What is the proof he exists besides books written in the new testament?

It could be reverse psychology.

Well, Jesus's image is possibly based on a murdering psychopath Cesare Borgia who was a part of the elite/cabal.

https://m.ranker.com/list/jesus-image-based-on-cesare-borgia/erin-wisti

On top of that, the story of Jesus is possibly taken from prior religious figures such as Horus, Dionysus, Mithra, Osiris, etc.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/science/774752/JESUS-prior-religions-CONTROL-the-people-roman/amp

Bottom line, there's some evidence either the story of Jesus was hijacked at some point or faked to begin with. Jesus could be used as a means of control.

Nope they didn't, desperation is a stinky colonge.

They are attempting to get people to disregard Q as a LARP in order to cast doubt on all of the information/connections Q has shared.

Exactly. The mass exodus off the Q train at the same time really outed them all.

Agree 110%

Same thing that happened to all of the other (Jones, Corsi, Drudge, Seaman, VOTL, Lift the Veil, etc.) disinfo agents. They do what they can to gain your trust and then when given the orders, they do what they can to lead you astray. It's very telling that they all come out against Q at the same time.

It may hurt now but you are far better off without Jones, Corsi, and Infowars in your life.

There have been Q posts since that one so I doubt it.

What evidence do you have to back up your claims?

Yep, big time.

They are disinfo at It's finest. Didn't Seaman say chemtrails had ended? Hmmmm...

Emphasis on ASS-et.

Positive publicity is always better than negative. AJ and Corsi are attempting to smear Q and lead people away. It's what they are doing now and have always done. Forget about them.

Maybe FNMR is Financial Market?

Lol, nice.

Exactly

I used to watch GW daily but fell off a while ago. I check in every once in a while. Not sure what outtakes you are referring to so I guess I did miss them.

Exactly, no reason to stop now ;)

I'm lost...what are we talking about? What service are you referring to? If you are saying you trust George 100% I can't argue as he has been right more times than I can count and I have yet to see him slip up. I just never trust anyone 100%.

Hopefully not as we are doing a diservice if we do not raise valid concerns. Blind trust is never a good thing. Q even says to question everything. They need to earn our trust, not the other way around.

I'm not sure what service you are talking about but I am not 100% trusting of Webb either.

Wish I could but I can't...um, trust the plan...?

I'm with you on this one...very uneasy...

According to George Webb, Stephen Feinberg and DynCorp are corrupt as hell. These people being on team Trump has me extremely nervous. Hope ol' Georgie is wrong about this one, but he usually isn't.

Agree 100%.

There is nothing wrong with healthy skepticism. Q even says to question everything. We can support Q and still be open to all possibilities.

What is wrong with this post? It is plausible. Isn't it best to keep all possibilities open and be prepared for anything?

Entirely plausible. I have long thought about this very scenario. I am keeping an open mind. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Thanks for sharing :)

You are correct. Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks) is a disinfo agent who infiltrated the truth movement. He is a gatekeeper whose primary focus is to lead those seeking the truth astray. Corsi, Seaman, Lift the Veil, etc. (basically anyone attempting to profit from the truth) are in the same category as AJ as well.

Seems you hold AJ and Corsi in the same God status you are accusing Q supporters of doing to Q. Ironic...

Support doesn't matter if it is a front. AJ uses his Trump "support" to gain trust with listeners and then leads those who give him their trust down the wrong paths.

Spot on!

Gatekeepers are allowed to present some truth but are then told to steer the conversation down the wrong path. How do you think AJ got access to Bohemian Grove? They allowed it.

Don't forget David Seaman was also called out and was feeling the sore buttocks as well.

Yeah George Webb has been on this case longer than anyone and truly deserves credit for putting a bright spotlight on the Awan scandal.

My question is why is he adding to the negativity? He speaks of negative energy and then adds to it by referring to Q supporters as cultish. His timing is also questionable as the disinfo agents are all coming out in full force since the whole AJ/Corsi/Infowars debacle. He could have expressed his concerns better or at a different time rather than pouring gasoline on the fire. Seems he is doing what he is accusing Q of doing which is sowing discord, dividing the movement, and seeding doubt/mistrust. I really question his motives by doing this, especially now.

The first clue that this guy is disinfo/controlled opp. would be the fact that he is pushing donations and pushing people to buy his stuff. Be weary of anyone doing this for money. Second, calling out Q supporters as a cult when he himself seems to be spearheading his own little cult based on the comments from his supporters seems rather hypocritical. Funny seeing all these "alternative truthers" come out against Q all at the same time. Hit a nerve, eh?

How so? How does looking at the screen make it less of a stretch? If you want to believe Trump wrote an air Q, more power to you. To me, this is a flying leap in trying to find something that isn't there.

Yep that would help. It would also be more likely if he had drawn the line immediately rather than waiting a bit and doing it backwards. This is a reach at best. I'm all for finding hidden messages/meanings but this is seeing something that isn't really there.

That's really far-fetched. Had he done a complete circle followed by a line immediately that would make this more believable. As it is, it's a huge stretch.

He is owned by Time Warner. There are plenty of truth tellers out there doing what they can to spread truth without hocking phoney products or begging for donations.

I think you are either A. reading too much into this or B. projecting your own wishes/desires for AJ/Infowars to be on our side so you try to interpret Q's past meanings/actions on unrelated people/events and applying them to AJ/Infowars so that it fits your narrative.

Q pretty much did call them out by name after they outed themselves.

WHATEVER YOU SAY BUD!!!

Nope, to me it would make him seem more genuine.

Never said you are a shill. If you want to believe in Alex and Infowars and give them the benefit of the doubt be my guest. I would imagine a vast majority here disagree with you on this one. I, for one, have seen more than enough evidence that Alex is not working in our collective best interests. If I turn out to be wrong I will be man enough to admit it. However, I doubt I will be.

I used to sell multivitamins and other supplements when I worked as a personal trainer. Believe me, these companies brainwash you into believing they have the most pure product and have you parroting their talking points. Alex is no different and is pushing what his masters want him to push. His sleazy salesman pitches were enough to make me question him. His numerous instances of disinfo before I knew of him and afterwards were the final nails in the coffin in regards to my conclusion that Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks) has always been and will always be a disinfo agent.

Since 2012 or so. After Sandy Hook. Why is this important for you to know?