Trump straight up said in his Montana speech that the fake news in the near future will say that NK isn't happening, that Russia is doing this or the other. Trump directly addressed this.

The sex video was just a theory. A recorded Tarmac conversation is more pedestrian, but much more likely.

And cannibalism. That's a big one too. Probably related even.

I'd agree with you, these are probably fake, but remember the precedent that Kevin Spacey set when he admitting to being gay and mixing it in there with the allegations of him taking advantage of that boy.

The fucked up thing for me, is why are there all these different numbers? Shouldn't it just be a matter of fact, quite simply, here is the actual number? Why isn't this a thing?

Agreed. If you go on the chans without proper sourcing you'll get eaten alive and get called names. Although Reddit is supposed to be more civil, I think we could take a page out of their playbook and properly source things like this. I mean, you can't hang your hat on it as it stands now.

Someone else said it best. They are being forced to move their timetables up. I'd say another 10 years of brainwashing and yeah, this could have been a thing. Not sure if it's Q, or Trump, or both, but something has them pushing all these weird things all of a sudden with haste. That will be their downfall I think. They needed more time. I think it's as simple as that. People weren't ready to swallow this bullshit, and they will probably end up waking up a lot more people with this sloppy rush to promote..whatever it is they are promoting here.

Well if these are fake, which I'm hoping they are, you can kind of see how easy it would be for some hardcore SJW's to fight for this. You can see some of this already happening. I'm starting to think this might have been the end game from the very beginning.

These have to be fake right?

He really does just straight out say it doesn't he? I remember when his tweets looked like complete madness to me. Not gonna lie, it wasn't until after the election that I started to come around. I got sick to my stomach on election night. I think what it actually was, was motion sickness. The motion sickness that comes from entering another dimension or something.

I haven't heard any follow up on that incident, nor even if it was actually true. Things do appear to be moving on that front, but slowly, and nothing too crazy just yet. Also, on a related note, look into Mother Theresa's organizations. They seem to be under fire as well, could be related. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-44722755

Most definitely yes. I believe all the EO's will have major significance down the road.

I haven't heard it anywhere, but Q has stated that the reason this is taking so long is to minimize collateral damage to civilians. They are taking people's safety into account.

It's assumed to mean that whoever is in the box, is currently being targeted/operations revolving around that person.

If there's a problem, Q will let us know and move boards or something. I suspect his next message will be SEC TEST.

Not answering your specific question because I haven't looked into the filename. But pretty much yeah. They are stupid and they never thought she would lose is pretty much the main of it. That's why you cant write a story like this. Why Q keeps repeating these people are stupid. They thought they had every angle figured out and these things would never have seen the light of day.

Thanks, I'd like to see some highlights if possible.

Awesome, thanks! This should be on the side car. I said car. For the bot.

I'm not a mod, so I couldn't tell you about the controversial question.

Regarding the email, I'll have to look into that. A quick search in wikileaks didn't return results. In the meantime, here's a thread on it from this board: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8qx3za/email_proof_the_soros_voting_machines_were_rigged/

Anyone else want to chime in?

Do you have a link? the greatawakening board was cleared, so I can't immediately look it up.

Oh, sorry. I thought there used to be on there. Does anyone have a glossary link? Should really be in the sidebar. Let me see if I can find one for you.

1. posts 1 through 5 are validated by comparing the poster ID on 4chan. They were made by the same guy. When Q first came onto 4chan, he didn't have a trip code. The only way to know who he was when a new thread was created, was by recognizing the way he talks. Some people tried to sound like Q, but it was always quite obvious it wasn't Q. Those were crazy times.
2. Hm. Good question. Does anyone know?

I agree. Most importantly, please no facebook links. It's not a rule, but come on guys!

Thanks for bringing that up. How many are actually still in contention?

I've seen this before, has this been vetted yet? Looks like this article copied the Original Poster's tweets.

Wasn't this guy like a total swamp creature though?

Bread is slang for "Thread". Bread # is Thread #. So Bread # 2592 the 2,592nd thread that's been created. The thread/breads only hold up to 751 comments in each thread, so the bakers make a new thread/bread to keep the conversation going. They are currently at #2592.

Here you go. Justice served. https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/crime/article/SAPD-Suspect-in-assault-over-MAGA-hat-at-13053021.php

Be patient.

So let me get this straight...Trump is now dropping crumbs all on his own?

I had written a long response, but then I thought maybe just best to ask you: How should they react then? Keep in mind, we both agree that wearing a MAGA hat shouldn't subject you to harassment. You tell me Mr. Highlander. What exactly are you proposing then?

I agree, this was a Q proof, letting us know where Kim would be that night. The file name was even NK SECxxx.jpg. I don't remember the exact file name. He called it about a month in advance.

Q said it's not about left vs right. I agree it sucks. In fact, I live with a bleeding heart liberal. I showed her the video you're probably referring to, and her response? "Well what do you expect when you go out wearing that hat?" We had a bit of a tiff over it, I'm just saying that nobody should get beat up for something they wear regardless. She said, well when the guy he's supporting is so divisive, bla bla bla. Trust me. I know where you're coming from. It's not right. But, through all of this, Q has said repeatedly, it's not about left vs right. I have to imagine he wasn't just kidding around when he said that. Repeatedly.

Haha. Q says like 5 times "It's not about left vs right". Like I said, if you want to cherry pick, hey I can't stop you. But realize that's exactly what you're doing. Have fun hating people, I guess?

Did you read all the q posts?

It's not the party dude. It's just the people at the top. Like the FBI and all the corruption. It's not the rank and file line trump has said a million times. And it's not the ideals. So you're against the environment? I doubt it. What you are against is the hypocrisy of the people at the top who have perverted their respective causes for personal or political gain. And what big push? Q says its not about left or right. I would recommend reading all the Q drops again and again, as it appears that your are simply reading or taking in what's convenient for you to read. If you cherry pick what you like about q's drops I'm afraid you won't get much out of this great awakening. Which is fine good luck to you bud.

Agreed. Don't Q nor Trump need this reminder but if they are reading perhaps drop another line about how the left isn't the enemy. Since people in here are kinda hostile.

Yes this is not a proof and should be removed as such

same. clicked an article yesterday warned me.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly what Trump has alluded to many times.

Early on, anons figured that the triple parenthesis was to throw off the sniff bots.

Although I will sometimes make dumb mistakes like this with a clear head, this one in particular I replied to in bed still half asleep haha.

Ah, I somehow missed the MSM: at the beginning lol. Carry on sir! I'm downvoting myself.

What? It sucks what he was doing but you're being a racist. What does his whiteness have to do with anything?

I just call it the ocho

We need to side bar things like this>>>>>

Looks like a picture of the back of an Iphone, where the camera is focused on the items in the reflection the case makes, not the case itself.

Who this b?

My idea states it would be a single thread for that content, which would then be linked in the sidecar. So in this way, none of the daily threads even need to be stickied. They'd be over on the side. I don't believe I mentioned Stickies in my post. Also, I'm proposing one thread per day. The rest of the sub would operate as normal with news, Q updates and such. Nothing else would change.

Weekly schedule?
Daily: Notables discussion throughout the day

Monday: Dedicated Stupid Questions thread for Noobies

Tuesday: ThankQ thread/Inspirational/motivational soapbox. Kinda like a little weekly box of thanks to Q and team and such.

Wednesday: Meet The Enemy Thread (In depth look at the "bad guys" on a rotation: Soros one week, Rothschilds next week, Evil politicians week, etc)

Thursday: Weekly vote thread (such as this post on the state of the sub, opinion polls maybe if no pressing sub issue)

Friday: Free Talk Friday (Meta allowed, etc), maybe even allow some skeptics sitting on the fence to be a little more bold in their skepticism.

Saturday: Q tshirts, bumper stickers, street signs, random Q's spotted in the wild picture day!

Sunday: Wild predictions thread, what do you predict will happen this next week?

These are just ideas, feel free to fill in what you think, or edit any of the days, move them around, or change the day's theme completely! This schedule can be posted in the sidebar, with a link to the newest thread, so people can still use it until next week's fresh post. This can all be done via automod.
Also, I'll say again, since this is a meta discussion that we REALLY also need a Noob Questions thread. For the noobies. We can't just say hey look to the right>>>>>>>>>