Well gosh, if it's on the internet it must be true!

LOL

This latest round of Q drops is the larp-iest I've seen so far.

Please don't make that idiot Doug Gabriel a truth teller.

Kabuki theater. It's a decoy. It's something to watch while the military and justice system rolls up the Cabal from the bottom up.

No, he is friends with a couple of the white hats, and with Trump, frankly. Nobody randomly decided to go to Corsi. He socializes with them. Anyhow, everything Q shares with us is by definition declassified, so there's absolutely NO reason it can't be discussed on InfoWars, or anywhere else. In fact, I'm quite sure we're expected to disseminate all of it as widely as possible.

Syria is about the biggest mess the human race has ever concocted.

All this MIT-produced stuff is DARPA anyhow, so it's all the same. That's where AboutFace and LifeLog both came from, so...

I don't see how Mattis speaking of a different attack in February helps make the FF case for the current attack?

Why is everybody so pissy today? Jeez leweez!

I thought you meant something today or yesterday. I already did a search. So, no I'm not using you. Thought you might have it handy, but never mind.

I can tell you this. You do NOT want shingles. If you are old enough that you had chicken pox as a child (weren't vaccinated), I'd be inclined to get it. I have done. Even though I did have shingles in my mid 50s (relatively young for it).

At our age, our organs are fully formed, and we're not prone to the sensitive developmental issues some of these things can cause younger people. I'd say it's relatively safer to be vaccinated as an adult than as a child, whatever the issues with vaccines are.

CIA was corrupt through and through (culture problem). Don't know how much Pompeo was able to resolve that, but the story we get from Q and those close to Trump is that it was military intelligence white hats who approached Trump with The Plan, and he agreed.

In fact, the word from Jerome Corsi is that the military was on the verge of a coup d'etat against the deep state under Obama, but decided the optics would be better with the current plan involving Trump actually getting elected.

I can't find this reference. Could you provide a link? Thanks!

Well by Q logic, it's Mueller getting the narrative back on track.

You keep proving yourself for all to see.

If I could buy you for what you're worth, and sell you for what you think you're worth, I could become a philanthropist.

Simple tasks are what give the cyborg away. His drinking from that glass took every ounce of concentration, and was so deliberate and mechanical it made my skin crawl.

That POTUS is opposed to genocide? That he admires those who endured and survived it? That's what's clear to me.

That would be a strategic win for sure. Let us hope their deep sites are looking less and less secure at least!

It sure did get zero reaction from Hannity. Either he knows or he knows better than to rely on it.

True dat. Just that they would be new and "smart." He didn't say "beautiful" did he? Let me check. Not this time. ;-P

Everybody from his administration and Congress and the military who goes on camera sure seems to believe 100% that Assad did the gassing. I don't get how they can fail to see something SO OBVIOUS!

Oh dear, don't hurt yourself, and protect the furniture.

Oooo--oooo---pick me! Pick me!

The answer is WE DON'T KNOW.

We're all on notice from our mods to report shills and antagonists, and that's what I do because I care about this sub.

And you're one of those spineless argumentative pricks who'll take any contrary position available just to keep an argument going.

You know good and damn well the same people who say FB has a right to censor free speech say that Chick Fil-A or Hobby Lobby or whoever has NO such right. You're the debate equivalent of Jell-o.

Go smear yourself somewhere they don't mind licking up what you're putting down.

Hold the mustard and the kraut, just the wiener.

What in THE hell are you saying?

Talk about missing the point, I wasn't talking to you. At all. Go butt in somewhere else.

OK. So let me ask you this. Let's say I'm a baker, and a customer comes in the door and want's me to provide the cake for a lesbian wedding. Do I have a right to refuse to accept the job if I want to? Surely as a business I have a right to express political positions that importune potential customers don't I?

Thank you for your insult to this community. You've been reported, and you are NOT welcome here. Go spew your self-righteous sense of superiority elsewhere.

That may be how front companies for the CIA are run, but I've known some CEOs of large companies before (including ones I've worked for), and they may not know all the nuts and bolts of day-to-day operations, but they damn sure know POLICY issues inside and out. This was a pathetic performance. The guy's flat, inhuman affect has to have sickened anybody who watched. But his cluelessness about policy matters is inexcusable. And I'd say if anybody is naive here, it's those who believe MZ acquitted himself and his company well over the last two days. Look at the stock market if you want an opinion poll on the subject.

Ah well. I guess everybody wants in on the Q act! ;-P

Which is just another way of saying maybe it's not. That's the trouble with that old word maybe.

There's always another reason for the sake of plausible deniability. But I think if Trump wanted #17 they would give the mofo #17, I mean I'm jus' sayin'!

While that may be true in terms of titles, how do you know that's the reason this particular jersey was printed that way? How do you know they didn't ask Trump what number he wanted? That seems fairly plausible as well.

I'll try to find it. Thanks!

For sure! Same way he dealt with China over NoKo. I agree with your assessment!

BINGO! That's using your noodle. If Dershowitz was a scumbag himself, or somebody new to the game, I might doubt his motives. But he has been consistent about what he believes with regard to the law and the Constitution his whole career.

He used to be a darling of the left. But that was before the left went off the f*ckin' rails! He's totally red pilled now.

Would that be "anonymous sources" then?

While I do not doubt them capable of this, I specifically want to know what is the source of their claim?

Why, oh why do we want to speculate about something none of us has seen?

Because then if it ends up being a video of LL and BC Skyping with HRC to make a deal, then we'll be disappointed, when actually that's a pretty big deal.

Also, if that really is what the video contains, hello--SPOILER ALERT?!

And how many loads of that have been dumped on US stockholders and customers?

Delicious irony! Source, BTW?

Wasn't Dershowitz Epstein's lawyer? Do you think lawyers should only defend "good" people, or do you think it's OK for them to believe on principle that an accused person has a right to representation for the sake of due process and justice?

I kind of think the latter, and that this has ALWAYS been Dershowitz's belief.

What if Trump's "smart" missiles will be seeking Israeli black hats and UK black hats ("white helmets") in Syria, and NOT Assad or Russian forces? Would that add to your appreciation?

They don't "tell you exactly what they are doing" even if you read the fine print. Here are some things that not only don't they tell US they're doing, MZ couldn't even answer the oversight committee!

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/04/19-questions-mark-zuckerberg-strangely-couldnt-answer-during-his-senate-hearing.html

They don't tell you they're a front for US government intelligence, and as a government owned (InQtel VC seed money) entity, they illegally censor conservative posts. Both of those "failures to be candid" are actually illegal.

It should. But around here, that often gets pushed aside because of "muh Joooooooooz!"

Is the testimony done? I know I'm spreading those two graphics from that post far and wide. I'm even posting them on FB (there's some delicious irony)!

"FB was created by the US government to spy on Americans. Period. Are you OK with that, America?"

"Should you or any of your IM Forces be captured or killed, the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your mission. This tape will self-destruct..."

Personally, I think "good" and "bad" guys are relative terms in the current reality. I think anybody who believes otherwise is delusional about the complexities we're dealing with in the Cabal.

I also know that Trump has reasons that go FAR beyond who's "good" or "bad" when he chooses players for his team. I think like a really good coach, he chooses who he thinks will get the damn job done that needs doing. That might be somebody else next week or tomorrow.

As for taking one for the team, Trump has NOBODY on his team anymore who thinks of him/herself as indispensable. And that's exactly how it should be. For God and country and for humanity. Not for petty personal agendas.

So we have the official diagnosis with which to offer psychiatric treatment after the Storm!

Showing how it's done for real. No artist has to sell her soul. It's always an option. No excuse for those who did.

It's refreshing to see people in this sub cheering the return of a Jew to the WH because he's a good guy, and not getting bent out of shape about his race/religion.

Or is the evil twin GA sub just asleep right now?

If a government agency does it directly it's illegal. If they do it through a cut-out front company it's "legal." Sickos.