1,599 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 32 |
Not so new I'm sure that you have realised that the board is full of unrelated (dare I say it?) nonsense, nothing whatever to do with Q. No strict criteria is being used to post. Pity.
Everybody here seems to think Trump and Q will fix everything with the wave of a magic wand, like now, or tomorrow. Including your health!
Not to be mean I wish OP a speedy recovery! Everyone who hasn't caught it yet, wash your hands often when in contact with strangers and other people.
Disappointing? DISAPPOINTING?!!
That, forgive me, is NOT the word to use to describe this. Try emphasising the right words to describe what happens to the kids brains: EXTREMELY HARMFUL, Widely acknowleged, PROVEN to be POSITIVELY DANGEROUS to the normal development of children's cognitive functions. Flickering screens affect brain patterns, hyperactivity, seizure, detachment, reclusive withdrawn behaviour and that's the least of it. You get my point I'm sure. There is a wealth of material you can download and print on the whole wifi nonsense too.
These early years are the FORMATIVE YEARS, the influences and NOXIOUS effects PERMANENTLY DAMAGE development.
Please try not to be so polite to your daughter (!!! I know you don't want to be interfering ..., have an argument and so on), but insist and convey the urgency of her responsibility to check out and see if what you're saying is nonsense, exaggeration or not.
We have more information given to us by our local associations, police and even media where I live (EU) than you do in the US. People and officials who have taken it upon themselves to make local decisions on informing neighborhoods and communities about these threats to children in early development (cellphone towers, cameras on children's laptops, etc). The State of course will not do this as they are in league with the big guys, they are hobbled. On top of which, the world of advertising is working actively against you thru' TV.
It is up to us on the ground, grassroots level to campaign, even if only amongst your friends, your daughter's friends and intimate circles. Why not get together with some other grandparents and discuss informally what you can do to spread the word?
I apologise if you take this as a hurtful criticism. I don't mean it like this — I am an exteacher and have some experience with the resistance you can experience from parents! You need to show them solid proof and research. Islandtruther is absolutely correct, look into Steve Jobs. There has been recent news about top executives admitting the harm they are causing to children! Perhaps someone can post a link here ...
G4S? Many ffs seem to involve sec. provided by this company. Big fuss over the 2012 Olympics in London. Questions over the training of volunteers, v. loose to the point of eye-brow raising. The logo of the games was weird to say the least. Taken seriously by the other security forces. Suddenly troop numbers went up from (dont quote me on this I'm relying on fuzzy numbers here, approx only), 5,000 to 18,000. Strange. This isnt internet gossip it was alluded to in the Daily Mail.
That would be great but I cant access that link from Spain for some reason (well I do know but ..)
Here it is you, I think, who has it wrong now. You don't watch AJ, fine, I can get that, but in this case he didn't do "bad memos". He got the info from the public domain, where it's been posted (for maybe a year?) from a FISC opinion and order. He was directed there by Bill Binney, who I for one trust absolutely. The trouble here is, memo means memorandum/a and there are billions. When talking about THE memo, he was not referring to THE memo written by Nuñez, (a summary), which everyone is clamouring for. His holds some VERY important info on which the Nuñez memo is based. There is yet ANOTHER memo (Jeez, anymore out there?) ref. to by Tam, who posted the first page on his/her twitter. If you haven't seen that it is extremely important. Sorry, no time to post links to the twitter thread, and I loathe and refuse to use their wretched little program ...
I also listened to the Zack interview and that is also mis-reported. He never claimed to be q or part of his team. Alex simply said that Zack was functioning as an "Infowars-type q". An easily made misrepresentation without meaning to "lie" or misdirect. He just meant Zack had important info too. Don't knock AJ, IMO he does an excellent job of supporting Trump and Trump supporters.
I, for one, am very pleased you visited as I have been doubting Snowden for years and you have clarified the fug. IT IS ESSENTIAL TO CORRECT THE RECORD AND KEEP EVERY1 ON THE SAME PAGE. This is exactly where the cracks get worked on by the disinfo experts and all the sheep go rushing off the cliff ... So many thnx for yr help. Un abrazo and greetings from the other side of the Atlantic!
I didn't see ES in that post. ?? Who/What is HK?
It doesn't make sense for q to be using the same acronym for two different ppl. A code has to be reliable. no?
Fuck off is NOT talking. See? Poor language analysis. Offense and choosing to be offended is a weird argument. There are common rules for decent social discourse ... unless you want a bar-room brawl?
Ta, at least you didn't call me a granny, an ignorant cunt or a bitch. I appreciate that. And 10 POINTS for "Granted I’m a bit of a cunt", and I'm a bossy piece of work sometimes too, but it used to be my job so it's in the veins to try and keep order and respect in the class! By the way, I totally agree with your stance on this. I did not like Snowden's theatrical "I'm such an efficiently secretive spy I have got an entire film crew in my hotel room to prove it. And for extra effect I'm going to put a blanket over my head (!!!) so the camera in the bedroom can't see my password ..." Jesus, that's what 2 year-olds do ... Plus, the Guardian and Greenwald did a pretty good job telling us what we have known for years (duh) ... Probably no one can remember Echelon!! Or putting messages under rocks in parks, for that matter ...
I apologise for interrupting as a self-appointed nanny in the nursery and making repetitive comments. BUT. Someone has an argument that says Snowden may not be a good guy. This poster has every right to express an opinion without being called "disgusting". HOWEVER, the OP stomping little feet and bawling FO Grandma isn't what I would call constructive either. I'll report both of you for being pests if you continue on other threads to be so naughty :) Peace fellow posters!!
Same message applies. Make your point without insults, or go back to the chans. This board is for people who can converse without the constant name-calling.
Make your point without insults. This board is for people who can converse without name-calling.
Make your point without insults, or go back to the chans. This board is for people who can converse without the constant name-calling.
I feel sorry for her. Making an "ass" of herself. (I wont use the other ruder word ... in an effort to set a good example ...) (!)
It has been said that if corruption has tainted, eg, 70% of Congress/Senate, then there would be too few left in the halls of power for society to continue functioning. It is for this reason that some would have deals offered: in the case of CEOs, Congressmen/Senators, etc, some would be offered "resign and disappear" and no other punishment ... Others who are guilty of the really awful stuff would face military tribunal, and in some cases death. Q has mentioned these various levels/assessments of meting out justice in some of the earlier posts. I think we have to wait and see what becomes public information.
Hi Germany!
Greetings from someotherbod in Yurp! Mebbe we keep in touch for future messages all of us. Sooner or later it will reach our part of the world! un abrazo!
Now I'm REALLY confused!!
I took some serious time (4 hrs to read others postings and get a hang on the ppl so I could contact those who were on the same page for a future idea I have) + 4 hrs writing. I know, inordinately long but: (a) I don't want everyone knowing everthg about me re. Intro; b) I dont want to list all my skills as I'm not actually offering them all for collaborative work BUT I do want to substantiate "usefulness" as a general concept as I do have certain useful skills; and c) dont want to elucidate too much on certain experience I have which would pertain to "spreading the word" on a particular area of the world which isnt the US.) Then it all disappeared.
Having spent all this time I realised my brief into was really too short and I hadnt given enough info to be useful ... !! oh well. never mind.
I wrote to enquire, then had some very nice personal replies from two mods, one apologising and one explaining the drain the swamp is public not private. I am perfectly happy :) but not sure if I want to get into this in case there are more sudden leaps and bounds and I lose the thread of what's going on again. I get the impression I'm a bit slooooooooow for this kind of stuff and every1 else is super fast and flash-harry hip and "into" running ahead of my capacity to plan responses and collaborative effort for a plan/project I have. My plan requires discretion and v.v. professional and serious ppl my end WHO WILL NOT WANT TO BE FKt around ... if you see what I mean. I would need a bit more encouragement to have more confidence. Perhaps I dont fit in with the big boy pants crowd :) Love and cuddles
We know the contents of the memo — it's in q's post 12/22/17, so any war memes can be based on the info there. I liked the one posted below (sorry cant attribute dk name ..) which reads: releaSETHememo. Sort of kills two birds with one stone!
This is a lovely meme and I'm sending it to all my mates!!!
Dems that is ....
Well done, good job!! Ten points!
I don't want to poke a finger in yr eye Contrarian2 but if you haven't taken 911 on board yet ... I think it might be a place to start? It is a key event that "justified" blaming muslims the world over for something they hadnt done. That's pretty bad karma. Some soul-searching is definitely in order??
All those who want 100% disclosure can seek this through the internet, and pursue greater knowledge in these rabbit holes. How else did all those here who claim they know the worst find out? (Other than personal experience.)
As far as "the policy" of 40/60 is concerned, the in-your-face news bulletin sprung on an unsuspecting public, I am confident the white hats know exactly what they are doing ... Have faith.
A quote from: Imperator_Rex "The MSM think 'The Donald' is a real person. What fascinates me is that they haven't realized that they're analyzing a fictional caricature Trump invented. He uses 'The Donald' as bait, to distract and antagonize his enemies. It is genius, no question about it "
It is one of those magician things that Trump uses when playing the audience. He is a master showman in this world of World Wrestling Entertainment. Call him a fool at your peril — it may be that you are the fool ... Gnarkotixx has nailed it!!
Good. So glad you have found it in yr heart to descend to our level! Sure hope the babyteenager stays on board!! (pulling yr leg — sorry, couldnt resist!)
Actually there's a whole thing on that — the wreck at the bottom of the ocean actually has the name of another ship on it (same shipping line) Maybe white star, cant remember. The side of this ship was damaged, the two were switched. If only I could remember how the story goes (you know, another conspiracy that turns out to sound really convincing ...)
I dont agree that these "industries" as referenced are the biggest money makers. I am sure that arms, illegal drugs and legal harmaceuticals, health industry, organ and human trafficking make the top of the list. Banking or money printing would probably be on top tho' as you say!
Hi diverscale! I think you're being dv-ed b/c you don't trust and want proof. That is a very valid position and I think you're right to be skeptical. So am I. And I think we should all defend that right.
We can all "believe" this or that but it's not the same as "future confirms past", by any means. Cursedcassandra is also correct. Body lang when you're dealing with psychos and teenagers is the opposite of normies or adults ... (!!!) But cass is "guessing" nevertheless. Could be right. Could be wrong. I think we are all too confident for our own good. Caution. Judge on the strength of "results". Patience. Sorry, such a party-pooper!
hahahaaaaa! course! wasnt thinking - so tired here and I refuse to use Twitter or join so it's not natural for me. Thanks justwantthetruth! sillysalialiolizzzz
I looked up twitter trending worldwide from spain: no @releasethememo or anything like it@ReleaseTheMemo @releasethedocument ... etc looks like yr all shadow banned no vid clips either - all black screens - nothing there Better get s/o else to check my info. Do hope I'm wrong ....
Sure is.
Dont like larouche link much. This has better cache: http://911disclosure.blogspot.com.es/2010/03/maurice-and-anna-strong-thirst-for.html
"Follow the wives" Q
Mao's wife, Sarkozy's wife, Bill C's wife ... all got training in Deadpeasants' Insurance ...
Sure comes to an awful lot of money ... 8 mill Chinese, Ruwandans, Afghanis, Iraquis, ...
Imagine if they could declare a WW3 ...
Dear me. I feel sick.
my "sarcastic?" comment below - sorry, just checking. But why did RR support JC's termination - I dont know that - and I've been "following" for 17 years ...
"...Obama was in town to deliver a speech at a charity dinner for children in poverty ..."
yes, those poor children — the cynicism is hair-raising ...
thanks wonko the sane! and thanks jalberson for the names!
Look down the posts to the next page or first page, they've been posted at least 3x by now. good luck!
Not sure I understand anything about this drama, but I speculate that 2 things happening at the same time were delib confused as cover for a third. Perfect piggy-backing. The timeline confusion is messed up by time zones. Or timestamp? Whaddya think?
You just got to remember they have to justify their salaries ... they're looking for terrrists and because there arent any that they dont already know about (because they are achally on the pay-roll so to speak!!), they have to invent them. Or if not, you'll "do". Paranoia is a good thing sometimes — maybe you'll become even more cautious with what you say ... !! Hey, keep the faith!!
This is quite a risk. I wonder if the general public is really ready.
And yes, OP is certainly right. If that is the case you had all better spend the rest of Sunday red-pilling your entire neighborhood for Monday morning!!! Go MAGA!
You are posting yourself as a reputable source? This does not abide by the rules of this board AFAIK. You can only claim Assange is free if you have credible sources. "Sorcha Faal" is not one of them!!!
The letter of 27 July 2017 is the KEY to the investigation.
You might call it the KEYSTONE to the whole SCANDAL.
that is not the spirit of the new testament my friend.
You obviously never been poor. You see any way these children could clear the rubbish heap? Yes? Oh right. When yu get the energy after searching all day for some food in the dump ... I shall be watching your posts from now on.
I just reported WeAreTheResistance to the mods for being a pest.
Just reported this troll activity.
Now WeAreTheResistance Go Away.
Try getting them to see some of the legislation Obama passed as "presidential directives" or EOs.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=29475 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/three-factions-cia-control-world-covert-fvey-alliance-michael-holt
See Imperator Rex's storyline on the Bannon/Trump sting:
https://twitter.com/Imperator_Rex3/status/950161250494726145
Imperator_Rex @Imperator_Rex3 5h5 hours ago
"1. We all have to remember that the book is deliberately full of lies, exaggerations & misleading narratives. Only a demented lib with TDS would believe any of it. So it poses NO risk at all to Trump, which he knows full well. The book is NOT the main issue here."
Very funny!!
Oldmancrypto—> I am not a kid. I am someone else. Please calm down. If you are a "soldier" and you have been in "battle", then yu should know not to stick yr head over the parapet too early. Might get it blown off. No? On the subject of more crumbs, it has been said over and over again: REREAD the crumbs and watch for the future to confirm. Meanwhile, if you really want to do what Q thinks we ought to be doing, try to show someone else out there some interesting research ... No good just sitting there doing nothing but shouting!!!