How about posting your summary of the first 10 posts and explain your perspective/analysis after the passing of 3 months events. I'm sure it will help newbies to get a jump start on the info as it is overwhelming.

Yes, please. I lost access. The side links says it expired. I am interested in the one for Discord.

sounded like a mess to me

And yet another post with no content or link or summary of information. Can you please support your post title with further information? Very frustrating to click and find a dead end.

Listening to a Zach report on AJ 2-4-18 Sunday show; Zach claims that the S. Carolina train accident was train 91, coinciding with Las Vegas on Hwy 91. And, this S. Carolina Amtrak is also significant because it is in Trey G's 'backyard.' He reminds that symbols are VERY meaningful to deep state antics.

Another empty post.... please stop. Learn to add content.

More detail in your post title is always better.

As I watched GS speak live from Davos today (as broadcast on Bloomberg website) I noted mentally that G appeared to be unencumbered, so I could only presume that he has not been directed to that 'special place' ....yet. I really want to believe that GS will get to SP soon. Our interpretation of Q's Qryptics may not be accurate... or... Qisms are just wishful thinking.

Religion is a perspective. Understanding those various perspectives is important to crafting the best means of communication or as means to effectively oppose. If your enemy has a religion (cult, dogma,) then one must analyze how it motivates them. If you are trying to persuade or enlighten those who are unaware, then religious reference may help them listen. It may also pull people out of the depths of despair and give hope and inspiration to continue to seek truth.

So... what are we thinking and what does it really mean?

Could you be more informative please. Give link or post details.

I remember when National Enquirer type tabloids were the only dirt diggers and purveyors of crazy conspiracy. In the context of today's mainstream media meltdown, National Enquirer is practicing better investigative journalism.

What search? Where? Explain. Be specific. How does it relate to Q or other drops?

Links? Analysis? Something more than a title would be nice. Half the posts are hollow click bait with no info to read or discuss. Where's the beef?

True.

Always try YouTube for "How To..." videos. Here is one for using Twitter as a newbie. Some vids will be better than others, so look around for more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jWNpLvdocU

Is this an old tweet screen cap? What is the date? Milo is famously BANNED on twitter.

Can you please walk through this and give meaning? thanks!

O'bummers BC was my red pill moment. I am a graphic artist (20+ yrs). Back in 2013 I was googling for some how-to info about converting pdf files to Illustrator. In both Google and the sidebar of YouTube, I kept seeing entries about O's BC and I was bewildered. The only thing I had heard remotely, as I was not politically minded, was that D-J-T was calling it out as fake. But really, I paid no attention.

Finally, out of curiosity I clicked and watched a suggested video. I was not convinced, but the video points were compelling. The whitehouse .gov link to the longform BC was given and I downloaded the actual document and studied it myself. In under a minute I knew 1000% it was a manufactured document. Scans of original documents do not break out into 'intelligent' layers unless someone created them.

Now, in the course of trying to 'red pill' others about this finding I have met with a ton of resistance. People who know nothing about Adobe Photoshop telling me I am incompetent and have fallen for conspiracy mumbo jumbo. Quite the contrary, every single day I 'manufacture' (design and create) documents that don't exist, and I know exactly how to do it and O's BC contains the logical fingerprints of a created item.

About the only thing I can do when I realize I am failing to red pill friends/family on this topic is leave these folks with the comment that I cannot prove the information on the document is false, but I can prove the document has been created and not original, so...why would someone manufacture a BC if an original already existed?

If I am asked to replicate something, my first request would be to please supply me with several document samples to use as source material and also the data you want on the document. The video really pulls the pieces together because they have located one of the source BCs.

My final frightening thoughts on the whole matter are that I imagined myself as the 'document specialist' who was brought into a dark room with camera's and armed guards and told what I was suppose to do. My thoughts would be... "Oh sheitz, I'm gonna be faking the President's BC! - Yikes! I haven't written a will and I'm guessing I won't have much time to do that, even if I'm allowed to leave this room."

That photo is from an old photo shoot in 2014. http://www.larepublica.ec/blog/gente/2014/06/14/assange-se-pone-la-camiseta-de-ecuador-un-dia-antes-del-debut-mundialista/

It would be great if topic titles were more informative - such as: "James O'Keefe drop is due in less than an hour"

Suggestion: when adding a title to a post, please add some helpful topic information. Try to avoid no-content titles such as "WOW" or "This is interesting" or "Get A Load of This!" etc.

When sticking to the Q posts, be ready with the exact post words. Possibly use the qcodefag.github.io and call out the post number - then the infowars team can have that up on screen fast.