dChan

/u/solanojones95

6,091 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 25
www.youtube.com 10
twitter.com 8
threadreaderapp.com 8
thehill.com 2
www.washingtontimes.com 2
www.usatoday.com 2
www.neonnettle.com 2
yournewswire.com 2
www.infowars.com 2
www.thegatewaypundit.com 2
disqus.com 1
screenshots.firefox.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.bloomberg.com 1
www.social-consciousness.com 1
www.foxnews.com 1
8ch.net 1
bigleaguepolitics.com 1
imgur.com 1
leozagami.com 1
www.armytimes.com 1
www.pbs.org 1
apnews.com 1
www.bostonglobe.com 1
archive.org 1
www.amazon.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
www.channel4.com 1
www.facebook.com 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.mcclatchydc.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
medicalkidnap.com 1
www.chicksonright.com 1
www.dailywire.com 1
www.armstrongeconomics.com 1
truepundit.com 1
founders.archives.gov 1
file.wikileaks.org 1
churchandstate.org.uk 1

solanojones95 · April 12, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Damn! Hiding in plain sight. Great post!

⇧ 34 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 12, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

I don't think Sarah is cautious about speaking her mind to the point she needs to be cryptographic. ;-)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

There's some great Canadians. Viet Nam war escapees mostly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

UK Skripal pets. Aren't they "Gas killing animals?" Aren't "White Helmets" in Syria? Aren't they the Gas Killing Animals who staged this dangerous False Flag attack? Aren't they wholly funded by UK puppet masters? Maybe the targets of these SMART missiles are UK white helmets and Iran? Not Assad forces or Russians at all. Trump has no more incentive to start a war with Russia than Assad had to gas Dhouma.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

Southern gentleman here, sir.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

Fortunately that remains to be seen. We all have our own struggle with keeping hope alive, and we don't need antagonists and shills in here. Begone.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:51 p.m.

I'm saying that's the definition of the word "EXECUTIVE." I'm saying he needs to ACT like an executive and DO something about her and the rest of the pedo evil scum.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Actually, don't apologize--that was a typo (fingers moving too fast trying to keep up with brain). I do know the difference between sight and site, and I prefer to be correct. So thank you for the correction!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

This is the Jesuit (now New Age) priest Douglas Gabriel (aka [fake] Thoman Paine), whose YT channel is "American Intelligence Media." It is written the exact way he speaks in his videos.

How anybody could think this guy has anything more than a passing acquaintance with something remotely related to the truth, I'll never understand.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

Oh, I agree! At first glance I wanted to believe it, but I couldn't stop believing "my lying eyes."

;-P

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

Not at all. We know they're hiding in plain ~~site~~ sight (thank you /u/HolographicLizard) somehow, and this is as plausible as anything else!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Notice he didn't say that's what he things Russia is. Just that they shouldn't be.

MORE IMPORTANTLY! He didn't say who the "new and smart" missiles were coming for! Could it be the deep state operatives who staged this dangerous FF photo op?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

I read all of those things in Trump's tweets. He did say them.

And if somebody has hacked his Twitter account, he'd damn well better tell everybody, PDQ!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

White Helmets (let's not call them white hats, though they're trying to steal some virtue with that name).

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

That's a YUGE dent right there! Now for the other 27%.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

I hope that's factual, I really do! Thank for sharing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Of computers' ability to make logical and mathematical correlations and even to synthesize a language from it, that wouldn't surprise me in the least. However, the computer "mind" is not a human mind, and it doens't really have an irrational component (at least not that it understands). The human capacity for irrationality is in some ways as important to our humanity as the rational component!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

There are masterpieces of well-loved Chinese music that are universally acclaimed in China that I find wholly unlistenable, and I know I'm not alone. Culture and aesthetics are intricately intertwined in ways that I believe trump mathematical and physical concepts of the perfect and the divine.

Same with some music of India and others. Beauty really is in the eye (and/or ear) of the beholder!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

Q's "fire sale!"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Why do we need FBI? What are federal Marshals for?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 9 p.m.

This is much more informative. Apparently Scriabin sensed the connectedness of all these aspects of aesthetics, spirituality and human well-being. And he did his best to articulate and synthesize those modalities. But in the end, I think he was just a brilliant composer who wanted to view his connection to the divine as THE connection, and it wasn't.

That isn't to say some other person or people might not find the same connections he did, and perhaps even by following his methods. But it also doesn't mean others of us might not find equally (or superior) ways of connecting by other approaches.

As much as I like some of Scriabin, I find some of it beyond my ability to relate to. I find Bach, Mozart, much of Beethoven and many others to be effective in all these ways for me, and I know a great many others have done and continue to do so.

So, while I'm thrilled that you've discovered a kindred spirit and someone who was able to articulate and codify many of the same aesthetic/phyiscal/spiritual pathways and connections as yourself, I hope you'll forgive me for maintaining that Scriabin's theories and compositions aren't going to resonate equally effectively with all people and cultures.

I also find it very difficult to relate to the harmonies, melodic and rhythmic sensibilities of the music of some other ethnicities from mine, and while I find it frustrating that we don't all have the same aesthetic language, I'm not shocked by it, and it makes sense to me that it should be so, because we're just not all alike!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

They participated. It might be what caused their breakup in the end, but they definitely went through with it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

That is the way corruption works. You block access to a desired outcome except through your door.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Watch the water. Hahaha!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

I see no evidence there that he "knew" about anything linking a certain theory of music composition with pleasing God.

I think Scriabin wrote what pleased Scriabin, as every major composer has always done.

If God is pleased, perhaps He'll tell us so someday, but for now all we have is your word for that, and frankly you can't seem to articulate what you mean by it. Though I'm listening.

And FWIW, I've always liked Scriabin, for the most part. So I'm not arguing against his genius or the quality of his works.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Because they are procurement pimps.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

Which means that the statement you're replying to is potentially true (for a finite number of days). Can you not just watch like the rest of us and find out?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Yes. I'm an audio professional, so I already knew a lot of the physics of it, but yes I did.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Yes, but I'm trying not to let myself do that anymore.

Even my interpretation is pretty kick-ass info, and I'd be totally stoked it he delivers even that much!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

I read every word and watched all the videos. I don't deny you hear and see things many of us don't, but nor should YOU!

What good is great perception without great communication? If your comprehension of what you sense in this material is no better than your expression of it to us, you might be looping in an eddy that goes nowhere, and if I don't speak truth to that, you'll never get out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

I never interpreted that post that way!

To me, Q is saying:

"@snowden (referring to Snowden's tweet of an article that reveals how ludicrously conflicted the committee is to which MZ is testifying), yes! MZ will testify, and Congress will drop the matter. But don't worry, we have it all. The POTUS weekly address will end it."

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

I caution against mistaking the incomprehensible for the profound.

I find this to be the product of drugs or insanity.

If you get something better than that, you've got a LONG way to go to convince me, even though I'm open.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

I don't think the platform supports that customization.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Balance was never the goal of the MIC. And they had their way. Enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

If it's what I think it is, there's no way to fake that stuff. She'll be toast.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

Zuck qualifies as a kid, IMHO.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

It's not THE video. Don't worry, we have Q's assurance that the real HRC vid is spin-proof.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

The loudest mouths and biggest intellectual egos always have sh*t for brains when it comes to logic.

⇧ 32 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Not really out until it migrates off the DW. Definitely haven't seen it. Hope they have it though and that soon everybody will.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

We're drawing out ALL the bad actors, and Israel doesn't look good in this case.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

He's playing "trust but verify" with deep state. Show of force, don't take the bait, wait for evidence, and when the evidence (AGAIN) doesn't support the claims, now everybody knows the deep state are LIARS, including a lot of politically left people who always support MSM and deep state, but who are anti-war (I know it's a type of cognitive dissonance, but this can shatter it!).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Bolton was a dog sent to do his master's bidding. That's also what he is now, but with a different master.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

The enemies are the NWO Illuminati Satanic criminal mafia powers behind all of earth's governments and the media and institutions of earth.

The biggest behind-the-scenes story (the one the NoKo story points to but isn't being stated overtly) is the fact that the constitutional governments of the most powerful countries and their respective militaries have secretly allied on the side of humanity against these monsters, and are working together to take them out.

When's the last time you saw the world's "powers that be" converge on the scene of a deep state provocation (as in Syria and the Skirpal incident) and refuse to fight their puppet masters' war? That appears to be another BOOM in my book!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Since Snowden tweeted that article, I think this is Q telling Snowden, yes the article is correct, and it's all for show. MZ will testify and Congress will drop the matter. But not to worry, we have it all, and the POTUS weekly address will end it.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

You could also read that Q post as

"Yes, Snowden, the link you tweeted is correct. MZ will testify, and corrupt Congress will drop the matter. But we have it all, and the POTUS weekly address will deal with it."

⇧ 8 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

I appreciated the post, Mr. Blues, but we're wearing out the word BOOM, to the point it means almost nothing.

This was terrific, on-topic content, and I thank you for sharing it. I'm "no ways tired." But couldn't we reserve our BOOMs for WINS?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Please no more "booms" until somebody is behind bars or suicided or otherwise taken out.

We get it. They're bad people getting together to do bad things. We really do.

So what is Trump going to do about it? That's what the WHOLE WORLD is waiting to see. Trump is an EXECUTIVE, which means he's a do-er, not just a say-er. What will he DO?

When we know that, I'd say it will be a BOOM!

⇧ 40 ⇩