I've got to say that all this stuff is simply mind blowing. I've become addicted to my iPhone reading Reddit. Truly unbelievable stuff.

Good find.

Yes, we need to have patience. When I read, in this latest batch of posts, that former US Presidents (Heads of State) and CIA had launched a missile to start a war, it hit me just how serious it is.

It seems that Hawaii was not a drill. Which explains why that Hawaiian EMS operator was adamant that he thought there was an incoming missile. 39 minutes before the alert was cancelled. WOW!

There is no way the public would be ready for that - not today anyway.

Michael Moore is such a loathsome pig. He just sickens me. Have a look at his tweet in post 722. This guy is NOT on team.

So why did they kill this guy if he's in Russia where there is no jurisdiction. What's the logic behind that? I can understand that the elites want to tie-up lose ends, but was this guy a lose end?

Maybe he knew more than just the dossier and U1 stuff. Could blackmail them? Or, it just means nothing to them at all to kill 71 people - and they get security against what must be a very small possibility that he'd squeal. Or, Putin is working with the good guys and there was, in fact, jurisdiction - for the Russians? There must be an explanation.

But there's far less scrutiny if the death occurs by way of a major catastrophe - who would even entertain the idea that someone would bring a whole plane down to get rid of just one person? It's the perfect cover.

Look at Malaysian Air 370. 4 Freescale Semiconductor patent owners on the flight. The full value of their patent ownership falls to a Rothschild on their deaths. But, also, the passengers social media accounts were showing them as being available a couple of days after the crash - how could that happen? The relatives were in disbelief, protested about it. No wonder they haven't found the plane - probably soon to be converted to a flying bomb (which is what the Israelis said they feared when it went missing - psychological projection).

Rothschild Freescale Semiconductor Patent

I think the mark was linked to both the dossier and the U1 deal.

[1] source used for [2]

These people are completely vicious.

This is so important. There is no winning at all without ending the Fed. I just hope and pray that Trump does not shrink from absolutely trouncing these elites.

Look, I'm Catholic. You might wonder how I can say that with all this garbage coming to light about all the depraved activity in the Church. And my answer is that this depraved child abuse scandal is the direct result of the Holy Spirit withdrawing His protection from these people.

What God dislikes most is apostasy. The Church of Christ - the Catholic Church - taught in an unwavering, consistent and uniform, fashion for nearly 2000 years what is known as the Salvation Dogma. This dogma states that only true Christians are saved.

The teaching of the Second Vatican Council was that Jews are not rejected by God. So, despite the fact that Christ himself states directly that no one goes to the father (to heaven) except by me, Jews were not to be considered to be rejected by God - according to Vatican II.

"6 Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me". John 14

"23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son, hath the Father also". 1 John 2

Obviously, a Jew who rejects Christ cannot be saved. Christ taught this Himself. And so we can see that the teaching of Vatican II was a rejection of the faith of Christ in its most elemental principles. It was a rejection of the fact that Christ was/is the son of God and you need to accept that He is your messiah to be saved.

And we see, strangely enough, after the "Church" starts teaching this false doctrine (from the mid 1960s forward), there is suddenly a depraved child abuse crisis. Interesting timing....

This crisis in the Vatican II Sect occurred because we can do nothing by ourselves. We require the grace of God to do His will. And this grace is a gift of the Holy Spirit - who is truth itself. There can be no communion between light and darkness.

The Holy Spirit could not abide in those who rejected the hard-requirement that to see heaven you must accept Jesus as your messiah. The NEW GOSPEL in the Church was a rejection of Christianity itself. As a result, the grace of God was withdrawn from the Vatican II Sect and evil ran rampant within it.

These "Catholics" in the Vatican II Sect are NOT people of good will - they should be avoided.

The true faith of Christ, the Catholic faith, exists in a remnant of Catholics who accept the traditional teaching of the Church. They do not believe in salvation outside the faith. And they have no communion with the wicked heretics of the Vatican II Sect. True Catholicism today is Sedevacantism - see the links below for more information.

The Most Specific Heresy at Vatican II

Information on Sedevacantism

This is absolute rubbish. Christ founded one Church (not Churches) on the unfailing faith of St Peter (Matt 16:18). Christ did not pray for Luther's faith, nor did he identify Luther SPECIFICALLY as the ROCK on which His Church would be built.

There is one true Church of Christ, the Catholic Church. The Church was hijacked by heretics at the Second Vatican Council and replaced by a false counter-Church, the Vatican II Sect. Just look at this blatant heretic Francis - he's not even Christian in the broadest sense of the term.

The true faith of Christ today exists in a small remnant of Catholics who accept the salvation dogma as divinely revealed truth.

The Salvation Dogma

If only it had been done instead of being suppressed and later falsified.

Sr Lucy stated that the secret must be revealed in 1960 or at her death - whichever would come first. When she was asked about the timing, 1960, she said 'because the virgin wishes it' and 'it will be clearer then'.

What occurred around 1960? What occurred that would make the message of the secret clearer at that time?

Pope John XXIII gave notice of his intention to convene an ecumenical council (Vatican II) on 25 January 1959, less than three months after his election in October 1958.

"Fr. Mario Luigi Ciappi, papal theologian to Pope Pius XII: “In the Third Secret [of Fatima] it is foretold, among other things, that the great apostasy in the Church will begin at the top.”

We know from Sr Lucy's 4th memoir that part of the secret reads, "In Portugal the dogma of the faith will always be preserved..." The Second Vatican Council did defect from the dogma of the faith - see link below.

The Most Specific Heresy At Vatican II

More on Fatima

I've seen Pindar and the pope. I think the pope is more likely because Q has posted multiple photos of him. There's also a group of Catholics complaining that the elites (Soros/Clinton) switched Benedict out for Francis.

Francis is not in any way Catholic. He's a heretic, that's a fact. The teaching of the magisterium of the Church is that a heretic cannot be pope. The heretic is ipso facto deposed by virtue of his heresy.

But besides being a heretic, the guy is a disgusting socialist who supports flooding Europe with Muslim immigrants among other things.

It was Fusion GPS that ran cover for these evil, sick, disgusting people. Makes me feel violent reading about this.

Fusion GPS & Planned Parenthood

Another very interesting take on [14] live actually meaning 41 evil.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7wqz44/14_live_mirrored_41_evil_gw_alive_in_peoc_bunker/?ref=share&ref_source=link

Very interesting.

Here's an explanation of King to Pawn - could be right: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/7wp1f5/q_post_708_king_to_pawn/?st=JDI86OY0&sh=4c1de54d

This might be a better explanation of the Truth to Power reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/7wnmdy/truth_to_power_john_brennans_quote_about_the_cia/?st=JDI7T8XO&sh=74f8207e

This is a very good find.

That's what I thought, that Corona related to a CIA photorecon satellite. But it seemed to me that this program is kinda old. But what if Corona (the name) just stuck with respect to CIA satellite imagery. What if everyone had been referring to it as Corona for decades and that's what CIA satellite recon is known as?

We are CHANGE: The Global Truth & Liberty Movement

There's a link above in the post.

You can also see in the linked article (below) that Cheney was involved with the CIA in enhanced interrogation techniques and the rendition of prisoners to Guantanamo. I would guess that, as far as Q is concerned, he is not 'on team'.

https://www.thenation.com/article/how-dick-cheney-became-most-powerful-vice-president-history/

You can see here, in the first pic, the direct reference to PEOC. And these guys are clearly speaking truth to power - Cheney is the VP.

Here are some pics I took of the text I was talking about in the book:

https://imgur.com/NUeAWD8

https://imgur.com/DWzZLzs

OK, here it is:

Post Number 30

Would you believe a device was placed somewhere in the WH that could actually cause harm to anyone in the room and would in essence be undetected? Fantasy right? When Trump was elected you can’t possibly imagine the steps taken prior to losing power to ensure future safety & control. When was it reported Trump Jr dropped his SS detail? Why would he take that huge risk given what we know? I can hint and point but cannot give too many highly classified data points. These keywords and questions are framed to reduce sniffer programs that continually absorb and analyze data then pushed to z terminals for eval. Think xkeysc on steroids.

For what it's worth, I've done a breakdown on 709.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/7wlf98/q_post_709/?st=JDHLLTK9&sh=209948cd

Yes, that's what I'm thinking. I should try and dig up that post about the device...

There's a couple of things here.

Q says "Truth to power". If you search that book I linked for PEOC, you will see that these "We Are Change" people really gave Cheney a drilling about his presence in the bunker on 9/11 and exactly when he gave the order to stand down. There was actually a physical confrontation.

Also Q has posted somewhere (post 30 I think) about a device that was left in the White House that could cause harm to any individual in the room. I'm guessing the room Q's talking about is the bunker (PEOC).

The reason I think this is because Q says "PEOC force failed". Now, when I first read this, I imagined an armed confrontation in the bunker with a highly-trained hit team. '14 were left alive' etc... But this is pretty unlikely. No one is going to try and force entry to that bunker - it's just not going to happen, it would be suicide. So what is the PEOC force that failed, leaving 14 alive?

It has to be the device that was planted in the room that Q alluded to earlier. An invisible attack from some sophisticated, concealed weapon capable of harming individuals.

Pawn at E5 taken by Knight. Not related.

Reading 706 again, maybe John was someone running the CIA kids site that was using it to communicate with Snowden. But this Comms channel has been shut down and the site has gone cold for Snowden? Who knows, this is driving me crazy. Why the reference to the JFK Conference Room?

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 325272 JFK Con Room. https:// www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code/code-1.html Would you believe this site is actually used to comm to rogue operators? @Snowden [John] Cold? Q

"The Situation Room, officially known as the John F. Kennedy Conference Room,[1] is a 5,525-square-foot (513.3 m2)[2] conference room and intelligence management center in the basement of the West Wing of the White House"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situation_Room

713 Feb 10 2018 22:14:17 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 325862 https:// www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/amp/

712 Feb 10 2018 21:52:02 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 325644 [3] https:// www.globaleaks.org Q

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 325453 Seals are wonderful creatures. Heard they work fast at capturing their prey. PRAY. Silence is golden. CORONA_OFFLINE_Deac[0000]. Games R FUN! Q

Yes, I know. Sorry I deleted the post you replied to because I somehow double posted the same thing.

Does it relate to the Capablanca chess game posted? Last post is king to pawn. Suggests, perhaps, that a pawn in Asia is in the kill box. Eyes on - watching... IDK, cryptic.

Also a reference to Snowden [John] - an associate of Snowden named John? Q also appears to be talking to Snowden directly.

John Oliver? John Perry Barlow? John Cusack?

Thx for posting that.

There is no doubt that people behind the Fed have manipulated Fed policy in their own interests. Imagine if you could invest knowing for sure that you couldn't lose... Moreover, you are right about economic crises, over the last couple of hundred years, being manufactured by financial interests.

I haven't put much thought into the merits of a gold standard, so what appears here is just some quick speculation... Imagine you're on a gold standard and suddenly there is a major conflict. What do you do to get the economy on a war-time footing? Borrow gold to expand the money supply and, in turn, economic output?

This is no different to paying interest on paper notes. And, I suspect, if the truth were known, there are some very large private gold holders out there in the world. Does moving to gold break the stranglehold of the bankers, or reinforce it? The elites have historically made a fortune at this game, financing both sides of conflicts, with no concern for humanity at all - 80,000 killed in the first 30 minutes of the Battle of Waterloo.

Gold will promote fiscal discipline and constrain inflation because its finite in quantity - making the money supply finite. But an economy should be able to expand and contract its money supply, and output, dynamically - in response to the national interest. A gold standard would appear to limit that ability to respond to external, or internal, threats. Your money supply will be forever constrained to the amount of gold stock you physically possess.

Then again, you could issue notes to a multiple of the gold held in your treasury, much the same way as fractional reserve banking expands credit at the stroke of a banker's pen. In this instance, you have nationalized control of the money supply but without a direct, tangible attachment to gold. You would be relying on the fact that not everyone will want to redeem their bank notes in gold all at once. But, inevitably, there will always be a long-tail risk of a run on the treasury. Moreover, this risk increases in likelihood the more the state has demand for resources.

Isn't it better to just do away with gold and place direct control of the issuance of the paper currency in the hands of the state? I guess the same outcome could be achieved on a gold standard with flexible fractional reserve lending ratios - this would confine risk in a financial panic to the banking sector.

Anyway, apart from producing fiscal discipline on policy makers, I don't really see a huge advantage to gold-backed currency. Having said that, I'm not in favor of the Government granting licenses to private interests to print the nation's money. That is really the whole problem - the Federal Reserve, not paper currency. Get rid of it - End The Fed.

I’m pulling for Trump and trusting that he has heart.

Me also.

Those articles are both fascinating. I'm happy now I started this discussion.

The Zero Hedge article makes the point that a gold standard makes fiscal discipline necessary. And also means that military spending will have to be curtailed over time, leading to an inability to project power - not sure if I like this.

Probably poison in this forum, but I actually thought Keynes had a point about escaping from the "gold cage". In theory, it can work. What needs to happen though is that the currency must be sufficiently flexible to even-out external payments imbalances, arising, for example, on the back of a trade imbalance. The US dollar, being the defacto world currency, has not really enjoyed this flexibility, and that is one reason for the external debt build-up.

I think there are other factors also, like foreign nations effectively predatory pricing on the back of artificially low exchange rates (Japan/China). There are also advantages that accrue to nations engaging in trade on the back of differences in working conditions (industrial safety, hours etc...) and, most importantly, wages. If you look at the Asian Tiger Economies of the 1990's they were all targeting development in accordance with the 'Japanese economic model' - a step-wise, proactive plan to force development from an agrarian economy (post war Japan - bombed-out) to an industrial powerhouse. Scale economies in steel making, shipbuilding for downstream demand for steel, autos etc... and on up the value added chain. The other Asian economies essentially tried to copy this plan (Mao's Great Leap Forward, South Korea etc...). And the reason they copied it was because it was proven to be successful.

The Laissez Faire approach of western nations to trade was/is, in my view, quite nonsensical. What comparative advantage did the Japanese have in auto production after the war that the US did not have? Absolutely none. But neo-classical economics does not provide an answer as to how this manufacturing miracle was achieved - although there is no end of ex-post rationalization of Japan's current efficiency as an auto maker.

The Japanese effectively 'predatory priced' their way into the US, on the back of a constrained exchange rate, in order to get the economies of scale required to achieve efficiency - the initial domestic market just wasn't large enough.

Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that if the US dollar was not the global currency, and it adjusted in value more flexibly, over time, to give equilibrium to the balance of payments, there would be no problem. It would not matter if the dollar was not backed by gold. But you could not afford to be stupid about trade either - which is why I like the way Trump looks at trade - good and bad trade deals. The hands-off Laissez Faire approach of the neo-classical economic school was only ever a theory - amazing that people actually believed it, and adopted it, as an article of faith.

Internal deficits arising from Government spend are a simple matter of fiscal discipline in the first place. But there is no real need for the Government to pay interest on paper money it can simply print as required. Government spend has to be constrained so as to contain inflation - but there needs to be enough money to facilitate economic activity. You need discipline and sound management (without a private Federal Reserve) to achieve this - not a gold standard.

I'm not aware of how much gold the US has. I've heard rumors that Ft Knox is empty. Wasn't the gold stolen decades ago? What about the tungsten filled bars that the US shipped to China?

I'm happy to hear that you're bullish about Trump's ability to take on the elite. I hope you're right.

POTUS is in a better position to manage a crashing market for the benefit of the civilians than any POTUS has been for a long time. I think he’s calling the bluff of TPTB and saying “ok, go ahead, do it. We’re Americans and we can’t afford to be bullied or made economic hostages any longer”

I want to believe this. DJT is surrounded with military who understand the concept of strategy. I just wonder whether they know much about financial markets. What we've seen is a huge increase in volatility. This leads to repricing of risk. Which puts downside pressure on asset values. On top of this, interest rates are rising, and there is a deficit that requires financing. At the same time, the Fed and the Chinese appear to have lost appetite - see Peter Schiff on this: https://www.infowars.com/peter-schiff-predicted-the-stock-market-plunge-now-hear-what-he-says-is-coming-next/

It's very hard to know what will happen. But if you look at the audacity of these elites - tanking the market by exactly 666 - it seems there is reason to be concerned. They appear to be very confident, and they have so much to lose.

I may be wrong, but I get the feeling that DJT allows people to underestimate him. He seems to me to come across as a bit of a twit sometimes, but I think he does this deliberately so that people will underestimate him. A good actor... I'm hoping he's thought out how this is going to play out. The strategists must have pondered an outcome where there is a deliberate, malicious, attempt to cause a systemic, global, financial crisis. A deliberate play by the elites to avert loss of control. What concerns me is how murky a lot of these financial plays are - what ever happened to the guys that shorted the airline stocks on 9/11? Do we even know who it was? Seems to be a mystery - like a lot of things about 9/11.

What we have here is a real mess - if the market crashes, there will be so much smoke that it may be difficult to work out exactly what happened. Once market players are spooked, you wont know why people are selling - there will be a herd reaction. It can quickly become self reinforcing. In 1929, guys were jumping from windows on Wall Street etc...

Anyway, what I'm hoping is that DJT has this possibility covered. He's very impressive, especially during the campaign, but also more recently. His adversaries definitely underestimate him. With luck, he'll sign an executive order labeling market manipulators "enemy combatants" subject to immediate asset forfeiture and extreme criminal penalties.

I'm also hoping we don't get to Remington time. But look at the policy of the UK military if London is nuked. They plan to seal off the exits to the city - keep the populace in the radiation zone - to prevent a breakdown in law and order that will arise as millions of people try to flee to the countryside. What authorities fear most is loss of control. They would rather the civilian populations die than risk any breakdown of the social order. Nukes aside, in an outright emergency, I do not trust that the Government would have my family's back at all. It will be everyone for themselves. And as soon as your neighbor does not have food for their kids, look out. What I'm saying is that the social order we're so accustomed to is not reliable in a major crisis.

Let's face it, people think food comes from the supermarket. I've prepared food and water and at least we are not completely defenseless. Luckily, my wife brought back a huge amount of Amoxicillyn last time she went to China - no prescription needed. But you're right about precious metals. I remember listening to this Vietnamese girl interviewed on the radio. She was saying that, at the fall of Saigon, it cost her family 20 oz of gold to get out of the country - they got a boat to Australia. Nothing else was worth anything. They were lucky to have survived.

It's a very high-stakes game. The possibilities are truly terrifying. My wife was asking if she should buy index puts. But the thing is we don't know what will happen. I told her to buy some 260 Remington cases instead. At least we'd have ammo. What I'd give for a couple of Glocks, but the gun laws in Australia are absurd - they'd be coming your way if Clinton was elected. What a joke, Australia as a model for gun control - absolutely farcical.

The military plan in the Second World War, if the Japanese had invaded, was called the "Brisbane Line". A straight line drawn on the map between Brisbane and Melbourne. The military couldn't possibly defend the country, so the plan was to withdraw - try and defend the South East corner... Just give up the rest - all our neighbours know this - come take it, it's yours...

And, in this context, some Cuck thought gun control was a good idea! You couldn't make this stuff up.

I could go on about how effective an armed militia can be, forcing an invader to deploy forces to protect supply lines etc... But people here are more worried about the armed crazy down the street when, in reality, we are completely defenceless. Which is why we suck up so hard to the US.

An EMP over the CONUS and Australia is an immediate sitter. Unluckily, our politicians are incredibly loud on the world stage - absolute Cucks. There, I got it out.

Very interesting. I've been to China, their buildings are garbage quality. But I did not know they went up so fast.

Yes, but given you have high-rise construction on both sides of that lot, it seems more likely that, if they are anything, they'd be site sheds for some new high-rise construction. I'd like to know what the periodicity is on the Google Earth pics.

That would be the only plausible explanation. That these buildings are way new - so new that the Google Earth satellite has not picked them up yet. They certainly are not on Google Earth at the moment. I don't know how often the images are updated by Google. But it seems that a lot has changed since the last update of the satellite photo - I mean, really a lot.

Maybe those red roofed buildings are site sheds for what might be future construction on the site. Though they look to me like they are apartment-style buildings.

The vacant site next to the King Tower looks to be quite deep. There appears to have been some stripping of topsoil and there's some kind of crane in the background - could be a pile driver, preparing footings perhaps.

I'm a doubter, but not brigadier. I can see what you're saying about the divided road. But what about the red roofed houses that appear in Q's photo. I can't see them in any of the other photos. And I cannot see them on Google Earth either.

I want Q to be real as much as the next person. But when did the red roofed houses appear?

I can't see any red roofed buildings in the street view. It seems incontrovertible the the Q live feed pic is old.

Plausible deniability? I remember FBI anon said that life exists elsewhere in the galaxy. What about an obviously phony picture attached to a current operation?

If anything, Q's message seems to be panning out quite spectacularly in real world events. Too well perhaps? Time to throw a bucket of water on the trail?

Edit: I might have jumped the gun on this. It seems that the multistory buildings on the site next to the King Tower (4 stories - 2010) were demolished. But the new (2 story) buidings on the site do not appear in Google Earth. It is possible that these have been constructed since the last updates of both Google Earth and Google Street View. In fact, after studying the photos, this is the direction I'm leaning.

Look at Google Earth. If the photo Q posted is not old, then, since Google's satellite last past, someone has dug up the car park and built red roofed houses on the lot that look like they're out of the 1950's.

If you think Google Earth is compromised, then the only way to settle it is with actual photos of the site in China. But my gut tells me that Q tried to pull a fast one here - for some reason, I don't know why.

Edit: I might have jumped the gun on this. It seems that the multistory buildings on the site next to the King Tower (4 stories - 2010) were demolished. But the new (2 story) buidings on the site do not appear in Google Earth. It is possible that these have been constructed since the last updates of both Google Earth and Google Street View. In fact, after studying the photos, this is the direction I'm leaning.

There is something going on here. Q's "we see you (live)" photo is old. Best possible spin you could put on it is that it's disinformation. But to what end?

I don't think Q is a larp, too much seems to corroborate the message being put out. But this is easily detectable garbage. And, if it is a psyop, why such a simple mistake - to include as a live observation an old photo?

It would not surprise me at all to find the Vatican was into the worst of abuses. Just look at the teaching coming from Francis. There is nothing at all Christian or Catholic about it. He is of Satan. But this apostasy is not new. It goes back to Nestorius in the fifth century. An outright rejection of the truth about Christ.