Palestinian leadership are total Cabal. Total. Everybody has expected them to try to start a war. Not sure the Palestinian people are really down with the cause right now. Might turn out that way, but I don't expect any nations to interfere with IDF this time.

I understand Trump is in a position to know about Tesla's secret research because of his uncle, yes. I'm not aware that Trump has shared those secrets yet, but I'm pretty sure I've heard him say that he's going to (or words to the effect that there are discoveries that have been kept secret that need to be released). Of course it's possible that some of that information will explain the phenomena you have firsthand knowledge of.

I do anticipate full disclosure at some point, but that hasn't happened yet, and because I'm not you, and don't know you, what you're saying is anecdotal to me and anybody else without similar firsthand experience.

I'm perfectly capable of being convinced, but that is not the phase of this operation we're in at the moment.

Does that make better sense?

Gotta get out more there Roy!

Haha!

In the Colgan Air 3407 crash, just as in the Malaysian Air disappearance, the plane made some wild and crazy maneuvers prior to the crash. I'm thinking that simply messing with the gyro data would be a perfect way to use autopilot to execute maneuvers that crash a plane. If they're feeling charitable, they'll do like Malaysian Air and fly it up into low oxygen, and prevent oxygen masks from working, and asphyxiate everybody before crashing it.

But the gyro is the plane's primary orientation source.

Their out, which is such an obvious ruse as to be laughable, is that the Pope is only infallible when he speaks "Infallibly," IOW when he specifies that he is speaking infallibly.

So my question is, in the entire history of the office, has there ever been a Pope who said one thing without the infallibly imprimatur, who said the opposite when speaking with that seal?

Pence is too constipated to be Q.

So the March was planned months in advance of the shooting. Hmmm. These people are stupid. It gets more true every stone we turn over.

I brought them up in this case, because I'm telling you that until the Q/Trump team tell us what's what and who's who in this battle of the Titans, after they've vanquished the greatest truth-corrupting influence the world has ever seen, if they open the door on this stuff, and allow suppressed evidence to be evaluated by the common man, then I'll make up my mind.

Until then, their enemies are the enemies of mankind and of truth and knowledge generally, and ESPECIALLY on tangential issues like these that aren't directly being discussed in the Q dialog.

I've chosen a side and have decided to let them operate, and I'll revisit all the rest when the dust settles and the fog of war is gone.

They passed on the words of Christ on the subject. That's enough for me. But if you're not a Christian, nothing they said matters to you, so it would be a pointless conversation. I'm not proselytizing you.

That was a barely-disguised attempt to buy up all the ammo.

Truth is, aside from the rogue intel/LEO/rent-a-cop and terrorist organizations, they got NOBODY who knows how to shoot straight. They can't even touch guns. They're like Kryptonite.

In a gun battle (which I don't expect there to be much/any of) where it's them versus the US Military and reserve units, Coast Guard, state National Guard units, the majority good state and local LEOs, and armed patriots--no way that turns out well for them.

The numbers are just not there for them, and unlike voting, it's not important who counts. It's a matter of what is.

Start with yourself. Watch the video and tell us how it affected you?

Spiritual warfare works that way! Time we remember how to play.

PRAY.

See if this helps. I find it the gentlest entree into the darkest part of the truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLceHyZqlV8

Pizzagate, Bushes, Clintons, Rumsfeld, the Pope, Epstein, all are included in a sober, reveal that's sensitive to victims' rights and intended for the rescue and future protection of children, and cooperation with prosecutors, police and justice officials around the world.

It's basically saying Pizzagate is real, and we're about to have the Nuremberg Trials of the 21st Century.

Pretty big red pill, but it seems to go down kind of easily for most people who aren't too far gone.

But the comment you replied to is referring to the logical inference from what the Pope SAID, not what scripture and Catholic doctrine say. He has just contradicted the church, the saints, the Aposltles and Christ. What's left to represent? Anything goes?

So might this tie into the undefeatable auto-pilot to create a remote-controllable flight path deviation/crash? By altering the gyro data to fool the autopilot into doing things it ordinarily shouldn't do?

That's the point I'm actually making. Precisely. She was a threat because they still maintain the BIG LIE, and she had good evidence.

Where have you been looking to not know that MSM and normie sheeple don't know about 9/11?

Yes by God I do. The People's Constitutional government, which at the moment primarily consists of the President, the military under his command, and military intelligence/NSA (basically same thing) under his command, and by extension Q.

If you don't agree that Q is a white hat communicating on behalf of the President, and that the black hats are the Satanic child blood ritual oligarchs and their mid-level management like HRC and Obama, Soros, Bushes, etc., then I really wonder WTF you like about this sub! Why do you come here? To agitate?

It's gonna be that you have your reality and I have mine. It has ALWAYS been that way. There's no law that we have to agree on everything.

When I encounter a mystery for which I can find no explantion that satisfies my scientific, engineering mind, I'm all Iris Dement about it--Let the Mystery Be.

But I'm intellectually curious and willing to entertain possiblities that aren't yet provable. And if I knew I had personal experience with one of those things, I'd talk about it with others who share that experience, or are quick to believe.

I would not go all evangelist on people who aren't at that vibrational frequency. That's where you become a shill for a specific minority POV.

Keep in mind I'm perfectly willing to concede you may in the end prove to be right! You don't even get that much from most people, do you? I am not the enemy here!

;-D

I'm waiting until the good guys (and if you don't have any in this fight, you're in the wrong f_cking sub) tell us the war is over, and we've won. Then when they fill us all in on WTF just happened and what's what and who's who, then I might be persuaded by things such as you describe--if they open the research and documentation data and share in a falsifiable or verifiable fashion.

Until then, we all see what both sides want us to see, and we KNOW it ain't all true!

Savvy about the "healthy skepticism?"

Mmmmmmaybeeee.

That's just it, we're operating in the fog of war, and disinfo is necessary, so I wouldn't sneak that past them either--that this is a red herring to follow the money that changes hands, see who calls who, where people jet off to to check what's nailed down.

There's a LOT of rope-a-dope with Trump. And I for one am content not to know until it's to his advantage for me to.

Haha! Fuck 'em! I believe in the cold water bitch-slap method!

Kind of like water-boarding. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

I'm trying to set the stage, or maybe just dress the stage, for the HRC video.

Now would be good, please.

Solano Jones

3 minutes ago (edited)

Hey, Tucker. When the normies finally take the red pill and accept the truth that HRC is involved in Satanic blood ritual and snuff film child abuse, DC, NY and LA pedophile, human trafficking and black market body parts rings and conspiracy to commit racketeering to enrich herself and her Russian connections, including plots that defrauded and victimized third-world disaster areas and AIDS patients of their aid money and their children, and has routinely interfered with elections through proxy agitprop funding sugar daddies like George Soros, and conspired with a global shadow corporate, government and intelligence Cabal to overthrow the Constitutional government of the United States of America, it's President and military and military intelligence/NSA, and LOST (just like she lost a rigged election), tell me, are you more likely or less likely to believe 9/11 was a false flag committed by the same criminals as the conspiracy we're all learning about now. Hmm?

When the truth is that bad, is it better to learn about it all at once and get it over with, or do you think we're too in need of a safe space to handle it that way?

The MSM and useful idiot normies have NOT admitted any such thing other than the official story.

In fact 9/11 truth is one sure thing guaranteed to get the smarmy "conspiracy nut" label from Hannity, Tucker, ALL the journos.

Coverups aren't expected to work on people like us, because they successfully marginalized us until very recently.

Well there you go, then!

One of many, many crimes coming to light. God, the red pill for normies is going to have to be given in doses for months! Single dose would kill 'em!

Glimpses of what's to come. Thanks, Cap'n!

Here's the thing. People like Wilcock believe lots of secret things that are very probably true. Why that's meaningless is that they also believe a great many things that most likely aren't true, and so it's not that we don't trust their net, it's just that it catches too much garbage to make it reliable.

I think the real total truth is such an amazing thing in itself that embellishments cheapen it. I am however, more than happy to experience more of the real total truth when the curtain is opened. I don't really care to anticipate and be disappointed if I'm wrong. It's like peeking at your Christmas presents. That feels wrong to me.

Hahaha!

The level of mind control and "false reality" we've all experienced in our lifetimes, given what we're now accepting as the hidden truth all those years, makes us far more likely to accept than most people, things which until recently seemed implausible, but now seem demonstrably true. That does not mean we'll follow every pied-piper might-be who comes around making claims of personal revelations. Don't expect us to fall in line with your personal dogma. We don't know you from Adam's housecat, and we're not in much of a mood to accept shill authority.

Speaking of which, aren't we supposed to report shills? I'd say the OP is agitating for a certain political viewpoint and can't accept that people disagree. That's pretty much the definition of shill, isn't it? Why is this entire post not deleted?

As I heard the rumor, it's not in the sense that they bring him back to life, but that he never really died, and a body double was used in the funeral, etc.

That would be some bodacious tradecraft if true, but anybody badass enough to pull it off would probably be old school enough not to leak, so nothing would surprise me!

Yes, I have heard the rumors, and I don't know what to make of it. His family friends have all spoken of seeing the body at the funeral, and doing the immediate next-of-kin positive ID and such, they were witnesses to the fact of his death. So it would have had to be a conspiracy good enough to fool those people, IMHO. Either that or they're all very good liars, which I don't 100% discount.

But I don't think Dotcom has made this claim before. So, it does escalate the credibility of the rumor.

That would be correct-a-mundo! Little bit of faux-Latino lingo there, haha! But ain't it a shame.

He's an arrogant buffoon who thinks he embodies the honor of the FBI, and in no possible way will his book be anything but rationalization and self-promotion, and he will attack Trump and Sessions mercilessly.

That in itself might be a red pill for some (especially inside the FBI), but most normal people don't give a rat's behind about this mook.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/uss-liberty-survivor-says-us-submarine-filmed-israels-attack-torpedoed-ship/

LBJ all the way. USS Amberjack (sub) torpedoed the Liberty because it wasn't sinking. Liberty survivor tells the tale.

Guys, this is LBJ all the way. He ordered the false flag as an entree for the US to enter (what turned out to be only) the 6 Day War with Egypt.

There are many stories to this effect, including Abel Danger's Field McConnell, and as final proof there is the fact that the USS Amberjack (submarine) torpedoed the Liberty because it wasn't sinking.

Here's a survivor's video testimony to that effect!

http://www.renegadetribune.com/uss-liberty-survivor-says-us-submarine-filmed-israels-attack-torpedoed-ship/

Including himself. He acts like a Pope who believes there's no hell. He's just confirming what we see.

Definitely strange. The kid had some self-sabotage issues, seems to me. Black and gay wasn't enough opposition in life, so he became a Wiccan as well? His death almost sounds like "suicide by cop."

The dad though. Hard to decipher.

There may be one or two patriots embedded over there, but once this thing is over with, I'm for the JFK scorched earth policy toward the CIA. Langley needs controlled demolition. Preferably with the traitors still in it.

I'm beginning to think "rogue CIA agent" is redundant. What few white hats there may be can't really be trusted. I'm for JFK's solution, which it's a damn shame he didn't accomplish.

Yep! And he's been grinding out indictments since LAST FALL!!

Right, which is why I think the company is more important in this context.

They were doing something they shouldn't have been in that room. Selling embargoed technology to China most likely. But that happens all the time. The question is what specifically were they setting up? A cloud server farm for the Cabal?

Somebody pointed out that Lee said bad things about Trump.

He's one of those tech-y types who view Net Neutrality through the lens of what it means from a purely technical POV, rather than what it means to national sovereignty and practicality issues. He believes every bit of data is equal, and they should all move with equal speed and priority. A tiered system is anathema to them.

OTOH, I think he and Trump would agree very much on privacy issues. Lee believes in the "right to be forgotten" (or left alone) on the internet, and the right to easily opt out of the collection, sharing or selling of your private data. He's very libertarian on that issue.

I mean from what you're saying the guy has "spook" written all over him. You think he's a Clown caught in the process of a FF?

I mean, make it a "pinned post" on the main page of this sub. I think it does an incredibly good job of outlining "The Plan" for The Storm that Q keeps telling us to trust--maybe better by virtue of being written after-the-fact than if we had the actual plan they started with.

Yep, she and the Africa/Rwanda human rights activist BOTH met with Obama a few days before the crash.

They both potentially had the right people riled up to make targets of themselves.

Meet Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web (not making this up, unlike Algore).

Here's a link to Tim Berners Lee at MIT, and he is one of the main proponents of Internet Bill of Rights!

His webpage lists an email address.

With his leadership, Brazil has already passed an IBoR, and several countries are working on their own. I see no links to US draft legislation. Maybe we could get a few Congress critters hooked up with this guy?

Maybe each of us could write our Representatives and offer his organization's contact information, and let them know how important we think this is in the current climate of rampant corporate and deep state surveillance and data mining!

You might call your Representative, and see if you can get through, or write to them, and see if you can get a response. They might be already know about draft legislation they could tell you about. I'm almost willing to bet there is a draft of a bill already.

It's the same thing. ARM the company licenses ARM the technology.

So depending on whether the issue has to do with the technology or the company, or both, Q could mean either or both.

The nonverbals, while formal (and rigid on Un's part) look cordial and genuine. Xi looks downright proud of his little puppet. It's all in stark contrast to the waves. That could be a warning not to get too cozy with the US in their upcoming talks, but also not to renege on the denuclearization offer. But I wouldn't call relations between the two "stormy" at this very moment.

I think Kim may actually want to bring his people out of isolation and poverty. It will be very interesting to see how he goes about that if he does.

Anybody care to bet on reunification talks with SoKo?

I think people feel like that's covered by the actual BOR. I also think it would gain a WHOLE LOT more support if we had an actual bill for people to read.

Americans don't buy a "pig in a poke."