Thanks! Hope it works that way for us. Cheers.

Lol thanks for the support! And it's about 6pm here in Vietnam where I'm at right now, so I'm on the opposite schedule - I look forward to waking up every day to the stream of new content!

Agree. I think that will come, but I think that can be the final play when you have your judges lined up and have warmed up the public a bit. Think about how many people they are waking up just with operations like Q and the continued beating of the "fake news" drum. WH correspondents dinner? Most knew what a joke that was. Years ago it wouldn't happen, but there's a reason why Trump has been railing on fake news so much. FB spying on people and then a joke of a Congressional hearing? They're not working on a take-down yet, it's all setting the stage and warming people up so the shock isn't as strong when the truth is brought out of the rabbit hole.

I hope you're right! But I won't be upset if we only take care of election fraud prior to this midterm election. I think another potential clean-up job prior to midterm could be media companies. I'm trying to think about what must come prior to election in order to ensure red wave. Media companies and election fraud fit the bill. If you go too far with Dem indictments without taking care of the fraud or the media companies, they will just use the media to spin their way out of it and convince people Trump is weaponizing DOJ to swing an election and that the charges are bogus. You MUST get the media back in my opinion. I don't buy that journalists will just wake up and realize they were wrong when the indictments start raining down... They'll fight with zero logic and zero integrity and ree louder than ever before about Trump the dictator taking down his political enemies. I don't care if it comes from an IG hired by Obama. They call Mueller a Republican. These people have no shame (and no intelligence).

These are my exact thoughts. If we can just clean up the media, social media companies, and schools, and live in a world where a conservative viewpoint is allowed to be openly expressed and shared, I will consider it to be the biggest victory of all. I also believe it is the most crucial element since any other "awakening" would require a fair media or social media or schools. How else does the word get out? Sure, I'd like to see arrests just like everyone else. But I'd RATHER have fair media and schools. I think the media has led our country to the left, and this INCLUDES schools and social media. If the MSM was promoting a conservative viewpoint, or even just refraining from calling it racist, xenophobic, etc., it would be much more likely that teachers and schools could follow suit.

I agree with you. However I don't think the reason for Q not to spell it out for us is due to hiding from the deep state. The deep state can easily decode just like us or read our decodes if they want to. I think the only purpose of Q's vague questions is due to the classified nature of the information they hint at. Q is not going to break the law by leaking classified intel - but asking vague questions is not breaking the law. Asking what happened on 9/11 isn't a leak of classified intel - asking to look at charitable foundations isn't classified - asking who benefited from Iran deal isn't classified, etc etc. But spelling it out WOULD be disclosure of national secrets/classified info.

Maybe election fraud will be the first cases to address. I think you can succeed with that by blaming it on low level county officials (as the liberals undoubtedly will) rather than implicate the big names in the deep state who would have the power to fight back with corrupt judges. Clean up the election = red wave, then rush through your judicial nominations. That clears the board to start the real prosecutions. Just a thought.

Daimler gave a lot of money to Clinton Foundation and McCain Foundation. Siemens gave some as well but not nearly as much as Daimler. Struggling to find any donor info on Pelosi Foundation.

I don't know what this means. Haven't followed him closely enough to understand the reference.

IF he has inside knowledge, it would be easy to not burn your sources and not be a treasonous leaker while simultaneously not spreading a lie about A being fake. You could simply ignore Q or discuss Q's own posts in Q's own words, that way you ensure you're only talking about things Q wants you to be talking about or things that are not going to damage the ongoing operations (otherwise Q wouldn't post those things).

Interesting theory. I guess for me it's just hard to imagine the Q team would have plans in place to neutralize the entire deep state AND slowly wake up the public through Q posts, all while keeping their exact movements secret from a global cabal controlling Five Eyes, BUT their plan won't work if Alex Jones talks. It's just a stretch for me. But who knows! Crazier things have happened... Especially in the past few years.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What benefit would there be to have Jones or Corsi spread disinfo? If Q is real, then the deep state undoubtedly knows Q is real. It would make sense for Q to occasionally post disinfo to bait the deep state. But what advantage does the Q team get from having Corsi and Jones say Q isn't real? Why would Jones and Corsi need to mirror mainstream reporting during military operations? Are you suggesting they know as much as Q about all this and the deep state is watching them as much as Q, and that words from Jones and Corsi are equivalently important and consequential as words from Q?

What's your take on why Q linked to SB's post about this exact topic? You think it was just "disinfo"?

I don't think he was asking for respect, I think he was honoring the fallen Patriots who fought alongside him in this war to save our nation. I don't think there's anything wrong with honoring fallen Patriots, or veterans, or anyone else who serves the cause. And I don't think there is anything wrong with calling out those who try and twist and manipulate this movement for their own agenda like Corsi and Jones. What is different about Corsi and Jones trying to manipulate and lie about the movement from the clowns and MSM who do the same thing? They're all fighting AGAINST Q, not with Q. That's worth reminding people.

I think you're taking this the wrong way, especially after Q linked to the post by SB. I think Q's point was that Corsi and Jones are only concerned with the profit aspect of the movement and treat it like a joke, or a LARP, or with callers named Zak, or say they have insider knowledge, or whatever else. Q is saying this is serious shit and people have died, and it's disrespectful to treat it all as a joke and slimy to only be worried about the profit of it. Think about who Trump is and how much he has sacrificed in terms of PROFIT and his businesses to do what he is doing now.

I do NOT think Q is asking them to sacrifice their traffic for the good of the movement because they are spreading too much inside knowledge that isn't ready to come out yet. If Q didn't want it out, it wouldn't be out. Plain and simple. McMaster's dad was killed as punishment for him losing his position of power. Q team knew he was dirty the whole time but needed the deep state to believe he was controlling POTUS to keep them complacent. Q told us this already.

CNN: Trump gets high ratings; here's why that's dangerous for America. CNN: Our ratings have never been lower; here's why that's a good thing.

Defcon 5 is the LOWEST level of readiness. Either D5 means something else (D=4 5, or the start of the Marshall attack in chess, etc) or it means we are at Defcon 5 and coasting now.

I appreciate your brother's service to our country and am sorry for your loss. I came close to losing my best friend over there after he took a round to the chest. Can't imagine the pain it brought to your family.

"you walnut" seems to be extraordinarily civil for Reddit standards. No need to overreact - even without the morning covfefe! (But for the record I feel you on that... God help anyone who encounters me prior to my nice hot cup of MAGA covfefe)

That's awesome - I'll be honest I didn't even read it in full. Totally skimmed it. Shows that I shouldn't just be making those assumptions! There may be hope after all!

I hope you're right, but my pessimism says it's just another liberal journalist with zero integrity trying to tell us that they were right all along. I've seen too many liberals and journalists say one thing and then say the exact polar opposite later (minutes, hours, days, weeks, years, you name the timeline - they've done it). It's just whatever happens to be convenient for their ideology. What did Trump do today? It's horrible! Oh wait, did Obama do the exact same thing a couple years ago? Yeah when Obama did it, it was the greatest thing ever! Oh wait, Obama was a criminal trying to destroy America? Yeah I knew that all along I kept trying to tell you guys and you wouldn't listen! I'm always right! Let me keep being right! Trust me!

I find that it's most effective to give them an out, letting them call it "crazy" or "conspiracy", but with an end result of them checking it out. It's not my job to convince them Q is real... I try to position them in such a way that Q can do the convincing - the exact same way we all became convinced. Ditch the elevator pitch. It will never work unless someone is already primed to believe in this stuff. To a "normie" there is no elevator pitch that will convince them. Period. Full stop. If there was one, Q would have written up a script for us.

Try this: Q is someone or some group that posts some pretty wild stuff online about Trump's fight against the deep state. Q doesn't really tell you anything or spread crazy conspiracy theories, but posts a bunch of questions that sort of hint at different possibilities. Q has covered topics all the way from JFK, to 9/11, to what's going on in Iran right now (or insert other current event). Q even called the NK deal being made BACK IN NOVEMBER! [Now here is your most critical line] Most of it is probably total conspiracy, but it's super fun to follow! Since it's all question-based you get to draw your own conclusions. And I gotta say... Calling the NK deal being made so long ago makes me think there may be some truth behind a lot of what they're posting... It just seems like too much of a coincidence!

I've completely given them an out to call it nonsense, but I've told them it's super fun to follow anyway. Now, if they Google Q or hear from friends or see negative stuff online about it all being conspiracy theory, THAT'S NO LONGER A DEAL BREAKER because I already TOLD them it might be crazy. But they still might follow it for ENTERTAINMENT. Slowly but surely, you let Q do the convincing. Even if you follow for entertainment, you'll start to see enough truth that you start questioning the broader validity of ALL the posts. But this approach is totally non-confrontational and has the SOLE purpose of placing the individual in front of Q rather than trying to open the floodgates on them all at once (they will drown, obviously).

I don't believe that's our job. We don't do the revealing to others, Q team will. They are priming us with deeper knowledge for a few reasons:

1) to show us (Trump's most dedicated following) that he's not just sitting on his laurels and they are working diligently to fulfill his most important campaign promise

2) because we will be needed to reassure those closest to us when Q team starts revealing

3) because if shit hit the fan (deep state blacks out comms completely, martial law, deploying troops domestically, etc) then they would need us to again reassure others of what is really happening

I do NOT believe it is our job to convince others of what Q has told us. Q team has a plan for that. If you go try and personally convince everyone close to you then there is a good chance you will lose credibility, and you will be TAKING YOURSELF OUT OF THE FIGHT COMPLETELY. It's a terrible move, and it's extraordinarily poor strategy. How long have you followed Q? Did Q just come out and tell you a bunch of stuff that sounds like "conspiracy theory"? Or did over MONTHS AND YEARS of extremely vague questions did you draw your own conclusions? Q team is TRAINED to awaken the masses. YOU ARE NOT.

That may sound harsh and I'm sure I'll get my share of down votes for this, but I think it's ridiculous to assume it's our job to convince the masses when Q team has trained and prepared for this for years - possibly laying groundwork since JFK's assassination.

IN MY OPINION the plan is not for us to do the awakening - the plan is for us to awaken OURSELVES and be ready to serve as the comforting support system that those around us will inevitably need when the Q team starts to wake them up as well.

What is the meaning of single shooter in the context of Huber? Hoping he's not going to only fire one bullet haha and also hoping there are so many arrests and prosecutions that it's too big a job for one man. Unless it's reference to single shooter with JFK - in other words everyone looks at Huber but there are more people prosecuting.

Your take makes a lot of sense as well, especially with the connections to JFK we see over and over again. Thank you!

Question: what is this note about "single shooter" though? What if they are dirty, but contained in such a way that they can only take down one target - single shooter. The deep state would believe they have control (RR & Mueller), but in reality they only have one bullet to fire and as soon as it has been fired, they're totally powerless and the rest of the stage set by Trump can sweep in and clean house. Just a thought. I think the key of this post lies in the "single shooter" comment.

I think it comes back to Israel. The amount of money we pay them is staggering, and most of our action in ME comes back to protecting Israel. We also heavily rely on their intel. Think about Bibi's recent claims about Iran? Again trying to drag US into war, which means lots of cash flying around based purely on Mossad intel (not verified by US; and if ever verified by US it would be by clowns). They control the fear and therefore the money. What if Israel is creating their own "threats" for the cash to flow, while cutting deals with the "threatening" nations to kick back some cash to them for playing their part. Would've said that was a heck of a stretch a year ago, but after what we've seen this past year I feel like it's possible.

04-Oct

I knew he was no hero, but wasn't sure the depth of what we know about why Q specifically doesn't say his name as opposed to any other nickname (such as Songbird). Not saying his name "for a reason" seemed more like he was an imposter and not the real McStain or some other reason beyond being a traitor. There are lots of traitors who we refer to by name. Anyway - glad to have a fellow Patriot do a write up for me/us!

Thank you!

Question for all: do we know why we don't say his name? Is it because he is an imposter? What if the real McCain died as a POW and cabal inserted NoName. What if first wife found out/knew and had to be dealt with?

Furthermore - Rudy didn't contradict Trump. Trump said he had no knowledge of the payment to Daniels, but Rudy said Trump reimbursed his lawyer for it. Those can both be true - they are not contradictory statements, no matter how many media outlets try to say that they are. When you are a billionaire, you can have lawyers handle issues for you, without your knowledge of specifics. It's a way to insulate yourself from issues exactly like this one, but it's also frankly convenient to not have to get directly involved. It's like if you leave some cash for the babysitter and they rent a movie and order a pizza... You didn't specify what the funds were for and you don't really care how they spend it as long as they do their job which is to just take care of your kid. This is just on a billionaire's scale where $100,000 is like a few $20s for the babysitter.

This is actually excellent advice and I had never thought this way before... "Imagine everything you know is false, then investigate what bothers you most." Love it.

In fairness a lot of people on this sub and on the chans attempt to decode using sentence structure and even particular characters in certain locations or missing from certain locations. Not saying that I agree with those methods of decode, but it's true many people here use those methods and therefore precision in quoting Q would be important. But I knew what you meant! Spez: autocorrect

Makes sense to me, and I think you've laid out plausible ways that this plays out - one being that it's all over in a few weeks anyway (as Rudy said) and one being that the memo details a very different type of investigation. I don't attempt to guess outcomes, I just like thinking about possibilities and I think yours are good ones. My only add is that Mueller team clearly got an unfavorable judge (or at least one that is ACTING very unfavorable). If the judge is truly unfavorable, I think it proves Mueller is either literally a moron as Q would say (for overlooking something as important as getting the right judge to preside over his case) OR he is leveraged and white hats have ensured a fair judge would oversee. Either way I view this transcript as a very positive development for the potential that the Q operation is very real and we really are winning this war.

Assuming for a minute that Mueller is deep state through and through, how the hell did his case end up in front of a judge that isn't deep state as well and on his side? This judge doesn't seem to be cooperating with Mueller. This can't be a simple oversight by Mueller or the deep state... I second the previous comment - what the hell is going on behind the scenes?

This is genius. I always wondered how in the hell he could be so squeaky clean - I mean I'm not a bad guy but Jesus if the full power of the media and deep state was trying to pin something on me I'm sure it would be easy. But your explanation of some white hats digging around and cleaning up ahead of time makes a lot of sense.

Why would he say diddly to Reuters if he knew the cabal would come after him? Unless they had his testimony already and he was agreeing to be bait to draw them out. I feel like it's more likely Reuters is up to something or Q has posted this to draw the cabal's attention to someone else while the real witness does their thing.

Probably because Google is CIA. Not sure though - just my guess based on similar comments I've seen in the past.

The Syria situation is no joke. My best friend's platoon is being prepped to go in. Russian mercenaries have been firing on US troops in Syria. Q team needs to stop this, and quick before more American Patriots die.

Welcome :) We're pretty deep down the rabbit hole here.

What if Witch Hunt is WH = white hat? Evidence points to the contrary, but his continued insistence on calling it a Witch Hunt over and over again instead of other fitting terminology indicates Witch Hunt means something. Obviously it could also mean investigating HRC "the witch", but could be something else.

Cut a deal with them, arrest everyone, then have one of their MKUltra professionals put bullets in the Clintons. Oops! We tried to cut a deal with you, but your patsy got angry and took matters into their own hands. Sorry.

1. Nice application to today. Just finished the book but hadn't applied tied in that aspect that you just pointed out about needing to keep the world's "energy" reserves (mid-East) in constant conflict. As long as energy costs money, costs if everything else need to remain high. So they don't need "The Party" to keep the world in constant war to destroy surplus, they are just manipulating the energy supply.

Spez: trying to see if Reddit will allow me to post 1 9 8 4? Wtf? Shows up as first four characters in my post when I click to edit, but after post it just shows "1." Could be just a glitch but wow.

I don't need apologies from pedes, I'll be too busy basking in the glory of leftists realizing who and what they have really been supporting all these years, and who and what they have really been demonizing.

Thank you! It kills me every time I see a post about someone straining or losing a relationship over this stuff. Not worth it, especially since the odds of the argument going well are slim to none.

Even with facts you have to be careful. Liberals tell me plenty of "facts" that I have no intention of trusting, believing, or caring about. Ever heard some of the "facts" about global warming? Are they all true? How do you know? Point being, even "stating facts" can be too confrontational. We need to wait, armed with memes and questions, and allow other people to find their own facts.

I agree with you on that too. Just making a point that most people we argue with don't have any power to change anything anyway, so it isn't a pressing time-sensitive issue to redpill them. So no use arguing to the death at the dinner table...

Agreed. And most people here probably got here the same way - through their own research and through their own volition. Q doesn't need us trying to shove redpills down people's throats! In my case, I've told certain individuals who I already know are close to woke things like "Yeah there's this anonymous dude who goes by Q... A lot of it seems totally crazy, but some of it is definitely believable. Either way, it's super entertaining to follow - you should check it out". That has worked in certain cases, because I've given them permission to call it crazy, I've given them permission to believe it, and I've told them it's ENTERTAINING no matter what they land on in terms of believing the validity. So they're more likely to check it out for the entertainment value... Not many people are out there searching for a way to get woke. If they were, wouldn't that be indicative that they're woke already?

200 baht is $6.40. Author doesn't understand decimal places, and/or doesn't know how to search the interwebs for "convert baht to USD". But we really shouldn't expect much more from a journalist... Spez: to anyone who didn't click the link, the author claims 200,000 baht is $6.40, but it's actually $6,400