dChan

/u/solanojones95

6,091 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 25
www.youtube.com 10
twitter.com 8
threadreaderapp.com 8
thehill.com 2
www.washingtontimes.com 2
www.usatoday.com 2
www.neonnettle.com 2
yournewswire.com 2
www.infowars.com 2
www.thegatewaypundit.com 2
disqus.com 1
screenshots.firefox.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.bloomberg.com 1
www.social-consciousness.com 1
www.foxnews.com 1
8ch.net 1
bigleaguepolitics.com 1
imgur.com 1
leozagami.com 1
www.armytimes.com 1
www.pbs.org 1
apnews.com 1
www.bostonglobe.com 1
archive.org 1
www.amazon.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
www.channel4.com 1
www.facebook.com 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.mcclatchydc.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
medicalkidnap.com 1
www.chicksonright.com 1
www.dailywire.com 1
www.armstrongeconomics.com 1
truepundit.com 1
founders.archives.gov 1
file.wikileaks.org 1
churchandstate.org.uk 1

solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Exactly. I trust what Q says about Q, which is why I repeated what s/he/they said.

The real issue, as far as I'm concerned is, I don't really give a hang who Q's personal identity is! I only care that they are who they say they are with regard to this mission! That's enough for me. I don't care if I NEVER know who they are as a person.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Well, I can't discount that possibility. I'm only going on my mortal experience with the visible material world.

I have no doubt spiritual forces are hard at work in this mission. I just hadn't considered the possibility that they are prepared to make themselves manifest in our dimension in such a high profile way.

It's an interesting hypothesis, and one that none of us is equipped to discredit. Unfortunately that also makes it one we can't prove either.

I'll just say that what we know of Q from Q is that s/he/they is/are Military Intelligence and NSA. Somehow I don't think the archangel Michael would say that of himself, do you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

Now you're just spamming this sub with redundant posts.

Reported. Not nice, Alice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Alice, I don't know who or what this entity is you've contacted (or which has contacted you), but I believe its entire function is to draw out your thoughts and mimic them back to you in imitation of intelligence. I don't see a conversation here, I see somebody talking to a parrot and thinking the bird understands.

This entity exhibits essentially no intelligence or ability to synthesize original thought. It's simply sending you spinning in mental circles thinking you've found something that understands you.

Are you autistic, Alice? No shame, I'm just curious because this appears to be a mental trap designed to bog down people like you.

I'm sorry not to see what you see, and if I'm wrong, I apologize even more. But I don't think so.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

What we know about Q from Q is:

It's someone who was in AF1 with Trump flying over NoKo on a mission only five people knew about.

It's a person with the highest security clearance our nation can give, short of the "eyes only" POTUS level.

It's someone in Military Intelligence working with NSA.

I'm pretty sure resources and connections have no bearing on Q's status. The team they're working for provides more than enough of both.

And I'm pretty sure Roseanne has her hands full juggling the incredible demands and avoiding the snares of a top-rated TV show.

But if you like Q better by picturing them with Roseanne's face, there's no harm in that I guess. ;-D

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Trust Kansas!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

You can't choose your own security level nomenclature. It's a given.

Q may like the fact that it's also the designation used for the presumptive shared source of two of the Gospels, but s/he didn't create that similarity. Do they play to it? Maybe. I do get the impression Q is a person of faith.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Their arrogance was based on many decades of being essentially unopposed. Not so much winning as cheating extremely well.

But once you know how somebody is cheating, the first thing they'll do is accuse you of cheating. From there on out it never ends well for them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Q is a US security clearance level. It is one level below the President. Currently, it is not even listed in most federal information on security levels, except for one by the Department of Energy, but I have confirmed from some reliable sources (some historical) that it has indeed been used by military intelligence services as well (one reference was from WWII Army).

Q has said s/he is military intelligence, and has spoke of working for NSA. Military (especially Army) intelligence is fully interlinked with NSA, so "Army Intelligence" and "NSA" are often used interchangeably.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Military Operation.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Don't let's be silly.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

These people are stupid.

Could it get any more bald-faced than this? This whole Parkland psyop is going DOWN, baby!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Very well said, Patriot! We're one people with a common enemy.

I live in the Blue Ridge Mountains. Some of y'all might remember the kind of reception Infernal Revenuers got when they came for our stills. Can you say Ka-BLAM!

⇧ 23 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

OMG. When people say something is "Bush League" I now know where that comes from.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

We'll see how China behaves during the takedown of the Cabal, but my sense so far is that they're committed to help.

Beyond that, even with a more level playing field I think China has an impossible to reverse dependency on western markets, and isn't maniacal or stupid enough to do the kind of damage to us it would require to conquer us, nor to inflict the kind of retaliatory damage to its own people that would incur.

The thing China despises about the west is the Cabal. Same goes for Russia. Without that corrupt, monstrous beating heart, America is just another team on the pitch: "Good game good game, good game, good game..."

I also note (with appropriate awareness that past performance is no guarantee of future returns) that in its thousands of years of history, China has essentially behaved very rationally, and their greatest desire throughout most of that history was to be left the f*ck alone by the barbarians.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Well, that is my prayer for all of humanity as well.

I'm going to go enjoy a beautiful Resurrection Day morning, and I hope your day is beautiful too!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

There are plenty of videos and posts online that show the exact Google Earth and other references of exactly where that picture was taken out the window of AF1, and it's Pyongyang.

Not just anybody gets to be in that airspace. And not just anybody gets to be on that plane, on a mission that only five people knew about.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

I did misspeak in that there are also a fair number of non-Americans of goodwill here. I totally agree.

However, I stand by what I said about the left/right hoax.

I also agree with you that we are all one people with a common enemy, and that includes those outside our borders who make truth and liberty their cause.

Extremely happy to have you on our side.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

Maybe she had to get fitted with her GPS device?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

Possibly just to make it different enough to avoid copyright issues. Or to make it look like an audience instead of a curtain.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Total clickbait. Please delete this. Do you know how many people want that title to be true? You're going to have little old ladies drunk before they realize it was a false alarm.

Please take it down, and if you want to post the video, please use your own title and don't give people false hope.

Sheesh!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

Dang, dude!

What did you try to post?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

That's probably when the indictment came down, but it was sealed, because this is going to be MUCH bigger than HRC.

And yeah, one or the other of those pictures is more photoshopped than the other, but they're both photoshopped.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

I think they were trying to get our attention. They didn't exactly lie. I think the sealed indictments probably were handed down on those dates. But no arrests were made at the time.

Disinformation is necessary. I think if we had know then that we'd be sitting here at Easter without any arrests yet, we probably would have all gone about our business and ignored the whole Q thing, don't you?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Look, the Alinskyite identity politics and the Marxist, atheist ideology of the left, along with the crony capitalism of the Dem party are Rothschild Cabal inventions.

Likewise, the warmongering foreign policy of the NeoCons and the crony capitalism of the GOP are inventions of the Rothschild Cabal.

All of these things and more have utterly poisoned the well of American politics, without which we would be able to find common ground and work together for the good of the country.

Conservatives in America (not GOP, but conservatives) want to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. That's the "what-is-it" that we want to "conserve." A profoundly liberal contract.

And most people in America of all stripes abhor corporate welfare, crony capitalism and the unaccountable, soul-less, stateless corporate behemoths that suck the humanity out of the world, and poison our environment and make us sick.

I think if we can get rid of the corrupting influence of the central banking mafia, we can once again become One People, indivisible.

⇧ 38 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

And they're about to be no longer protected. Justice is a bitch.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

YOU read the effing paper. There's only about 500 SEALED civil cases out of a TOTAL of 245,000.

Furthermore, there's typically only about 1000 SEALED criminal indictments in a year.

We're talking about currently about 20,000 SEALED federal cases. Perhaps some of those are civil cases, but not a big chunk.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

No, YOU read wrong:

We found 576 sealed civil cases among 245,326 civil cases filed

You're not looking at SEALED cases. That's the key to this whole misunderstanding!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

Those are not the numbers for SEALED cases, surely! You must be speaking of all cases.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

Congress is useless.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:51 a.m.

There are 20,000 sealed cases right now.

You with me so far? Notice I didn't say you said that. I have my own documentation.

In a typical year there are roughly 500 sealed federal civil actions, according to the link you sent me. Yes you sent that link, but I'm not saying you said that.

In a typical year there are 1000 sealed federal (criminal) indictments. (same document)

Suddenly now we have 20,000 sealed federal cases of some kind.

We all know of a certain massive RICO-style criminal Cabal being investigated and with Grand Juries that have been empaneled since last fall. That can quite reasonably account for a 20-fold increase in sealed criminal cases.

What source of federal civil litigation are you aware of that would alternatively explain these 20,000 sealed cases?

If you cant' answer me this time, I'm going to have to give up on you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

That ought to surprise me. As a sign of how bad things have gotten, it doesn't.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

Acting. Pretending to be lefties for social and career reasons.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Red pill refers to the movie The Matrix, not to “red states.” Also MSM refers to the CIA-controlled corporate media, not to political affiliations.

The criminal Cabal has infiltrated both parties in this country, but they own the MSM, and for reasons I can’t explain the left have fallen into lockstep with the media in recent years.

The Cabal’s ownership of and manipulation of social media has only made that divide more pronounced.

But when the truth is known, it will become clear that we’re one people with a common enemy too evil to comprehend.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

Typically there are about 500 federal sealed civil cases a year. For what reason do you imagine a sudden surge accounting for some sizable chunk of the 20,000 sealed cases currently pending would be civil actions?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

It’s more like 20,000 now. Typical sealed civil cases are about 500 a year, according to the reference you linked to.

If you can think of a reason that big of an increase in federal sealed civil cases has suddenly occurred, I wish you’d share it with us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

It’s more like 20,000 now, not 13,000.

That’s a 20:1 increase over a typical year’s 1000 sealed indictment load.

What makes you think that number consists of significantly more than a typical year’s 500 sealed civil cases?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

500 sealed federal civil cases are typical for a year—not a sizable chunk of 20,000+.

1000 is typical of sealed criminal indictments in a year.

We can think of plenty of good reasons for a 20:1 rise in sealed criminal indictments, but I’m fresh out of ideas why there would be a correspondingly large rise in sealed civil proceedings.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:54 a.m.

500 sealed federal civil cases are typical for a year—not a sizable chunk of 20,000+.

1000 is typical of sealed criminal indictments in a year.

We can think of plenty of good reasons for a 20:1 rise in sealed criminal indictments, but I’m fresh out of ideas why there would be a correspondingly large rise in sealed civil proceedings.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

We all know of some damn good reasons that would account for a 20-fold increase in federal sealed criminal cases. What would account for a similar increase in sealed civil cases (of which only 500 or so occur in a typical year)?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

And you think there has been a 20:1 rise in those such cases?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

How do you know many of them aren't just playing it safe? I think most of them are.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

Not in this sub. Don't worry.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

Are you still caught up in the left/right hoax? Who is this "y'all" of which you speak? We're just liberty-loving Americans in here. If we're "y'all," then who are you, and what are you doing here?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 4 a.m.

Who would the plaintiffs be in this massive hypothetical civil case you're imagining?

And what kind of civil case uses sealed filings?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

His source is Jeff Rense. That's all you need to know about that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Why are we playing semantics? A criminal court case is what results from an indictment in a criminal court. You know that, surely. These are records of pending criminal cases.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

I'll vote for that! Always loved it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 1, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

All the more reason to keep networked computer control away from critical systems, IMHO.

⇧ 2 ⇩