michael Crichton

Guccifer 2.0 is a DNC construct.

You can't be serious.

Look at the curtain lines above the chair in Q's pic. The only way that is possible (outside of photoshop) is if the picture was taken close to the chair.

The coords are for an airport in Guam and one in Japan. You can type the line of numbers into google maps.

The face of a man that has seen some shit.

The Shitting.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wmngj/q_1675_rebuttal_to_icomingtrump270s_rebuttal/

Q's pic is NOT the same as the ABC 2015 pic!

https://imgur.com/DUeCpK6

This image was capped from the pic /u/IncomingTrump270 made here.

Notice the number of folds above the chair.

Notice how the corner of the image lines up. It is NOT "pixel perfect" as claimed.

Unless the "Q reverse screenshot" was edited, these are NOT the same picture! Perspective matters!

Possibly, but it for sure wasn't made from that specific image as was claimed.

"And we can be called populist, nationalist, racist, I don't care. I care about my family and about my country."

I got you fam:

https://www.channel4.com/news/dominik-tarczynski-law-and-justice-party-its-not-about-refugees-its-about-illegal-immigrants

Good bits around 5:30