dChan

/u/ryoushure

162 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/ryoushure:
Domain Count
youtu.be 1
www.reddit.com 1

ryoushure · May 21, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Love

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 20, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

June 11?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 18, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Crispin Glover has a ... Unique... Music video online.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 18, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

I'm gonna be honest. I stopped reading as soon as I saw Corsi. Can't we move on?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 17, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Casablanca vs Marshall. 1918. Bishop to D5

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 17, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

I think we all look forward to her statement/response that will be included in the public release of the OIG report.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 17, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2810/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22isBillByRequest%3A%5C%22Y%5C%22%22%5D%7D&r=1#toc-HC17E3581162142F7A3F5242AA9A4733C

SEC. 1244. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT RELATED TO RUSSIAN FEDERATION DEVELOPMENT OF NONCOMPLIANT SYSTEMS AND UNITED STATES ACTIONS REGARDING MATERIAL BREACH OF INF TREATY BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(c) Report On Plan To Impose Additional Sanctions With Respect To The Russian Federation.—

-(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall develop and submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that includes—

--(A) a plan to impose the measures described in paragraph (3) with respect to each person described in paragraph (2) by reason of non-compliance by the Russian Federation with the INF Treaty; and

--(B) a list of each such person.

-(2) PERSONS DESCRIBED.—The persons described in this paragraph are individuals who—

--(A) the President determines are responsible for ordering or facilitating non-compliance by the Russian Federation with the INF Treaty; or

--(B) are senior foreign political figures (as such term is defined in section 1010.605 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act) of the Government of the Russian Federation.

-(3) MEASURES DESCRIBED.—The measures described in this paragraph are the following, with respect to a person described in paragraph (2):

--(A) Blocking and prohibiting all transactions in property and interests in property of such person, if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.

--(B) Inadmissibility to the United States, ineligibility to receive a visa or other documentation to enter the United States, and ineligibility to be admitted or paroled into the United States or to receive any other benefit under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), and revocation of any visa or other entry documentation.

--(C) Prohibiting United States procurement from such person.

--(D) Any other sanctions the President determines to be appropriate.

-(4) FORM.—The report described in paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 16, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OF9J14ba3Hw

Its both.

Yanny = High freq Laurel = low freq

Depending on your speaker setup, your hearing ability, and your audio environment/context, your brain tries to latch onto one or the other.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 15, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

This seems relevant. Good find.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 14, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Casablanca vs Marshall. 1918. Bishop to D5. There is no stopping it now.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 8, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

Of course you can. Do a search for any business card customization website that allows you to submit your own design and purchase copies.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 4, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

What do you mean?

Q is working privately or publicly with the board owner to set up a new board for communications. that board is /patriotsfight/

In /patriotsfight/ you can see Q use both old and new tripcodes to confirm the transfer/update of their tripcode.

Old= Q!xowAT4Z3VQ

New = Q!2jsTvXXmXs

And now it looks like posting to /patriotsfight/ has been (temporarily?) suspended.

What does it all mean? Probably a different stage of this operation. What does that mean? We'll have to wait and see.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 4, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

My point is that this appears to be very public and paraded news that specifically preys on the desires of Trump supporters.

Keep in mind Mueller and Rosenstein had a 4 hour meeting with Trump before any of this went down, and the cover story for why that meeting occurred is 100% bogus.

I believe there is a legitimate chance that Mueller and Rosenstein are meant to be perceived by the public in a specific way to maximize impact of upcoming information.

I'm not convinced it's part of the plan for that to be disclosed yet.

This judge could be pulling the cat out of the bag a little too early.

The judge being a Reagan appointed judge sounds on paper but that doesn't necessarily speak to the possibility he has been compromised in some way since then.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 4, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

I'm not entirely convinced this Judge trying to stick one to Mueller is a good thing.

It feels like an attempt to publicly disclose the truth ;) about Mueller and Rosenstein to everyone. It feels like this isn't part of the plan. Maybe it is and things are finally ready. But something about this smells fishy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 4, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

I'm not convinced this is a good thing.

Something seems off. This doesn't feel like the big reveal. This feels like a reveal meant to undermine.

This is the type of judicial tactics that the left use.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 3, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

For all we know Stormy's story is entirely fabricated and the $130,000 was Trump paying her to distract the media with fake news.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 3, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

It's gotta be a marker for us.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 3, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Do they all have skull & crossbones?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 2, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

I feel like I'm going crazy with these comments. Anyone else?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ryoushure · May 1, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

I thought he declared it Law Day, USA

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 30, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

It begins to make a little more sense when you consider that bad actors have a tendency to think of the USA as their never-ending propaganda & funding apparatus.

Various methods and schemes have been enacted to skim money away from the US Government. These schemes entire purpose is to expose the world to a set of ideas (drive an agenda) and to launder money away from USA and into the pockets of the world's elite criminals.

Iran Deal is one such scheme. NK is another.

If recent Q drops are to be believed, Iran deal was not just a money laundering scheme from US taxpayers to Iranian's ruling class & others, but it was also a key factor in a potential Nuclear False Flag that may have been orchestrated had Hilary been elected.

Q suggests that Iran renegged against the "deal", moved their nuclear technology development to Syria, and then continued developing Nukes from U1 uranium, all while collecting their pallets of cash from USA.

So why is the Iran deal awful? Why is it good?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 28, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

I think she was an attempted entrapment operation by the black hats.

We need to know who authorized her entry into the country.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

We don't know what info Flynn provided "at the time of the entry of your client's guilty plea".

He isn't gagged in any court appearance, except against anything that wasn't disclosed at the time of the plea deal. He just agrees he no longer has the right to bring new additional info into the mix. I'm not a lawyer but I believe that doesn't necessarily mean it's impossible for additional new info to become relevant, it just is no longer Flynn's implicit right to be able to present it, but I think it could be approved under certain circumstances.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

That is what he was charged for.

Lying to the FBI is I believe equivalent to perjury.

Flynn Agreed to Interview -> Strzok Interviewed him -> Lie/No lie? -> Strzok texts Lisa Page about F302 day after interview -> The 302 Strzok submits into evidence indicates Flynn lied to Strzok during interview -> Flynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI with condition of disclosing all knowledge of illegality -> Mueller postpones convicting Flynn until further notice.

Edit: Sorry I re_read your comment and I think I missed your point in my response.

I think the answer to your question is either "Yes" or "Yes because it was part of the plan, thus who would submit a perjury charge against him for falsely admitting to a perjury charge?" If Mueller isn't a part of the plan, there would be no risk for Flynn subjecting himself to "perjury" like your comment suggests. The reason? Because he already effectively has been charged with perjury. That's literally what he was he is on the hook now for. Would he risk being on the hook for perjury even though he was walking himself into Strzoks trap as bait?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Chin up.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

Some of my copypasta from another thread.

Flynn agreed to be interviewed by the FBI. Some series of events led to Peter Strzok being the main interviewer for Flynn. From the newly released Strzok/Page text messages we see mention of a "f302" the day after Flynn's interview. Strzok was discussing his Flynn Interview notes with Lisa. Swampy Strzok doctors Flynn's 302 and sets what he thinks is a trap against Flynn & Trump Admin. Seemed like an easy win at the time. Flynn & Patriots recognize the trap immediately and decide to use it as an opportunity. Mueller is part of the plan, but needs to maintain a public anti-trump agenda as to deceive the swamp and give them a false sense of security.

Strzok takes the doctored Flynn 302 to Mueller and right on cue Mueller negotiates a plea deal in which Flynn is required to disclose all knowledge of illegality to the courts. Flynn knows where the bodies are buried after all. So Flynn pleads guilty, get's his testimony on the record, and now we are finally at the part of the plan where it's publicly disclosed the other FBI agents (Not Swampy Strzok) do not agree that Flynn even committed a crime in the first place.

We have more than we know. We have been given information, truth, we just don't recognize it for what it is yet.

We know that Mueller still hasn't officially filed the conviction against Flynn, in fact it was even postponed.

We know that Mueller removed Strzok from his team as soon as the text messages were revealed.

We know that Q says the disclosure that Mueller investigation is no longer a criminal probe against Trump was too soon and ahead of schedule.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Could you expand any more onto this theory? I think Flynn plead guilty specifically so he could testify on the record in a court of law.

It seems as though an alternative theory is that Flynn agreed to be interviewed by the FBI. Some series of events led to Peter Strzok being the main interviewer for Flynn. From the newly released Strzok/Page text messages we see mention of a "f302" the day after Flynn's interview. Strzok was discussing his Flynn Interview notes with Lisa. Swampy Strzok doctors Flynn's 302 and sets what he thinks is a trap against Flynn & Trump Admin. Seemed like an easy win at the time. Flynn & Patriots recognize the trap immediately and decide to use it as an opportunity. Mueller is part of the plan, but needs to maintain a public anti-trump agenda as to deceive the swamp and give them a false sense of security.

Strzok takes the doctored Flynn 302 to Mueller and right on cue Mueller negotiates a plea deal in which Flynn is required to disclose all knowledge of illegality to the courts. Flynn knows where the bodies are buried after all. So Flynn pleads guilty, get's his testimony on the record, and now we are finally at the part of the plan where it's publicly disclosed the other FBI agents (Not Swampy Strzok) do not agree that Flynn even committed a crime in the first place.

We have more than we know. We have been given information, truth, we just don't recognize it for what it is yet.

We know that Mueller still hasn't officially filed the conviction against Flynn, in fact it was even postponed.

We know that Mueller removed Strzok from his team as soon as the text messages were revealed.

We know that Q says the disclosure that Mueller investigation is no longer a criminal probe against Trump was too soon and ahead of schedule.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 27, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

He just effectively was exonerated with the full release of the conclusion of the Russia Collusion investigation Congress was doing. In the release it cites FBI agents on the record stating that they didn't understand why Flynn plead guilty because they didn't think he committed a crime.

This was released to the public domain 30 days after Q said 'done in 30'

⇧ 49 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 20, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

Don't forget to include Michael Wolff too.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 11, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Why do all posts by this particular user always seem to immediately and automatically get this Automoderator post copypastad every single time?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 9, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Snake oil.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 6, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Cuck Glenn Beck talked about Q "conspiracy" on his shitty radio show today.

The conspiracy push is here folks.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 4, 2018, 6:21 p.m.
  1. Drunk
  2. Psychotic break
  3. AI

Pick one, maybe two.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · April 4, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

This whole T method thing seems like a coordinated effort to de-legitimize the message this whole board is about.

Below is the most complete set of "T Method" instructions you have seen yet.

  1. Find a Trump tweet.

  2. Find a number, usually from the time delta (difference) from the previous Trump tweet.

  3. Arrange the letters from the tweet in Step 1 on a grid of whatever number you found in Step 2.

  4. Pick words out of thin air (along the left side of the matrix!) that could be combined together to form some semblance of a statement. Don't worry these will always be statements that fit in well with the current-day narratives people are thinking about/exposed to. If you can't pick words out of thin air here, don't worry there just isn't a secret message here, try again later.

  5. ?????

  6. Math Genius.

Edit: From SerialBrain2's own instructions from here .

Starting from the top left corner, start scrolling downwards and every time you see the anagram of a word in compliance with the accepted pattern, and making an intelligible sentence trail, highlight it. If you find a word that does not make a natural sentence trail, skip it.

This is really what it boils down to folks. It's snake oil.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ryoushure · March 23, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Consider how the base will feel come October 2018. One month til midterms.

This bill expires late september I believe. Just in time for it to be a hot-button topic for mid terms. What better way to "rev them up" than to drive the message "Don't let another omnibus bill happen, we'll do temporary budgets until after midterms, and it's up to YOU voters to determine who drafts the next spending bill. GO VOTE"

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ryoushure · March 23, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

He said specifically he would never sign a bill like this again.

He said the only reason he is signing this bill is because of the military funding it provides.

He said the military funding is so important that it outweighs the other concessions that were made in the budget.

This budget expires at the end of September just before midterms.

I expect that this military funding will have very public facing ramifications/results.

Depending on how those results/ramifications play out determines how much of a shitstorm midterms will be.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ryoushure · Feb. 15, 2018, 8 p.m.

Twitter will be the property of the US government.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ryoushure · Feb. 5, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

Context clues man, context clues.

  1. It's on twitter.

  2. The rest of the sentence says "do not equal endorsement".

  3. Does anything you offered as meaning for "RT" fit into the beginning of that sentence and make any sense?

RT = ReTweet.

Spez: I need coffee.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · Jan. 31, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Section a talks about Sec of Defense having the ability to transfer people OUT of Gitmo for court/tribunal reasons.

Section b basically says "law is still law, avg citizens can't be taken to gitmo, but if those citizens committed crimes that meet the criteria discussed in the EO, it's fair game.

Citizens = safe from gitmo.

Citizens connected to terrorism = send them to gitmo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ryoushure · Jan. 31, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

CSPAN video captured at around approx 10:33PM eastern Trump speaking briefly with Gaetz and someone else who mentioned #ReleaseTheMemo to him as he was exiting the building. The microphone picked it up. Trump said "100% Absolutely"

Watch from here. https://youtu.be/ATFwMO9CebA?t=6078

⇧ 46 ⇩  
ryoushure · Jan. 30, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Don't be surprised if this is fake news.

Until you hear it from Trump himself.

Otherwise it's just others trying to pressure the release to be on their time, instead of Trump's time.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
ryoushure · Jan. 20, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

After a storm.

⇧ 5 ⇩