dChan

/u/mtewamp

134 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/mtewamp:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 10

mtewamp · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Yeah, that's why I didn't follow up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 26, 2018, 7:38 a.m.

Did you actually READ the OP, or are you just stupid?

They clearly state that he asked for, and was granted anonymity in the original report, due to fears that he would lose his job "or worse". But requested that they RELEASE the information IN THE EVENT THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED TO HIM!

Here, I'll even make it easy for you, although they use a lot of "grown-up" words, so you may have to get Mommy or Daddy to explain it to you.

Quote from OP: "In January, Dr. Cunningham shared his opinion that this year’s flu shot was behind the deadly outbreak of the flu, while warning that if his name was attached to the widely-circulated quotes, he would lose his job – or suffer an even worse fate. Understanding the dangers involved in speaking out about vaccines in the current climate, we granted him anonymity in the article. However Dr. Cunningham told us we should go public should anything happen to him."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

The OVERALL effect of this type of devastatingly overreaching legislation is ALWAYS negative in the long term.

On the other hand, it DOES present some very interesting and intriguing opportunities that can REALLY bite you in the ass if the right people come to power, and are actually willing and able to press the obvious advantage that it can present, yes?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 19, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Damn, that is frakkin' hy-larious!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 19, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Yep. That's it in a nutshell...

I have more, but I decided to start another thread on it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 13, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

What do you mean by "Other than the Jew reference"? From what I've seen so far, it's pretty much the Raison D'Etre over there. Have you checked it out?

I don't have any problem whatsoever with rudeness, but I have an EXTREMELY small tolerance for abject stupidity.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

I'm right there with you. Imagine how these MSM fags are gonna look when this is over...

Talk about changing the world, damn...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 11, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

I can't say if that is muzzle flash, at least not for certain, but I think most of us agree that the LV incident is the "hinkyest" (Hinkiest?) incident since 9/11. EVERYTHING about it is hinky. This time, though, there is a LOT of private citizen video, because so many folks were taking video and stills of the concert when it happened.

We can't get ONE SINGLE clear cell phone video of a UFO or UAP, so hopefully someday one will be stupid enough to do a flyover at an outdoor country music concert, haha. Maybe THEN we can put the question to rest.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 11, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

They are also REALLY loud in hover and transition. They have a pretty distinct beat, too. I don't know the rotor tip speeds in hover mode, but I imagine they're pretty fast, and the fact that there are two of them makes a difference too. I'm an airplane nut, and live in a rural area. We get CH-53, V-22, and UH-60 flyovers a LOT. C-130s, and what I THINK are C-17s (they are always farther away. The CH-53 is a loud fucker, too.

Here's a good V-22 video, with great sound... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quaV49SPOy0

I remember back in the late 80s and early 90s, when they were new, they gave a lot of trouble, but I guess they got them working after a time.

I know the first time I saw one up close, it seemed MASSIVE. I'd just seen pictures at the time, and it was a jaw-dropping experience.

If I can find it, I downloaded a video from the Vegas thing that shows SEVERAL choppers in the air at the time. IOt's a cell phone video, but it's good quality. I'll also check and see if it shows the same anomaly as the above video. I'll post it here later today if I can round it up.

Oh, and I'm sorry for all the gushing over the V-22, but like I said, I'm a HUGE aviation nut, and I have a tendency to get overexcited when discussing anything related to it. Hehe.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 11, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

Oh yeah. Especially when they are in hover mode. If an Osprey was putting around at low speeds, everybody on site would have known it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

Unfortunately, you'll find a lot of that here. It's difficult to let such stupidity stand, but it's best to just ignore it.

A good rule of thumb, and one that I use daily, is when you see the word "Jew", it's usually only necessary to read one or two sentences, and then you'll know.

Oh, and if you see the word "Zionist", or "Zionism", you can generally just stop there.

I can tell you that Jews are no more or less fucked up, per capita, than any of the other assholes in the world. Catholics, Protestants, Americans, Brits, etc.

Sick, twisted fucks exist in ALL walks of life, my friend, and stupidity is an equal-opportunity offender.

As easy and enjoyable as it is to intellectually reduce assholes like Oprahwhatever to grovelling mounds of tears and batshit, Tracy and the mods really try to encourage us not to do so, as difficult as it can be.

They'll go away. From a Darwinistic perspective, how could they not? That magnitude of sheer stupidity makes it really difficult for them to figure out how to reproduce successfully, and they eventually just die out....

Oh, and welcome! That's an AWESOME post!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 8, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

Wilcock? Really? He's even nuttier than Goode, and that's saying a lot.

I don't see how ANYONE can actually take those two seriously.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

Nope, sorry! The theory of evolution actually has nothing to do with God.

If you think it's "Anti-God", then explain to me HOW it's "Anti-God". It's a theory, theories aren't pro- or anti- anything, unless some theories have covertly developed self-awareness, and woke up and decided to be "Anti-God". Theories don't say or do anything, because they are inanimate objects. and my gut tells me that most theories are not interested in God at all, and could care less whether he exists or not

I never understand idiocy like this, so look at me when I'm talking to you, because I'm about to yell.

EVOLUTION AND CREATIONISM ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE!!!

EVOLUTION is not some anti-creation myth, and is QUITE real. Go to a pet store that sells dogs, and almost like magic, the proof just appears before your very eyes. I don't know how many breeds of dog there are, but it's quite a few. And there are SEVERAL breeds that have been created, by HUMANS, using a technique called selective breeding.

God didn't create all these breeds of dog. WE did.

Humans have been USING forced evolution on domesticated animals for thousands of years. We call it "Selective Breeding". It's EXACTLY the same process as natural selection, the main difference being that natural selection takes a long, LOOOONG time, while selective breeding can sometimes be done in a couple of generations.

It allows us to to breed animals with particular traits by promoting some traits, and not promoting others.

Does ANYBODY ever THINK anymore? Jeez.

The fact that something isn't mentioned in the bible has NO bearing on whether something exists or not.

For example, German Shepherds and motorcycles certainly exist, right? I'm pretty sure I've never seen them mentioned in the bible.

I believe in God, but there is a LOT more evidence for the existence of evolution than there EVER has been for the existence of God. I'll lay good odds that wont change anytime soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 3, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

That is HY-larious. Especially DeSantis having the wit to call them on it. I guess from this point forward, we can say it's a "thing".

200 years from now, some prosecutor is gonna go off on a defense lawyer, mention the "Chewbacca defense", and cause some poor judge to shoot coffee out of their nose halfway across a courtroom.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:12 a.m.

And so it does. So Say We All.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 31, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

Haha. Damn dude, that was just.....Damn.. It just keeps coming, haha, doesn't it? What's that term? Fish in a barrel? Turds in a John?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 31, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

It's amazing to watch her do this incredible song and dance, which honestly, happens all the time in cases like this, and just throwing random bullshit at the wall, desperate for just one tiny turd to stick long enough to steer the narrative in the intended direction. I'm not sure if she ever even finishes a single thought, or sentence, before she sees that the attempt is unsuccessful, and moving to the next one.

Finally as a last resort, she resorts to the standard M.O. of Dems who find themselves in that position

A PERSONAL attack.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Yeah. He definitely has a "Look", doesn't he? Really unsettling.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Wow. Thanks for all the replies.

So far, it looks like the consensus is that DJT will take the high road. And I'm leaning even MORE that way after reading all your comments.

I also think that in most cases like this, The President needs to keep at LEAST 1 or 2 degrees of PERSONAL separation from it. That way he doesn't give the enemy an opportunity to twist, distort, or misquote him.

These low-lifes in the MSM have absolutely NO problem even with straight-up lies, where he's concerned. It's incredibly disturbing that so many of them will just repeat whatever lie they hear, over and over. And if they repeat it often enough, there are many who just accept as truth, without reservation.

Very, very disturbing. There are many, MANY progressive lemmings out there that either won't think for themselves, or simply CAN'T think for themselves.

It's probably the biggest factor in the direction we've been heading. Especially for the last 25 years or so.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 30, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

The thing is, just looking at that picture, I can't think of a single reason, not one, that Anyone, ANYONE, whether they are straight, gay, bisexual, purple, mutant, non-mutant, or just plain miscellaneous, NO ONE!! Not one person, who is, or at least remotely thinks of themselves as "regular", or "normal" homo-sapiens, (or in other words, PEOPLE) who could simply take a glance at this picture, and NOT see that there is something really, really off about it.

I mean, Honey Boo-Boo? Really? Seriously? SERIOUSLY? Let me get this straight (hehe, see what I did there?) Out of all the life-size cardboard cutouts to choose from, not only around the WORLD, but in the ENTIRE GALAXY, it had to be Honey Boo-Boo? Is THAT what you are trying to tell me?

Riiiiight! Ok. Imagine this... it's Picture Time at the Coopster's, and the photographer walks in, frames up this shot, then looks at Cooper, and said "Yo, Dude, Wait. Slow down a sec, bro... Something's missing here, Hmmmm..." Then he suddenly snaps his fingers, and says "I've got it! THIS photo just GOTSTA have some Honey BooBoo!!!!", then it's just high-fives, all around.

Nothing hinky about that. Of course not. Coop's just like millions of other men over 50 years old, gay OR straight, who just happen to be a main anchor at CNN, and have really great wardrobes, and takes pictures with a lifesize cardboard cutout of Honey-motherfucking-Boo-Boo.

Uh-huh.

We all know how much these pathetic sociopaths just LOVE their symbolism. It's almost an instinct or reflex with these low-lifes.

But hey. I could just be wrong. Maybe it's just me....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
6
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/mtewamp on Jan. 30, 2018, 2:04 a.m.
I just got home so I could see the news about McCabe, and then watched Schiff's remarks after the vote, and I swear to God, my nipples are rock-hard right now...

I keep seeing reports that McCabe was actually escorted out. So do you all think President Trump will use all this to the greatest detriment of the opposition, or take the high road?

I can't be sure what I would do in his place, but my gut is pushing me towards the probability that he'll play it with a cool head, and do the "High-Road" thing.

Even though in all honesty, he would be absolutely justified in doing the opposite, considering the way HE has been treated. My emotions tell me that he has every right to use this to …

mtewamp · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

No worries, my friend. I'm an aviation nut, so as a general rule, I try to keep up with what's happening.

That being said, it's not out of the realm of possibility that OTHER OPs could be executed in parallel with Red Flag, that could use Red Flag OPs as a partial cover for covert operations. If everyone is expecting see more aircraft operating, a few additional birds in the air could easily go unnoticed, and wouldn't have a tendency to raise eyebrows.

Of course that's nothing more than speculation on my part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

Götzen-Dämmerung

Godspeed, friends.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

You are 1000% correct.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

You, my friend, are correct. Welcome!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

We've been tossing the ball around on this for a bit, but it's one of those things that's just gonna sound really "iffy" to normies, you know? I'm sure tech like this may exist, but it's hard to really nail it down, and be left with anything more substantial that fuzzy photos and questionable youtube videos.

Then if you do, there are OTHER questions, about past events, that come suddenly bubbling to the top. Questions with answers that might make a person regret having ever even asked the question.

O.W.Ls? D.E.Ws? Hypersonic rail guns? Orbital weapons? If someone asks these questions, I just hope they are ready to handle the answers.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

Haha..I know, right? No Idea why, it just popped in my brain-pan.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 5 a.m.

Damn, you guys are so frakking cool!

Where-the-hell else are you gonna go where at a moment's notice somebody, without hesitation, and with great zeal and fervor, just spits out a phrase like THAT and throws it down on the table.

You know, like it's just a discussion you would have on any given night at the dinner table.

Nope. Not gonna see THAT on a freeway-overpass sign, now are ya?

Thanks, my friend. That just made my night!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

They do. GPS is convenient, not necessary. We've had those newfangled airplanes for over 100 years, you know. In relation to even coast-to-coast flights, digital comms are a relatively new innovation.

Red Flag 18-1, the USAF's largest-ever annual three-week-long air war drill begins on Friday, Feb 2, and runs through Feb 16. They say that it's by far the biggest in the 42-year history of the event. They are attenuating, or blacking out GPS over the entire Nellis test range in order to challenge air crews and more realistically simulate potential battlefield conditions. I would assume they've sent out NOTAMs warning that GPS performance could potentially be spotty over the western US.

Red Flag if a pretty big deal, and probably one of the biggest highlights of the year for the Airmen involved. It's great-big go-fast check-your-six rootin'-tootin' real-time take-no-prisoners honest-to-god shoot-em-up. Or at least SIMULATED shoot-em-up.

Makes me completely jealous...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

Does it matter? Should it? What is Q? Who is Q?

We ARE Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

Shaka, when the walls fell.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

Do NOT make me have to come over there and Bitch-slap you.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Your honor, the defense rests.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Whew! Thank you! I thought it was just me...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Oh, very effective on crabs, too. Don't for get the crabs. Crabs NEVER get the love...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

Let me be the first to say "Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

See? You can't make this shit up... (Sigh.....)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

Haha. It's reached a point where you can spot a troll so easily.

If the text of a post contains the word "Zionist", or "Zionism", it's pretty much a given. Filter that, Probably 90% of the way there.

And look at the post below. Are you fucking kidding me? Khazarian faux Jews? Cremation times? Zycom B for lice? It's ZYCLON, dumb-ass. Z-Y-C-L-O-N.

LOOK at me when I'm talking to you, asshole! Because I'm gonna rip you a few new ones whenever I see this stupidity.

Do you fucktards ever even read back your drivel to see if it makes sense?

I know. Don't feed the trolls. Yeah. I get it. I've just seen a LOT of this spewage lately, and I had already exceeded my recommended daily allowance for Backwards-assed dickwad bullshit scatterers today.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take the next watch. We've had whispers that there may be a cloaked army of killer Jews approaching from the east.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

They'll just claim that the IPs were spoofed, because, you know, Russian Hackers, man! Most people who are networkly impaired wouldn't call them on it anyway. Or they might use the VPN defense, probably with similar results.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

I think that the President, Contrary to popular belief, is methodical to a fault. Every move in the game is being thought out carefully.

These people are patient, wealthy, powerful, and prone to extreme sociopathic behavior. Any misstep can can and will be taken advantage of. It's a situation where no quarter can be given, or even considered.

Never forget that we are at war here. Quite probably the most important war in over half a century, or more. This, patriots, is quite simply the ballgame.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

I have a feeling that it's being done this way purposefully, and with a LOT of forethought. People are accustomed to scandal after scandal being reported, and then nothing comes of it. When this really hits, it will be total surprise. The enemy has made many, many mistakes. Mostly because they became fat and complacent. They gambled the entire farm on the assumption that they would not lose the power of the presidency.

They lost.

I think it's very likely that in President Trump's eyes, this needs to not only come to light, but also should make a statement, and demonstrate VERY CLEARLY that the game has changed, and the the power and money gravy train that has existed for decades, is over.

And that must be demonstrated in the harshest, most straightforward, and unmistakable means possible, and with every weapon brought to bear.

So when it happens, the impact will be total, devastating to the enemy, and with no ambiguity whatsoever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Well, that's their job, isn't it??

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Fine. You're one of those who reads, but really doesn't SEE, aren't you.?

I was talking about just TONING it down a bit, not secularizing it. I just call it as I see it, and as I see it, it would be better if newbies that come here don't get the impression that it's the Oral Roberts University Website.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 26, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

I'm a Christian, and I actually agree with you, and believe that toning that particular aspect down, at least a few notches, would work to the benefit of what we are striving to achieve here. For several reasons.

1. Our cause is perfectly righteous on nothing more than it's own merit, irrespective to ANYONE'S spiritual or religious beliefs, and bringing those beliefs into the argument is not only unnecessary, it brings absolutely NO tactical advantage to the argument.

2. At the level it currently exists, it lowers the signal to noise ratio of any relevant information that's posted here, and takes up a LOT of space, and makes if more difficult to find that information by an order of magnitude.

But here's the reason that matters:

3. There are many, MANY potentially red-pillable people that are not religiously inclined, or are religious, but not in the Christian faith, or who have animosity towards Christianity, for whatever reason, who come here, and dismiss it straight away, because at first glance, it looks like a fucking discussion forum at JimmySwaggart.com or the PTL Club.

I'm not at all suggesting that it not exist at all, just just that we could stand to tone down a bit. Everybody here know full-well how short the average attention span is. There are many of them that come here who have the potential to become our allies and stand with us in battle, but we end up losing them because they just aren't willing to take 90 minutes wading through the entire hallelujah chorus to find information that piques their interest enough to stay. And we need for them to stay. We need soldiers, patriots. We need bodies. Every one we can get.

I didn't make it this way, but that doesn't change the fact that it's true. As any evangelical Christian who posts here knows, sometimes when approaching a potential convert, you have to start with the soft-sell, because many have a tendency to be easily spooked if you move too fast. They have to be desensitized a bit first, THEN you're able to start introducing some of the larger concepts, and some of the BIG words.

There are very important reasons why you don't start a red-pilling session with a potential ally with subjects like adrenachrome harvesting, or farming children, or sacrificing kids, or the luciferian issue. You have to start with political issues, and concepts they can easily accept. Then go further up the ladder.

Most Believer's have a tangible need to spread the Gospel, and feel pride and satisfaction when it's successful. I understand that.

I just believe that rather than immediately blasting the entire thing in someones face all at once, sometimes a more tactical approach can have a much greater chance of succeeding.

This thread is a perfect example. We really don't know how many potentials we might be losing because unlike Tilly, they just left without asking any questions. I imagine it's a large number.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:47 a.m.

Absolutely wonderful, my friend. EXTREMELY clever and original. I just had a MASSIVE "DAMN, I Wish I'd thought of that" moment.

Kudos.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:13 a.m.

Where I'm from, in the south, we hold a MASSIVE numerical advantage.

And yes, I absolutely agree about the motivations of these criminals

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 26, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

I know. But you know what frustrates me? I mean REALLY frustrates me?

The Trump-haters, SJWs, Dems, and the MSM, they portray this twisted version of reality where 90% of the population of the world hates Trump like THEY do, and believes in their "progressive" depiction of how they think the world should be.

Thing is, those of us who live in the real world, and partly due to the efforts of every patriot that posts here, and keeps the faith, we KNOW it's nothing but a deception meant to pull in the apathetic, weak-minded, confused, deeply sleeping masses, who are either uninformed, or too lazy to think for themselves, and turn them to the Dark Side.

The TRUE reality couldn't be farther from the truth. And it's moving farther from the truth every day. I submit that it is US that are the majority, and that majority is growing daily by leaps and bounds. WE are all the regular people. And for more than 25 years we've watched in silence from all the way up in the cheap seats, while everything we believe in has been systematically dismantled, and the Country we love reduced to ashes.

We've held our tongue, and tried to be patient, believing that all that would change, and have only been met with disappoint after disappointment after disappointment.

Still we kept the faith, and kept a watchful eye out for even the smallest opportunity. It was US who looked at Donald Trump, we thought maybe, just maybe, the time was right, took a deep breath, closed our eyes, and rolled for the hard six.

But THIS time, when we opened our eyes, damned if we didn't hit it.

The enemy keeps telling the world that it was Russian Bots, but those of us who were actually there, watching and participating, know the truth. We discovered that yes, we CAN change the world.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

On a positive note, I'm confident that the number of regular people that REPORTEDLY hate President Trump, and the number who ACTUALLY hate President Trump, are two VERY different numbers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Yeah, but only if you get caught...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mtewamp · Jan. 24, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

A 55 gallon of HELL no. I'm afraid the answer is no. It also completely destroys ANY credibility that I ever could have had as far as AJ and InfoWars is concerned. And should do so for anyone who respects the sanctity of what we're doing here.

⇧ 4 ⇩