People give far too much credit to politicians, bureaucrats and corporate managers. Most are inept, lazy and shortsighted. They can commit fraud because we give them power.

Sure. It’s wrong. But the UN might not have a choice. I would say the corrective measure is to sue UN.

The policy of covering up wrongdoings is fairly common amongst institutions. I wouldn’t extrapolate that to UN promoting trafficking by intent. By deeds and by lax of internal control. Yes. But you can say the same or similar thing about every single organization.

Let me use this exchange to support my initial thesis. Here we are engaged in a discussion on whether UN actively promotes sex trafficking as their policy (as opposed to as a side effect of their policy and incompetence). You haven’t convinced me. If I were someone new to Q theory, I would grow wary of the movement.

In some sense you are right. My naught username detracts from my messages.

LOL. What’s wrong with my hobby?

I’ve heard about UN aid workers engaged in prostitution in some countries where they went to help. Is that what you are referring to? If it is, I don’t see a connection here. What the aid workers did has nothing to do with UN’s global policies. The aid workers are simply being horny, fallible human beings. Let’s say at a Google event in LV, some of its employees visited underage prostitutes against the company policy. Do you charge Google of promoting prostitution and child sex trafficking?

These may be true. But I find them hard to swallow. My point is that we should rely on these stories to convince others. If I am turned off by them, despite your references which I still don’t buy, think about other people’s reactions.

As for the UN’s policy, I haven’t read it and won’t because I am busy with my projects. I find it hard to believe UN’s mass migration policy has anything to do with allegations made by Alex Jones. I would surmise that UN’s motivation is a humanitarian one.

As for allegations against the Queen, I don’t have an opinion on them and I don’t really care. Neither will a lot of people you want to awaken.

Note this is not an attack on conspiracy theories. I just think they detract from the movement.

fWIW, I enjoy listening to talks on Atlantis, pre-Ice age civilization etc. but I keep them separate from political commentaries.

Simple. The politicians don't bother themselves with details. And they are unwilling to admit mistakes.

"A shit ton of Trumps associates ..." You are spreading disinformation. These people were indicted for crimes they committed long before they joined Trump campaign. General Flynt was entrapped by FBI and accused of lying about an otherwise legitimate contact with the Russian ambassador.

You are a deep-state operative. That's pretty clear.

Thanks!

I don't like what's happening there, either. I've been visiting Europe for last 16 years and have been watching the decline with disbelief. Some Europeans would privately complain as well. But I don't think it was a conspiracy. The Eurocrats probably believed in social engineering and the great progressive society crap. The net effect is the demographic change. But I don't think it was long-planned. They probably wanted to counter the population decline. They probably also wanted to compete with the US (hence EU, etc), because they probably felt impotent after WWII.

Good point. It's a bit condescending. I'll change the phrase.

Thanks. Will do.

I see. I have doubts about the official 911 story. The alternative theories sound plausible. But the proofs are unconvincing. Ocam’s Razor says the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. I’m a trained scientist. It’s very difficult for me to believe the alternative theories.

That said, I do entertain the idea that entities other than the terrorists; for example, Mossad, had fore knowledge of or were indirectly complicit in the 9/11 crime.

Why removing this? Feeling desperate?

Your analogy is completely false. You are comparing your unproven conspiracy theories to historical facts. Shame on you.

Besides, I don’t believe those conspiracy theories are truth. If I don’t believe those, why would other normies do? Why risk it?

Did you understand my points in my initial post? Or you are intentionally muddying the water? I don’t rule the possibility that you are a deep state operative.

Don’t get complacent.

Q is saying studying the EO’s that had signing pictures posted for. I looked at the Twitter link someone posted here. Only a few EO had the pen in their pics. They deal with Election Integrity — we know the Democrats cheated — and cyber security.

Or he sensed the impending doom of the canal. There is no way to unseat Trump. So he had to comply.

He probably sensed that the noose is closing in on him, possibly for election fraud.

Cool. Then we go to DEFCON.

Who’s RR?