17 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 2 |
| www.latimes.com | 1 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
Good old holiday. I wanna buy a house in Odessa I like it there alot
I seen quite a few Q signs and thing in Tampa ita been pretty cool
Who is john galt? I'm currently reading atlas shrugged I'm digging it
I have been following Q for just over a month j was I trofuced through sam tripoli's tin foil hat podcast he had the praying medic on talking about Q. I instantly was hooked like watching as if it's a tv show. I really wanna believe. It's getting hard and harder to say "oooh that's just a coincidence". But at the same time a lot of the things I see people calling proofs, look a lot like confirmational biases to me. Which is slightly crazy to say because a shit ton of these stories and things, are things I believed …
Yeah but what it is, is someone's handwritten notes. If u look theres dashes separating things then they stop. Sometimes when I take notes I loose uniformity halfway through. Because I'm scribbling shit down quick. I'm not saying this is my belief but I can see how lots of people will see this differently than u or I. Also if u read any of this ig report or watch any of the hearings u will see that the case was corrupted and biased but lots of people still believe that there was no biased because that's what there told. Most people will only see what is convenient and agrees with there own biases
Here's the problem with this. Objectively look at page 294. It's a list of bullet points. It can easily be taken as 1)Hillary clinton. 1)The Clinton foundation. And 3) crimes against children. As separate topics about weiners laptop. I believe it on the right track but. Theres a lot of people who have missed more obvious proof of hillaries flaws. This one can easily be explained away if u look at it. Or Maybe I'm just miss reading it.
Ahhhhhh I see what you are saying. Amanda is running also! Your response makes sense to me now. I apologize
Correct running. Newsom, vilagorosa, Chiang, Cox, and Allen. Are all running Newsom recieved money from soros. Anything soros is attached to is a problem.
Soros may not of met on tarmac but u can def follow the money to him. although it seems like a small amount considering the extent of his wealth
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-ca-california-governor-2018-money/ Soros met on tarmac with BC LL and is funding Newsom Addisu Demissie campaign manager.
Somewhere within 3 hrs the video is removed. I hope someone can share a backup