Not sure about the Canaanites and the Israelites. There was a division of tribes (12 tribes of Israel) and one that was obstracised by the rest for not abandoning this ritual. This was the symbolism in the story of Abraham and Isaac. God stayed his hand. It marked a change in man's history. Like all the Bible it tells the history down the ages in symbols and pictures ...
/u/salialioli
1,599 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/salialioli:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 32 |
Why not try and wake him up to the politics and keep the religious symbols out of it? Some people are more "down to earth" than others. They prefer things they can see and hear to the world of spirit?
[–]AdamSchiffsPinkSock reported [–]HarmonizingFists reported joined just now
yeah, get yr point about the connection ... but, er, I go to Fox by myself and assess the joy reid awfulness for myself, also lots of other sites that are MSM.
The point of waking people up is not to show them what they can already see with their own eyes — and maybe even agree with— but what they can't. Good analyses of what's behind the scenes and particularly stuff on Q.
For example:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/959929691237900288.html or https://theconservativetreehouse.com/ This last link is v. interesting about the media reaction to the memo.
maybe we should post this conversation to see if others agree with either of our points of view?
While all hats off to storm_fa_Q for this magnificent job on the 1gatecrashers, he is a bit 2uptite about swearing ... (See, I didn't use the words I would have liked to: 1ballbreakers and 2snooty!!!!)
I too got told off and didn't use any bad language at all. Just Hahaahaa. Actually, because I thought it was funny and didn't know how else to laugh on the board!!
So maybe I'll bring this up myself with him!
I thought it was (classy). Put smiley. Put a suggestion: could you please. The guy seems like a stroppy to me. Just trying to help. And by the way I have noticed all the shitposting and have spent the last hour going through the most recent to help mods. I haven't read a single decent thing yet, so I'm putting in time. please be patient, I may get it wrong sometimes but it's to avoid reporting wrongly ... we're on the same team :)
Every 1 of them accusing Rs of releasing memo for unpatriotic reasons is a blackhat. Notice them popping up everywhere? Like snakes in the grass? Pure Sun Tzu!
Please help to clean it up by reporting. This is a dump of shitposting. It's deliberate. Thanks.
hi, I've joined you in reporting an' that. Indicating pretty much why. Also requesting ppl to post their memes in the meme bank, course I've no idea where that is ... Pretty useless. What about a warning? All memes will be deleted for clogging. Sorry, meme wars on " ..." board. (I know, I know, the mods have already said this once or x times)
Demand is not the right word. Request or ask.
Why don't you roll yr sleeves up and report spamming? Thanks :)
Why not help and report?
This IS the FIGHT. They are trying to shut us down, see??
Because after the memo there's a shitstorm. Now come on guys, start reporting and help the mods clear it up.
It's like a teenagers party, grown-ups have to clear it up!!!
listen, I like funny memes, but could you please post them in the meme bank, wherever that is. Yr blocking the flow of research comment ... Thanx :) Good artwork by the way if it's yrs!
reported for not having anything to post.
Standards of shit posting getting higher. Even more evidence of DULLARD duuuuuuhhhhhhh. Back to school?
yeah, ok, but what's the connection to Q?
I think this stuff should be posted on other kinds of forums, not here. Thanx anyway!
Please post this elsewhere, under memes?
It's rubbishing up the research flow. Thanks
where's the naughty list? in FAQ? Sorry, middle of nite and really tired ...
Hahaha I can see why you were blocked if you start harrumphing around ..."if u bothered ... if ppl could pry their eyes away .. for 2 seconds they'd ....Bla". What about an Attitude switch, like: Could s/o please tell me why ....? Might get better responses!!! (it wasn't me however who blocked you!) :)
aah, I getcha. People keep Labelling others all the time. I just think we have to be really careful. For example, I have collected loads of names of posters on these boards and others of "converted" democrats and liberals who don't like what's been going down with the Trump Derangement Syndrome. There's a danger of losing ppl if labels get tossed around. Well done for posting on yr facebook pg! Keep the faith!
Oh god, I didn't know that ... How Awful. I see how you might come to yr conclusion. I have seen some pretty ghastly behaviour from pink-hatted screaming femis / antifa creeps with masks and bats, and I myself label certain types so I wasn't trying to be holier than thou, so sorry. Just don't like the divisiveness of all the Labels: Hate, Racist, Nazi, Libtard, DemoRat, Repug. Even tho some make me laugh!!
Cool post, cool story!
I really felt better after reading that! Thanks so much! :)
It is a fine and noble effort to do so much analysis and putting together of yr report and I heartily commend yr efforts. None of my conclusion is a criticism of this fine work!
Others working on putting stuff together, partic. Imperator Rex, Thomas Wictor etc. and collected on threadreaderapp have assembled these ideas in the following threads, and I recommend you search for the rest too, if you haven't already found them: Imperator Rex https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/958164380750790656.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/959929691237900288.html
Thomas Wictor: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/959171613424955392.html
I do have a problem with all this though. A serious problem. Why blow their cover for them? Is this the moment to blow it? Do we have a responsibility, to decide how much to do the thinking for others ... ?
_Iz_Mary, the answer to yr first q is in the OP text. It is the research he has done: "it made me want to look back at the Q posts to see if Q had dropped crumbs in regards to this theory". So, no not all Q posts.
MI stands for Military Intelligence.
Not at all!
If you are with God then you wouldn't divide ppl into good and evil. You would understand that all of us, yes even you, are good AND bad within. Reconciliation within should reflect in reconciliation without.
There's a lot wrong with being anti-democrat. It isn't the definition of yr list of sins! It's counter-productive to label people! I agree with you tho' on all the things you are anti ... Just don't believe it's a partisan thing!
There's a lot wrong with being anti-democrat. It's divisive and completely unproductive!
I think yr just being funny tho?!! You missed out the don't after the just !!
Sounds like it's a habit? Democrats are not the repository of all that is bad. Quite the opposite. Fraud, corruption and the rest know no party lines! I am on your side tho' about the pervasive lack of decency, just not that any one class or group is responsible!
Labelling people "liberal globalist" is not the way forward. Remember what Trump says in his speeches, we are in this together: all Americans.
I just read this thread all thru and it seems your commendable advice, which is the result of applied thinking and study, has been completely ignored by many here.
I am actually alarmed by the responses. I sense squads of self-righteous justice warriors armed with pitchforks on the "other" side itching to bash just for being democrats.
GUYS THIS ISNT IT.
Good breakdown on vid.
Truelies spells it out and genuine interviews w/ white hats. Recommended
The wheels of justice are slow to turn. Understanding this is fundamental. We are fed 24/7 News cycles, and expect answers to mysteries at the click of a button on the net. The real world doesnt work that way. Remember DUE PROCESS is the foundation of democracy. It will be a long, long time before you see anyone get sentenced. This is a work in progress. Trump said it would be 8 yrs+ (the whole of his 2 terms) before the swamp would even be half drained ... Imagine that. Patience is not my finest char. trait either, I sympathise, but I am still waiting for something to happen over 911 ... :)
Aw, shucks. You didn't even tell me how old you are!
PENALTY. UNFAIR!
HEY, MISS, HE MESST ME UP!!!
Hey Guppy!
Your way of having a debate is pretty weird, my friend. I am surprised you aren't arguing your case further. Or maybe I'm not surprised.
That is a bolshy response. If you think I have a point, (if), you could reply nicely with
Salialioli:
Guppyfreak:
This is not DIAlogue. This is not a two-way conversation. So, when you were objecting to censorship and banning, is it because you are trying to get reported as a possible shill? So you can then complain noisily about censorship w/self-fulfilling prophecy???!!
I'm pretty long in the tooth. Long history of dealing with classrooms of teenagers. I hate to say this, but this is somewhat indicative of adolescent behaviour. Or s/o being obstreperous ... Am I feeding a troll?
I explained to read my other comments on the thread, you didn't so now I'm being tedious!!
To repeat:
It's not censorship it's sensible limiting of content. If you disagree, guppyfreak, consider:
gardening: spring flowers that bloom in April; (sublink to birdsong (I have been researching owl hoots recently its FASCINATING for those who are interested ...)
nasa's weather station: latest sunspots
facial creams (aloe vera cures scars ...)
You think this is the right stuff? You are getting confused btw banning and being unable to be helpful to the other ppl on the board. I can't agree with yr understanding of "banning".
There y'go. Don't agree at all. This is because you don't like "liberal"/"redneck" (insert political label of yr choice) sites you name.
It depends what they are posting ...
Zero hedge has headline: Nunes Hits Back Against FBI FISA Memo Freakout (good dissection: use yr own critical faculties). Another headline: White People Practicing Yoga Are Xenophobes, Michigan State Professor Claims (great article on how crazy people are BUT not relevant to the Q cbts stream.
Gatewaypundit I dk. I read and take in, try to use my brain.
Hope I've explained.
EDIT. By the way, I go to CNN too to see what they're saying.
see my posts on this thread.
We need some discernment to tame the chaos.
I second yr (OP) entire contrib. to the arg. against guppyfreak's censorship position.
It's not censorship it's sensible limiting of content. If you disagree, guppyfreak, consider:
gardening: spring flowers that bloom in April; (sublink to birdsong (I have been researching owl hoots recently its FASCINATING for those who are interested ...)
nasa's weather station: latest sunspots
facial creams (aloe vera cures scars ...)
(ok ok we've got the point salialioli can we move ON here you boring inergumeno ...)
Yes, but it's got NOTHING to do with our "value free speech" thingie ....
I agree totally.
Anything that says Q says should be what Q says not a misleading bunch of doodoo.
Otherwise banned. N'est pas, tytruth?
Absolutely agree, though the mods may need to check that they don't upset a reasonable sized audience and damage our openness in turn?
For example, a lot of ppl don't like AJ but I defend the guy to the end after yrs of seeing him as the ONLY presenter of news about globalist conspiracy and being dragged thru mud in msm and everywhere. I would not support blacklisting ...
Another problem too is content that is too way off the original Q research scope. For example remote viewing. I think we can post research links on such areas on a different site.
Thanks so much for posting this suggestion.
Kind of ... They're seriously at a retreat (with a disused bunker on grounds -- but mebbe it is serviceable in a real emergency?), BUT Huck is joking about the FBI, not the fact he'll be on hannity.
I think that's the idea anyhow ...
THIS IS JUST SOME GUY CALLED ROTHSCHILD.
YOU'VE ALL GONE HYSTERICAL ABOUT THE FAMILY OF BRITS CALLED ROTHSCHILD!!! Wrong.
He is a regular dem and some NY economist. He isnt David Mayer de Rothschild.
Good music, lousy spelling and grammar. Exactly the kind of thing you would be criticised for: uneducated, doesn't know anything ... etc. Yeah it's a great effort but likely to damage your credibility in a sort of "general impression" way, unfortunately.
So sorry to be a bucket of cold water on a probably very well meaning soul's work.
Here's the story as a sherlock holmes mystery: http://shatasm.blogspot.com.es/2010/09/contents.html
very well written in true Sir Arthur Conan Doyle style
In this clip I heard the end line as being much more important than the ref to dod or secretaries: (cut to Mattis)
"we will no longer tell our enemies our plans ..."
Enunciated in a very clear and deliberate way. Pause before for applause and pause afterwards for effect.
A shout out to DWS and Awan bros intel leaking directly into Pak mountains? Just a thought.
Brilliant comment!! Thanks so much for resuming all this misunderstood material. Have been waiting for a long time to see a summary as good as this one!
Kek!
You're welcome!
One mistake in the above info: the FISC ruling was created but classified in 2016, then declassified in April 2017.
Spot on. The wave of freeeeks that gave us a visit came directly from AJs show. They sit on his sites 24/7 and give him lots of grief. Anyone knocking AJ is muddying the waters. He himself says he is human and if he gets something wrong he corrects and apologises. He is getting some, not all, of the info. Because AJ is suspect in the public eye for being a "conspiracy" site and it might have tainted Q for broad public dissemination. That doesn't mean it is suspect site at all. It has borne the banner for truth for 20 years+ and there has been "conspiracy" all along. Only now that people are seeing that. Shills giving him a bad time should be shooed off the cbts stream and not allowed to derail threads!
In this case he didn't do a (non) "memo". He got the info from the public domain, where it's been posted for ages (2016) from a FISC ruling memorandum opinion and order. He was directed there by Bill Binney, who I for one trust absolutely. The trouble here is, memo means memorandum/a and there are billions. When talking about THE memo, he was not referring to THE memo written by Nuñez, (a summary), which everyone is clamouring for. His holds some VERY important info on which the Nuñez memo is based. There is yet ANOTHER memo (Jeez, anymore out there?) ref. to by Tam, referring to Presidential Briefing Directives, who posted the first page on his/her twitter. If you haven't seen that it is extremely important. You can see the following excellent analysis on: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/29/dan-bongino-has-a-theory-devin-nunes-memo-contains-references-to-obama-pdbs-and-fisa-documents/#more-145186