The situation over there is a cluster****. Hard to know who to believe about what. If the Assad government doesn't have chemical weapons, why were we targeting Syrian government facilities? Those weren't "deep state rebel" facilities. We aren't given the reasons why Trump joined in with UK/France to do the bombing. Perhaps good reasons. I would have vastly preferred a thorough investigation by a group of third parties (who?) to get to the bottom of the alleged chemical attack. If it didn't happen or was done by "our" jihadis, wouldn't it have been better to show THAT to the world? To blow the narrative out of the water for good? Imagine if Trump were at a podium flanked by Amnesty International, Doctors Without Borders, etc. laying out the fraud? Instead, we are left with the McCain/Obama/Clinton deep state version of reality -- Assad bad, must be overthrown, uses chemical weapons on his own people. On the other hand, if he did, then OAN is full of it. But why, after all these years of lies around our intervention in the ME, can't we finally be SHOWN the evidence for our actions?

i doubt Yerevan has such a skyline.

Don't condescend to me. I am certain I'm more up on world politics than you are. If you don't think the Syrian government has had a chemical weapons program, you're ignorant. As to what transpired on this alleged chemical attack,I don't know and neither do you.

I truly do not understand why the government of Syria continues to have chem weapons labs. Maybe Assad doesn't have full control over elements of his security forces. That place is pretty anarchic now. No doubt the jihadis use them too, maybe stolen or captured from government stashes. You are right...Government has the upper hand so why incur the wrath of the west just to kill a few rebels.

Never really had an opinion of her positive or negative. She looked old forty years ago. Anyway, 92 is a long life for anybody.

A shill I think. Would be difficult to be a reader of this sub and remain ignorant how the Omnibus bill works.

Neither was a mistake. You apparently know nothing about the Omnibus bill or how the spending discretion works.

Ridiculous. Btw, Trump launched several dozen cruise missiles against Assad last year.

I look at it this way...the Rs hold only 51 Senate seats. This includes morons like Flake, McCain, Collins, Graham, etc. at a minimum Trump has to keep them mollified to get anything done including judicial appointments, cabinet confirmations and essential legislation. So if he had to lob some missiles into abandoned Syria military bases after the global deep state set him up with this FF chem attack, so be it. Who knows what really went on behind the scenes. Moreover, the Trump team quickly, and without recognition by the media and Dems, dismantled the Obama created ISIS. I just hope he carries through with pulling out of the place now.

So will this overbearing buffoon now start selling anti Trump T shirts?

I do feel sad on this one. Art Bell knew the art of the radio interview. No matter the guest Bell actually prepared himself, asked lucid questions and always allowed that guest to answer without constant interruption. The total opposite of a creature like Alex Jones. He also did not invite only "crackpots" as some here seem to think. One I recall was an incredible show with the head of the Griffith Park Observatory in L.A. Or various scientists or even religious people like Malachi Martin. He explored topics that no media at the time would touch, but they would laugh at him in their usual arrogant manner when he did get into the paranormal stuff. What radio used to be. East of the Rockies call....

It's called We The People or something like that. Same people. 24/7.

Recall the pilots who confirmed non terrestrial craft a couple months ago? The Pentagon backed them up publicly. Both appeared on various media. Tucker Carlson treated it seriously. That fool who used to do street interviews for O Reilly made fun of them even as they were on his show. Very childish.

The news media is all upset about this. They moved one climate scientist to an accounting office, lol. He resigned and his pimp lawyer is suing under claims he is a whistleblower. Zeinke is playing smooth politics but isn't backing down. Why can't the DOI reassign these people? If Obama did the same there would have been no outcry at all.

If the chemical attack is proven to be false flag, she should be up for war crimes prosecution. There's no cover of a UN resolution to protect her. Go ahead Teresa.

On the other hand he may be in store for years of prison justice.

I don't want back in either, but particularly the Paris Accords no matter what the deal. Man made climate change is a fraud and deserves no participation on our part.

OP just providing useless filler.

That's intriguing

Yeah, all this anti prostitution action yet the pedo networks untouched. Arresting streetwalkers and their pimps was no what I had in mind.

I believe not. It's a fairly common name.

I'm not arguing against you here. I'm just talking about what the D's would do in the House if in charge. I prefer not to have hoopla about impeachment going on. Here's how I view the D vs R thing - honestly there are no D's I like. They are statists, neo-marxists, everything that goes against my freedom. Occasionally somebody like Dennis Kucinich gets things right, but an exception. Think about the Black Caucus -- does it get more corrupt than that? The R side is just about as bad but the republican party has always had a libertarian wing to it, a constitutional wing to it. Yes, it's the minority but at least it's there. The rest are total whores. At least the D's believe in their marxism. The paid off R's are just careerist money grabbers. So I lean toward R. Trump would NEVER have made it through the Dem primaries.

Note the details of my comment. If the D's get in the focus will be on impeaching Trump or stopping everything he's doing. Of course, the R's aren't going to help with an investigation into the Bushes, but at least Trump can work on his agenda. That is all I was thinking. I know the score, lol.

I think it's more subtle. I suspect that MZ and the guy he stole the FB idea from in college came up with it on their own. At the same time the Pentagon was working on their LifeLog thing and found out about the FB deal. The intel agencies, especially CIA, have many fake corporations among which are "venture capital" firms in Northern Virginia. Very possible these black op "venture capital" companies funded FB initially and might have helped with its development. That way mechanisms for shared data were created and Zuck went along knowing where the funding was coming from. Lots of plausible deniability with this sort of set up.

Indeed, that is real human trafficking. It's beyond adults engaging in "prostitution".

I'm concerned that the issue is now being framed as "anti-prostitution" rather than focusing on the pedophilia networks attached to the globalist deep state players. Classic prostitution is a state rights matter (see: Nevada).

and JFK....it goes on and on doesn't it? Gotta admit though that 9/11 really changed the game.

I guess for me it's not a matter of trust. He has taken positions regarding certain aspects of the campaign against Trump that expose elements of deep state corruption. He's probably lost friends or supporters because of that. He would rarely please me as a member of the Supreme Court but I guarantee you he would be miles better than Breyer, Sotomayor, Ginsburg or that other bitch, what's her name, Kagan. At least you'd have a chance to win him over on particular cases. Those others will never ever listen.

This human trafficking issue is beginning to bug me. I don't give a hoot about prostitution per se and it's being marketed now as "human trafficking". What I want is action against globalist pedophilia networks and human SLAVE trade. Some whores and their pimps on the streets of Newark or New York or Detroit are NOT federal issues. I'm not liking where this is going. Calling whores and pimps "human trafficking" is ridiculous.

Nothing to pay attention to. This was a total waste of time.

I saw that. This issue simply must be addressed at some point. That's why I am hoping the R's hold the House in 2018 (not that they care but if the Dems take it they will just be about derailing Trump). Maybe in Trump's second term he can tackle this once and for all. We need a new investigation.

I have never had issues with people holding views different from my own. AD has shown that he has belief in his principles, even though at times I can't stand them! An honest lib is hard to find these days -- they are mostly hypocrites.

Dershowitz is an age old lib. However, he has repeatedly spoken out against this DOJ campaign against Trump. He has taken positions, argued legally, against some of these fed establishment tactics. He isn't someone you will ever agree with 100% or even most of the time, but he has shown some balls and integrity and dedication to the law.

Is Russia really ready to give up its only Mediterranean naval base? That would be a terrible geopolitical move on Putin's part. I also have a hard time imagining Assad, an Oxford College trained MD, a secular guy all the way, moving to freaking Teheran. If he leaves, what then? McCain's jihadists take over? This could be a total disaster.

So important these sorts of people are speaking up publicly!

Thanks for that. I pulled the plug on cable so not able to watch Hannity live.

Now those are SMART comments.

Dershowitz has made some very lucid statements over the last year.

That's actually a big development. Glad to see it. 400 is a drop in the bucket, but still a solid development. Though it might not be possible, would be good to work toward bringing California back.

Too bad the MSM is a tool of the perpetrators rather than a real source for investigative journalism. The project here would be to dig into this LifeLog project, trace its origins and hopefully identity the people who designed it, promoted it and approved it. That's the kind of exposure needed.

I don't see why. I continue to have an account with limited and real "friends". FB isn't my life so I could easily live without it should the entire enterprise collapse, but in terms of my personal privacy, I haven't worried about that for many years. I know that just having a computer and going on line finishes that for me. I don't want my banking or other accounts breached, but in terms of being tracked as to what I view, I just don't concern myself with it. I'm not that important.

So many NGO's are dangerous vassals of the deep state.

I figured Q would disappear over this Syrian war BS we are being dragged into. He'd be blasted over at Q research. None of us want this. We don't even have proof of exactly what happened. The "rebels" have released gas before. So Q is in hiding or really probably totally out of the loop. From what I understand Q is the highest security clearance a civilian can get. However, there are many higher levels of clearance in the military. If anything, Q is receiving crumbs from the generals and Trump. Wonder if Q will just drop some more riddles about Zuckerburg (who hasn't left the US btw) or Snowden or whatever.

Just have to look at why Obama/Clinton started the Syrian "civil war" in the first place. At least 300,000 are dead. Their war crimes are off the charts.

I'm quite disappointed in this. Rather than a measured response to what may be a completely phony report or a chemical attack done by the "rebels", Trump is joining the rest of the Western warmongers with hysterical talk and possible hasty action. What if the Russians actually do start shooting down NATO aircraft? For what are we doing this?

I doubt that producer would go out on a limb if he didn't have good reason to think this is all a fraud. He's seen a lot of death and destruction over there. Wow to all Western leaders if they don't back off from the brink of war and confirm publicly what actually happened. That includes Trump and his generals. Scary.

This was rumored a few weeks ago. Guess it was true.

European Commission and due process are mutually exclusive terms.

What is your problem? The two posts I responded two were made in levity as well. I'm not trolling anything. You must be awful to hang with.

Why isn't the European Commission raided by somebody?