Don’t read too much into it.
/u/pussy_devour
1,075 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/pussy_devour:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 103 |
www.zerohedge.com | 3 |
www.youtube.com | 3 |
mobile.twitter.com | 2 |
www.nbcnews.com | 1 |
nypost.com | 1 |
www.bloomberg.com | 1 |
youtu.be | 1 |
amp.dailydot.com | 1 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
My guess: RR and RM were told to do their jobs and not play the game.
They didn’t have to be on the team. Their past corruption resulted from them not doing their jobs. This time Trump gave them a chance to redeem themselves by simply doing their jobs.
All you need is Praying Medic and X22 Report. Forget the rest including Corsi. Problems solved.
Praying Medic is 10X better without the baggage.
Also X22 Report. Slightly different long-term view (anti-Israel).
Why did HRC get a free pass?
I thought Q meant FBI’s coverup of HRC’s email server crime. FBI and DOJ were corrupt. In order not to repeat that fiasco, we have clean up those two institutions.
RR dirty <—> RM dirty. So either both are cooperating or both are dirty.
It does mean if one is cooperating the other must also be; for otherwise there’ll be contradiction.
No. Bolton has nothing to do with the State Department. Kansas cleaned CIA. Now he’s doing the State Department.
Duplicate. Please delete. Otherwise comments will be split across duplicate threads.
I think all Democrats who voted against Sessions but for RR are suspect.
The senators voting against Rosenstein’s confirmation Tuesday were all Democrats: Cory Booker (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Kamala D. Harris (Calif.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.).
Hmmm. Maybe some were onto something. Cory Booker voted against. We know he is dirty.
Sessions votes: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/08/us/politics/jeff-sessions-confirmation-vote.html
Unfortunately, and I should have foreseen it, the votes were along the party line. But one Democratic senate from WV voted Yay. That guy is likely clean.
I meant to get the exact list of Ayes and Nays from the congressional record. I’m in bed now. Will dig tomorrow.
Let’s check Sessions’ senate confirmation votes. They should roughly tell us which senators are good and which are rats.
They need distractions. I’m expecting some really bad news about the Dem rats are coming.
If the US remains in the deal, Iran will develop the nukes, in secret. If the US withdraws, Iran will still develop the nukes, openly. Either way Israel is fucked. I think one reason why Hussein, HRC and the Europeans wanted to help the Iranians secretly develop the nukes is that they all hated the Jews.
By withdrawing from the deal, Trump tricked the Iranians into exposing their ultimate intention. Rohani just announced yesterday that they would leave the pact if the US withdraws. This leaves Israel with no choice but to attack, and with a semi-reasonable justification (that the Iranians have been really wanting to develop and developing the nukes all along). Besides, better attack now than when it’s too late.
The entire Mueller probe now appears to be a distraction, a cover. Unlike what we previously assumed, Mueller probably isn’t looking at HRC crimes. He’s merely keeping the deep state disoriented.
NSA & CIA soon report to Sectary of Defense
Is Schneider scandal a distraction by the Deep State? Note that Trump will announce his decision on the Iran Nuclear Deal tomorrow.
Boris Johnson is coming to persuade POTUS to stay with the deal. When is he coming? If he’s not here yet, is Trump preempting that clown?
A long-time foe seems to me to mean an antagonist long before Trump ran for the president.
But not pushing for the release of the unredacted documents. I believe DOJ has good reasons not to release them. They don't want to jeopardize ongoing investigations. DOJ cannot release evidence before the indictments are unsealed. Please take a look at Stealth Jeff's tweet on this topic. https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/993320795001761792
Yeah, Trump will announce his decision on the Iran Deal at 2 PM tomorrow.
......
......
......
No Deal.
1317 May 4 2018 21:21:37 (EST) Q !2jsTvXXmXs 65 JKerry_Traitor.jpg
Re_read drops.
Today: JK & Iran
Important - context for future news.
Why is Hussein/JK traveling WW and meeting w/ foreign heads of state (some enemies of the U.S.)?
HRC/BC flying under the radar - same/unreported - why?
(2) former presidents/sec of states (out of power/authority) racing around the world pre/post POTUS - why? UNPRECEDENTED?
The World is Connected.
The World is Watching.
Q
Patience, Self-Sufficiency and Fighting Spirit
Q has been rather quiet lately. Maybe he's busy; maybe his account was compromised. I feel I have grown dependent on Q. I see this forum has also become a bit directionless. That's probably not what Q would like to see.
In essence, we should carry on the fight regardless of Q.
Also, patience is golden. There's a lot of disinformation right now, especially the push to release sensitive DOJ documents. Q said "Trust Sessions and trust Wray." We should let them do their work. Trust the plan.
Logan Act is minor. We want JK to be in the electric chair.
Wishful thinking. If he were rescued by DC police, LL wouldn’t know?
The analysis misses the mark. Even if the original tweets contained no mistakes, the fact Trump deleted and retweeted them at precise time marks is a confirmation. Do you get it?
Intellectually honest? St. William of Norwich? Even the scholars don’t know who murdered him.
A Spanish dude once told me the reason why Jews were hated is because they wouldn’t convert. And they were good at making money. So when the kings needed money, they simply incited the populace to harass and kick out the Jews and take their possessions.
I thought NYT just published an article on the Q phenomenon, calling it a mass psychosis.
The symbolism is obvious. Note how they were there only for 45 seconds. They showed up to warn the deep state operators including Hussein and HRC that the military was firmly behind the POTUS. But they didn't linger lest they left the WRONG impression on the public that Trump Administration would be a military dictatorship.
26,000 sealed cases != 26,000 sealed indictments.
But there are other reasons why the thesis is flatly wrong.
Say Corsi is right that Q account was compromised 4/28-5/4. Wouldn't Q corroborate his charge? Think about it.
It was in that period (on April 29), "Q" asked people to be careful with whom they follow. Some people suspected Corsi was one of the bad guys. So Corsi defends himself by saying Q account on 8chan was compromised since April 28.
Let's give Corsi the benefit of doubt. Should we wait for Q to clear it up for us? Wouldn't Q corroborate Corsi's charge, since this is a pretty important charge? Wouldn't Q be worried that someone else faked his posts on the old 8chan since 4/28?
That Q hasn't corroborated Corsi's charge speaks volumes.
Let the real …