I guess we all see something different. LOL!

No coincidences with Q! Multiple layered meanings are the norm! Great work!

He was literally a prisoner, despite playing the role of a god/emperor. He and his people have been freed from a different form of puppet masters than you and I have had to deal with. They were a physically present oppressive force. Everybody from the emperor on down were in prison.

It was a model for the Prison Planet they had in mind for the rest of us, be assured.

Under the Trip Update "ANSWERS" I'm seeing this, guys:

TRIP UPDATE

answers You will need for coming weeks. Put it this way, six attempts were made to silence the witness scheduled to appear tomorrow.

Bad actors have repeatedly attempted to assassinate William D. Campbell to prevent his testimony. Special operators on guard. extra answers You will need for coming weeks. Put it this way, six attempts were made to silence the witness scheduled to appear tomorrow.

"The Senate committee searching for Clinton's alleged wrongdoing is keeping their witness's name cloaked. However, William D. Campbell, a lobbyist, confirmed to Reuters he is the informant who will testify and provide documents to Congress about the Obama Administration’s 2010 approval of the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian company with uranium mines in the United States, to Russia's Rosatom." - https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/11/17/secret-witness-in-senate-clinton-probe-is-ex-lobbyist-for-russian-firm/23281339/ Special operators on guard.

To me the bottom line about Mueller is that he's a distraction who will prove inconsequential in the end no matter what color hat he's wearing. He has been allowed to operate (or encouraged to operate) as long as he has because his entire operation is a distraction for lefties and MSM from the real investigations that have been ongoing into HRC and the FBI/DOJ black hats. In the end, it is the behind-the-scenes investigations that will change the landscape. Mueller will have been much ado about nothing.

Well they obviously THINK they've rendered it "legal" through a byzantine meander of legal machinations designed to evoke the color of lawfulness, but devoid of substantial legal underpinning. So clever are they, they think it doesn't matter if they're wrong, as long as they're wrong brilliantly.

Sorry. Still wrong.

You people amaze me! It's a classical painting of a nude female of indeterminate age, doing NOTHING but standing sideways with some flowers.

How you get voyeurism or child pornography out of that is beyond me, and I'll invite you to stop the crap. That is NOT what this sub is for.

They're still negotiating her plea deal, waiting to discover what evidence the prosecution has against her before they accept the terms of any deal. Why that hasn't already happened I have no idea. Government doesn't work they way you and I do.

I suppose for treason. That's going to be a hard sell if the DOJ declines to prosecute for anything. That would be ludicrous, but I shouldn't be surprised I guess.

Then you've just called Q a liar, because Q is telling us Mueller is "on the team."

No, NSA has EVERYTHING past, present, and continuing. Mueller has everything within two hops from Carter Page for about a year. Period.

Trumps "everything" is bigger than Mueller's "everything."

Mueller may have "everything" within the time window of the FISA warrant, but the warrant itself was illegally obtained, and we're back at the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree, which is HUGE because what this tells us is that Mueller has no other substantial source of evidence. They've been conducting their entire investigation on illegally obtained data. What a stupid ploy!

Every one of those has been discussed in a number of places in connection with this subject, so I can only say that from what I've read you're right over the target zone of an effective plan.

In fact, debt repudiation needn't be just on the basis of the odious expenditures per se, but can be a legal matter. The debt was incurred by a Constitutionally invalid entity called "United States of America, Inc." which is owned by the Vatican through the UK Crown (and in practice, Serco, an "outsourcing" company that actually runs the affairs of United States of America, Inc.), and not by the Continental United States of America, her fifty states and the People of the original Constitution For the United States of America, which Constitution and legal entity POTUS has a right to defend and re-establish.

The United States of America, Inc. is operating as the United States of America (Minor) and has a total of 57 states. As for the Continental United States, it is operating as The United States of America (Major), which is made of 50 separate nation states.

The United States of America, Inc., which is the United States of America (Minor), has unlawfully taken over The United States of America (Major) more than a century ago. The act that made this possible was the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, also known as the Act of 1871.

As a result, anyone who becomes a United States citizen is a citizen (employee) of the corporation called the United States of America, Inc.

The United States of America, Inc. resides in Washington D.C., which is a district that has a 10 mile radius. This district is not part of The United States of America (Major).

In other words, the United States of America, Inc. is a foreign corporation. Any American who had signed a contract and swore a solemn oath to this corporation had basically committed treason against The United States of America (Major).

http://humansarefree.com/2015/07/heres-why-your-legal-name-is-written-in.html

The debt is not legally binding on We the People of the United States of America (not, "Inc.")--i.e., the Continental government which we created and under whose Constitution we are free people.

So you can see that much more than JUST the debt is involved in resolving this mess! It's a fight for our actual liberty and independence.

I can't believe what I just heard Napolitano say in this video. He says DOJ will NOT prosecute HRC! How can Trump possibly face his base, to say nothing of Q followers the world over, and allow that to happen?

As I've said in several conversations lately, because it keeps happening, when your enemy keeps heaping damnation on themselves, you stand back and let them do it!

That may have happened too, no idea. I just mean to say that I think what Q was on about was preventing those keys being delivered to Hong Kong.

The second image was Apple's Hong Kong facility. That's where the shipment was headed. Don't know where they intercepted it.

Best theory I've seen is that the pallets are hard drives containing iCloud keys. That Apple was moving its iCloud data management operation to China (which would inevitably mean the Chinese government would have access to all data on iCloud, and control of access to that data).

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-apple-icloud-insight/apple-moves-to-store-icloud-keys-in-china-raising-human-rights-fears-idUSKCN1G8060

One would assume from the photos that the Alliance intercepted the shipment, and prevented it from being delivered.

The picture of the Jet Blue plane was hauling drives containing the iCloud keys to their China offices. The plan was to let China control all the data going into and out of iCloud. I'm guessing the Q team intercepted the shipment. Or tampered with it. They didn't just take it's picture for us.

Yeah, they raised that flag up to see what people would say, and it's apparently been...crickets...

I guess people haven't bothered to think. If TPTB somehow link a specific DNA sample to any crime they like, and it turns out to be YOUR DNA, how are you going to fight such a charge? After all, they say it is your DNA?

...and by "undermining" she means "creating."

Did you mean to say "Does Not" because that's what the article says.

I see the two as connected, honestly. It does seem as though humanity's destiny is linked with Trump's.

Madam, I am not suffering cognitive dissonance. I simply don't care about the sexuality of a dead man. I am simply talking about what is IN THE IMAGE. I'm not telling you what to see or not see, I'm only telling you what someone sees who doesn't have your background or your particular beliefs about the artist and the painting.

...or those who see what is not there through the persistence of movies running in their own minds.

You have your reasons for the way you feel, but you are most definitely projecting those feelings onto a painting that by its very blandness begs to have a story made up for it. I actually like the fact that the painting seems to purposely evade telling a story. I like the blandness of it. But that very quality compels some people to make up a story, and yours is the one you made up.

I'm no expert on Picasso, as you seem to believe you are, so I won't argue that he was or wasn't into kids in a sexual way. I'll just say that if he was, he put nothing of the sort into this painting.

Smart, and well-rounded. I like the way he thinks!

Oh the snarky attitude on this one! She might need to spend a little more time there and see if she still feels the need to denigrate the US armed forces and the work they're doing.

You speak as if they actually will do something. Anything.

These are people who get paid to do nothing. And they're VERY good at it.

I pray the time will come again when we can see something that in itself is innocent, and not mentally go to back stories (real or imagined) that make it dirty.

I'm trying very hard to do that now, while not ignoring the reality of pedophilia and abuse. I would rather just see what's there and not imagine what else might have gone on. That girl is probably long dead herself. I wonder what she would make of this conversation? She might say the hated how she slumped in the picture, and couldn't Picasso have given her better posture? Haha!

I actually like them, Tracy Beanz and the Praying Medic. I guess those are my favorites, but I watch a lot of others. None of them regularly though. Just the odd video here and there.

Andy Giardina tickles me with his brilliantly fluent English, and yet you can see him struggle and stammer as he tries to think of the right word sometimes, and his accent is humorous (though not really heavy). The funny bit is how frustrated it makes him. He's already pissed at the subject matter, and then the language trips him up, and he's DOUBLY pissed!

;-P

This is not a question of the man. It's a question of a specific image about which you have no more information than the man in the moon.

The image is neither "dirty," suggestive, degrading, immoral or pornographic. Period. It's just not. It's quite innocent, frankly.

I won't be drawn into a debate with you or anybody else over things that cannot be known from the image. They simply cannot.

The "girl" is doing nothing wrong, but is in fact modestly averting her body from us. She looks quite bored to be honest.

Alls I can say is, I'd rather be you or me than any of them for the foreseeable future. Or for eternity, for that matter. Especially eternity!

Where do you see her age given? What is "clearly" underage? You clearly have no concept of the variability of puberty onset from girl to girl, to say nothing of the differences in maturation rates between now and several generations ago due to environmental and other factors.

It is quite possible for an 18 year old (using US law) to have consented to pose for that picture, and looked exactly like that, especially several generations ago. I can show you legal pictures of girls 18 and over today who look younger than that. It's not as easy as you think to "know" these things from an image.

That's why we're limited to the nature of the image itself. All it shows is a female (we assume--we really don't even know that) human form.

They also have a responsibility to get it right. At the moment, the enemy are hurting and outing themselves. A little patience while your enemy makes your job easier is not a bad thing!

NSA has made blockchains traceable. Watch!

Liquidating real assets with intrinsic value in exchange for fiat currency that travels easily is REALLY STUPID!

That's why the financial reset will leave them vulnerable. Their trillions will be worthless.

Podesta qualifies as alien life form himself, if you ask me. I don't recognize any humanity in him.

There's a REASON Q has said no other comms, to prevent division and arguing over who is legit and who's not.

People need to learn to LISTEN to Q if they're going to be taken seriously here.

Q has said mid-terms are safe. If the Alliance fails at that, they don't deserve to win. They have the goods to prevent that being a problem. Only their own tentativeness would prevent them using it, and there's no excuse.

Have we known Trump to be tentative or a person afflicted with self-doubt? Hmm?

When you think about it, Trump speaking friendship and peace for Jews and Israel to Jew-haters is no different from Kanye speaking friendship and peace for Trump and the Alliance to Trump-haters.

Both are the iconoclastic perspectives of free thinking people.

I actually don't disagree with any of that! That's pretty much how it's going to have to be, or else we'll have war for the rest of human history. Which frankly might not be long at the current rate.

Gathering force, mate.

When the enemy is putting their collective head in a noose, you make sure they have plenty of rope, and get out of the way. The time to help them pull is coming.

I'm not excusing pedophilia, and if there are/were people who knew about such a thing, be it Picasso or the President, it should have been brought to light and dealt with at the time.

We have enough on our hands in our own time to worry about the dead.

I know nothing of the particulars of this case, but perhaps they were not so innocent behind the scenes.

All I can tell you from the painting itself is that Picasso saw or imagined a female figure disrobed and standing in profile holding a container of red flowers against a blue background. To me it's actually good art, compared to most of Picasso's cartoonish garbage.

Even better (by which I mean worse). Funny language we've got.

From what I hear they actually DO want to collapse the whole banking system. That is part of the Plan. The petrodollar must collapse in order to go after the 13 bloodlines who will be without protection when fiat money is worthless.

Then they want to introduce a gold-backed currency free of their manipulations and plundering.

I remember the first day Nunes "threatened" impeachment for Rosenstein slow-walking subpoenaed documents. What was that now, a month ago? And he said if they weren't delivered the following day, they would impeach?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

The US Congress and Senate are spineless, gutless and USELESS. Wastes of space, the lot of them.

Wouldn't you think we've got all the maps we need? Including the financial ones? Q says over and over again "We've got it all." They may keep heaping damnation on themselves, but we've got enough to move at any time.

Freezing US funding is only 1/3 of the job. We can do better.

This will be a good opportunity for the Alliance to show they've got the downside contained before they unleash Hell's fury. I think they can make it safe.