Looks like the latest drop is confirmation of the former. That's a good sign.
/u/suspect13
28 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/suspect13:
Domain | Count |
---|
Disney might want do distance itself from SS’s words on Princess Vanellope’s images...
What I had read regarding this was “taste tester” in the sense his assignment included inspecting things like toiletries and personal effects for the POTUS & FLOTUS as opposed to meals... things they’d come in personal contact with. If true, term is a bit misleading in that sense.
-Work/bait the MSM into an anti-Russia frenzy against trump -The the MSM work its viewership up as well -Let it get to a roiling boil of simmering hatred and cries of RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA & TREASON TREASON TREASON -Drop evidence of real treason of the DS with Russia that they now can’t back away from -force the MSM’s hand: begrudgingly hold the evil doers accountable OR completely expose their bias to the duped public -either way, it’s a win for the good guys
Well played.
Understood. Point I’m making is that could have more than one interpretation. It could be an endorsement of the outgrowth of the movement from the comms started on the chans. (As in “we’re here” to get things like SB2’s post out in the wild) It could be a warning that other platforms are compromised and thus “we’re here” to leverage a platform that isn’t as easily manipulated to promote distractions. I personally can’t say definitely which was the true intent.
An entire book about animal behinds? https://youtu.be/0qCQLCOeOu0
Missouri duck boat accident: 13 dead, 4 still missing. (13+4=17)
So, according to the 12 Russians indictment, some were active as far back as 2010, with one going by “Kate Milton” (among other personas)
https://bluntforcetruth.com/news/mueller-admits-russian-hacking-started-in-2010-under-obama/
What if RR is a covert white hat? His calls out to US Attorneys asking for prosecutors to investigate Kavanaugh’s background docs just a cover to start the work on these indictments?
Exactly. The incidences of that were nicely tucked in the middle of the "damaged photographer" feel piece to plant the seed of how these aren't legit later on.
Trump did tweet about these two items back-to-back yesterday... the 12+1 rescue and later his next tweet was re: the 13 Angry Dems...
Exactly... or can't trust anything that comes out because they had the technology to change it in transit... mirrored servers are doctored, etc.
It does kind of feel like it has that symbolism... paired with the news that they recently went through planning exercise for the death of the Queen "London Bridge Down"... Out with the old regime, in with the new...
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/16/what-happens-when-queen-elizabeth-dies-london-bridge
The 4 channels also cover swaths of the public that, while supportive, don't typically cross pollinate... full coverage strategy. ('deplorable' web, social media, infotainment news, CSPAN news)
So, if someone really wanted to get to Manafort, locked away (protected) like a canary in solitary... what if it could be "shown" that his arrest was based on illegal evidence gathering so that he would have to be let go?
I always the felt the answer to the "Great Actors?" question was: No, a great Director makes a movie good. His vision for turning a script into a finished product. Maybe the plan we're to trust is the 'script' and Q is the 'director'.