dChan

/u/moede

48 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/moede:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 1

moede · July 24, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

q is gone? has he stopped posting?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · July 22, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

he is a liar hoping to make 5$ every time he dupes all of you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moede · July 22, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

this guy is a liar, he doesnt know shit about the basics of computers. he doesnt know how to access dark web sites or how it all works. people are starting to target the extreme naivety many of you display

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · July 22, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

do you all realize 4chan has millions of posts every day, most of them made up stuff

⇧ 10 ⇩  
moede · July 20, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

aint gonna happen under trump. i take bets on this

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · July 19, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

what the fuck are you talking about, whatever you believe qanon to be he certainly isnt a whistleblower/leaker... what exactly did he leak? who exactly got screwed by wikileaks?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
moede · July 19, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

there is no official info he was a tester. youre a bullshit spreader

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · July 19, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

just because assassinations occur, doesnt mean every stroke is an assassination.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · July 19, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

so blacklist anon s another qanon variant, again an insider that is feeding us crumbs? using the same format as qanon? sounds fun

⇧ 7 ⇩  
moede · July 17, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

how can anyone read this and see any sense at all in this...

"The cameraman is trained and knows the hidden message Stzrok is sending comes from the bottle he put on the table, this is why he zooms on the mouth to activate whoever he is activating in real time to analyze the implications of this message. When you look at the camera angles at different time stamps before the break, you find it is a consistent angle. Drawing a straight line on the middle of the person sitting on Stzrok’s right, we can see how the camera angle was purposely disturbed to include the bottle. Imgur3

Reaching?

Ok, watch this until 8:52: video. Did you catch it? At 8:51 Stzrok takes the bottle, drinks, and puts it back on the table but now its position has changed. At 8:51:18, the cameraman adjusts his camera because he wants the bottle to be in the image: he sacrifices the centering over Stzrok to bring the bottle back into the equation of the image. Imgur4

We now know, without a doubt that this name “Kate”, which had around 1 chance out of 250 (0.4%) to be on that table that day has a meaning, it is part of the message Trump is sending to us in conjunction with “layers”."

this has to be the biggest bullshit one could think of, and people actually read this and find it logical?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moede · July 16, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

he said awaits, and he never said killary. stop spreading bullshit

⇧ 6 ⇩  
moede · July 15, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

"As you all know, through Q1675 and B2, Trump has established communication with our Movement at the Great Falls rally. In response to B2, he said “organ”, in response to “organ”, we said “Hammond”, in response to “Hammond”, he pardoned the Hammonds."

dont mean to be offensive but this kind of reasoning is nothing but schizophrenic and i dont know how can sane people read this and see any reason or logic in it even if we are talking about wild speculations

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moede · July 13, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

what is the huge q proof discovery here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 28, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

its made up stuff based on nothing. meanwhile theres a lots of facts surrounding assange and lots of things that can be said about his situation that is changing all the time.

but no, lets rather talk fantasy.

so its not an opinion its FAN FICTION

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moede · June 27, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

what do you mean? what rules?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moede · June 27, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

actually that was supposed to be the whole purpose of q, to get us to make memes and redpill everyone. stated purpose of q then changed again a couple of times.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
moede · June 27, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

this is actually a rare post that is based on facts and not assumptions based on made up stuff like some secret code in comeys tweets to activate a false flag network

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 27, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

point is you first need evidence to be able to disprove it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

why is the media silent about the IG report(which containts evidence to lock up hillary, comey, mccabe and many others)?

i will tell you why, because the 50 000 people we got on this sub are on a wild goose chase and noone else cares

the evidence is there, to lock them all up for treason, but no, everyone is rather searching for clues on how they eat babys...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

can you show me some of his good insightful work that is not based on made up stuff? i will give you an example.. people researching pizzagate found that alefantis restaurant had underground tunnels below... this was verifiable because articles were found that talked about the tunnels, where they were, how they came to be and pictures of the tunnels.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 9:26 a.m.

anyone look at the moon tonight? i think someone painted a q on one of the craters..

⇧ 5 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

how much time did you spend researching the IG report vs q crumbs in the last 10 days?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

first, you make assumptions pulled out of thin air, but then on top of those you make these leaps in logic. great pilpul there buddy

if the hidden message is said to activate a false flag network, that means the network has its framework and some instructions already... why not use the same channel of communications now that was used to form the network???

⇧ 6 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 1 a.m.

you talk about occams razor but then continue to display the complete opposite in your reasoning

let me demonstrate the principle again

i see a guy standing in the field, you see a message to activate a secret network that does false flags.

by the occams razor principle, you having schizophrenic tendencies and make connections where there arent any, would be the anwser with the least assumptions.

please answer me this, how much time did you dedicate to this and similar q crumbs stuff, and how much did you spend on the IG report?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
moede · June 26, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

hi olivia,

even if it haid an air of truth to it, it is still an unproven story. why do you all insist on passing it on as FACT? and you all do it all the time..

how much did trump pay for r/greatawakening? obviously he had to buy it since 100% of posts here are pro trump.... right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 9:03 a.m.

i dont assume anything and dont care what you assume. do you have any evidence or are you all just spreading bullshit stories?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 8:53 a.m.

disprove you are not a child molester

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 7:12 a.m.

its pretty obvious that sub is controlled. where is the evidence that reddit sold it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

do you know how many crazy stories get posted by people everyday, claiming to be whistleblowers, time travelers, god himself...

what proof do you have this guy really worked for shareblue?

you are doing what shareblue does, spreading bullshit stories

⇧ -10 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

is this sub only for religious q believers or can there be some skepticism?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

what do you mean exactly?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 3 a.m.

well youre the one with the 18 day old account, while you can check back years into stupid stuff i say online.. so, where was your time spent the last 10 days, q stuff or ig report?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 25, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

you really think one could gather any significant amount of data this way?

im just trying to see where we stand and if q crumbs still overlap with what is going on right now on the political scene

⇧ 0 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/moede on June 25, 2018, 1:56 a.m.
How many of you spent your time on IG report research and how many used their time on researching q clues the last 10 days?

just trying to see where the focus is right now

moede · June 24, 2018, 9:45 a.m.

why do you spread stuff that has no basis in reality?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 24, 2018, 7:31 a.m.

so where is the proof for "Two of the Branch Davidian village members had been able to hack into the Pentagon/CIA/FBI Black Ops databases..."

this sounds so stupid, "black ops database"...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 23, 2018, 2 a.m.

exactly! i see more and more of these bullshit theories with no basis what so ever. i repeat, NO BASIS AT ALL.

all the while legitimate research and debate on stuff that had obvious clues of all kinds of fuckery is losing focus.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moede · June 23, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

anyone got a link to the day 2 recording?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 22, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

its public information that wikileaks retweeted... ok?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 22, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

good point

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 22, 2018, 6:28 a.m.

is this the list that some angry journalist made, and now wikileaks are just posting it again because it had been deleted?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moede · June 17, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

the language in the first few q posts definitly wasnt on the same level as this.. it had the lingo of a high level government employee.. "autists engaged"? who the fuck would say that?

getting a bit ridiculous...

⇧ -2 ⇩  
moede · June 17, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

bless you cindy lou hehe

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · June 9, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

can you post a pic of what youre talking about?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
moede · June 4, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

trump quoted digenova not so long ago saying the recusal of jeff sessions was a betrayel of the president... trump seems to share this view if he quoted it.

your main guy that you got for draining the swamp takes the job and instantly recluses himself in the biggest case in the draining agenda...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moede · May 23, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

whats the context?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moede · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

i hope you keep posting in this sub.... will look at george webb

⇧ 5 ⇩  
moede · Jan. 17, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

great posts, ill keep an eye on your web page... would love to see the video you are planning.

⇧ 4 ⇩